mirror of
				https://github.com/python/cpython.git
				synced 2025-10-31 21:51:50 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
	
	
		
			132 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			5.5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
	
	
			132 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			5.5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
|   | # Adding or extending a family of adaptive instructions.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | ## Families of instructions
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The core part of PEP 659 (specializing adaptive interpreter) is the families | ||
|  | of instructions that perform the adaptive specialization. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A family of instructions has the following fundamental properties: | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | * It corresponds to a single instruction in the code | ||
|  |   generated by the bytecode compiler. | ||
|  | * It has a single adaptive instruction that records an execution count and, | ||
|  |   at regular intervals, attempts to specialize itself. If not specializing, | ||
|  |   it executes the non-adaptive instruction. | ||
|  | * It has at least one specialized form of the instruction that is tailored  | ||
|  |   for a particular value or set of values at runtime. | ||
|  | * All members of the family have access to the same number of cache entries. | ||
|  |   Individual family members do not need to use all of the entries. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The current implementation also requires the following, | ||
|  | although these are not fundamental and may change: | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | * If a family uses one or more entries, then the first entry must be a | ||
|  |   `_PyAdaptiveEntry` entry. | ||
|  | * If a family uses no cache entries, then the `oparg` is used as the | ||
|  |   counter for the adaptive instruction. | ||
|  | * All instruction names should start with the name of the non-adaptive | ||
|  |   instruction. | ||
|  | * The adaptive instruction should end in `_ADAPTIVE`. | ||
|  | * Specialized forms should have names describing their specialization. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | ## Example family
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The `LOAD_GLOBAL` instruction (in Python/ceval.c) already has an adaptive | ||
|  | family that serves as a relatively simple example. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The `LOAD_GLOBAL_ADAPTIVE` instruction performs adaptive specialization, | ||
|  | calling `_Py_Specialize_LoadGlobal()` when the counter reaches zero. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | There are two specialized instructions in the family, `LOAD_GLOBAL_MODULE` | ||
|  | which is specialized for global variables in the module, and | ||
|  | `LOAD_GLOBAL_BUILTIN` which is specialized for builtin variables. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | ## Performance analysis
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The benefit of a specialization can be assessed with the following formula: | ||
|  | `Tbase/Tadaptive`. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Where `Tbase` is the mean time to execute the base instruction, | ||
|  | and `Tadaptive` is the mean time to execute the specialized and adaptive forms. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | `Tadaptive = (sum(Ti*Ni) + Tmiss*Nmiss)/(sum(Ni)+Nmiss)` | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | `Ti` is the time to execute the `i`th instruction in the family and `Ni` is | ||
|  | the number of times that instruction is executed. | ||
|  | `Tmiss` is the time to process a miss, including de-optimzation | ||
|  | and the time to execute the base instruction. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The ideal situation is where misses are rare and the specialized | ||
|  | forms are much faster than the base instruction. | ||
|  | `LOAD_GLOBAL` is near ideal, `Nmiss/sum(Ni) ≈ 0`. | ||
|  | In which case we have `Tadaptive ≈ sum(Ti*Ni)`. | ||
|  | Since we can expect the specialized forms `LOAD_GLOBAL_MODULE` and | ||
|  | `LOAD_GLOBAL_BUILTIN` to be much faster than the adaptive base instruction, | ||
|  | we would expect the specialization of `LOAD_GLOBAL` to be profitable. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | ## Design considerations
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | While `LOAD_GLOBAL` may be ideal, instructions like `LOAD_ATTR` and | ||
|  | `CALL_FUNCTION` are not. For maximum performance we want to keep `Ti` | ||
|  | low for all specialized instructions and `Nmiss` as low as possible. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Keeping `Nmiss` low means that there should be specializations for almost | ||
|  | all values seen by the base instruction. Keeping `sum(Ti*Ni)` low means | ||
|  | keeping `Ti` low which means minimizing branches and dependent memory | ||
|  | accesses (pointer chasing). These two objectives may be in conflict, | ||
|  | requiring judgement and experimentation to design the family of instructions. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | ### Gathering data
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Before choosing how to specialize an instruction, it is important to gather | ||
|  | some data. What are the patterns of usage of the base instruction? | ||
|  | Data can best be gathered by instrumenting the interpreter. Since a  | ||
|  | specialization function and adaptive instruction are going to be required, | ||
|  | instrumentation can most easily be added in the specialization function. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | ### Choice of specializations
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The performance of the specializing adaptive interpreter relies on the | ||
|  | quality of specialization and keeping the overhead of specialization low. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Specialized instructions must be fast. In order to be fast, | ||
|  | specialized instructions should be tailored for a particular | ||
|  | set of values that allows them to: | ||
|  | 1. Verify that incoming value is part of that set with low overhead. | ||
|  | 2. Perform the operation quickly. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | This requires that the set of values is chosen such that membership can be | ||
|  | tested quickly and that membership is sufficient to allow the operation to | ||
|  | performed quickly. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | For example, `LOAD_GLOBAL_MODULE` is specialized for `globals()` | ||
|  | dictionaries that have a keys with the expected version. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | This can be tested quickly: | ||
|  | * `globals->keys->dk_version == expected_version` | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | and the operation can be performed quickly: | ||
|  | * `value = globals->keys->entries[index].value`. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Because it is impossible to measure the performance of an instruction without | ||
|  | also measuring unrelated factors, the assessment of the quality of a | ||
|  | specialization will require some judgement. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | As a general rule, specialized instructions should be much faster than the | ||
|  | base instruction. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | ### Implementation of specialized instructions
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | In general, specialized instructions should be implemented in two parts: | ||
|  | 1. A sequence of guards, each of the form | ||
|  |   `DEOPT_IF(guard-condition-is-false, BASE_NAME)`, | ||
|  |   followed by a `record_cache_hit()`. | ||
|  | 2. The operation, which should ideally have no branches and | ||
|  |   a minimum number of dependent memory accesses. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | In practice, the parts may overlap, as data required for guards | ||
|  | can be re-used in the operation. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | If there are branches in the operation, then consider further specialization | ||
|  | to eliminate the branches. |