Modified one line of descriptive text.
The text refers to "our example," despite there being five other examples in between the reference and the actual example to which the reference is intended.
I added the word "previous" and parentheses with the text "first example on Class Objects," where "Class Objects" is a link to that section.
Add a note to the readline module documentation stating that
Python 3.13 and later no longer supports readline in the default REPL,
as per gh-118840. Includes workaround using PYTHON_BASIC_REPL.
Update tutorial to remove the reference, and use a different key to
test things out.
Signed-off-by: Kuang Yu Heng <yuheng3107@gmail.com>
Update selected RFC 2822 references to RFC 5322
RFC 2822 was obsoleted by RFC 5322 in 2008. This updates references
to use the current standard in documentation, docstrings, and comments.
It preserves RFC 2822 references in legacy API components to maintain their
historical context.
RFC 822 → RFC 2822 → RFC 5322 progression is explained where relevant.
In some places specific sections of RFC are referenced where it seems helpful.
Scout rule was applied in some places and RFC mentions format was
normalized in doc strings and comments.
Co-authored-by: Petr Viktorin <encukou@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Loïc Simon <loic.pano@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: pauleveritt <pauleveritt@me.com>
Add glossary entry for `token`, and link to it.
Avoid talking about tokens in the SyntaxError intro (errors.rst); at this point
tokenization is too much of a technical detail. (Even to an advanced reader,
the fact that a *single* token is highlighted isn't too relevant. Also, we don't
need to guarantee that it's a single token.)
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
* bpo-41411 fstring index in tutorial/inputoutput
To assist in searching for fstrings I have added an index
* Add newline
---------
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
In the datastructures tutorial doc, some operations are described as
"equivalent to" others. This has led to some user-confusion -- at
least in the Discourse forums -- about cases in which the operations
differ.
This change doesn't systematically eliminate the word "equivalent"
from the tutorial. It just substitutes "similar to" in several cases
in which "equivalent to" could mislead users into expecting exact
equivalence.
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
* For-else deserves its own section in the tutorial
* remove mention of unrolling the loop
* Update Doc/tutorial/controlflow.rst
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
