This method was named reinitialize_command in distutils and accompanied
by a comment suggesting to change it to get_reinitialized_command.
Following that, I did the change for distutils2, but it proved
confusing: The Distribution object has an internal cache of command
objects, to make sure only one instance is ever used, and the name
get_reinitialized_command could suggest that the object returned was
independent of that cache, which it was not. I’m reverting the name
change to make code clearer.
This is copied from the namesake distutils command; there is no
automated test, so buildbots won’t call for my head this time, but it
should be okay as Python 3 users have tested the distutils command.
In dry-run mode, packaging commands should log the same info as in real
operation and should collect the same files in self.outputs, so that
users can run a command in verbose and dry-run mode to see exactly what
operations will be done in the real run.
There was already a test for this, but it was complicated and had a
subtle bug (custom command objects need to be put in dist.command_obj so
that other command objects may see them) that rendered it moot.
