mirror of
				https://github.com/python/cpython.git
				synced 2025-11-04 07:31:38 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			5214 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			182 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			TeX
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			5214 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			182 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			TeX
		
	
	
	
	
	
\documentclass{manual}
 | 
						||
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
% Things to do:
 | 
						||
% Should really move the Python startup file info to an appendix
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\title{Python Tutorial}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\input{boilerplate}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\makeindex
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{document}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\maketitle
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\ifhtml
 | 
						||
\chapter*{Front Matter\label{front}}
 | 
						||
\fi
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\input{copyright}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{abstract}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\noindent
 | 
						||
Python is an easy to learn, powerful programming language.  It has
 | 
						||
efficient high-level data structures and a simple but effective
 | 
						||
approach to object-oriented programming.  Python's elegant syntax and
 | 
						||
dynamic typing, together with its interpreted nature, make it an ideal 
 | 
						||
language for scripting and rapid application development in many areas 
 | 
						||
on most platforms.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The Python interpreter and the extensive standard library are freely
 | 
						||
available in source or binary form for all major platforms from the
 | 
						||
Python Web site, \url{http://www.python.org/}, and can be freely
 | 
						||
distributed.  The same site also contains distributions of and
 | 
						||
pointers to many free third party Python modules, programs and tools,
 | 
						||
and additional documentation.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The Python interpreter is easily extended with new functions and data
 | 
						||
types implemented in C or \Cpp{} (or other languages callable from C).
 | 
						||
Python is also suitable as an extension language for customizable
 | 
						||
applications.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This tutorial introduces the reader informally to the basic concepts
 | 
						||
and features of the Python language and system.  It helps to have a
 | 
						||
Python interpreter handy for hands-on experience, but all examples are
 | 
						||
self-contained, so the tutorial can be read off-line as well.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
For a description of standard objects and modules, see the
 | 
						||
\citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library Reference} document.  The
 | 
						||
\citetitle[../ref/ref.html]{Python Reference Manual} gives a more
 | 
						||
formal definition of the language.  To write extensions in C or
 | 
						||
\Cpp, read \citetitle[../ext/ext.html]{Extending and Embedding the
 | 
						||
Python Interpreter} and \citetitle[../api/api.html]{Python/C API
 | 
						||
Reference}.  There are also several books covering Python in depth.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This tutorial does not attempt to be comprehensive and cover every
 | 
						||
single feature, or even every commonly used feature.  Instead, it
 | 
						||
introduces many of Python's most noteworthy features, and will give
 | 
						||
you a good idea of the language's flavor and style.  After reading it,
 | 
						||
you will be able to read and write Python modules and programs, and
 | 
						||
you will be ready to learn more about the various Python library
 | 
						||
modules described in the \citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library
 | 
						||
Reference}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\end{abstract}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\tableofcontents
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{Whetting Your Appetite \label{intro}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you ever wrote a large shell script, you probably know this
 | 
						||
feeling: you'd love to add yet another feature, but it's already so
 | 
						||
slow, and so big, and so complicated; or the feature involves a system
 | 
						||
call or other function that is only accessible from C \ldots Usually
 | 
						||
the problem at hand isn't serious enough to warrant rewriting the
 | 
						||
script in C; perhaps the problem requires variable-length strings or
 | 
						||
other data types (like sorted lists of file names) that are easy in
 | 
						||
the shell but lots of work to implement in C, or perhaps you're not
 | 
						||
sufficiently familiar with C.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Another situation: perhaps you have to work with several C libraries,
 | 
						||
and the usual C write/compile/test/re-compile cycle is too slow.  You
 | 
						||
need to develop software more quickly.  Possibly perhaps you've
 | 
						||
written a program that could use an extension language, and you don't
 | 
						||
want to design a language, write and debug an interpreter for it, then
 | 
						||
tie it into your application.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In such cases, Python may be just the language for you.  Python is
 | 
						||
simple to use, but it is a real programming language, offering much
 | 
						||
more structure and support for large programs than the shell has.  On
 | 
						||
the other hand, it also offers much more error checking than C, and,
 | 
						||
being a \emph{very-high-level language}, it has high-level data types
 | 
						||
built in, such as flexible arrays and dictionaries that would cost you
 | 
						||
days to implement efficiently in C.  Because of its more general data
 | 
						||
types Python is applicable to a much larger problem domain than
 | 
						||
\emph{Awk} or even \emph{Perl}, yet many things are at least as easy
 | 
						||
in Python as in those languages.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Python allows you to split up your program in modules that can be
 | 
						||
reused in other Python programs.  It comes with a large collection of
 | 
						||
standard modules that you can use as the basis of your programs --- or
 | 
						||
as examples to start learning to program in Python.  There are also
 | 
						||
built-in modules that provide things like file I/O, system calls,
 | 
						||
sockets, and even interfaces to graphical user interface toolkits like Tk.  
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Python is an interpreted language, which can save you considerable time
 | 
						||
during program development because no compilation and linking is
 | 
						||
necessary.  The interpreter can be used interactively, which makes it
 | 
						||
easy to experiment with features of the language, to write throw-away
 | 
						||
programs, or to test functions during bottom-up program development.
 | 
						||
It is also a handy desk calculator.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Python allows writing very compact and readable programs.  Programs
 | 
						||
written in Python are typically much shorter than equivalent C or
 | 
						||
\Cpp{} programs, for several reasons:
 | 
						||
\begin{itemize}
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
the high-level data types allow you to express complex operations in a
 | 
						||
single statement;
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
statement grouping is done by indentation instead of beginning and ending
 | 
						||
brackets;
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
no variable or argument declarations are necessary.
 | 
						||
\end{itemize}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Python is \emph{extensible}: if you know how to program in C it is easy
 | 
						||
to add a new built-in function or module to the interpreter, either to
 | 
						||
perform critical operations at maximum speed, or to link Python
 | 
						||
programs to libraries that may only be available in binary form (such
 | 
						||
as a vendor-specific graphics library).  Once you are really hooked,
 | 
						||
you can link the Python interpreter into an application written in C
 | 
						||
and use it as an extension or command language for that application.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
By the way, the language is named after the BBC show ``Monty Python's
 | 
						||
Flying Circus'' and has nothing to do with nasty reptiles.  Making
 | 
						||
references to Monty Python skits in documentation is not only allowed,
 | 
						||
it is encouraged!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
%\section{Where From Here \label{where}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Now that you are all excited about Python, you'll want to examine it
 | 
						||
in some more detail.  Since the best way to learn a language is
 | 
						||
using it, you are invited here to do so.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In the next chapter, the mechanics of using the interpreter are
 | 
						||
explained.  This is rather mundane information, but essential for
 | 
						||
trying out the examples shown later.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The rest of the tutorial introduces various features of the Python
 | 
						||
language and system through examples, beginning with simple
 | 
						||
expressions, statements and data types, through functions and modules,
 | 
						||
and finally touching upon advanced concepts like exceptions
 | 
						||
and user-defined classes.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{Using the Python Interpreter \label{using}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Invoking the Interpreter \label{invoking}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The Python interpreter is usually installed as
 | 
						||
\file{/usr/local/bin/python} on those machines where it is available;
 | 
						||
putting \file{/usr/local/bin} in your \UNIX{} shell's search path
 | 
						||
makes it possible to start it by typing the command
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
python
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
to the shell.  Since the choice of the directory where the interpreter
 | 
						||
lives is an installation option, other places are possible; check with
 | 
						||
your local Python guru or system administrator.  (E.g.,
 | 
						||
\file{/usr/local/python} is a popular alternative location.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Typing an end-of-file character (\kbd{Control-D} on \UNIX,
 | 
						||
\kbd{Control-Z} on Windows) at the primary prompt causes the
 | 
						||
interpreter to exit with a zero exit status.  If that doesn't work,
 | 
						||
you can exit the interpreter by typing the following commands:
 | 
						||
\samp{import sys; sys.exit()}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The interpreter's line-editing features usually aren't very
 | 
						||
sophisticated.  On \UNIX, whoever installed the interpreter may have
 | 
						||
enabled support for the GNU readline library, which adds more
 | 
						||
elaborate interactive editing and history features. Perhaps the
 | 
						||
quickest check to see whether command line editing is supported is
 | 
						||
typing Control-P to the first Python prompt you get.  If it beeps, you
 | 
						||
have command line editing; see Appendix \ref{interacting} for an
 | 
						||
introduction to the keys.  If nothing appears to happen, or if
 | 
						||
\code{\^P} is echoed, command line editing isn't available; you'll
 | 
						||
only be able to use backspace to remove characters from the current
 | 
						||
line.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The interpreter operates somewhat like the \UNIX{} shell: when called
 | 
						||
with standard input connected to a tty device, it reads and executes
 | 
						||
commands interactively; when called with a file name argument or with
 | 
						||
a file as standard input, it reads and executes a \emph{script} from
 | 
						||
that file. 
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A second way of starting the interpreter is
 | 
						||
\samp{\program{python} \programopt{-c} \var{command} [arg] ...}, which
 | 
						||
executes the statement(s) in \var{command}, analogous to the shell's
 | 
						||
\programopt{-c} option.  Since Python statements often contain spaces
 | 
						||
or other characters that are special to the shell, it is best to quote 
 | 
						||
\var{command} in its entirety with double quotes.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that there is a difference between \samp{python file} and
 | 
						||
\samp{python <file}.  In the latter case, input requests from the
 | 
						||
program, such as calls to \function{input()} and \function{raw_input()}, are
 | 
						||
satisfied from \emph{file}.  Since this file has already been read
 | 
						||
until the end by the parser before the program starts executing, the
 | 
						||
program will encounter end-of-file immediately.  In the former case
 | 
						||
(which is usually what you want) they are satisfied from whatever file
 | 
						||
or device is connected to standard input of the Python interpreter.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When a script file is used, it is sometimes useful to be able to run
 | 
						||
the script and enter interactive mode afterwards.  This can be done by
 | 
						||
passing \programopt{-i} before the script.  (This does not work if the
 | 
						||
script is read from standard input, for the same reason as explained
 | 
						||
in the previous paragraph.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Argument Passing \label{argPassing}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When known to the interpreter, the script name and additional
 | 
						||
arguments thereafter are passed to the script in the variable
 | 
						||
\code{sys.argv}, which is a list of strings.  Its length is at least
 | 
						||
one; when no script and no arguments are given, \code{sys.argv[0]} is
 | 
						||
an empty string.  When the script name is given as \code{'-'} (meaning 
 | 
						||
standard input), \code{sys.argv[0]} is set to \code{'-'}.  When
 | 
						||
\programopt{-c} \var{command} is used, \code{sys.argv[0]} is set to
 | 
						||
\code{'-c'}.  Options found after \programopt{-c} \var{command} are
 | 
						||
not consumed by the Python interpreter's option processing but left in
 | 
						||
\code{sys.argv} for the command to handle.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Interactive Mode \label{interactive}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When commands are read from a tty, the interpreter is said to be in
 | 
						||
\emph{interactive mode}.  In this mode it prompts for the next command
 | 
						||
with the \emph{primary prompt}, usually three greater-than signs
 | 
						||
(\samp{>\code{>}>~}); for continuation lines it prompts with the
 | 
						||
\emph{secondary prompt}, by default three dots (\samp{...~}).
 | 
						||
The interpreter prints a welcome message stating its version number
 | 
						||
and a copyright notice before printing the first prompt:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
python
 | 
						||
Python 1.5.2b2 (#1, Feb 28 1999, 00:02:06)  [GCC 2.8.1] on sunos5
 | 
						||
Copyright 1991-1995 Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam
 | 
						||
>>>
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Continuation lines are needed when entering a multi-line construct.
 | 
						||
As an example, take a look at this \keyword{if} statement:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> the_world_is_flat = 1
 | 
						||
>>> if the_world_is_flat:
 | 
						||
...     print "Be careful not to fall off!"
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
Be careful not to fall off!
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{The Interpreter and Its Environment \label{interp}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Error Handling \label{error}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When an error occurs, the interpreter prints an error
 | 
						||
message and a stack trace.  In interactive mode, it then returns to
 | 
						||
the primary prompt; when input came from a file, it exits with a
 | 
						||
nonzero exit status after printing
 | 
						||
the stack trace.  (Exceptions handled by an \keyword{except} clause in a
 | 
						||
\keyword{try} statement are not errors in this context.)  Some errors are
 | 
						||
unconditionally fatal and cause an exit with a nonzero exit; this
 | 
						||
applies to internal inconsistencies and some cases of running out of
 | 
						||
memory.  All error messages are written to the standard error stream;
 | 
						||
normal output from the executed commands is written to standard
 | 
						||
output.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Typing the interrupt character (usually Control-C or DEL) to the
 | 
						||
primary or secondary prompt cancels the input and returns to the
 | 
						||
primary prompt.\footnote{
 | 
						||
        A problem with the GNU Readline package may prevent this.
 | 
						||
}
 | 
						||
Typing an interrupt while a command is executing raises the
 | 
						||
\exception{KeyboardInterrupt} exception, which may be handled by a
 | 
						||
\keyword{try} statement.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Executable Python Scripts \label{scripts}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
On BSD'ish \UNIX{} systems, Python scripts can be made directly
 | 
						||
executable, like shell scripts, by putting the line
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
#! /usr/bin/env python
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
(assuming that the interpreter is on the user's \envvar{PATH}) at the
 | 
						||
beginning of the script and giving the file an executable mode.  The
 | 
						||
\samp{\#!} must be the first two characters of the file.  On some
 | 
						||
platforms, this first line must end with a \UNIX-style line ending
 | 
						||
(\character{\e n}), not a Mac OS (\character{\e r}) or Windows
 | 
						||
(\character{\e r\e n}) line ending.  Note that
 | 
						||
the hash, or pound, character, \character{\#}, is used to start a
 | 
						||
comment in Python.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The script can be given a executable mode, or permission, using the
 | 
						||
\program{chmod} command:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
$ chmod +x myscript.py
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim} % $ <-- bow to font-lock
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Source Code Encoding}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is possible to use encodings different than \ASCII{} in Python source
 | 
						||
files. The best way to do it is to put one more special comment line
 | 
						||
right after the \code{\#!} line to define the source file encoding:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
# -*- coding: iso-8859-1 -*- 
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
With that declaration, all characters in the source file will be treated as
 | 
						||
{}\code{iso-8859-1}, and it will be
 | 
						||
possible to directly write Unicode string literals in the selected
 | 
						||
encoding.  The list of possible encodings can be found in the
 | 
						||
\citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library Reference}, in the section
 | 
						||
on \ulink{\module{codecs}}{../lib/module-codecs.html}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If your editor supports saving files as \code{UTF-8} with a UTF-8
 | 
						||
\emph{byte order mark} (aka BOM), you can use that instead of an
 | 
						||
encoding declaration. IDLE supports this capability if
 | 
						||
\code{Options/General/Default Source Encoding/UTF-8} is set. Notice
 | 
						||
that this signature is not understood in older Python releases (2.2
 | 
						||
and earlier), and also not understood by the operating system for
 | 
						||
\code{\#!} files.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
By using UTF-8 (either through the signature or an encoding
 | 
						||
declaration), characters of most languages in the world can be used
 | 
						||
simultaneously in string literals and comments. Using non-\ASCII
 | 
						||
characters in identifiers is not supported. To display all these
 | 
						||
characters properly, your editor must recognize that the file is
 | 
						||
UTF-8, and it must use a font that supports all the characters in the
 | 
						||
file.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{The Interactive Startup File \label{startup}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
% XXX This should probably be dumped in an appendix, since most people
 | 
						||
% don't use Python interactively in non-trivial ways.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When you use Python interactively, it is frequently handy to have some
 | 
						||
standard commands executed every time the interpreter is started.  You
 | 
						||
can do this by setting an environment variable named
 | 
						||
\envvar{PYTHONSTARTUP} to the name of a file containing your start-up
 | 
						||
commands.  This is similar to the \file{.profile} feature of the
 | 
						||
\UNIX{} shells.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This file is only read in interactive sessions, not when Python reads
 | 
						||
commands from a script, and not when \file{/dev/tty} is given as the
 | 
						||
explicit source of commands (which otherwise behaves like an
 | 
						||
interactive session).  It is executed in the same namespace where
 | 
						||
interactive commands are executed, so that objects that it defines or
 | 
						||
imports can be used without qualification in the interactive session.
 | 
						||
You can also change the prompts \code{sys.ps1} and \code{sys.ps2} in
 | 
						||
this file.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you want to read an additional start-up file from the current
 | 
						||
directory, you can program this in the global start-up file using code
 | 
						||
like \samp{if os.path.isfile('.pythonrc.py'):
 | 
						||
execfile('.pythonrc.py')}.  If you want to use the startup file in a
 | 
						||
script, you must do this explicitly in the script:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
import os
 | 
						||
filename = os.environ.get('PYTHONSTARTUP')
 | 
						||
if filename and os.path.isfile(filename):
 | 
						||
    execfile(filename)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{An Informal Introduction to Python \label{informal}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In the following examples, input and output are distinguished by the
 | 
						||
presence or absence of prompts (\samp{>\code{>}>~} and \samp{...~}): to repeat
 | 
						||
the example, you must type everything after the prompt, when the
 | 
						||
prompt appears; lines that do not begin with a prompt are output from
 | 
						||
the interpreter. %
 | 
						||
%\footnote{
 | 
						||
%        I'd prefer to use different fonts to distinguish input
 | 
						||
%        from output, but the amount of LaTeX hacking that would require
 | 
						||
%        is currently beyond my ability.
 | 
						||
%}
 | 
						||
Note that a secondary prompt on a line by itself in an example means
 | 
						||
you must type a blank line; this is used to end a multi-line command.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Many of the examples in this manual, even those entered at the
 | 
						||
interactive prompt, include comments.  Comments in Python start with
 | 
						||
the hash character, \character{\#}, and extend to the end of the
 | 
						||
physical line.  A comment may appear at the start of a line or
 | 
						||
following whitespace or code, but not within a string literal.  A hash 
 | 
						||
character within a string literal is just a hash character.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Some examples:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
# this is the first comment
 | 
						||
SPAM = 1                 # and this is the second comment
 | 
						||
                         # ... and now a third!
 | 
						||
STRING = "# This is not a comment."
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Using Python as a Calculator \label{calculator}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Let's try some simple Python commands.  Start the interpreter and wait
 | 
						||
for the primary prompt, \samp{>\code{>}>~}.  (It shouldn't take long.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Numbers \label{numbers}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The interpreter acts as a simple calculator: you can type an
 | 
						||
expression at it and it will write the value.  Expression syntax is
 | 
						||
straightforward: the operators \code{+}, \code{-}, \code{*} and
 | 
						||
\code{/} work just like in most other languages (for example, Pascal
 | 
						||
or C); parentheses can be used for grouping.  For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 2+2
 | 
						||
4
 | 
						||
>>> # This is a comment
 | 
						||
... 2+2
 | 
						||
4
 | 
						||
>>> 2+2  # and a comment on the same line as code
 | 
						||
4
 | 
						||
>>> (50-5*6)/4
 | 
						||
5
 | 
						||
>>> # Integer division returns the floor:
 | 
						||
... 7/3
 | 
						||
2
 | 
						||
>>> 7/-3
 | 
						||
-3
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Like in C, the equal sign (\character{=}) is used to assign a value to a
 | 
						||
variable.  The value of an assignment is not written:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> width = 20
 | 
						||
>>> height = 5*9
 | 
						||
>>> width * height
 | 
						||
900
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A value can be assigned to several variables simultaneously:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> x = y = z = 0  # Zero x, y and z
 | 
						||
>>> x
 | 
						||
0
 | 
						||
>>> y
 | 
						||
0
 | 
						||
>>> z
 | 
						||
0
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There is full support for floating point; operators with mixed type
 | 
						||
operands convert the integer operand to floating point:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 3 * 3.75 / 1.5
 | 
						||
7.5
 | 
						||
>>> 7.0 / 2
 | 
						||
3.5
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Complex numbers are also supported; imaginary numbers are written with
 | 
						||
a suffix of \samp{j} or \samp{J}.  Complex numbers with a nonzero
 | 
						||
real component are written as \samp{(\var{real}+\var{imag}j)}, or can
 | 
						||
be created with the \samp{complex(\var{real}, \var{imag})} function.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 1j * 1J
 | 
						||
(-1+0j)
 | 
						||
>>> 1j * complex(0,1)
 | 
						||
(-1+0j)
 | 
						||
>>> 3+1j*3
 | 
						||
(3+3j)
 | 
						||
>>> (3+1j)*3
 | 
						||
(9+3j)
 | 
						||
>>> (1+2j)/(1+1j)
 | 
						||
(1.5+0.5j)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Complex numbers are always represented as two floating point numbers,
 | 
						||
the real and imaginary part.  To extract these parts from a complex
 | 
						||
number \var{z}, use \code{\var{z}.real} and \code{\var{z}.imag}.  
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> a=1.5+0.5j
 | 
						||
>>> a.real
 | 
						||
1.5
 | 
						||
>>> a.imag
 | 
						||
0.5
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The conversion functions to floating point and integer
 | 
						||
(\function{float()}, \function{int()} and \function{long()}) don't
 | 
						||
work for complex numbers --- there is no one correct way to convert a
 | 
						||
complex number to a real number.  Use \code{abs(\var{z})} to get its
 | 
						||
magnitude (as a float) or \code{z.real} to get its real part.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> a=3.0+4.0j
 | 
						||
>>> float(a)
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
TypeError: can't convert complex to float; use abs(z)
 | 
						||
>>> a.real
 | 
						||
3.0
 | 
						||
>>> a.imag
 | 
						||
4.0
 | 
						||
>>> abs(a)  # sqrt(a.real**2 + a.imag**2)
 | 
						||
5.0
 | 
						||
>>>
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In interactive mode, the last printed expression is assigned to the
 | 
						||
variable \code{_}.  This means that when you are using Python as a
 | 
						||
desk calculator, it is somewhat easier to continue calculations, for
 | 
						||
example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> tax = 12.5 / 100
 | 
						||
>>> price = 100.50
 | 
						||
>>> price * tax
 | 
						||
12.5625
 | 
						||
>>> price + _
 | 
						||
113.0625
 | 
						||
>>> round(_, 2)
 | 
						||
113.06
 | 
						||
>>>
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This variable should be treated as read-only by the user.  Don't
 | 
						||
explicitly assign a value to it --- you would create an independent
 | 
						||
local variable with the same name masking the built-in variable with
 | 
						||
its magic behavior.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Strings \label{strings}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Besides numbers, Python can also manipulate strings, which can be
 | 
						||
expressed in several ways.  They can be enclosed in single quotes or
 | 
						||
double quotes:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 'spam eggs'
 | 
						||
'spam eggs'
 | 
						||
>>> 'doesn\'t'
 | 
						||
"doesn't"
 | 
						||
>>> "doesn't"
 | 
						||
"doesn't"
 | 
						||
>>> '"Yes," he said.'
 | 
						||
'"Yes," he said.'
 | 
						||
>>> "\"Yes,\" he said."
 | 
						||
'"Yes," he said.'
 | 
						||
>>> '"Isn\'t," she said.'
 | 
						||
'"Isn\'t," she said.'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
String literals can span multiple lines in several ways.  Continuation
 | 
						||
lines can be used, with a backslash as the last character on the line
 | 
						||
indicating that the next line is a logical continuation of the line:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
hello = "This is a rather long string containing\n\
 | 
						||
several lines of text just as you would do in C.\n\
 | 
						||
    Note that whitespace at the beginning of the line is\
 | 
						||
 significant."
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
print hello
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that newlines would still need to be embedded in the string using
 | 
						||
\code{\e n}; the newline following the trailing backslash is
 | 
						||
discarded.  This example would print the following:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
This is a rather long string containing
 | 
						||
several lines of text just as you would do in C.
 | 
						||
    Note that whitespace at the beginning of the line is significant.
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If we make the string literal a ``raw'' string, however, the
 | 
						||
\code{\e n} sequences are not converted to newlines, but the backslash
 | 
						||
at the end of the line, and the newline character in the source, are
 | 
						||
both included in the string as data.  Thus, the example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
hello = r"This is a rather long string containing\n\
 | 
						||
several lines of text much as you would do in C."
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
print hello
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
would print:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
This is a rather long string containing\n\
 | 
						||
several lines of text much as you would do in C.
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Or, strings can be surrounded in a pair of matching triple-quotes:
 | 
						||
\code{"""} or \code{'\code{'}'}.  End of lines do not need to be escaped
 | 
						||
when using triple-quotes, but they will be included in the string.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
print """
 | 
						||
Usage: thingy [OPTIONS] 
 | 
						||
     -h                        Display this usage message
 | 
						||
     -H hostname               Hostname to connect to
 | 
						||
"""
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
produces the following output:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
Usage: thingy [OPTIONS] 
 | 
						||
     -h                        Display this usage message
 | 
						||
     -H hostname               Hostname to connect to
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The interpreter prints the result of string operations in the same way
 | 
						||
as they are typed for input: inside quotes, and with quotes and other
 | 
						||
funny characters escaped by backslashes, to show the precise
 | 
						||
value.  The string is enclosed in double quotes if the string contains
 | 
						||
a single quote and no double quotes, else it's enclosed in single
 | 
						||
quotes.  (The \keyword{print} statement, described later, can be used
 | 
						||
to write strings without quotes or escapes.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Strings can be concatenated (glued together) with the
 | 
						||
\code{+} operator, and repeated with \code{*}:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> word = 'Help' + 'A'
 | 
						||
>>> word
 | 
						||
'HelpA'
 | 
						||
>>> '<' + word*5 + '>'
 | 
						||
'<HelpAHelpAHelpAHelpAHelpA>'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Two string literals next to each other are automatically concatenated;
 | 
						||
the first line above could also have been written \samp{word = 'Help'
 | 
						||
'A'}; this only works with two literals, not with arbitrary string
 | 
						||
expressions:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 'str' 'ing'                   #  <-  This is ok
 | 
						||
'string'
 | 
						||
>>> 'str'.strip() + 'ing'   #  <-  This is ok
 | 
						||
'string'
 | 
						||
>>> 'str'.strip() 'ing'     #  <-  This is invalid
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
    'str'.strip() 'ing'
 | 
						||
                      ^
 | 
						||
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Strings can be subscripted (indexed); like in C, the first character
 | 
						||
of a string has subscript (index) 0.  There is no separate character
 | 
						||
type; a character is simply a string of size one.  Like in Icon,
 | 
						||
substrings can be specified with the \emph{slice notation}: two indices
 | 
						||
separated by a colon.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> word[4]
 | 
						||
'A'
 | 
						||
>>> word[0:2]
 | 
						||
'He'
 | 
						||
>>> word[2:4]
 | 
						||
'lp'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Slice indices have useful defaults; an omitted first index defaults to
 | 
						||
zero, an omitted second index defaults to the size of the string being
 | 
						||
sliced.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> word[:2]    # The first two characters
 | 
						||
'He'
 | 
						||
>>> word[2:]    # All but the first two characters
 | 
						||
'lpA'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Unlike a C string, Python strings cannot be changed.  Assigning to an 
 | 
						||
indexed position in the string results in an error:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> word[0] = 'x'
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
TypeError: object doesn't support item assignment
 | 
						||
>>> word[:1] = 'Splat'
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
TypeError: object doesn't support slice assignment
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
However, creating a new string with the combined content is easy and
 | 
						||
efficient:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 'x' + word[1:]
 | 
						||
'xelpA'
 | 
						||
>>> 'Splat' + word[4]
 | 
						||
'SplatA'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Here's a useful invariant of slice operations:
 | 
						||
\code{s[:i] + s[i:]} equals \code{s}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> word[:2] + word[2:]
 | 
						||
'HelpA'
 | 
						||
>>> word[:3] + word[3:]
 | 
						||
'HelpA'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Degenerate slice indices are handled gracefully: an index that is too
 | 
						||
large is replaced by the string size, an upper bound smaller than the
 | 
						||
lower bound returns an empty string.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> word[1:100]
 | 
						||
'elpA'
 | 
						||
>>> word[10:]
 | 
						||
''
 | 
						||
>>> word[2:1]
 | 
						||
''
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Indices may be negative numbers, to start counting from the right.
 | 
						||
For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> word[-1]     # The last character
 | 
						||
'A'
 | 
						||
>>> word[-2]     # The last-but-one character
 | 
						||
'p'
 | 
						||
>>> word[-2:]    # The last two characters
 | 
						||
'pA'
 | 
						||
>>> word[:-2]    # All but the last two characters
 | 
						||
'Hel'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
But note that -0 is really the same as 0, so it does not count from
 | 
						||
the right!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> word[-0]     # (since -0 equals 0)
 | 
						||
'H'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Out-of-range negative slice indices are truncated, but don't try this
 | 
						||
for single-element (non-slice) indices:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> word[-100:]
 | 
						||
'HelpA'
 | 
						||
>>> word[-10]    # error
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
IndexError: string index out of range
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The best way to remember how slices work is to think of the indices as
 | 
						||
pointing \emph{between} characters, with the left edge of the first
 | 
						||
character numbered 0.  Then the right edge of the last character of a
 | 
						||
string of \var{n} characters has index \var{n}, for example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 +---+---+---+---+---+ 
 | 
						||
 | H | e | l | p | A |
 | 
						||
 +---+---+---+---+---+ 
 | 
						||
 0   1   2   3   4   5 
 | 
						||
-5  -4  -3  -2  -1
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The first row of numbers gives the position of the indices 0...5 in
 | 
						||
the string; the second row gives the corresponding negative indices.
 | 
						||
The slice from \var{i} to \var{j} consists of all characters between
 | 
						||
the edges labeled \var{i} and \var{j}, respectively.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
For non-negative indices, the length of a slice is the difference of
 | 
						||
the indices, if both are within bounds.  For example, the length of
 | 
						||
\code{word[1:3]} is 2.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The built-in function \function{len()} returns the length of a string:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> s = 'supercalifragilisticexpialidocious'
 | 
						||
>>> len(s)
 | 
						||
34
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{seealso}
 | 
						||
  \seetitle[../lib/typesseq.html]{Sequence Types}%
 | 
						||
           {Strings, and the Unicode strings described in the next
 | 
						||
            section, are examples of \emph{sequence types}, and
 | 
						||
            support the common operations supported by such types.}
 | 
						||
  \seetitle[../lib/string-methods.html]{String Methods}%
 | 
						||
           {Both strings and Unicode strings support a large number of
 | 
						||
            methods for basic transformations and searching.}
 | 
						||
  \seetitle[../lib/typesseq-strings.html]{String Formatting Operations}%
 | 
						||
           {The formatting operations invoked when strings and Unicode
 | 
						||
            strings are the left operand of the \code{\%} operator are
 | 
						||
            described in more detail here.}
 | 
						||
\end{seealso}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Unicode Strings \label{unicodeStrings}}
 | 
						||
\sectionauthor{Marc-Andre Lemburg}{mal@lemburg.com}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Starting with Python 2.0 a new data type for storing text data is
 | 
						||
available to the programmer: the Unicode object. It can be used to
 | 
						||
store and manipulate Unicode data (see \url{http://www.unicode.org/})
 | 
						||
and integrates well with the existing string objects providing
 | 
						||
auto-conversions where necessary.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Unicode has the advantage of providing one ordinal for every character
 | 
						||
in every script used in modern and ancient texts. Previously, there
 | 
						||
were only 256 possible ordinals for script characters and texts were
 | 
						||
typically bound to a code page which mapped the ordinals to script
 | 
						||
characters. This lead to very much confusion especially with respect
 | 
						||
to internationalization (usually written as \samp{i18n} ---
 | 
						||
\character{i} + 18 characters + \character{n}) of software.  Unicode
 | 
						||
solves these problems by defining one code page for all scripts.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Creating Unicode strings in Python is just as simple as creating
 | 
						||
normal strings:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> u'Hello World !'
 | 
						||
u'Hello World !'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The small \character{u} in front of the quote indicates that an
 | 
						||
Unicode string is supposed to be created. If you want to include
 | 
						||
special characters in the string, you can do so by using the Python
 | 
						||
\emph{Unicode-Escape} encoding. The following example shows how:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> u'Hello\u0020World !'
 | 
						||
u'Hello World !'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The escape sequence \code{\e u0020} indicates to insert the Unicode
 | 
						||
character with the ordinal value 0x0020 (the space character) at the
 | 
						||
given position.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Other characters are interpreted by using their respective ordinal
 | 
						||
values directly as Unicode ordinals.  If you have literal strings
 | 
						||
in the standard Latin-1 encoding that is used in many Western countries,
 | 
						||
you will find it convenient that the lower 256 characters
 | 
						||
of Unicode are the same as the 256 characters of Latin-1.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
For experts, there is also a raw mode just like the one for normal
 | 
						||
strings. You have to prefix the opening quote with 'ur' to have
 | 
						||
Python use the \emph{Raw-Unicode-Escape} encoding. It will only apply
 | 
						||
the above \code{\e uXXXX} conversion if there is an uneven number of
 | 
						||
backslashes in front of the small 'u'.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> ur'Hello\u0020World !'
 | 
						||
u'Hello World !'
 | 
						||
>>> ur'Hello\\u0020World !'
 | 
						||
u'Hello\\\\u0020World !'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The raw mode is most useful when you have to enter lots of
 | 
						||
backslashes, as can be necessary in regular expressions.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Apart from these standard encodings, Python provides a whole set of
 | 
						||
other ways of creating Unicode strings on the basis of a known
 | 
						||
encoding. 
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The built-in function \function{unicode()}\bifuncindex{unicode} provides
 | 
						||
access to all registered Unicode codecs (COders and DECoders). Some of
 | 
						||
the more well known encodings which these codecs can convert are
 | 
						||
\emph{Latin-1}, \emph{ASCII}, \emph{UTF-8}, and \emph{UTF-16}.
 | 
						||
The latter two are variable-length encodings that store each Unicode
 | 
						||
character in one or more bytes. The default encoding is
 | 
						||
normally set to \ASCII, which passes through characters in the range
 | 
						||
0 to 127 and rejects any other characters with an error.
 | 
						||
When a Unicode string is printed, written to a file, or converted
 | 
						||
with \function{str()}, conversion takes place using this default encoding.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> u"abc"
 | 
						||
u'abc'
 | 
						||
>>> str(u"abc")
 | 
						||
'abc'
 | 
						||
>>> u"<22><><EFBFBD>"
 | 
						||
u'\xe4\xf6\xfc'
 | 
						||
>>> str(u"<22><><EFBFBD>")
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 0-2: ordinal not in range(128)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
To convert a Unicode string into an 8-bit string using a specific
 | 
						||
encoding, Unicode objects provide an \function{encode()} method
 | 
						||
that takes one argument, the name of the encoding.  Lowercase names
 | 
						||
for encodings are preferred.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> u"<22><><EFBFBD>".encode('utf-8')
 | 
						||
'\xc3\xa4\xc3\xb6\xc3\xbc'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you have data in a specific encoding and want to produce a
 | 
						||
corresponding Unicode string from it, you can use the
 | 
						||
\function{unicode()} function with the encoding name as the second
 | 
						||
argument.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> unicode('\xc3\xa4\xc3\xb6\xc3\xbc', 'utf-8')
 | 
						||
u'\xe4\xf6\xfc'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Lists \label{lists}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Python knows a number of \emph{compound} data types, used to group
 | 
						||
together other values.  The most versatile is the \emph{list}, which
 | 
						||
can be written as a list of comma-separated values (items) between
 | 
						||
square brackets.  List items need not all have the same type.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> a = ['spam', 'eggs', 100, 1234]
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
['spam', 'eggs', 100, 1234]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Like string indices, list indices start at 0, and lists can be sliced,
 | 
						||
concatenated and so on:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> a[0]
 | 
						||
'spam'
 | 
						||
>>> a[3]
 | 
						||
1234
 | 
						||
>>> a[-2]
 | 
						||
100
 | 
						||
>>> a[1:-1]
 | 
						||
['eggs', 100]
 | 
						||
>>> a[:2] + ['bacon', 2*2]
 | 
						||
['spam', 'eggs', 'bacon', 4]
 | 
						||
>>> 3*a[:3] + ['Boe!']
 | 
						||
['spam', 'eggs', 100, 'spam', 'eggs', 100, 'spam', 'eggs', 100, 'Boe!']
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Unlike strings, which are \emph{immutable}, it is possible to change
 | 
						||
individual elements of a list:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
['spam', 'eggs', 100, 1234]
 | 
						||
>>> a[2] = a[2] + 23
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
['spam', 'eggs', 123, 1234]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Assignment to slices is also possible, and this can even change the size
 | 
						||
of the list:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> # Replace some items:
 | 
						||
... a[0:2] = [1, 12]
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
[1, 12, 123, 1234]
 | 
						||
>>> # Remove some:
 | 
						||
... a[0:2] = []
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
[123, 1234]
 | 
						||
>>> # Insert some:
 | 
						||
... a[1:1] = ['bletch', 'xyzzy']
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
[123, 'bletch', 'xyzzy', 1234]
 | 
						||
>>> a[:0] = a     # Insert (a copy of) itself at the beginning
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
[123, 'bletch', 'xyzzy', 1234, 123, 'bletch', 'xyzzy', 1234]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The built-in function \function{len()} also applies to lists:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> len(a)
 | 
						||
8
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is possible to nest lists (create lists containing other lists),
 | 
						||
for example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> q = [2, 3]
 | 
						||
>>> p = [1, q, 4]
 | 
						||
>>> len(p)
 | 
						||
3
 | 
						||
>>> p[1]
 | 
						||
[2, 3]
 | 
						||
>>> p[1][0]
 | 
						||
2
 | 
						||
>>> p[1].append('xtra')     # See section 5.1
 | 
						||
>>> p
 | 
						||
[1, [2, 3, 'xtra'], 4]
 | 
						||
>>> q
 | 
						||
[2, 3, 'xtra']
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that in the last example, \code{p[1]} and \code{q} really refer to
 | 
						||
the same object!  We'll come back to \emph{object semantics} later.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{First Steps Towards Programming \label{firstSteps}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Of course, we can use Python for more complicated tasks than adding
 | 
						||
two and two together.  For instance, we can write an initial
 | 
						||
sub-sequence of the \emph{Fibonacci} series as follows:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> # Fibonacci series:
 | 
						||
... # the sum of two elements defines the next
 | 
						||
... a, b = 0, 1
 | 
						||
>>> while b < 10:
 | 
						||
...       print b
 | 
						||
...       a, b = b, a+b
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
1
 | 
						||
1
 | 
						||
2
 | 
						||
3
 | 
						||
5
 | 
						||
8
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This example introduces several new features.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{itemize}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
The first line contains a \emph{multiple assignment}: the variables
 | 
						||
\code{a} and \code{b} simultaneously get the new values 0 and 1.  On the
 | 
						||
last line this is used again, demonstrating that the expressions on
 | 
						||
the right-hand side are all evaluated first before any of the
 | 
						||
assignments take place.  The right-hand side expressions are evaluated 
 | 
						||
from the left to the right.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
The \keyword{while} loop executes as long as the condition (here:
 | 
						||
\code{b < 10}) remains true.  In Python, like in C, any non-zero
 | 
						||
integer value is true; zero is false.  The condition may also be a
 | 
						||
string or list value, in fact any sequence; anything with a non-zero
 | 
						||
length is true, empty sequences are false.  The test used in the
 | 
						||
example is a simple comparison.  The standard comparison operators are
 | 
						||
written the same as in C: \code{<} (less than), \code{>} (greater than),
 | 
						||
\code{==} (equal to), \code{<=} (less than or equal to),
 | 
						||
\code{>=} (greater than or equal to) and \code{!=} (not equal to).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
The \emph{body} of the loop is \emph{indented}: indentation is Python's
 | 
						||
way of grouping statements.  Python does not (yet!) provide an
 | 
						||
intelligent input line editing facility, so you have to type a tab or
 | 
						||
space(s) for each indented line.  In practice you will prepare more
 | 
						||
complicated input for Python with a text editor; most text editors have
 | 
						||
an auto-indent facility.  When a compound statement is entered
 | 
						||
interactively, it must be followed by a blank line to indicate
 | 
						||
completion (since the parser cannot guess when you have typed the last
 | 
						||
line).  Note that each line within a basic block must be indented by
 | 
						||
the same amount.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
The \keyword{print} statement writes the value of the expression(s) it is
 | 
						||
given.  It differs from just writing the expression you want to write
 | 
						||
(as we did earlier in the calculator examples) in the way it handles
 | 
						||
multiple expressions and strings.  Strings are printed without quotes,
 | 
						||
and a space is inserted between items, so you can format things nicely,
 | 
						||
like this:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> i = 256*256
 | 
						||
>>> print 'The value of i is', i
 | 
						||
The value of i is 65536
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A trailing comma avoids the newline after the output:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> a, b = 0, 1
 | 
						||
>>> while b < 1000:
 | 
						||
...     print b,
 | 
						||
...     a, b = b, a+b
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that the interpreter inserts a newline before it prints the next
 | 
						||
prompt if the last line was not completed.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\end{itemize}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{More Control Flow Tools \label{moreControl}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Besides the \keyword{while} statement just introduced, Python knows
 | 
						||
the usual control flow statements known from other languages, with
 | 
						||
some twists.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{\keyword{if} Statements \label{if}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Perhaps the most well-known statement type is the
 | 
						||
\keyword{if} statement.  For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> x = int(raw_input("Please enter an integer: "))
 | 
						||
>>> if x < 0:
 | 
						||
...      x = 0
 | 
						||
...      print 'Negative changed to zero'
 | 
						||
... elif x == 0:
 | 
						||
...      print 'Zero'
 | 
						||
... elif x == 1:
 | 
						||
...      print 'Single'
 | 
						||
... else:
 | 
						||
...      print 'More'
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There can be zero or more \keyword{elif} parts, and the
 | 
						||
\keyword{else} part is optional.  The keyword `\keyword{elif}' is
 | 
						||
short for `else if', and is useful to avoid excessive indentation.  An 
 | 
						||
\keyword{if} \ldots\ \keyword{elif} \ldots\ \keyword{elif} \ldots\ sequence
 | 
						||
%    Weird spacings happen here if the wrapping of the source text
 | 
						||
%    gets changed in the wrong way.
 | 
						||
is a substitute for the \keyword{switch} or
 | 
						||
\keyword{case} statements found in other languages.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{\keyword{for} Statements \label{for}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \keyword{for}\stindex{for} statement in Python differs a bit from
 | 
						||
what you may be used to in C or Pascal.  Rather than always
 | 
						||
iterating over an arithmetic progression of numbers (like in Pascal),
 | 
						||
or giving the user the ability to define both the iteration step and
 | 
						||
halting condition (as C), Python's
 | 
						||
\keyword{for}\stindex{for} statement iterates over the items of any
 | 
						||
sequence (a list or a string), in the order that they appear in
 | 
						||
the sequence.  For example (no pun intended):
 | 
						||
% One suggestion was to give a real C example here, but that may only
 | 
						||
% serve to confuse non-C programmers.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> # Measure some strings:
 | 
						||
... a = ['cat', 'window', 'defenestrate']
 | 
						||
>>> for x in a:
 | 
						||
...     print x, len(x)
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
cat 3
 | 
						||
window 6
 | 
						||
defenestrate 12
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is not safe to modify the sequence being iterated over in the loop
 | 
						||
(this can only happen for mutable sequence types, such as lists).  If
 | 
						||
you need to modify the list you are iterating over (for example, to
 | 
						||
duplicate selected items) you must iterate over a copy.  The slice
 | 
						||
notation makes this particularly convenient:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> for x in a[:]: # make a slice copy of the entire list
 | 
						||
...    if len(x) > 6: a.insert(0, x)
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
['defenestrate', 'cat', 'window', 'defenestrate']
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{The \function{range()} Function \label{range}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you do need to iterate over a sequence of numbers, the built-in
 | 
						||
function \function{range()} comes in handy.  It generates lists
 | 
						||
containing arithmetic progressions:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> range(10)
 | 
						||
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The given end point is never part of the generated list;
 | 
						||
\code{range(10)} generates a list of 10 values, exactly the legal
 | 
						||
indices for items of a sequence of length 10.  It is possible to let
 | 
						||
the range start at another number, or to specify a different increment
 | 
						||
(even negative; sometimes this is called the `step'):
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> range(5, 10)
 | 
						||
[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
 | 
						||
>>> range(0, 10, 3)
 | 
						||
[0, 3, 6, 9]
 | 
						||
>>> range(-10, -100, -30)
 | 
						||
[-10, -40, -70]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
To iterate over the indices of a sequence, combine
 | 
						||
\function{range()} and \function{len()} as follows:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> a = ['Mary', 'had', 'a', 'little', 'lamb']
 | 
						||
>>> for i in range(len(a)):
 | 
						||
...     print i, a[i]
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
0 Mary
 | 
						||
1 had
 | 
						||
2 a
 | 
						||
3 little
 | 
						||
4 lamb
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{\keyword{break} and \keyword{continue} Statements, and
 | 
						||
         \keyword{else} Clauses on Loops
 | 
						||
         \label{break}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \keyword{break} statement, like in C, breaks out of the smallest
 | 
						||
enclosing \keyword{for} or \keyword{while} loop.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \keyword{continue} statement, also borrowed from C, continues
 | 
						||
with the next iteration of the loop.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Loop statements may have an \code{else} clause; it is executed when
 | 
						||
the loop terminates through exhaustion of the list (with
 | 
						||
\keyword{for}) or when the condition becomes false (with
 | 
						||
\keyword{while}), but not when the loop is terminated by a
 | 
						||
\keyword{break} statement.  This is exemplified by the following loop,
 | 
						||
which searches for prime numbers:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> for n in range(2, 10):
 | 
						||
...     for x in range(2, n):
 | 
						||
...         if n % x == 0:
 | 
						||
...             print n, 'equals', x, '*', n/x
 | 
						||
...             break
 | 
						||
...     else:
 | 
						||
...         # loop fell through without finding a factor
 | 
						||
...         print n, 'is a prime number'
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
2 is a prime number
 | 
						||
3 is a prime number
 | 
						||
4 equals 2 * 2
 | 
						||
5 is a prime number
 | 
						||
6 equals 2 * 3
 | 
						||
7 is a prime number
 | 
						||
8 equals 2 * 4
 | 
						||
9 equals 3 * 3
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{\keyword{pass} Statements \label{pass}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \keyword{pass} statement does nothing.
 | 
						||
It can be used when a statement is required syntactically but the
 | 
						||
program requires no action.
 | 
						||
For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> while True:
 | 
						||
...       pass # Busy-wait for keyboard interrupt
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Defining Functions \label{functions}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
We can create a function that writes the Fibonacci series to an
 | 
						||
arbitrary boundary:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> def fib(n):    # write Fibonacci series up to n
 | 
						||
...     """Print a Fibonacci series up to n."""
 | 
						||
...     a, b = 0, 1
 | 
						||
...     while b < n:
 | 
						||
...         print b,
 | 
						||
...         a, b = b, a+b
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
>>> # Now call the function we just defined:
 | 
						||
... fib(2000)
 | 
						||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The keyword \keyword{def} introduces a function \emph{definition}.  It
 | 
						||
must be followed by the function name and the parenthesized list of
 | 
						||
formal parameters.  The statements that form the body of the function
 | 
						||
start at the next line, and must be indented.  The first statement of
 | 
						||
the function body can optionally be a string literal; this string
 | 
						||
literal is the function's \index{documentation strings}documentation
 | 
						||
string, or \dfn{docstring}.\index{docstrings}\index{strings, documentation}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There are tools which use docstrings to automatically produce online
 | 
						||
or printed documentation, or to let the user interactively browse
 | 
						||
through code; it's good practice to include docstrings in code that
 | 
						||
you write, so try to make a habit of it.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \emph{execution} of a function introduces a new symbol table used
 | 
						||
for the local variables of the function.  More precisely, all variable
 | 
						||
assignments in a function store the value in the local symbol table;
 | 
						||
whereas variable references first look in the local symbol table, then
 | 
						||
in the global symbol table, and then in the table of built-in names.
 | 
						||
Thus,  global variables cannot be directly assigned a value within a
 | 
						||
function (unless named in a \keyword{global} statement), although
 | 
						||
they may be referenced.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The actual parameters (arguments) to a function call are introduced in
 | 
						||
the local symbol table of the called function when it is called; thus,
 | 
						||
arguments are passed using \emph{call by value} (where the
 | 
						||
\emph{value} is always an object \emph{reference}, not the value of
 | 
						||
the object).\footnote{
 | 
						||
         Actually, \emph{call by object reference} would be a better
 | 
						||
         description, since if a mutable object is passed, the caller
 | 
						||
         will see any changes the callee makes to it (items
 | 
						||
         inserted into a list).
 | 
						||
} When a function calls another function, a new local symbol table is
 | 
						||
created for that call.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A function definition introduces the function name in the current
 | 
						||
symbol table.  The value of the function name
 | 
						||
has a type that is recognized by the interpreter as a user-defined
 | 
						||
function.  This value can be assigned to another name which can then
 | 
						||
also be used as a function.  This serves as a general renaming
 | 
						||
mechanism:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> fib
 | 
						||
<function object at 10042ed0>
 | 
						||
>>> f = fib
 | 
						||
>>> f(100)
 | 
						||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
You might object that \code{fib} is not a function but a procedure.  In
 | 
						||
Python, like in C, procedures are just functions that don't return a
 | 
						||
value.  In fact, technically speaking, procedures do return a value,
 | 
						||
albeit a rather boring one.  This value is called \code{None} (it's a
 | 
						||
built-in name).  Writing the value \code{None} is normally suppressed by
 | 
						||
the interpreter if it would be the only value written.  You can see it
 | 
						||
if you really want to:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> print fib(0)
 | 
						||
None
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is simple to write a function that returns a list of the numbers of
 | 
						||
the Fibonacci series, instead of printing it:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> def fib2(n): # return Fibonacci series up to n
 | 
						||
...     """Return a list containing the Fibonacci series up to n."""
 | 
						||
...     result = []
 | 
						||
...     a, b = 0, 1
 | 
						||
...     while b < n:
 | 
						||
...         result.append(b)    # see below
 | 
						||
...         a, b = b, a+b
 | 
						||
...     return result
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
>>> f100 = fib2(100)    # call it
 | 
						||
>>> f100                # write the result
 | 
						||
[1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This example, as usual, demonstrates some new Python features:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{itemize}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
The \keyword{return} statement returns with a value from a function.
 | 
						||
\keyword{return} without an expression argument returns \code{None}.
 | 
						||
Falling off the end of a procedure also returns \code{None}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
The statement \code{result.append(b)} calls a \emph{method} of the list
 | 
						||
object \code{result}.  A method is a function that `belongs' to an
 | 
						||
object and is named \code{obj.methodname}, where \code{obj} is some
 | 
						||
object (this may be an expression), and \code{methodname} is the name
 | 
						||
of a method that is defined by the object's type.  Different types
 | 
						||
define different methods.  Methods of different types may have the
 | 
						||
same name without causing ambiguity.  (It is possible to define your
 | 
						||
own object types and methods, using \emph{classes}, as discussed later
 | 
						||
in this tutorial.)
 | 
						||
The method \method{append()} shown in the example, is defined for
 | 
						||
list objects; it adds a new element at the end of the list.  In this
 | 
						||
example it is equivalent to \samp{result = result + [b]}, but more
 | 
						||
efficient.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\end{itemize}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{More on Defining Functions \label{defining}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is also possible to define functions with a variable number of
 | 
						||
arguments.  There are three forms, which can be combined.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Default Argument Values \label{defaultArgs}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The most useful form is to specify a default value for one or more
 | 
						||
arguments.  This creates a function that can be called with fewer
 | 
						||
arguments than it is defined
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
def ask_ok(prompt, retries=4, complaint='Yes or no, please!'):
 | 
						||
    while True:
 | 
						||
        ok = raw_input(prompt)
 | 
						||
        if ok in ('y', 'ye', 'yes'): return True
 | 
						||
        if ok in ('n', 'no', 'nop', 'nope'): return False
 | 
						||
        retries = retries - 1
 | 
						||
        if retries < 0: raise IOError, 'refusenik user'
 | 
						||
        print complaint
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This function can be called either like this:
 | 
						||
\code{ask_ok('Do you really want to quit?')} or like this:
 | 
						||
\code{ask_ok('OK to overwrite the file?', 2)}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The default values are evaluated at the point of function definition
 | 
						||
in the \emph{defining} scope, so that
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
i = 5
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
def f(arg=i):
 | 
						||
    print arg
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
i = 6
 | 
						||
f()
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
will print \code{5}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\strong{Important warning:}  The default value is evaluated only once.
 | 
						||
This makes a difference when the default is a mutable object such as a
 | 
						||
list, dictionary, or instances of most classes.  For example, the
 | 
						||
following function accumulates the arguments passed to it on
 | 
						||
subsequent calls:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
def f(a, L=[]):
 | 
						||
    L.append(a)
 | 
						||
    return L
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
print f(1)
 | 
						||
print f(2)
 | 
						||
print f(3)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This will print
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
[1]
 | 
						||
[1, 2]
 | 
						||
[1, 2, 3]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you don't want the default to be shared between subsequent calls,
 | 
						||
you can write the function like this instead:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
def f(a, L=None):
 | 
						||
    if L is None:
 | 
						||
        L = []
 | 
						||
    L.append(a)
 | 
						||
    return L
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Keyword Arguments \label{keywordArgs}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Functions can also be called using
 | 
						||
keyword arguments of the form \samp{\var{keyword} = \var{value}}.  For
 | 
						||
instance, the following function:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
def parrot(voltage, state='a stiff', action='voom', type='Norwegian Blue'):
 | 
						||
    print "-- This parrot wouldn't", action,
 | 
						||
    print "if you put", voltage, "Volts through it."
 | 
						||
    print "-- Lovely plumage, the", type
 | 
						||
    print "-- It's", state, "!"
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
could be called in any of the following ways:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
parrot(1000)
 | 
						||
parrot(action = 'VOOOOOM', voltage = 1000000)
 | 
						||
parrot('a thousand', state = 'pushing up the daisies')
 | 
						||
parrot('a million', 'bereft of life', 'jump')
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
but the following calls would all be invalid:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
parrot()                     # required argument missing
 | 
						||
parrot(voltage=5.0, 'dead')  # non-keyword argument following keyword
 | 
						||
parrot(110, voltage=220)     # duplicate value for argument
 | 
						||
parrot(actor='John Cleese')  # unknown keyword
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In general, an argument list must have any positional arguments
 | 
						||
followed by any keyword arguments, where the keywords must be chosen
 | 
						||
from the formal parameter names.  It's not important whether a formal
 | 
						||
parameter has a default value or not.  No argument may receive a
 | 
						||
value more than once --- formal parameter names corresponding to
 | 
						||
positional arguments cannot be used as keywords in the same calls.
 | 
						||
Here's an example that fails due to this restriction:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> def function(a):
 | 
						||
...     pass
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
>>> function(0, a=0)
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
TypeError: function() got multiple values for keyword argument 'a'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When a final formal parameter of the form \code{**\var{name}} is
 | 
						||
present, it receives a \ulink{dictionary}{../lib/typesmapping.html} containing all keyword arguments
 | 
						||
whose keyword doesn't correspond to a formal parameter.  This may be
 | 
						||
combined with a formal parameter of the form
 | 
						||
\code{*\var{name}} (described in the next subsection) which receives a
 | 
						||
tuple containing the positional arguments beyond the formal parameter
 | 
						||
list.  (\code{*\var{name}} must occur before \code{**\var{name}}.)
 | 
						||
For example, if we define a function like this:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
def cheeseshop(kind, *arguments, **keywords):
 | 
						||
    print "-- Do you have any", kind, '?'
 | 
						||
    print "-- I'm sorry, we're all out of", kind
 | 
						||
    for arg in arguments: print arg
 | 
						||
    print '-'*40
 | 
						||
    keys = keywords.keys()
 | 
						||
    keys.sort()
 | 
						||
    for kw in keys: print kw, ':', keywords[kw]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It could be called like this:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
cheeseshop('Limburger', "It's very runny, sir.",
 | 
						||
           "It's really very, VERY runny, sir.",
 | 
						||
           client='John Cleese',
 | 
						||
           shopkeeper='Michael Palin',
 | 
						||
           sketch='Cheese Shop Sketch')
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
and of course it would print:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
-- Do you have any Limburger ?
 | 
						||
-- I'm sorry, we're all out of Limburger
 | 
						||
It's very runny, sir.
 | 
						||
It's really very, VERY runny, sir.
 | 
						||
----------------------------------------
 | 
						||
client : John Cleese
 | 
						||
shopkeeper : Michael Palin
 | 
						||
sketch : Cheese Shop Sketch
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that the \method{sort()} method of the list of keyword argument
 | 
						||
names is called before printing the contents of the \code{keywords}
 | 
						||
dictionary; if this is not done, the order in which the arguments are
 | 
						||
printed is undefined.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Arbitrary Argument Lists \label{arbitraryArgs}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Finally, the least frequently used option is to specify that a
 | 
						||
function can be called with an arbitrary number of arguments.  These
 | 
						||
arguments will be wrapped up in a tuple.  Before the variable number
 | 
						||
of arguments, zero or more normal arguments may occur.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
def fprintf(file, format, *args):
 | 
						||
    file.write(format % args)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Unpacking Argument Lists \label{unpacking-arguments}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The reverse situation occurs when the arguments are already in a list
 | 
						||
or tuple but need to be unpacked for a function call requiring separate
 | 
						||
positional arguments.  For instance, the built-in \function{range()}
 | 
						||
function expects separate \var{start} and \var{stop} arguments.  If they
 | 
						||
are not available separately, write the function call with the 
 | 
						||
\code{*}-operator to unpack the arguments out of a list or tuple:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> range(3, 6)             # normal call with separate arguments
 | 
						||
[3, 4, 5]
 | 
						||
>>> args = [3, 6]
 | 
						||
>>> range(*args)            # call with arguments unpacked from a list
 | 
						||
[3, 4, 5]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Lambda Forms \label{lambda}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
By popular demand, a few features commonly found in functional
 | 
						||
programming languages and Lisp have been added to Python.  With the
 | 
						||
\keyword{lambda} keyword, small anonymous functions can be created.
 | 
						||
Here's a function that returns the sum of its two arguments:
 | 
						||
\samp{lambda a, b: a+b}.  Lambda forms can be used wherever function
 | 
						||
objects are required.  They are syntactically restricted to a single
 | 
						||
expression.  Semantically, they are just syntactic sugar for a normal
 | 
						||
function definition.  Like nested function definitions, lambda forms
 | 
						||
can reference variables from the containing scope:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> def make_incrementor(n):
 | 
						||
...     return lambda x: x + n
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
>>> f = make_incrementor(42)
 | 
						||
>>> f(0)
 | 
						||
42
 | 
						||
>>> f(1)
 | 
						||
43
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Documentation Strings \label{docstrings}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There are emerging conventions about the content and formatting of
 | 
						||
documentation strings.
 | 
						||
\index{docstrings}\index{documentation strings}
 | 
						||
\index{strings, documentation}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The first line should always be a short, concise summary of the
 | 
						||
object's purpose.  For brevity, it should not explicitly state the
 | 
						||
object's name or type, since these are available by other means
 | 
						||
(except if the name happens to be a verb describing a function's
 | 
						||
operation).  This line should begin with a capital letter and end with
 | 
						||
a period.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If there are more lines in the documentation string, the second line
 | 
						||
should be blank, visually separating the summary from the rest of the
 | 
						||
description.  The following lines should be one or more paragraphs
 | 
						||
describing the object's calling conventions, its side effects, etc.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The Python parser does not strip indentation from multi-line string
 | 
						||
literals in Python, so tools that process documentation have to strip
 | 
						||
indentation if desired.  This is done using the following convention.
 | 
						||
The first non-blank line \emph{after} the first line of the string
 | 
						||
determines the amount of indentation for the entire documentation
 | 
						||
string.  (We can't use the first line since it is generally adjacent
 | 
						||
to the string's opening quotes so its indentation is not apparent in
 | 
						||
the string literal.)  Whitespace ``equivalent'' to this indentation is
 | 
						||
then stripped from the start of all lines of the string.  Lines that
 | 
						||
are indented less should not occur, but if they occur all their
 | 
						||
leading whitespace should be stripped.  Equivalence of whitespace
 | 
						||
should be tested after expansion of tabs (to 8 spaces, normally).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Here is an example of a multi-line docstring:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> def my_function():
 | 
						||
...     """Do nothing, but document it.
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
...     No, really, it doesn't do anything.
 | 
						||
...     """
 | 
						||
...     pass
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
>>> print my_function.__doc__
 | 
						||
Do nothing, but document it.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    No, really, it doesn't do anything.
 | 
						||
    
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{Data Structures \label{structures}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This chapter describes some things you've learned about already in
 | 
						||
more detail, and adds some new things as well.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{More on Lists \label{moreLists}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The list data type has some more methods.  Here are all of the methods
 | 
						||
of list objects:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{append}{x}
 | 
						||
Add an item to the end of the list;
 | 
						||
equivalent to \code{a[len(a):] = [\var{x}]}.
 | 
						||
\end{methoddesc}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{extend}{L}
 | 
						||
Extend the list by appending all the items in the given list;
 | 
						||
equivalent to \code{a[len(a):] = \var{L}}.
 | 
						||
\end{methoddesc}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{insert}{i, x}
 | 
						||
Insert an item at a given position.  The first argument is the index
 | 
						||
of the element before which to insert, so \code{a.insert(0, \var{x})}
 | 
						||
inserts at the front of the list, and \code{a.insert(len(a), \var{x})}
 | 
						||
is equivalent to \code{a.append(\var{x})}.
 | 
						||
\end{methoddesc}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{remove}{x}
 | 
						||
Remove the first item from the list whose value is \var{x}.
 | 
						||
It is an error if there is no such item.
 | 
						||
\end{methoddesc}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{pop}{\optional{i}}
 | 
						||
Remove the item at the given position in the list, and return it.  If
 | 
						||
no index is specified, \code{a.pop()} returns the last item in the
 | 
						||
list.  The item is also removed from the list.  (The square brackets
 | 
						||
around the \var{i} in the method signature denote that the parameter
 | 
						||
is optional, not that you should type square brackets at that
 | 
						||
position.  You will see this notation frequently in the
 | 
						||
\citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library Reference}.)
 | 
						||
\end{methoddesc}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{index}{x}
 | 
						||
Return the index in the list of the first item whose value is \var{x}.
 | 
						||
It is an error if there is no such item.
 | 
						||
\end{methoddesc}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{count}{x}
 | 
						||
Return the number of times \var{x} appears in the list.
 | 
						||
\end{methoddesc}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{sort}{}
 | 
						||
Sort the items of the list, in place.
 | 
						||
\end{methoddesc}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{methoddesc}[list]{reverse}{}
 | 
						||
Reverse the elements of the list, in place.
 | 
						||
\end{methoddesc}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
An example that uses most of the list methods:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> a = [66.6, 333, 333, 1, 1234.5]
 | 
						||
>>> print a.count(333), a.count(66.6), a.count('x')
 | 
						||
2 1 0
 | 
						||
>>> a.insert(2, -1)
 | 
						||
>>> a.append(333)
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
[66.6, 333, -1, 333, 1, 1234.5, 333]
 | 
						||
>>> a.index(333)
 | 
						||
1
 | 
						||
>>> a.remove(333)
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
[66.6, -1, 333, 1, 1234.5, 333]
 | 
						||
>>> a.reverse()
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
[333, 1234.5, 1, 333, -1, 66.6]
 | 
						||
>>> a.sort()
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
[-1, 1, 66.6, 333, 333, 1234.5]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Using Lists as Stacks \label{lists-as-stacks}}
 | 
						||
\sectionauthor{Ka-Ping Yee}{ping@lfw.org}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The list methods make it very easy to use a list as a stack, where the
 | 
						||
last element added is the first element retrieved (``last-in,
 | 
						||
first-out'').  To add an item to the top of the stack, use
 | 
						||
\method{append()}.  To retrieve an item from the top of the stack, use
 | 
						||
\method{pop()} without an explicit index.  For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> stack = [3, 4, 5]
 | 
						||
>>> stack.append(6)
 | 
						||
>>> stack.append(7)
 | 
						||
>>> stack
 | 
						||
[3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
 | 
						||
>>> stack.pop()
 | 
						||
7
 | 
						||
>>> stack
 | 
						||
[3, 4, 5, 6]
 | 
						||
>>> stack.pop()
 | 
						||
6
 | 
						||
>>> stack.pop()
 | 
						||
5
 | 
						||
>>> stack
 | 
						||
[3, 4]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Using Lists as Queues \label{lists-as-queues}}
 | 
						||
\sectionauthor{Ka-Ping Yee}{ping@lfw.org}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
You can also use a list conveniently as a queue, where the first
 | 
						||
element added is the first element retrieved (``first-in,
 | 
						||
first-out'').  To add an item to the back of the queue, use
 | 
						||
\method{append()}.  To retrieve an item from the front of the queue,
 | 
						||
use \method{pop()} with \code{0} as the index.  For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> queue = ["Eric", "John", "Michael"]
 | 
						||
>>> queue.append("Terry")           # Terry arrives
 | 
						||
>>> queue.append("Graham")          # Graham arrives
 | 
						||
>>> queue.pop(0)
 | 
						||
'Eric'
 | 
						||
>>> queue.pop(0)
 | 
						||
'John'
 | 
						||
>>> queue
 | 
						||
['Michael', 'Terry', 'Graham']
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Functional Programming Tools \label{functional}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There are three built-in functions that are very useful when used with
 | 
						||
lists: \function{filter()}, \function{map()}, and \function{reduce()}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\samp{filter(\var{function}, \var{sequence})} returns a sequence (of
 | 
						||
the same type, if possible) consisting of those items from the
 | 
						||
sequence for which \code{\var{function}(\var{item})} is true.  For
 | 
						||
example, to compute some primes:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> def f(x): return x % 2 != 0 and x % 3 != 0
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
>>> filter(f, range(2, 25))
 | 
						||
[5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\samp{map(\var{function}, \var{sequence})} calls
 | 
						||
\code{\var{function}(\var{item})} for each of the sequence's items and
 | 
						||
returns a list of the return values.  For example, to compute some
 | 
						||
cubes:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> def cube(x): return x*x*x
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
>>> map(cube, range(1, 11))
 | 
						||
[1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216, 343, 512, 729, 1000]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
More than one sequence may be passed; the function must then have as
 | 
						||
many arguments as there are sequences and is called with the
 | 
						||
corresponding item from each sequence (or \code{None} if some sequence
 | 
						||
is shorter than another).  For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> seq = range(8)
 | 
						||
>>> def add(x, y): return x+y
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
>>> map(add, seq, seq)
 | 
						||
[0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\samp{reduce(\var{func}, \var{sequence})} returns a single value
 | 
						||
constructed by calling the binary function \var{func} on the first two
 | 
						||
items of the sequence, then on the result and the next item, and so
 | 
						||
on.  For example, to compute the sum of the numbers 1 through 10:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> def add(x,y): return x+y
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
>>> reduce(add, range(1, 11))
 | 
						||
55
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If there's only one item in the sequence, its value is returned; if
 | 
						||
the sequence is empty, an exception is raised.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A third argument can be passed to indicate the starting value.  In this
 | 
						||
case the starting value is returned for an empty sequence, and the
 | 
						||
function is first applied to the starting value and the first sequence
 | 
						||
item, then to the result and the next item, and so on.  For example,
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> def sum(seq):
 | 
						||
...     def add(x,y): return x+y
 | 
						||
...     return reduce(add, seq, 0)
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
>>> sum(range(1, 11))
 | 
						||
55
 | 
						||
>>> sum([])
 | 
						||
0
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Don't use this example's definition of \function{sum()}: since summing
 | 
						||
numbers is such a common need, a built-in function
 | 
						||
\code{sum(\var{sequence})} is already provided, and works exactly like
 | 
						||
this.
 | 
						||
\versionadded{2.3}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{List Comprehensions}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
List comprehensions provide a concise way to create lists without resorting
 | 
						||
to use of \function{map()}, \function{filter()} and/or \keyword{lambda}.
 | 
						||
The resulting list definition tends often to be clearer than lists built
 | 
						||
using those constructs.  Each list comprehension consists of an expression
 | 
						||
followed by a \keyword{for} clause, then zero or more \keyword{for} or
 | 
						||
\keyword{if} clauses.  The result will be a list resulting from evaluating
 | 
						||
the expression in the context of the \keyword{for} and \keyword{if} clauses
 | 
						||
which follow it.  If the expression would evaluate to a tuple, it must be
 | 
						||
parenthesized.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> freshfruit = ['  banana', '  loganberry ', 'passion fruit  ']
 | 
						||
>>> [weapon.strip() for weapon in freshfruit]
 | 
						||
['banana', 'loganberry', 'passion fruit']
 | 
						||
>>> vec = [2, 4, 6]
 | 
						||
>>> [3*x for x in vec]
 | 
						||
[6, 12, 18]
 | 
						||
>>> [3*x for x in vec if x > 3]
 | 
						||
[12, 18]
 | 
						||
>>> [3*x for x in vec if x < 2]
 | 
						||
[]
 | 
						||
>>> [[x,x**2] for x in vec]
 | 
						||
[[2, 4], [4, 16], [6, 36]]
 | 
						||
>>> [x, x**2 for x in vec]	# error - parens required for tuples
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
    [x, x**2 for x in vec]
 | 
						||
               ^
 | 
						||
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
 | 
						||
>>> [(x, x**2) for x in vec]
 | 
						||
[(2, 4), (4, 16), (6, 36)]
 | 
						||
>>> vec1 = [2, 4, 6]
 | 
						||
>>> vec2 = [4, 3, -9]
 | 
						||
>>> [x*y for x in vec1 for y in vec2]
 | 
						||
[8, 6, -18, 16, 12, -36, 24, 18, -54]
 | 
						||
>>> [x+y for x in vec1 for y in vec2]
 | 
						||
[6, 5, -7, 8, 7, -5, 10, 9, -3]
 | 
						||
>>> [vec1[i]*vec2[i] for i in range(len(vec1))]
 | 
						||
[8, 12, -54]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
List comprehensions are much more flexible than \function{map()} and can be
 | 
						||
applied to functions with more than one argument and to nested functions:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> [str(round(355/113.0, i)) for i in range(1,6)]
 | 
						||
['3.1', '3.14', '3.142', '3.1416', '3.14159']
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{The \keyword{del} statement \label{del}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There is a way to remove an item from a list given its index instead
 | 
						||
of its value: the \keyword{del} statement.  This can also be used to
 | 
						||
remove slices from a list (which we did earlier by assignment of an
 | 
						||
empty list to the slice).  For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> a = [-1, 1, 66.6, 333, 333, 1234.5]
 | 
						||
>>> del a[0]
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
[1, 66.6, 333, 333, 1234.5]
 | 
						||
>>> del a[2:4]
 | 
						||
>>> a
 | 
						||
[1, 66.6, 1234.5]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\keyword{del} can also be used to delete entire variables:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> del a
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Referencing the name \code{a} hereafter is an error (at least until
 | 
						||
another value is assigned to it).  We'll find other uses for
 | 
						||
\keyword{del} later.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Tuples and Sequences \label{tuples}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
We saw that lists and strings have many common properties, such as
 | 
						||
indexing and slicing operations.  They are two examples of
 | 
						||
\ulink{\emph{sequence} data types}{../lib/typesseq.html}.  Since
 | 
						||
Python is an evolving language, other sequence data types may be
 | 
						||
added.  There is also another standard sequence data type: the
 | 
						||
\emph{tuple}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A tuple consists of a number of values separated by commas, for
 | 
						||
instance:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> t = 12345, 54321, 'hello!'
 | 
						||
>>> t[0]
 | 
						||
12345
 | 
						||
>>> t
 | 
						||
(12345, 54321, 'hello!')
 | 
						||
>>> # Tuples may be nested:
 | 
						||
... u = t, (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
 | 
						||
>>> u
 | 
						||
((12345, 54321, 'hello!'), (1, 2, 3, 4, 5))
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
As you see, on output tuples are alway enclosed in parentheses, so
 | 
						||
that nested tuples are interpreted correctly; they may be input with
 | 
						||
or without surrounding parentheses, although often parentheses are
 | 
						||
necessary anyway (if the tuple is part of a larger expression).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Tuples have many uses.  For example: (x, y) coordinate pairs, employee
 | 
						||
records from a database, etc.  Tuples, like strings, are immutable: it
 | 
						||
is not possible to assign to the individual items of a tuple (you can
 | 
						||
simulate much of the same effect with slicing and concatenation,
 | 
						||
though).  It is also possible to create tuples which contain mutable
 | 
						||
objects, such as lists.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A special problem is the construction of tuples containing 0 or 1
 | 
						||
items: the syntax has some extra quirks to accommodate these.  Empty
 | 
						||
tuples are constructed by an empty pair of parentheses; a tuple with
 | 
						||
one item is constructed by following a value with a comma
 | 
						||
(it is not sufficient to enclose a single value in parentheses).
 | 
						||
Ugly, but effective.  For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> empty = ()
 | 
						||
>>> singleton = 'hello',    # <-- note trailing comma
 | 
						||
>>> len(empty)
 | 
						||
0
 | 
						||
>>> len(singleton)
 | 
						||
1
 | 
						||
>>> singleton
 | 
						||
('hello',)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The statement \code{t = 12345, 54321, 'hello!'} is an example of
 | 
						||
\emph{tuple packing}: the values \code{12345}, \code{54321} and
 | 
						||
\code{'hello!'} are packed together in a tuple.  The reverse operation
 | 
						||
is also possible:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> x, y, z = t
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This is called, appropriately enough, \emph{sequence unpacking}.
 | 
						||
Sequence unpacking requires that the list of variables on the left
 | 
						||
have the same number of elements as the length of the sequence.  Note
 | 
						||
that multiple assignment is really just a combination of tuple packing
 | 
						||
and sequence unpacking!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There is a small bit of asymmetry here:  packing multiple values
 | 
						||
always creates a tuple, and unpacking works for any sequence.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
% XXX Add a bit on the difference between tuples and lists.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Sets \label{sets}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Python also includes a data type for \emph{sets}.  A set is an unordered
 | 
						||
collection with no duplicate elements.  Basic uses include membership
 | 
						||
testing and eliminating duplicate entries.  Set objects also support
 | 
						||
mathematical operations like union, intersection, difference, and
 | 
						||
symmetric difference.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Here is a brief demonstration:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> basket = ['apple', 'orange', 'apple', 'pear', 'orange', 'banana']
 | 
						||
>>> fruits = set(basket)               # create a set without duplicates
 | 
						||
>>> fruits
 | 
						||
set(['orange', 'pear', 'apple', 'banana'])
 | 
						||
>>> 'orange' in fruits                 # fast membership testing
 | 
						||
True
 | 
						||
>>> 'crabgrass' in fruits
 | 
						||
False
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
>>> # Demonstrate set operations on unique letters from two words
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
>>> a = set('abracadabra')
 | 
						||
>>> b = set('alacazam')
 | 
						||
>>> a                                  # unique letters in a
 | 
						||
set(['a', 'r', 'b', 'c', 'd'])
 | 
						||
>>> a - b                              # letters in a but not in b
 | 
						||
set(['r', 'd', 'b'])
 | 
						||
>>> a | b                              # letters in either a or b
 | 
						||
set(['a', 'c', 'r', 'd', 'b', 'm', 'z', 'l'])
 | 
						||
>>> a & b                              # letters in both a and b
 | 
						||
set(['a', 'c'])
 | 
						||
>>> a ^ b                              # letters in a or b but not both
 | 
						||
set(['r', 'd', 'b', 'm', 'z', 'l'])
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Dictionaries \label{dictionaries}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Another useful data type built into Python is the
 | 
						||
\ulink{\emph{dictionary}}{../lib/typesmapping.html}.
 | 
						||
Dictionaries are sometimes found in other languages as ``associative
 | 
						||
memories'' or ``associative arrays''.  Unlike sequences, which are
 | 
						||
indexed by a range of numbers, dictionaries are indexed by \emph{keys},
 | 
						||
which can be any immutable type; strings and numbers can always be
 | 
						||
keys.  Tuples can be used as keys if they contain only strings,
 | 
						||
numbers, or tuples; if a tuple contains any mutable object either
 | 
						||
directly or indirectly, it cannot be used as a key.  You can't use
 | 
						||
lists as keys, since lists can be modified in place using their
 | 
						||
\method{append()} and \method{extend()} methods, as well as slice and
 | 
						||
indexed assignments.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is best to think of a dictionary as an unordered set of
 | 
						||
\emph{key: value} pairs, with the requirement that the keys are unique
 | 
						||
(within one dictionary).
 | 
						||
A pair of braces creates an empty dictionary: \code{\{\}}.
 | 
						||
Placing a comma-separated list of key:value pairs within the
 | 
						||
braces adds initial key:value pairs to the dictionary; this is also the
 | 
						||
way dictionaries are written on output.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The main operations on a dictionary are storing a value with some key
 | 
						||
and extracting the value given the key.  It is also possible to delete
 | 
						||
a key:value pair
 | 
						||
with \code{del}.
 | 
						||
If you store using a key that is already in use, the old value
 | 
						||
associated with that key is forgotten.  It is an error to extract a
 | 
						||
value using a non-existent key.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \method{keys()} method of a dictionary object returns a list of all
 | 
						||
the keys used in the dictionary, in random order (if you want it
 | 
						||
sorted, just apply the \method{sort()} method to the list of keys).  To
 | 
						||
check whether a single key is in the dictionary, use the
 | 
						||
\method{has_key()} method of the dictionary.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Here is a small example using a dictionary:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> tel = {'jack': 4098, 'sape': 4139}
 | 
						||
>>> tel['guido'] = 4127
 | 
						||
>>> tel
 | 
						||
{'sape': 4139, 'guido': 4127, 'jack': 4098}
 | 
						||
>>> tel['jack']
 | 
						||
4098
 | 
						||
>>> del tel['sape']
 | 
						||
>>> tel['irv'] = 4127
 | 
						||
>>> tel
 | 
						||
{'guido': 4127, 'irv': 4127, 'jack': 4098}
 | 
						||
>>> tel.keys()
 | 
						||
['guido', 'irv', 'jack']
 | 
						||
>>> tel.has_key('guido')
 | 
						||
True
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \function{dict()} constructor builds dictionaries directly from
 | 
						||
lists of key-value pairs stored as tuples.  When the pairs form a
 | 
						||
pattern, list comprehensions can compactly specify the key-value list.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> dict([('sape', 4139), ('guido', 4127), ('jack', 4098)])
 | 
						||
{'sape': 4139, 'jack': 4098, 'guido': 4127}
 | 
						||
>>> dict([(x, x**2) for x in vec])     # use a list comprehension
 | 
						||
{2: 4, 4: 16, 6: 36}
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Looping Techniques \label{loopidioms}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When looping through dictionaries, the key and corresponding value can
 | 
						||
be retrieved at the same time using the \method{iteritems()} method.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> knights = {'gallahad': 'the pure', 'robin': 'the brave'}
 | 
						||
>>> for k, v in knights.iteritems():
 | 
						||
...     print k, v
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
gallahad the pure
 | 
						||
robin the brave
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 
 | 
						||
When looping through a sequence, the position index and corresponding
 | 
						||
value can be retrieved at the same time using the
 | 
						||
\function{enumerate()} function.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim} 
 | 
						||
>>> for i, v in enumerate(['tic', 'tac', 'toe']):
 | 
						||
...     print i, v
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
0 tic
 | 
						||
1 tac
 | 
						||
2 toe
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
To loop over two or more sequences at the same time, the entries
 | 
						||
can be paired with the \function{zip()} function.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> questions = ['name', 'quest', 'favorite color']
 | 
						||
>>> answers = ['lancelot', 'the holy grail', 'blue']
 | 
						||
>>> for q, a in zip(questions, answers):
 | 
						||
...     print 'What is your %s?  It is %s.' % (q, a)
 | 
						||
...	
 | 
						||
What is your name?  It is lancelot.
 | 
						||
What is your quest?  It is the holy grail.
 | 
						||
What is your favorite color?  It is blue.
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
To loop over a sequence in reverse, first specify the sequence
 | 
						||
in a forward direction and then call the \function{reversed()}
 | 
						||
function.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> for i in reversed(xrange(1,10,2)):
 | 
						||
...     print i
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
9
 | 
						||
7
 | 
						||
5
 | 
						||
3
 | 
						||
1
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
To loop over a sequence in sorted order, use the \function{sorted()}
 | 
						||
function which returns a new sorted list while leaving the source
 | 
						||
unaltered.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> basket = ['apple', 'orange', 'apple', 'pear', 'orange', 'banana']
 | 
						||
>>> for f in sorted(set(basket)):
 | 
						||
...     print f
 | 
						||
... 	
 | 
						||
apple
 | 
						||
banana
 | 
						||
orange
 | 
						||
pear
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{More on Conditions \label{conditions}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The conditions used in \code{while} and \code{if} statements above can
 | 
						||
contain other operators besides comparisons.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The comparison operators \code{in} and \code{not in} check whether a value
 | 
						||
occurs (does not occur) in a sequence.  The operators \code{is} and
 | 
						||
\code{is not} compare whether two objects are really the same object; this
 | 
						||
only matters for mutable objects like lists.  All comparison operators
 | 
						||
have the same priority, which is lower than that of all numerical
 | 
						||
operators.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Comparisons can be chained.  For example, \code{a < b == c} tests
 | 
						||
whether \code{a} is less than \code{b} and moreover \code{b} equals
 | 
						||
\code{c}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Comparisons may be combined by the Boolean operators \code{and} and
 | 
						||
\code{or}, and the outcome of a comparison (or of any other Boolean
 | 
						||
expression) may be negated with \code{not}.  These all have lower
 | 
						||
priorities than comparison operators again; between them, \code{not} has
 | 
						||
the highest priority, and \code{or} the lowest, so that
 | 
						||
\code{A and not B or C} is equivalent to \code{(A and (not B)) or C}.  Of
 | 
						||
course, parentheses can be used to express the desired composition.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The Boolean operators \code{and} and \code{or} are so-called
 | 
						||
\emph{short-circuit} operators: their arguments are evaluated from
 | 
						||
left to right, and evaluation stops as soon as the outcome is
 | 
						||
determined.  For example, if \code{A} and \code{C} are true but
 | 
						||
\code{B} is false, \code{A and B and C} does not evaluate the
 | 
						||
expression \code{C}.  In general, the return value of a short-circuit
 | 
						||
operator, when used as a general value and not as a Boolean, is the
 | 
						||
last evaluated argument.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is possible to assign the result of a comparison or other Boolean
 | 
						||
expression to a variable.  For example,
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> string1, string2, string3 = '', 'Trondheim', 'Hammer Dance'
 | 
						||
>>> non_null = string1 or string2 or string3
 | 
						||
>>> non_null
 | 
						||
'Trondheim'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that in Python, unlike C, assignment cannot occur inside expressions.
 | 
						||
C programmers may grumble about this, but it avoids a common class of
 | 
						||
problems encountered in C programs: typing \code{=} in an expression when
 | 
						||
\code{==} was intended.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Comparing Sequences and Other Types \label{comparing}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Sequence objects may be compared to other objects with the same
 | 
						||
sequence type.  The comparison uses \emph{lexicographical} ordering:
 | 
						||
first the first two items are compared, and if they differ this
 | 
						||
determines the outcome of the comparison; if they are equal, the next
 | 
						||
two items are compared, and so on, until either sequence is exhausted.
 | 
						||
If two items to be compared are themselves sequences of the same type,
 | 
						||
the lexicographical comparison is carried out recursively.  If all
 | 
						||
items of two sequences compare equal, the sequences are considered
 | 
						||
equal.  If one sequence is an initial sub-sequence of the other, the
 | 
						||
shorter sequence is the smaller (lesser) one.  Lexicographical
 | 
						||
ordering for strings uses the \ASCII{} ordering for individual
 | 
						||
characters.  Some examples of comparisons between sequences with the
 | 
						||
same types:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
(1, 2, 3)              < (1, 2, 4)
 | 
						||
[1, 2, 3]              < [1, 2, 4]
 | 
						||
'ABC' < 'C' < 'Pascal' < 'Python'
 | 
						||
(1, 2, 3, 4)           < (1, 2, 4)
 | 
						||
(1, 2)                 < (1, 2, -1)
 | 
						||
(1, 2, 3)             == (1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
 | 
						||
(1, 2, ('aa', 'ab'))   < (1, 2, ('abc', 'a'), 4)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that comparing objects of different types is legal.  The outcome
 | 
						||
is deterministic but arbitrary: the types are ordered by their name.
 | 
						||
Thus, a list is always smaller than a string, a string is always
 | 
						||
smaller than a tuple, etc.  Mixed numeric types are compared according
 | 
						||
to their numeric value, so 0 equals 0.0, etc.\footnote{
 | 
						||
        The rules for comparing objects of different types should
 | 
						||
        not be relied upon; they may change in a future version of
 | 
						||
        the language.
 | 
						||
}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{Modules \label{modules}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you quit from the Python interpreter and enter it again, the
 | 
						||
definitions you have made (functions and variables) are lost.
 | 
						||
Therefore, if you want to write a somewhat longer program, you are
 | 
						||
better off using a text editor to prepare the input for the interpreter
 | 
						||
and running it with that file as input instead.  This is known as creating a
 | 
						||
\emph{script}.  As your program gets longer, you may want to split it
 | 
						||
into several files for easier maintenance.  You may also want to use a
 | 
						||
handy function that you've written in several programs without copying
 | 
						||
its definition into each program.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
To support this, Python has a way to put definitions in a file and use
 | 
						||
them in a script or in an interactive instance of the interpreter.
 | 
						||
Such a file is called a \emph{module}; definitions from a module can be
 | 
						||
\emph{imported} into other modules or into the \emph{main} module (the
 | 
						||
collection of variables that you have access to in a script
 | 
						||
executed at the top level
 | 
						||
and in calculator mode).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A module is a file containing Python definitions and statements.  The
 | 
						||
file name is the module name with the suffix \file{.py} appended.  Within
 | 
						||
a module, the module's name (as a string) is available as the value of
 | 
						||
the global variable \code{__name__}.  For instance, use your favorite text
 | 
						||
editor to create a file called \file{fibo.py} in the current directory
 | 
						||
with the following contents:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
# Fibonacci numbers module
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
def fib(n):    # write Fibonacci series up to n
 | 
						||
    a, b = 0, 1
 | 
						||
    while b < n:
 | 
						||
        print b,
 | 
						||
        a, b = b, a+b
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
def fib2(n): # return Fibonacci series up to n
 | 
						||
    result = []
 | 
						||
    a, b = 0, 1
 | 
						||
    while b < n:
 | 
						||
        result.append(b)
 | 
						||
        a, b = b, a+b
 | 
						||
    return result
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Now enter the Python interpreter and import this module with the
 | 
						||
following command:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import fibo
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This does not enter the names of the functions defined in \code{fibo} 
 | 
						||
directly in the current symbol table; it only enters the module name
 | 
						||
\code{fibo} there.
 | 
						||
Using the module name you can access the functions:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> fibo.fib(1000)
 | 
						||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987
 | 
						||
>>> fibo.fib2(100)
 | 
						||
[1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89]
 | 
						||
>>> fibo.__name__
 | 
						||
'fibo'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you intend to use a function often you can assign it to a local name:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> fib = fibo.fib
 | 
						||
>>> fib(500)
 | 
						||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{More on Modules \label{moreModules}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A module can contain executable statements as well as function
 | 
						||
definitions.
 | 
						||
These statements are intended to initialize the module.
 | 
						||
They are executed only the
 | 
						||
\emph{first} time the module is imported somewhere.\footnote{
 | 
						||
        In fact function definitions are also `statements' that are
 | 
						||
        `executed'; the execution enters the function name in the
 | 
						||
        module's global symbol table.
 | 
						||
}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Each module has its own private symbol table, which is used as the
 | 
						||
global symbol table by all functions defined in the module.
 | 
						||
Thus, the author of a module can use global variables in the module
 | 
						||
without worrying about accidental clashes with a user's global
 | 
						||
variables.
 | 
						||
On the other hand, if you know what you are doing you can touch a
 | 
						||
module's global variables with the same notation used to refer to its
 | 
						||
functions,
 | 
						||
\code{modname.itemname}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Modules can import other modules.  It is customary but not required to
 | 
						||
place all \keyword{import} statements at the beginning of a module (or
 | 
						||
script, for that matter).  The imported module names are placed in the
 | 
						||
importing module's global symbol table.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There is a variant of the \keyword{import} statement that imports
 | 
						||
names from a module directly into the importing module's symbol
 | 
						||
table.  For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> from fibo import fib, fib2
 | 
						||
>>> fib(500)
 | 
						||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This does not introduce the module name from which the imports are taken
 | 
						||
in the local symbol table (so in the example, \code{fibo} is not
 | 
						||
defined).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There is even a variant to import all names that a module defines:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> from fibo import *
 | 
						||
>>> fib(500)
 | 
						||
1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This imports all names except those beginning with an underscore
 | 
						||
(\code{_}).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{The Module Search Path \label{searchPath}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\indexiii{module}{search}{path}
 | 
						||
When a module named \module{spam} is imported, the interpreter searches
 | 
						||
for a file named \file{spam.py} in the current directory,
 | 
						||
and then in the list of directories specified by
 | 
						||
the environment variable \envvar{PYTHONPATH}.  This has the same syntax as
 | 
						||
the shell variable \envvar{PATH}, that is, a list of
 | 
						||
directory names.  When \envvar{PYTHONPATH} is not set, or when the file
 | 
						||
is not found there, the search continues in an installation-dependent
 | 
						||
default path; on \UNIX, this is usually \file{.:/usr/local/lib/python}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Actually, modules are searched in the list of directories given by the 
 | 
						||
variable \code{sys.path} which is initialized from the directory 
 | 
						||
containing the input script (or the current directory),
 | 
						||
\envvar{PYTHONPATH} and the installation-dependent default.  This allows
 | 
						||
Python programs that know what they're doing to modify or replace the 
 | 
						||
module search path.  Note that because the directory containing the
 | 
						||
script being run is on the search path, it is important that the
 | 
						||
script not have the same name as a standard module, or Python will
 | 
						||
attempt to load the script as a module when that module is imported.
 | 
						||
This will generally be an error.  See section~\ref{standardModules},
 | 
						||
``Standard Modules,'' for more information.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{``Compiled'' Python files}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
As an important speed-up of the start-up time for short programs that
 | 
						||
use a lot of standard modules, if a file called \file{spam.pyc} exists
 | 
						||
in the directory where \file{spam.py} is found, this is assumed to
 | 
						||
contain an already-``byte-compiled'' version of the module \module{spam}.
 | 
						||
The modification time of the version of \file{spam.py} used to create
 | 
						||
\file{spam.pyc} is recorded in \file{spam.pyc}, and the
 | 
						||
\file{.pyc} file is ignored if these don't match.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Normally, you don't need to do anything to create the
 | 
						||
\file{spam.pyc} file.  Whenever \file{spam.py} is successfully
 | 
						||
compiled, an attempt is made to write the compiled version to
 | 
						||
\file{spam.pyc}.  It is not an error if this attempt fails; if for any
 | 
						||
reason the file is not written completely, the resulting
 | 
						||
\file{spam.pyc} file will be recognized as invalid and thus ignored
 | 
						||
later.  The contents of the \file{spam.pyc} file are platform
 | 
						||
independent, so a Python module directory can be shared by machines of
 | 
						||
different architectures.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Some tips for experts:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{itemize}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
When the Python interpreter is invoked with the \programopt{-O} flag,
 | 
						||
optimized code is generated and stored in \file{.pyo} files.  The
 | 
						||
optimizer currently doesn't help much; it only removes
 | 
						||
\keyword{assert} statements.  When \programopt{-O} is used, \emph{all}
 | 
						||
bytecode is optimized; \code{.pyc} files are ignored and \code{.py}
 | 
						||
files are compiled to optimized bytecode.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
Passing two \programopt{-O} flags to the Python interpreter
 | 
						||
(\programopt{-OO}) will cause the bytecode compiler to perform
 | 
						||
optimizations that could in some rare cases result in malfunctioning
 | 
						||
programs.  Currently only \code{__doc__} strings are removed from the
 | 
						||
bytecode, resulting in more compact \file{.pyo} files.  Since some
 | 
						||
programs may rely on having these available, you should only use this
 | 
						||
option if you know what you're doing.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
A program doesn't run any faster when it is read from a \file{.pyc} or
 | 
						||
\file{.pyo} file than when it is read from a \file{.py} file; the only
 | 
						||
thing that's faster about \file{.pyc} or \file{.pyo} files is the
 | 
						||
speed with which they are loaded.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
When a script is run by giving its name on the command line, the
 | 
						||
bytecode for the script is never written to a \file{.pyc} or
 | 
						||
\file{.pyo} file.  Thus, the startup time of a script may be reduced
 | 
						||
by moving most of its code to a module and having a small bootstrap
 | 
						||
script that imports that module.  It is also possible to name a
 | 
						||
\file{.pyc} or \file{.pyo} file directly on the command line.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
It is possible to have a file called \file{spam.pyc} (or
 | 
						||
\file{spam.pyo} when \programopt{-O} is used) without a file
 | 
						||
\file{spam.py} for the same module.  This can be used to distribute a
 | 
						||
library of Python code in a form that is moderately hard to reverse
 | 
						||
engineer.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
The module \ulink{\module{compileall}}{../lib/module-compileall.html}%
 | 
						||
{} \refstmodindex{compileall} can create \file{.pyc} files (or
 | 
						||
\file{.pyo} files when \programopt{-O} is used) for all modules in a
 | 
						||
directory.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\end{itemize}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Standard Modules \label{standardModules}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Python comes with a library of standard modules, described in a separate
 | 
						||
document, the \citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library Reference}
 | 
						||
(``Library Reference'' hereafter).  Some modules are built into the
 | 
						||
interpreter; these provide access to operations that are not part of
 | 
						||
the core of the language but are nevertheless built in, either for
 | 
						||
efficiency or to provide access to operating system primitives such as
 | 
						||
system calls.  The set of such modules is a configuration option which
 | 
						||
also depends on the underlying platform  For example,
 | 
						||
the \module{amoeba} module is only provided on systems that somehow
 | 
						||
support Amoeba primitives.  One particular module deserves some
 | 
						||
attention: \ulink{\module{sys}}{../lib/module-sys.html}%
 | 
						||
\refstmodindex{sys}, which is built into every 
 | 
						||
Python interpreter.  The variables \code{sys.ps1} and
 | 
						||
\code{sys.ps2} define the strings used as primary and secondary
 | 
						||
prompts:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import sys
 | 
						||
>>> sys.ps1
 | 
						||
'>>> '
 | 
						||
>>> sys.ps2
 | 
						||
'... '
 | 
						||
>>> sys.ps1 = 'C> '
 | 
						||
C> print 'Yuck!'
 | 
						||
Yuck!
 | 
						||
C>
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
These two variables are only defined if the interpreter is in
 | 
						||
interactive mode.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The variable \code{sys.path} is a list of strings that determine the
 | 
						||
interpreter's search path for modules. It is initialized to a default
 | 
						||
path taken from the environment variable \envvar{PYTHONPATH}, or from
 | 
						||
a built-in default if \envvar{PYTHONPATH} is not set.  You can modify
 | 
						||
it using standard list operations: 
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import sys
 | 
						||
>>> sys.path.append('/ufs/guido/lib/python')
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{The \function{dir()} Function \label{dir}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The built-in function \function{dir()} is used to find out which names
 | 
						||
a module defines.  It returns a sorted list of strings:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import fibo, sys
 | 
						||
>>> dir(fibo)
 | 
						||
['__name__', 'fib', 'fib2']
 | 
						||
>>> dir(sys)
 | 
						||
['__displayhook__', '__doc__', '__excepthook__', '__name__', '__stderr__',
 | 
						||
 '__stdin__', '__stdout__', '_getframe', 'api_version', 'argv', 
 | 
						||
 'builtin_module_names', 'byteorder', 'callstats', 'copyright',
 | 
						||
 'displayhook', 'exc_clear', 'exc_info', 'exc_type', 'excepthook',
 | 
						||
 'exec_prefix', 'executable', 'exit', 'getdefaultencoding', 'getdlopenflags',
 | 
						||
 'getrecursionlimit', 'getrefcount', 'hexversion', 'maxint', 'maxunicode',
 | 
						||
 'meta_path', 'modules', 'path', 'path_hooks', 'path_importer_cache',
 | 
						||
 'platform', 'prefix', 'ps1', 'ps2', 'setcheckinterval', 'setdlopenflags',
 | 
						||
 'setprofile', 'setrecursionlimit', 'settrace', 'stderr', 'stdin', 'stdout',
 | 
						||
 'version', 'version_info', 'warnoptions']
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Without arguments, \function{dir()} lists the names you have defined
 | 
						||
currently:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
 | 
						||
>>> import fibo, sys
 | 
						||
>>> fib = fibo.fib
 | 
						||
>>> dir()
 | 
						||
['__name__', 'a', 'fib', 'fibo', 'sys']
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that it lists all types of names: variables, modules, functions, etc.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\function{dir()} does not list the names of built-in functions and
 | 
						||
variables.  If you want a list of those, they are defined in the
 | 
						||
standard module \module{__builtin__}\refbimodindex{__builtin__}:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import __builtin__
 | 
						||
>>> dir(__builtin__)
 | 
						||
['ArithmeticError', 'AssertionError', 'AttributeError',
 | 
						||
 'DeprecationWarning', 'EOFError', 'Ellipsis', 'EnvironmentError',
 | 
						||
 'Exception', 'False', 'FloatingPointError', 'IOError', 'ImportError',
 | 
						||
 'IndentationError', 'IndexError', 'KeyError', 'KeyboardInterrupt',
 | 
						||
 'LookupError', 'MemoryError', 'NameError', 'None', 'NotImplemented',
 | 
						||
 'NotImplementedError', 'OSError', 'OverflowError', 'OverflowWarning',
 | 
						||
 'PendingDeprecationWarning', 'ReferenceError',
 | 
						||
 'RuntimeError', 'RuntimeWarning', 'StandardError', 'StopIteration',
 | 
						||
 'SyntaxError', 'SyntaxWarning', 'SystemError', 'SystemExit', 'TabError',
 | 
						||
 'True', 'TypeError', 'UnboundLocalError', 'UnicodeError', 'UserWarning',
 | 
						||
 'ValueError', 'Warning', 'ZeroDivisionError', '__debug__', '__doc__',
 | 
						||
 '__import__', '__name__', 'abs', 'apply', 'bool', 'buffer',
 | 
						||
 'callable', 'chr', 'classmethod', 'cmp', 'coerce', 'compile', 'complex',
 | 
						||
 'copyright', 'credits', 'delattr', 'dict', 'dir', 'divmod',
 | 
						||
 'enumerate', 'eval', 'execfile', 'exit', 'file', 'filter', 'float',
 | 
						||
 'getattr', 'globals', 'hasattr', 'hash', 'help', 'hex', 'id',
 | 
						||
 'input', 'int', 'intern', 'isinstance', 'issubclass', 'iter',
 | 
						||
 'len', 'license', 'list', 'locals', 'long', 'map', 'max', 'min',
 | 
						||
 'object', 'oct', 'open', 'ord', 'pow', 'property', 'quit',
 | 
						||
 'range', 'raw_input', 'reduce', 'reload', 'repr', 'round',
 | 
						||
 'setattr', 'slice', 'staticmethod', 'str', 'string', 'sum', 'super',
 | 
						||
 'tuple', 'type', 'unichr', 'unicode', 'vars', 'xrange', 'zip']
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Packages \label{packages}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Packages are a way of structuring Python's module namespace
 | 
						||
by using ``dotted module names''.  For example, the module name
 | 
						||
\module{A.B} designates a submodule named \samp{B} in a package named
 | 
						||
\samp{A}.  Just like the use of modules saves the authors of different
 | 
						||
modules from having to worry about each other's global variable names,
 | 
						||
the use of dotted module names saves the authors of multi-module
 | 
						||
packages like NumPy or the Python Imaging Library from having to worry
 | 
						||
about each other's module names.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Suppose you want to design a collection of modules (a ``package'') for
 | 
						||
the uniform handling of sound files and sound data.  There are many
 | 
						||
different sound file formats (usually recognized by their extension,
 | 
						||
for example: \file{.wav}, \file{.aiff}, \file{.au}), so you may need
 | 
						||
to create and maintain a growing collection of modules for the
 | 
						||
conversion between the various file formats.  There are also many
 | 
						||
different operations you might want to perform on sound data (such as
 | 
						||
mixing, adding echo, applying an equalizer function, creating an
 | 
						||
artificial stereo effect), so in addition you will be writing a
 | 
						||
never-ending stream of modules to perform these operations.  Here's a
 | 
						||
possible structure for your package (expressed in terms of a
 | 
						||
hierarchical filesystem):
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
Sound/                          Top-level package
 | 
						||
      __init__.py               Initialize the sound package
 | 
						||
      Formats/                  Subpackage for file format conversions
 | 
						||
              __init__.py
 | 
						||
              wavread.py
 | 
						||
              wavwrite.py
 | 
						||
              aiffread.py
 | 
						||
              aiffwrite.py
 | 
						||
              auread.py
 | 
						||
              auwrite.py
 | 
						||
              ...
 | 
						||
      Effects/                  Subpackage for sound effects
 | 
						||
              __init__.py
 | 
						||
              echo.py
 | 
						||
              surround.py
 | 
						||
              reverse.py
 | 
						||
              ...
 | 
						||
      Filters/                  Subpackage for filters
 | 
						||
              __init__.py
 | 
						||
              equalizer.py
 | 
						||
              vocoder.py
 | 
						||
              karaoke.py
 | 
						||
              ...
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When importing the package, Python searches through the directories
 | 
						||
on \code{sys.path} looking for the package subdirectory.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \file{__init__.py} files are required to make Python treat the
 | 
						||
directories as containing packages; this is done to prevent
 | 
						||
directories with a common name, such as \samp{string}, from
 | 
						||
unintentionally hiding valid modules that occur later on the module
 | 
						||
search path. In the simplest case, \file{__init__.py} can just be an
 | 
						||
empty file, but it can also execute initialization code for the
 | 
						||
package or set the \code{__all__} variable, described later.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Users of the package can import individual modules from the
 | 
						||
package, for example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
import Sound.Effects.echo
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This loads the submodule \module{Sound.Effects.echo}.  It must be referenced
 | 
						||
with its full name.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
Sound.Effects.echo.echofilter(input, output, delay=0.7, atten=4)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
An alternative way of importing the submodule is:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
from Sound.Effects import echo
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This also loads the submodule \module{echo}, and makes it available without
 | 
						||
its package prefix, so it can be used as follows:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
echo.echofilter(input, output, delay=0.7, atten=4)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Yet another variation is to import the desired function or variable directly:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
from Sound.Effects.echo import echofilter
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Again, this loads the submodule \module{echo}, but this makes its function
 | 
						||
\function{echofilter()} directly available:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
echofilter(input, output, delay=0.7, atten=4)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that when using \code{from \var{package} import \var{item}}, the
 | 
						||
item can be either a submodule (or subpackage) of the package, or some 
 | 
						||
other name defined in the package, like a function, class or
 | 
						||
variable.  The \code{import} statement first tests whether the item is
 | 
						||
defined in the package; if not, it assumes it is a module and attempts
 | 
						||
to load it.  If it fails to find it, an
 | 
						||
\exception{ImportError} exception is raised.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Contrarily, when using syntax like \code{import
 | 
						||
\var{item.subitem.subsubitem}}, each item except for the last must be
 | 
						||
a package; the last item can be a module or a package but can't be a
 | 
						||
class or function or variable defined in the previous item.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Importing * From a Package \label{pkg-import-star}}
 | 
						||
%The \code{__all__} Attribute
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Now what happens when the user writes \code{from Sound.Effects import
 | 
						||
*}?  Ideally, one would hope that this somehow goes out to the
 | 
						||
filesystem, finds which submodules are present in the package, and
 | 
						||
imports them all.  Unfortunately, this operation does not work very
 | 
						||
well on Mac and Windows platforms, where the filesystem does not
 | 
						||
always have accurate information about the case of a filename!  On
 | 
						||
these platforms, there is no guaranteed way to know whether a file
 | 
						||
\file{ECHO.PY} should be imported as a module \module{echo},
 | 
						||
\module{Echo} or \module{ECHO}.  (For example, Windows 95 has the
 | 
						||
annoying practice of showing all file names with a capitalized first
 | 
						||
letter.)  The DOS 8+3 filename restriction adds another interesting
 | 
						||
problem for long module names.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The only solution is for the package author to provide an explicit
 | 
						||
index of the package.  The import statement uses the following
 | 
						||
convention: if a package's \file{__init__.py} code defines a list
 | 
						||
named \code{__all__}, it is taken to be the list of module names that
 | 
						||
should be imported when \code{from \var{package} import *} is
 | 
						||
encountered.  It is up to the package author to keep this list
 | 
						||
up-to-date when a new version of the package is released.  Package
 | 
						||
authors may also decide not to support it, if they don't see a use for
 | 
						||
importing * from their package.  For example, the file
 | 
						||
\file{Sounds/Effects/__init__.py} could contain the following code:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
__all__ = ["echo", "surround", "reverse"]
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This would mean that \code{from Sound.Effects import *} would
 | 
						||
import the three named submodules of the \module{Sound} package.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If \code{__all__} is not defined, the statement \code{from Sound.Effects
 | 
						||
import *} does \emph{not} import all submodules from the package
 | 
						||
\module{Sound.Effects} into the current namespace; it only ensures that the
 | 
						||
package \module{Sound.Effects} has been imported (possibly running its
 | 
						||
initialization code, \file{__init__.py}) and then imports whatever names are
 | 
						||
defined in the package.  This includes any names defined (and
 | 
						||
submodules explicitly loaded) by \file{__init__.py}.  It also includes any
 | 
						||
submodules of the package that were explicitly loaded by previous
 | 
						||
import statements.  Consider this code:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
import Sound.Effects.echo
 | 
						||
import Sound.Effects.surround
 | 
						||
from Sound.Effects import *
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In this example, the echo and surround modules are imported in the
 | 
						||
current namespace because they are defined in the
 | 
						||
\module{Sound.Effects} package when the \code{from...import} statement
 | 
						||
is executed.  (This also works when \code{__all__} is defined.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that in general the practice of importing \code{*} from a module or
 | 
						||
package is frowned upon, since it often causes poorly readable code.
 | 
						||
However, it is okay to use it to save typing in interactive sessions,
 | 
						||
and certain modules are designed to export only names that follow
 | 
						||
certain patterns.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Remember, there is nothing wrong with using \code{from Package
 | 
						||
import specific_submodule}!  In fact, this is the
 | 
						||
recommended notation unless the importing module needs to use
 | 
						||
submodules with the same name from different packages.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Intra-package References}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The submodules often need to refer to each other.  For example, the
 | 
						||
\module{surround} module might use the \module{echo} module.  In fact,
 | 
						||
such references
 | 
						||
are so common that the \keyword{import} statement first looks in the
 | 
						||
containing package before looking in the standard module search path.
 | 
						||
Thus, the surround module can simply use \code{import echo} or
 | 
						||
\code{from echo import echofilter}.  If the imported module is not
 | 
						||
found in the current package (the package of which the current module
 | 
						||
is a submodule), the \keyword{import} statement looks for a top-level
 | 
						||
module with the given name.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When packages are structured into subpackages (as with the
 | 
						||
\module{Sound} package in the example), there's no shortcut to refer
 | 
						||
to submodules of sibling packages - the full name of the subpackage
 | 
						||
must be used.  For example, if the module
 | 
						||
\module{Sound.Filters.vocoder} needs to use the \module{echo} module
 | 
						||
in the \module{Sound.Effects} package, it can use \code{from
 | 
						||
Sound.Effects import echo}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Packages in Multiple Directories}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Packages support one more special attribute, \member{__path__}.  This
 | 
						||
is initialized to be a list containing the name of the directory
 | 
						||
holding the package's \file{__init__.py} before the code in that file
 | 
						||
is executed.  This variable can be modified; doing so affects future
 | 
						||
searches for modules and subpackages contained in the package.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
While this feature is not often needed, it can be used to extend the
 | 
						||
set of modules found in a package.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{Input and Output \label{io}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There are several ways to present the output of a program; data can be
 | 
						||
printed in a human-readable form, or written to a file for future use.
 | 
						||
This chapter will discuss some of the possibilities.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Fancier Output Formatting \label{formatting}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
So far we've encountered two ways of writing values: \emph{expression
 | 
						||
statements} and the \keyword{print} statement.  (A third way is using
 | 
						||
the \method{write()} method of file objects; the standard output file
 | 
						||
can be referenced as \code{sys.stdout}.  See the Library Reference for
 | 
						||
more information on this.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Often you'll want more control over the formatting of your output than
 | 
						||
simply printing space-separated values.  There are two ways to format
 | 
						||
your output; the first way is to do all the string handling yourself;
 | 
						||
using string slicing and concatenation operations you can create any
 | 
						||
lay-out you can imagine.  The standard module
 | 
						||
\module{string}\refstmodindex{string} contains some useful operations
 | 
						||
for padding strings to a given column width; these will be discussed
 | 
						||
shortly.  The second way is to use the \code{\%} operator with a
 | 
						||
string as the left argument.  The \code{\%} operator interprets the
 | 
						||
left argument much like a \cfunction{sprintf()}-style format
 | 
						||
string to be applied to the right argument, and returns the string
 | 
						||
resulting from this formatting operation.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
One question remains, of course: how do you convert values to strings?
 | 
						||
Luckily, Python has ways to convert any value to a string: pass it to
 | 
						||
the \function{repr()}  or \function{str()} functions.  Reverse quotes
 | 
						||
(\code{``}) are equivalent to \function{repr()}, but their use is
 | 
						||
discouraged.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \function{str()} function is meant to return representations of
 | 
						||
values which are fairly human-readable, while \function{repr()} is
 | 
						||
meant to generate representations which can be read by the interpreter
 | 
						||
(or will force a \exception{SyntaxError} if there is not equivalent
 | 
						||
syntax).  For objects which don't have a particular representation for
 | 
						||
human consumption, \function{str()} will return the same value as
 | 
						||
\function{repr()}.  Many values, such as numbers or structures like
 | 
						||
lists and dictionaries, have the same representation using either
 | 
						||
function.  Strings and floating point numbers, in particular, have two
 | 
						||
distinct representations.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Some examples:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> s = 'Hello, world.'
 | 
						||
>>> str(s)
 | 
						||
'Hello, world.'
 | 
						||
>>> repr(s)
 | 
						||
"'Hello, world.'"
 | 
						||
>>> str(0.1)
 | 
						||
'0.1'
 | 
						||
>>> repr(0.1)
 | 
						||
'0.10000000000000001'
 | 
						||
>>> x = 10 * 3.25
 | 
						||
>>> y = 200 * 200
 | 
						||
>>> s = 'The value of x is ' + repr(x) + ', and y is ' + repr(y) + '...'
 | 
						||
>>> print s
 | 
						||
The value of x is 32.5, and y is 40000...
 | 
						||
>>> # The repr() of a string adds string quotes and backslashes:
 | 
						||
... hello = 'hello, world\n'
 | 
						||
>>> hellos = repr(hello)
 | 
						||
>>> print hellos
 | 
						||
'hello, world\n'
 | 
						||
>>> # The argument to repr() may be any Python object:
 | 
						||
... repr((x, y, ('spam', 'eggs')))
 | 
						||
"(32.5, 40000, ('spam', 'eggs'))"
 | 
						||
>>> # reverse quotes are convenient in interactive sessions:
 | 
						||
... `x, y, ('spam', 'eggs')`
 | 
						||
"(32.5, 40000, ('spam', 'eggs'))"
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Here are two ways to write a table of squares and cubes:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> for x in range(1, 11):
 | 
						||
...     print repr(x).rjust(2), repr(x*x).rjust(3),
 | 
						||
...     # Note trailing comma on previous line
 | 
						||
...     print repr(x*x*x).rjust(4)
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
 1   1    1
 | 
						||
 2   4    8
 | 
						||
 3   9   27
 | 
						||
 4  16   64
 | 
						||
 5  25  125
 | 
						||
 6  36  216
 | 
						||
 7  49  343
 | 
						||
 8  64  512
 | 
						||
 9  81  729
 | 
						||
10 100 1000
 | 
						||
>>> for x in range(1,11):
 | 
						||
...     print '%2d %3d %4d' % (x, x*x, x*x*x)
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
 1   1    1
 | 
						||
 2   4    8
 | 
						||
 3   9   27
 | 
						||
 4  16   64
 | 
						||
 5  25  125
 | 
						||
 6  36  216
 | 
						||
 7  49  343
 | 
						||
 8  64  512
 | 
						||
 9  81  729
 | 
						||
10 100 1000
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
(Note that one space between each column was added by the way
 | 
						||
\keyword{print} works: it always adds spaces between its arguments.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This example demonstrates the \method{rjust()} method of string objects,
 | 
						||
which right-justifies a string in a field of a given width by padding
 | 
						||
it with spaces on the left.  There are similar methods
 | 
						||
\method{ljust()} and \method{center()}.  These
 | 
						||
methods do not write anything, they just return a new string.  If
 | 
						||
the input string is too long, they don't truncate it, but return it
 | 
						||
unchanged; this will mess up your column lay-out but that's usually
 | 
						||
better than the alternative, which would be lying about a value.  (If
 | 
						||
you really want truncation you can always add a slice operation, as in
 | 
						||
\samp{x.ljust(~n)[:n]}.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There is another method, \method{zfill()}, which pads a
 | 
						||
numeric string on the left with zeros.  It understands about plus and
 | 
						||
minus signs:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> '12'.zfill(5)
 | 
						||
'00012'
 | 
						||
>>> '-3.14'.zfill(7)
 | 
						||
'-003.14'
 | 
						||
>>> '3.14159265359'.zfill(5)
 | 
						||
'3.14159265359'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Using the \code{\%} operator looks like this:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import math
 | 
						||
>>> print 'The value of PI is approximately %5.3f.' % math.pi
 | 
						||
The value of PI is approximately 3.142.
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If there is more than one format in the string, you need to pass a
 | 
						||
tuple as right operand, as in this example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> table = {'Sjoerd': 4127, 'Jack': 4098, 'Dcab': 7678}
 | 
						||
>>> for name, phone in table.items():
 | 
						||
...     print '%-10s ==> %10d' % (name, phone)
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
Jack       ==>       4098
 | 
						||
Dcab       ==>       7678
 | 
						||
Sjoerd     ==>       4127
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Most formats work exactly as in C and require that you pass the proper
 | 
						||
type; however, if you don't you get an exception, not a core dump.
 | 
						||
The \code{\%s} format is more relaxed: if the corresponding argument is
 | 
						||
not a string object, it is converted to string using the
 | 
						||
\function{str()} built-in function.  Using \code{*} to pass the width
 | 
						||
or precision in as a separate (integer) argument is supported.  The
 | 
						||
C formats \code{\%n} and \code{\%p} are not supported.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you have a really long format string that you don't want to split
 | 
						||
up, it would be nice if you could reference the variables to be
 | 
						||
formatted by name instead of by position.  This can be done by using
 | 
						||
form \code{\%(name)format}, as shown here:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> table = {'Sjoerd': 4127, 'Jack': 4098, 'Dcab': 8637678}
 | 
						||
>>> print 'Jack: %(Jack)d; Sjoerd: %(Sjoerd)d; Dcab: %(Dcab)d' % table
 | 
						||
Jack: 4098; Sjoerd: 4127; Dcab: 8637678
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This is particularly useful in combination with the new built-in
 | 
						||
\function{vars()} function, which returns a dictionary containing all
 | 
						||
local variables.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Reading and Writing Files \label{files}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
% Opening files 
 | 
						||
\function{open()}\bifuncindex{open} returns a file
 | 
						||
object\obindex{file}, and is most commonly used with two arguments:
 | 
						||
\samp{open(\var{filename}, \var{mode})}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> f=open('/tmp/workfile', 'w')
 | 
						||
>>> print f
 | 
						||
<open file '/tmp/workfile', mode 'w' at 80a0960>
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The first argument is a string containing the filename.  The second
 | 
						||
argument is another string containing a few characters describing the
 | 
						||
way in which the file will be used.  \var{mode} can be \code{'r'} when
 | 
						||
the file will only be read, \code{'w'} for only writing (an existing
 | 
						||
file with the same name will be erased), and \code{'a'} opens the file
 | 
						||
for appending; any data written to the file is automatically added to
 | 
						||
the end.  \code{'r+'} opens the file for both reading and writing.
 | 
						||
The \var{mode} argument is optional; \code{'r'} will be assumed if
 | 
						||
it's omitted.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
On Windows and the Macintosh, \code{'b'} appended to the
 | 
						||
mode opens the file in binary mode, so there are also modes like
 | 
						||
\code{'rb'}, \code{'wb'}, and \code{'r+b'}.  Windows makes a
 | 
						||
distinction between text and binary files; the end-of-line characters
 | 
						||
in text files are automatically altered slightly when data is read or
 | 
						||
written.  This behind-the-scenes modification to file data is fine for
 | 
						||
\ASCII{} text files, but it'll corrupt binary data like that in JPEGs or
 | 
						||
\file{.EXE} files.  Be very careful to use binary mode when reading and
 | 
						||
writing such files.  (Note that the precise semantics of text mode on
 | 
						||
the Macintosh depends on the underlying C library being used.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Methods of File Objects \label{fileMethods}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The rest of the examples in this section will assume that a file
 | 
						||
object called \code{f} has already been created.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
To read a file's contents, call \code{f.read(\var{size})}, which reads
 | 
						||
some quantity of data and returns it as a string.  \var{size} is an
 | 
						||
optional numeric argument.  When \var{size} is omitted or negative,
 | 
						||
the entire contents of the file will be read and returned; it's your
 | 
						||
problem if the file is twice as large as your machine's memory.
 | 
						||
Otherwise, at most \var{size} bytes are read and returned.  If the end
 | 
						||
of the file has been reached, \code{f.read()} will return an empty
 | 
						||
string (\code {""}).
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> f.read()
 | 
						||
'This is the entire file.\n'
 | 
						||
>>> f.read()
 | 
						||
''
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\code{f.readline()} reads a single line from the file; a newline
 | 
						||
character (\code{\e n}) is left at the end of the string, and is only
 | 
						||
omitted on the last line of the file if the file doesn't end in a
 | 
						||
newline.  This makes the return value unambiguous; if
 | 
						||
\code{f.readline()} returns an empty string, the end of the file has
 | 
						||
been reached, while a blank line is represented by \code{'\e n'}, a
 | 
						||
string containing only a single newline.  
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> f.readline()
 | 
						||
'This is the first line of the file.\n'
 | 
						||
>>> f.readline()
 | 
						||
'Second line of the file\n'
 | 
						||
>>> f.readline()
 | 
						||
''
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\code{f.readlines()} returns a list containing all the lines of data
 | 
						||
in the file.  If given an optional parameter \var{sizehint}, it reads
 | 
						||
that many bytes from the file and enough more to complete a line, and
 | 
						||
returns the lines from that.  This is often used to allow efficient
 | 
						||
reading of a large file by lines, but without having to load the
 | 
						||
entire file in memory.  Only complete lines will be returned.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> f.readlines()
 | 
						||
['This is the first line of the file.\n', 'Second line of the file\n']
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\code{f.write(\var{string})} writes the contents of \var{string} to
 | 
						||
the file, returning \code{None}.  
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> f.write('This is a test\n')
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\code{f.tell()} returns an integer giving the file object's current
 | 
						||
position in the file, measured in bytes from the beginning of the
 | 
						||
file.  To change the file object's position, use
 | 
						||
\samp{f.seek(\var{offset}, \var{from_what})}.  The position is
 | 
						||
computed from adding \var{offset} to a reference point; the reference
 | 
						||
point is selected by the \var{from_what} argument.  A
 | 
						||
\var{from_what} value of 0 measures from the beginning of the file, 1
 | 
						||
uses the current file position, and 2 uses the end of the file as the
 | 
						||
reference point.  \var{from_what} can be omitted and defaults to 0,
 | 
						||
using the beginning of the file as the reference point.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> f=open('/tmp/workfile', 'r+')
 | 
						||
>>> f.write('0123456789abcdef')
 | 
						||
>>> f.seek(5)     # Go to the 6th byte in the file
 | 
						||
>>> f.read(1)        
 | 
						||
'5'
 | 
						||
>>> f.seek(-3, 2) # Go to the 3rd byte before the end
 | 
						||
>>> f.read(1)
 | 
						||
'd'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When you're done with a file, call \code{f.close()} to close it and
 | 
						||
free up any system resources taken up by the open file.  After calling
 | 
						||
\code{f.close()}, attempts to use the file object will automatically fail.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> f.close()
 | 
						||
>>> f.read()
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
ValueError: I/O operation on closed file
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
File objects have some additional methods, such as
 | 
						||
\method{isatty()} and \method{truncate()} which are less frequently
 | 
						||
used; consult the Library Reference for a complete guide to file
 | 
						||
objects.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{The \module{pickle} Module \label{pickle}}
 | 
						||
\refstmodindex{pickle}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Strings can easily be written to and read from a file. Numbers take a
 | 
						||
bit more effort, since the \method{read()} method only returns
 | 
						||
strings, which will have to be passed to a function like
 | 
						||
\function{int()}, which takes a string like \code{'123'} and
 | 
						||
returns its numeric value 123.  However, when you want to save more
 | 
						||
complex data types like lists, dictionaries, or class instances,
 | 
						||
things get a lot more complicated.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Rather than have users be constantly writing and debugging code to
 | 
						||
save complicated data types, Python provides a standard module called
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{pickle}}{../lib/module-pickle.html}.  This is an
 | 
						||
amazing module that can take almost
 | 
						||
any Python object (even some forms of Python code!), and convert it to
 | 
						||
a string representation; this process is called \dfn{pickling}.  
 | 
						||
Reconstructing the object from the string representation is called
 | 
						||
\dfn{unpickling}.  Between pickling and unpickling, the string
 | 
						||
representing the object may have been stored in a file or data, or
 | 
						||
sent over a network connection to some distant machine.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you have an object \code{x}, and a file object \code{f} that's been
 | 
						||
opened for writing, the simplest way to pickle the object takes only
 | 
						||
one line of code:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
pickle.dump(x, f)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
To unpickle the object again, if \code{f} is a file object which has
 | 
						||
been opened for reading:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
x = pickle.load(f)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
(There are other variants of this, used when pickling many objects or
 | 
						||
when you don't want to write the pickled data to a file; consult the
 | 
						||
complete documentation for
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{pickle}}{../lib/module-pickle.html} in the
 | 
						||
\citetitle[../lib/]{Python Library Reference}.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{pickle}}{../lib/module-pickle.html} is the standard way
 | 
						||
to make Python objects which can be stored and reused by other
 | 
						||
programs or by a future invocation of the same program; the technical
 | 
						||
term for this is a \dfn{persistent} object.  Because
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{pickle}}{../lib/module-pickle.html} is so widely used,
 | 
						||
many authors who write Python extensions take care to ensure that new
 | 
						||
data types such as matrices can be properly pickled and unpickled.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{Errors and Exceptions \label{errors}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Until now error messages haven't been more than mentioned, but if you
 | 
						||
have tried out the examples you have probably seen some.  There are
 | 
						||
(at least) two distinguishable kinds of errors:
 | 
						||
\emph{syntax errors} and \emph{exceptions}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Syntax Errors \label{syntaxErrors}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Syntax errors, also known as parsing errors, are perhaps the most common
 | 
						||
kind of complaint you get while you are still learning Python:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> while True print 'Hello world'
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
    while True print 'Hello world'
 | 
						||
                   ^
 | 
						||
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The parser repeats the offending line and displays a little `arrow'
 | 
						||
pointing at the earliest point in the line where the error was
 | 
						||
detected.  The error is caused by (or at least detected at) the token
 | 
						||
\emph{preceding} the arrow: in the example, the error is detected at
 | 
						||
the keyword \keyword{print}, since a colon (\character{:}) is missing
 | 
						||
before it.  File name and line number are printed so you know where to
 | 
						||
look in case the input came from a script.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Exceptions \label{exceptions}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Even if a statement or expression is syntactically correct, it may
 | 
						||
cause an error when an attempt is made to execute it.
 | 
						||
Errors detected during execution are called \emph{exceptions} and are
 | 
						||
not unconditionally fatal: you will soon learn how to handle them in
 | 
						||
Python programs.  Most exceptions are not handled by programs,
 | 
						||
however, and result in error messages as shown here:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 10 * (1/0)
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
ZeroDivisionError: integer division or modulo by zero
 | 
						||
>>> 4 + spam*3
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
NameError: name 'spam' is not defined
 | 
						||
>>> '2' + 2
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
TypeError: cannot concatenate 'str' and 'int' objects
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The last line of the error message indicates what happened.
 | 
						||
Exceptions come in different types, and the type is printed as part of
 | 
						||
the message: the types in the example are
 | 
						||
\exception{ZeroDivisionError}, \exception{NameError} and
 | 
						||
\exception{TypeError}.
 | 
						||
The string printed as the exception type is the name of the built-in
 | 
						||
name for the exception that occurred.  This is true for all built-in
 | 
						||
exceptions, but need not be true for user-defined exceptions (although
 | 
						||
it is a useful convention).
 | 
						||
Standard exception names are built-in identifiers (not reserved
 | 
						||
keywords).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The rest of the line is a detail whose interpretation depends on the
 | 
						||
exception type; its meaning is dependent on the exception type.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The preceding part of the error message shows the context where the
 | 
						||
exception happened, in the form of a stack backtrace.
 | 
						||
In general it contains a stack backtrace listing source lines; however,
 | 
						||
it will not display lines read from standard input.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \citetitle[../lib/module-exceptions.html]{Python Library
 | 
						||
Reference} lists the built-in exceptions and their meanings.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Handling Exceptions \label{handling}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is possible to write programs that handle selected exceptions.
 | 
						||
Look at the following example, which asks the user for input until a
 | 
						||
valid integer has been entered, but allows the user to interrupt the
 | 
						||
program (using \kbd{Control-C} or whatever the operating system
 | 
						||
supports); note that a user-generated interruption is signalled by
 | 
						||
raising the \exception{KeyboardInterrupt} exception.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> while True:
 | 
						||
...     try:
 | 
						||
...         x = int(raw_input("Please enter a number: "))
 | 
						||
...         break
 | 
						||
...     except ValueError:
 | 
						||
...         print "Oops! That was no valid number.  Try again..."
 | 
						||
...     
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \keyword{try} statement works as follows.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{itemize}
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
First, the \emph{try clause} (the statement(s) between the
 | 
						||
\keyword{try} and \keyword{except} keywords) is executed.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
If no exception occurs, the \emph{except\ clause} is skipped and
 | 
						||
execution of the \keyword{try} statement is finished.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
If an exception occurs during execution of the try clause, the rest of
 | 
						||
the clause is skipped.  Then if its type matches the exception named
 | 
						||
after the \keyword{except} keyword, the rest of the try clause is
 | 
						||
skipped, the except clause is executed, and then execution continues
 | 
						||
after the \keyword{try} statement.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\item
 | 
						||
If an exception occurs which does not match the exception named in the
 | 
						||
except clause, it is passed on to outer \keyword{try} statements; if
 | 
						||
no handler is found, it is an \emph{unhandled exception} and execution
 | 
						||
stops with a message as shown above.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\end{itemize}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A \keyword{try} statement may have more than one except clause, to
 | 
						||
specify handlers for different exceptions.  At most one handler will
 | 
						||
be executed.  Handlers only handle exceptions that occur in the
 | 
						||
corresponding try clause, not in other handlers of the same
 | 
						||
\keyword{try} statement.  An except clause may name multiple exceptions
 | 
						||
as a parenthesized list, for example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
... except (RuntimeError, TypeError, NameError):
 | 
						||
...     pass
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The last except clause may omit the exception name(s), to serve as a
 | 
						||
wildcard.  Use this with extreme caution, since it is easy to mask a
 | 
						||
real programming error in this way!  It can also be used to print an
 | 
						||
error message and then re-raise the exception (allowing a caller to
 | 
						||
handle the exception as well):
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
import sys
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
try:
 | 
						||
    f = open('myfile.txt')
 | 
						||
    s = f.readline()
 | 
						||
    i = int(s.strip())
 | 
						||
except IOError, (errno, strerror):
 | 
						||
    print "I/O error(%s): %s" % (errno, strerror)
 | 
						||
except ValueError:
 | 
						||
    print "Could not convert data to an integer."
 | 
						||
except:
 | 
						||
    print "Unexpected error:", sys.exc_info()[0]
 | 
						||
    raise
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \keyword{try} \ldots\ \keyword{except} statement has an optional
 | 
						||
\emph{else clause}, which, when present, must follow all except
 | 
						||
clauses.  It is useful for code that must be executed if the try
 | 
						||
clause does not raise an exception.  For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
for arg in sys.argv[1:]:
 | 
						||
    try:
 | 
						||
        f = open(arg, 'r')
 | 
						||
    except IOError:
 | 
						||
        print 'cannot open', arg
 | 
						||
    else:
 | 
						||
        print arg, 'has', len(f.readlines()), 'lines'
 | 
						||
        f.close()
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The use of the \keyword{else} clause is better than adding additional
 | 
						||
code to the \keyword{try} clause because it avoids accidentally
 | 
						||
catching an exception that wasn't raised by the code being protected
 | 
						||
by the \keyword{try} \ldots\ \keyword{except} statement.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When an exception occurs, it may have an associated value, also known as
 | 
						||
the exception's \emph{argument}.
 | 
						||
The presence and type of the argument depend on the exception type.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The except clause may specify a variable after the exception name (or list).
 | 
						||
The variable is bound to an exception instance with the arguments stored
 | 
						||
in \code{instance.args}.  For convenience, the exception instance
 | 
						||
defines \method{__getitem__} and \method{__str__} so the arguments can
 | 
						||
be accessed or printed directly without having to reference \code{.args}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> try:
 | 
						||
...    raise Exception('spam', 'eggs')
 | 
						||
... except Exception, inst:
 | 
						||
...    print type(inst)     # the exception instance
 | 
						||
...    print inst.args      # arguments stored in .args
 | 
						||
...    print inst           # __str__ allows args to printed directly
 | 
						||
...    x, y = inst          # __getitem__ allows args to be unpacked directly
 | 
						||
...    print 'x =', x
 | 
						||
...    print 'y =', y
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
<type 'instance'>
 | 
						||
('spam', 'eggs')
 | 
						||
('spam', 'eggs')
 | 
						||
x = spam
 | 
						||
y = eggs
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If an exception has an argument, it is printed as the last part
 | 
						||
(`detail') of the message for unhandled exceptions.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Exception handlers don't just handle exceptions if they occur
 | 
						||
immediately in the try clause, but also if they occur inside functions
 | 
						||
that are called (even indirectly) in the try clause.
 | 
						||
For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> def this_fails():
 | 
						||
...     x = 1/0
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
>>> try:
 | 
						||
...     this_fails()
 | 
						||
... except ZeroDivisionError, detail:
 | 
						||
...     print 'Handling run-time error:', detail
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
Handling run-time error: integer division or modulo
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Raising Exceptions \label{raising}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \keyword{raise} statement allows the programmer to force a
 | 
						||
specified exception to occur.
 | 
						||
For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> raise NameError, 'HiThere'
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
NameError: HiThere
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The first argument to \keyword{raise} names the exception to be
 | 
						||
raised.  The optional second argument specifies the exception's
 | 
						||
argument.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you need to determine whether an exception was raised but don't
 | 
						||
intend to handle it, a simpler form of the \keyword{raise} statement
 | 
						||
allows you to re-raise the exception:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> try:
 | 
						||
...     raise NameError, 'HiThere'
 | 
						||
... except NameError:
 | 
						||
...     print 'An exception flew by!'
 | 
						||
...     raise
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
An exception flew by!
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 2, in ?
 | 
						||
NameError: HiThere
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{User-defined Exceptions \label{userExceptions}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Programs may name their own exceptions by creating a new exception
 | 
						||
class.  Exceptions should typically be derived from the
 | 
						||
\exception{Exception} class, either directly or indirectly.  For
 | 
						||
example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> class MyError(Exception):
 | 
						||
...     def __init__(self, value):
 | 
						||
...         self.value = value
 | 
						||
...     def __str__(self):
 | 
						||
...         return repr(self.value)
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
>>> try:
 | 
						||
...     raise MyError(2*2)
 | 
						||
... except MyError, e:
 | 
						||
...     print 'My exception occurred, value:', e.value
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
My exception occurred, value: 4
 | 
						||
>>> raise MyError, 'oops!'
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
 | 
						||
__main__.MyError: 'oops!'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Exception classes can be defined which do anything any other class can
 | 
						||
do, but are usually kept simple, often only offering a number of
 | 
						||
attributes that allow information about the error to be extracted by
 | 
						||
handlers for the exception.  When creating a module which can raise
 | 
						||
several distinct errors, a common practice is to create a base class
 | 
						||
for exceptions defined by that module, and subclass that to create
 | 
						||
specific exception classes for different error conditions:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
class Error(Exception):
 | 
						||
    """Base class for exceptions in this module."""
 | 
						||
    pass
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
class InputError(Error):
 | 
						||
    """Exception raised for errors in the input.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    Attributes:
 | 
						||
        expression -- input expression in which the error occurred
 | 
						||
        message -- explanation of the error
 | 
						||
    """
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    def __init__(self, expression, message):
 | 
						||
        self.expression = expression
 | 
						||
        self.message = message
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
class TransitionError(Error):
 | 
						||
    """Raised when an operation attempts a state transition that's not
 | 
						||
    allowed.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    Attributes:
 | 
						||
        previous -- state at beginning of transition
 | 
						||
        next -- attempted new state
 | 
						||
        message -- explanation of why the specific transition is not allowed
 | 
						||
    """
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    def __init__(self, previous, next, message):
 | 
						||
        self.previous = previous
 | 
						||
        self.next = next
 | 
						||
        self.message = message
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Most exceptions are defined with names that end in ``Error,'' similar
 | 
						||
to the naming of the standard exceptions.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Many standard modules define their own exceptions to report errors
 | 
						||
that may occur in functions they define.  More information on classes
 | 
						||
is presented in chapter \ref{classes}, ``Classes.''
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Defining Clean-up Actions \label{cleanup}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \keyword{try} statement has another optional clause which is
 | 
						||
intended to define clean-up actions that must be executed under all
 | 
						||
circumstances.  For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> try:
 | 
						||
...     raise KeyboardInterrupt
 | 
						||
... finally:
 | 
						||
...     print 'Goodbye, world!'
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
Goodbye, world!
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<stdin>", line 2, in ?
 | 
						||
KeyboardInterrupt
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A \emph{finally clause} is executed whether or not an exception has
 | 
						||
occurred in the try clause.  When an exception has occurred, it is
 | 
						||
re-raised after the finally clause is executed.  The finally clause is
 | 
						||
also executed ``on the way out'' when the \keyword{try} statement is
 | 
						||
left via a \keyword{break} or \keyword{return} statement.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The code in the finally clause is useful for releasing external
 | 
						||
resources (such as files or network connections), regardless of
 | 
						||
whether or not the use of the resource was successful.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A \keyword{try} statement must either have one or more except clauses
 | 
						||
or one finally clause, but not both.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{Classes \label{classes}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Python's class mechanism adds classes to the language with a minimum
 | 
						||
of new syntax and semantics.  It is a mixture of the class mechanisms
 | 
						||
found in \Cpp{} and Modula-3.  As is true for modules, classes in Python
 | 
						||
do not put an absolute barrier between definition and user, but rather
 | 
						||
rely on the politeness of the user not to ``break into the
 | 
						||
definition.''  The most important features of classes are retained
 | 
						||
with full power, however: the class inheritance mechanism allows
 | 
						||
multiple base classes, a derived class can override any methods of its
 | 
						||
base class or classes, a method can call the method of a base class with the
 | 
						||
same name.  Objects can contain an arbitrary amount of private data.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In \Cpp{} terminology, all class members (including the data members) are
 | 
						||
\emph{public}, and all member functions are \emph{virtual}.  There are
 | 
						||
no special constructors or destructors.  As in Modula-3, there are no
 | 
						||
shorthands for referencing the object's members from its methods: the
 | 
						||
method function is declared with an explicit first argument
 | 
						||
representing the object, which is provided implicitly by the call.  As
 | 
						||
in Smalltalk, classes themselves are objects, albeit in the wider
 | 
						||
sense of the word: in Python, all data types are objects.  This
 | 
						||
provides semantics for importing and renaming.  Unlike 
 | 
						||
\Cpp{} and Modula-3, built-in types can be used as base classes for
 | 
						||
extension by the user.  Also, like in \Cpp{} but unlike in Modula-3, most
 | 
						||
built-in operators with special syntax (arithmetic operators,
 | 
						||
subscripting etc.) can be redefined for class instances.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{A Word About Terminology \label{terminology}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Lacking universally accepted terminology to talk about classes, I will
 | 
						||
make occasional use of Smalltalk and \Cpp{} terms.  (I would use Modula-3
 | 
						||
terms, since its object-oriented semantics are closer to those of
 | 
						||
Python than \Cpp, but I expect that few readers have heard of it.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
I also have to warn you that there's a terminological pitfall for
 | 
						||
object-oriented readers: the word ``object'' in Python does not
 | 
						||
necessarily mean a class instance.  Like \Cpp{} and Modula-3, and
 | 
						||
unlike Smalltalk, not all types in Python are classes: the basic
 | 
						||
built-in types like integers and lists are not, and even somewhat more
 | 
						||
exotic types like files aren't.  However, \emph{all} Python types
 | 
						||
share a little bit of common semantics that is best described by using
 | 
						||
the word object.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Objects have individuality, and multiple names (in multiple scopes)
 | 
						||
can be bound to the same object.  This is known as aliasing in other
 | 
						||
languages.  This is usually not appreciated on a first glance at
 | 
						||
Python, and can be safely ignored when dealing with immutable basic
 | 
						||
types (numbers, strings, tuples).  However, aliasing has an
 | 
						||
(intended!) effect on the semantics of Python code involving mutable
 | 
						||
objects such as lists, dictionaries, and most types representing
 | 
						||
entities outside the program (files, windows, etc.).  This is usually
 | 
						||
used to the benefit of the program, since aliases behave like pointers
 | 
						||
in some respects.  For example, passing an object is cheap since only
 | 
						||
a pointer is passed by the implementation; and if a function modifies
 | 
						||
an object passed as an argument, the caller will see the change --- this
 | 
						||
eliminates the need for two different argument passing mechanisms as in
 | 
						||
Pascal.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Python Scopes and Name Spaces \label{scopes}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Before introducing classes, I first have to tell you something about
 | 
						||
Python's scope rules.  Class definitions play some neat tricks with
 | 
						||
namespaces, and you need to know how scopes and namespaces work to
 | 
						||
fully understand what's going on.  Incidentally, knowledge about this
 | 
						||
subject is useful for any advanced Python programmer.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Let's begin with some definitions.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A \emph{namespace} is a mapping from names to objects.  Most
 | 
						||
namespaces are currently implemented as Python dictionaries, but
 | 
						||
that's normally not noticeable in any way (except for performance),
 | 
						||
and it may change in the future.  Examples of namespaces are: the set
 | 
						||
of built-in names (functions such as \function{abs()}, and built-in
 | 
						||
exception names); the global names in a module; and the local names in
 | 
						||
a function invocation.  In a sense the set of attributes of an object
 | 
						||
also form a namespace.  The important thing to know about namespaces
 | 
						||
is that there is absolutely no relation between names in different
 | 
						||
namespaces; for instance, two different modules may both define a
 | 
						||
function ``maximize'' without confusion --- users of the modules must
 | 
						||
prefix it with the module name.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
By the way, I use the word \emph{attribute} for any name following a
 | 
						||
dot --- for example, in the expression \code{z.real}, \code{real} is
 | 
						||
an attribute of the object \code{z}.  Strictly speaking, references to
 | 
						||
names in modules are attribute references: in the expression
 | 
						||
\code{modname.funcname}, \code{modname} is a module object and
 | 
						||
\code{funcname} is an attribute of it.  In this case there happens to
 | 
						||
be a straightforward mapping between the module's attributes and the
 | 
						||
global names defined in the module: they share the same namespace!
 | 
						||
\footnote{
 | 
						||
        Except for one thing.  Module objects have a secret read-only
 | 
						||
        attribute called \member{__dict__} which returns the dictionary
 | 
						||
        used to implement the module's namespace; the name
 | 
						||
        \member{__dict__} is an attribute but not a global name.
 | 
						||
        Obviously, using this violates the abstraction of namespace
 | 
						||
        implementation, and should be restricted to things like
 | 
						||
        post-mortem debuggers.
 | 
						||
}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Attributes may be read-only or writable.  In the latter case,
 | 
						||
assignment to attributes is possible.  Module attributes are writable:
 | 
						||
you can write \samp{modname.the_answer = 42}.  Writable attributes may
 | 
						||
also be deleted with the \keyword{del} statement.  For example,
 | 
						||
\samp{del modname.the_answer} will remove the attribute
 | 
						||
\member{the_answer} from the object named by \code{modname}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Name spaces are created at different moments and have different
 | 
						||
lifetimes.  The namespace containing the built-in names is created
 | 
						||
when the Python interpreter starts up, and is never deleted.  The
 | 
						||
global namespace for a module is created when the module definition
 | 
						||
is read in; normally, module namespaces also last until the
 | 
						||
interpreter quits.  The statements executed by the top-level
 | 
						||
invocation of the interpreter, either read from a script file or
 | 
						||
interactively, are considered part of a module called
 | 
						||
\module{__main__}, so they have their own global namespace.  (The
 | 
						||
built-in names actually also live in a module; this is called
 | 
						||
\module{__builtin__}.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The local namespace for a function is created when the function is
 | 
						||
called, and deleted when the function returns or raises an exception
 | 
						||
that is not handled within the function.  (Actually, forgetting would
 | 
						||
be a better way to describe what actually happens.)  Of course,
 | 
						||
recursive invocations each have their own local namespace.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A \emph{scope} is a textual region of a Python program where a
 | 
						||
namespace is directly accessible.  ``Directly accessible'' here means
 | 
						||
that an unqualified reference to a name attempts to find the name in
 | 
						||
the namespace.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Although scopes are determined statically, they are used dynamically.
 | 
						||
At any time during execution, there are at least three nested scopes whose
 | 
						||
namespaces are directly accessible: the innermost scope, which is searched
 | 
						||
first, contains the local names; the namespaces of any enclosing
 | 
						||
functions, which are searched starting with the nearest enclosing scope;
 | 
						||
the middle scope, searched next, contains the current module's global names;
 | 
						||
and the outermost scope (searched last) is the namespace containing built-in
 | 
						||
names.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If a name is declared global, then all references and assignments go
 | 
						||
directly to the middle scope containing the module's global names.
 | 
						||
Otherwise, all variables found outside of the innermost scope are read-only.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Usually, the local scope references the local names of the (textually)
 | 
						||
current function.  Outside of functions, the local scope references
 | 
						||
the same namespace as the global scope: the module's namespace.
 | 
						||
Class definitions place yet another namespace in the local scope.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is important to realize that scopes are determined textually: the
 | 
						||
global scope of a function defined in a module is that module's
 | 
						||
namespace, no matter from where or by what alias the function is
 | 
						||
called.  On the other hand, the actual search for names is done
 | 
						||
dynamically, at run time --- however, the language definition is
 | 
						||
evolving towards static name resolution, at ``compile'' time, so don't
 | 
						||
rely on dynamic name resolution!  (In fact, local variables are
 | 
						||
already determined statically.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A special quirk of Python is that assignments always go into the
 | 
						||
innermost scope.  Assignments do not copy data --- they just
 | 
						||
bind names to objects.  The same is true for deletions: the statement
 | 
						||
\samp{del x} removes the binding of \code{x} from the namespace
 | 
						||
referenced by the local scope.  In fact, all operations that introduce
 | 
						||
new names use the local scope: in particular, import statements and
 | 
						||
function definitions bind the module or function name in the local
 | 
						||
scope.  (The \keyword{global} statement can be used to indicate that
 | 
						||
particular variables live in the global scope.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{A First Look at Classes \label{firstClasses}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Classes introduce a little bit of new syntax, three new object types,
 | 
						||
and some new semantics.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Class Definition Syntax \label{classDefinition}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The simplest form of class definition looks like this:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
class ClassName:
 | 
						||
    <statement-1>
 | 
						||
    .
 | 
						||
    .
 | 
						||
    .
 | 
						||
    <statement-N>
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Class definitions, like function definitions
 | 
						||
(\keyword{def} statements) must be executed before they have any
 | 
						||
effect.  (You could conceivably place a class definition in a branch
 | 
						||
of an \keyword{if} statement, or inside a function.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In practice, the statements inside a class definition will usually be
 | 
						||
function definitions, but other statements are allowed, and sometimes
 | 
						||
useful --- we'll come back to this later.  The function definitions
 | 
						||
inside a class normally have a peculiar form of argument list,
 | 
						||
dictated by the calling conventions for methods --- again, this is
 | 
						||
explained later.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When a class definition is entered, a new namespace is created, and
 | 
						||
used as the local scope --- thus, all assignments to local variables
 | 
						||
go into this new namespace.  In particular, function definitions bind
 | 
						||
the name of the new function here.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When a class definition is left normally (via the end), a \emph{class
 | 
						||
object} is created.  This is basically a wrapper around the contents
 | 
						||
of the namespace created by the class definition; we'll learn more
 | 
						||
about class objects in the next section.  The original local scope
 | 
						||
(the one in effect just before the class definitions was entered) is
 | 
						||
reinstated, and the class object is bound here to the class name given
 | 
						||
in the class definition header (\class{ClassName} in the example).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Class Objects \label{classObjects}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Class objects support two kinds of operations: attribute references
 | 
						||
and instantiation.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\emph{Attribute references} use the standard syntax used for all
 | 
						||
attribute references in Python: \code{obj.name}.  Valid attribute
 | 
						||
names are all the names that were in the class's namespace when the
 | 
						||
class object was created.  So, if the class definition looked like
 | 
						||
this:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
class MyClass:
 | 
						||
    "A simple example class"
 | 
						||
    i = 12345
 | 
						||
    def f(self):
 | 
						||
        return 'hello world'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
then \code{MyClass.i} and \code{MyClass.f} are valid attribute
 | 
						||
references, returning an integer and a method object, respectively.
 | 
						||
Class attributes can also be assigned to, so you can change the value
 | 
						||
of \code{MyClass.i} by assignment.  \member{__doc__} is also a valid
 | 
						||
attribute, returning the docstring belonging to the class: \code{"A
 | 
						||
simple example class"}. 
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Class \emph{instantiation} uses function notation.  Just pretend that
 | 
						||
the class object is a parameterless function that returns a new
 | 
						||
instance of the class.  For example (assuming the above class):
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
x = MyClass()
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
creates a new \emph{instance} of the class and assigns this object to
 | 
						||
the local variable \code{x}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The instantiation operation (``calling'' a class object) creates an
 | 
						||
empty object.  Many classes like to create objects in a known initial
 | 
						||
state.  Therefore a class may define a special method named
 | 
						||
\method{__init__()}, like this:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
    def __init__(self):
 | 
						||
        self.data = []
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When a class defines an \method{__init__()} method, class
 | 
						||
instantiation automatically invokes \method{__init__()} for the
 | 
						||
newly-created class instance.  So in this example, a new, initialized
 | 
						||
instance can be obtained by:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
x = MyClass()
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Of course, the \method{__init__()} method may have arguments for
 | 
						||
greater flexibility.  In that case, arguments given to the class
 | 
						||
instantiation operator are passed on to \method{__init__()}.  For
 | 
						||
example,
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> class Complex:
 | 
						||
...     def __init__(self, realpart, imagpart):
 | 
						||
...         self.r = realpart
 | 
						||
...         self.i = imagpart
 | 
						||
... 
 | 
						||
>>> x = Complex(3.0, -4.5)
 | 
						||
>>> x.r, x.i
 | 
						||
(3.0, -4.5)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Instance Objects \label{instanceObjects}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Now what can we do with instance objects?  The only operations
 | 
						||
understood by instance objects are attribute references.  There are
 | 
						||
two kinds of valid attribute names.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The first I'll call \emph{data attributes}.  These correspond to
 | 
						||
``instance variables'' in Smalltalk, and to ``data members'' in
 | 
						||
\Cpp.  Data attributes need not be declared; like local variables,
 | 
						||
they spring into existence when they are first assigned to.  For
 | 
						||
example, if \code{x} is the instance of \class{MyClass} created above,
 | 
						||
the following piece of code will print the value \code{16}, without
 | 
						||
leaving a trace:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
x.counter = 1
 | 
						||
while x.counter < 10:
 | 
						||
    x.counter = x.counter * 2
 | 
						||
print x.counter
 | 
						||
del x.counter
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The second kind of attribute references understood by instance objects
 | 
						||
are \emph{methods}.  A method is a function that ``belongs to'' an
 | 
						||
object.  (In Python, the term method is not unique to class instances:
 | 
						||
other object types can have methods as well.  For example, list objects have
 | 
						||
methods called append, insert, remove, sort, and so on.  However,
 | 
						||
below, we'll use the term method exclusively to mean methods of class
 | 
						||
instance objects, unless explicitly stated otherwise.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Valid method names of an instance object depend on its class.  By
 | 
						||
definition, all attributes of a class that are (user-defined) function 
 | 
						||
objects define corresponding methods of its instances.  So in our
 | 
						||
example, \code{x.f} is a valid method reference, since
 | 
						||
\code{MyClass.f} is a function, but \code{x.i} is not, since
 | 
						||
\code{MyClass.i} is not.  But \code{x.f} is not the same thing as
 | 
						||
\code{MyClass.f} --- it is a \obindex{method}\emph{method object}, not
 | 
						||
a function object.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Method Objects \label{methodObjects}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Usually, a method is called immediately:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
x.f()
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In our example, this will return the string \code{'hello world'}.
 | 
						||
However, it is not necessary to call a method right away:
 | 
						||
\code{x.f} is a method object, and can be stored away and called at a
 | 
						||
later time.  For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
xf = x.f
 | 
						||
while True:
 | 
						||
    print xf()
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
will continue to print \samp{hello world} until the end of time.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
What exactly happens when a method is called?  You may have noticed
 | 
						||
that \code{x.f()} was called without an argument above, even though
 | 
						||
the function definition for \method{f} specified an argument.  What
 | 
						||
happened to the argument?  Surely Python raises an exception when a
 | 
						||
function that requires an argument is called without any --- even if
 | 
						||
the argument isn't actually used...
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Actually, you may have guessed the answer: the special thing about
 | 
						||
methods is that the object is passed as the first argument of the
 | 
						||
function.  In our example, the call \code{x.f()} is exactly equivalent
 | 
						||
to \code{MyClass.f(x)}.  In general, calling a method with a list of
 | 
						||
\var{n} arguments is equivalent to calling the corresponding function
 | 
						||
with an argument list that is created by inserting the method's object
 | 
						||
before the first argument.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you still don't understand how methods work, a look at the
 | 
						||
implementation can perhaps clarify matters.  When an instance
 | 
						||
attribute is referenced that isn't a data attribute, its class is
 | 
						||
searched.  If the name denotes a valid class attribute that is a
 | 
						||
function object, a method object is created by packing (pointers to)
 | 
						||
the instance object and the function object just found together in an
 | 
						||
abstract object: this is the method object.  When the method object is
 | 
						||
called with an argument list, it is unpacked again, a new argument
 | 
						||
list is constructed from the instance object and the original argument
 | 
						||
list, and the function object is called with this new argument list.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Random Remarks \label{remarks}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
% [These should perhaps be placed more carefully...]
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Data attributes override method attributes with the same name; to
 | 
						||
avoid accidental name conflicts, which may cause hard-to-find bugs in
 | 
						||
large programs, it is wise to use some kind of convention that
 | 
						||
minimizes the chance of conflicts.  Possible conventions include
 | 
						||
capitalizing method names, prefixing data attribute names with a small
 | 
						||
unique string (perhaps just an underscore), or using verbs for methods
 | 
						||
and nouns for data attributes.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Data attributes may be referenced by methods as well as by ordinary
 | 
						||
users (``clients'') of an object.  In other words, classes are not
 | 
						||
usable to implement pure abstract data types.  In fact, nothing in
 | 
						||
Python makes it possible to enforce data hiding --- it is all based
 | 
						||
upon convention.  (On the other hand, the Python implementation,
 | 
						||
written in C, can completely hide implementation details and control
 | 
						||
access to an object if necessary; this can be used by extensions to
 | 
						||
Python written in C.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Clients should use data attributes with care --- clients may mess up
 | 
						||
invariants maintained by the methods by stamping on their data
 | 
						||
attributes.  Note that clients may add data attributes of their own to
 | 
						||
an instance object without affecting the validity of the methods, as
 | 
						||
long as name conflicts are avoided --- again, a naming convention can
 | 
						||
save a lot of headaches here.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There is no shorthand for referencing data attributes (or other
 | 
						||
methods!) from within methods.  I find that this actually increases
 | 
						||
the readability of methods: there is no chance of confusing local
 | 
						||
variables and instance variables when glancing through a method.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Conventionally, the first argument of methods is often called
 | 
						||
\code{self}.  This is nothing more than a convention: the name
 | 
						||
\code{self} has absolutely no special meaning to Python.  (Note,
 | 
						||
however, that by not following the convention your code may be less
 | 
						||
readable by other Python programmers, and it is also conceivable that
 | 
						||
a \emph{class browser} program be written which relies upon such a
 | 
						||
convention.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Any function object that is a class attribute defines a method for
 | 
						||
instances of that class.  It is not necessary that the function
 | 
						||
definition is textually enclosed in the class definition: assigning a
 | 
						||
function object to a local variable in the class is also ok.  For
 | 
						||
example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
# Function defined outside the class
 | 
						||
def f1(self, x, y):
 | 
						||
    return min(x, x+y)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
class C:
 | 
						||
    f = f1
 | 
						||
    def g(self):
 | 
						||
        return 'hello world'
 | 
						||
    h = g
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Now \code{f}, \code{g} and \code{h} are all attributes of class
 | 
						||
\class{C} that refer to function objects, and consequently they are all
 | 
						||
methods of instances of \class{C} --- \code{h} being exactly equivalent
 | 
						||
to \code{g}.  Note that this practice usually only serves to confuse
 | 
						||
the reader of a program.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Methods may call other methods by using method attributes of the
 | 
						||
\code{self} argument:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
class Bag:
 | 
						||
    def __init__(self):
 | 
						||
        self.data = []
 | 
						||
    def add(self, x):
 | 
						||
        self.data.append(x)
 | 
						||
    def addtwice(self, x):
 | 
						||
        self.add(x)
 | 
						||
        self.add(x)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Methods may reference global names in the same way as ordinary
 | 
						||
functions.  The global scope associated with a method is the module
 | 
						||
containing the class definition.  (The class itself is never used as a
 | 
						||
global scope!)  While one rarely encounters a good reason for using
 | 
						||
global data in a method, there are many legitimate uses of the global
 | 
						||
scope: for one thing, functions and modules imported into the global
 | 
						||
scope can be used by methods, as well as functions and classes defined
 | 
						||
in it.  Usually, the class containing the method is itself defined in
 | 
						||
this global scope, and in the next section we'll find some good
 | 
						||
reasons why a method would want to reference its own class!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Inheritance \label{inheritance}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Of course, a language feature would not be worthy of the name ``class''
 | 
						||
without supporting inheritance.  The syntax for a derived class
 | 
						||
definition looks as follows:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
class DerivedClassName(BaseClassName):
 | 
						||
    <statement-1>
 | 
						||
    .
 | 
						||
    .
 | 
						||
    .
 | 
						||
    <statement-N>
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The name \class{BaseClassName} must be defined in a scope containing
 | 
						||
the derived class definition.  Instead of a base class name, an
 | 
						||
expression is also allowed.  This is useful when the base class is
 | 
						||
defined in another module,
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
class DerivedClassName(modname.BaseClassName):
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Execution of a derived class definition proceeds the same as for a
 | 
						||
base class.  When the class object is constructed, the base class is
 | 
						||
remembered.  This is used for resolving attribute references: if a
 | 
						||
requested attribute is not found in the class, it is searched in the
 | 
						||
base class.  This rule is applied recursively if the base class itself
 | 
						||
is derived from some other class.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There's nothing special about instantiation of derived classes:
 | 
						||
\code{DerivedClassName()} creates a new instance of the class.  Method
 | 
						||
references are resolved as follows: the corresponding class attribute
 | 
						||
is searched, descending down the chain of base classes if necessary,
 | 
						||
and the method reference is valid if this yields a function object.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Derived classes may override methods of their base classes.  Because
 | 
						||
methods have no special privileges when calling other methods of the
 | 
						||
same object, a method of a base class that calls another method
 | 
						||
defined in the same base class, may in fact end up calling a method of
 | 
						||
a derived class that overrides it.  (For \Cpp{} programmers: all methods
 | 
						||
in Python are effectively \keyword{virtual}.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
An overriding method in a derived class may in fact want to extend
 | 
						||
rather than simply replace the base class method of the same name.
 | 
						||
There is a simple way to call the base class method directly: just
 | 
						||
call \samp{BaseClassName.methodname(self, arguments)}.  This is
 | 
						||
occasionally useful to clients as well.  (Note that this only works if
 | 
						||
the base class is defined or imported directly in the global scope.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\subsection{Multiple Inheritance \label{multiple}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Python supports a limited form of multiple inheritance as well.  A
 | 
						||
class definition with multiple base classes looks as follows:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
class DerivedClassName(Base1, Base2, Base3):
 | 
						||
    <statement-1>
 | 
						||
    .
 | 
						||
    .
 | 
						||
    .
 | 
						||
    <statement-N>
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The only rule necessary to explain the semantics is the resolution
 | 
						||
rule used for class attribute references.  This is depth-first,
 | 
						||
left-to-right.  Thus, if an attribute is not found in
 | 
						||
\class{DerivedClassName}, it is searched in \class{Base1}, then
 | 
						||
(recursively) in the base classes of \class{Base1}, and only if it is
 | 
						||
not found there, it is searched in \class{Base2}, and so on.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
(To some people breadth first --- searching \class{Base2} and
 | 
						||
\class{Base3} before the base classes of \class{Base1} --- looks more
 | 
						||
natural.  However, this would require you to know whether a particular
 | 
						||
attribute of \class{Base1} is actually defined in \class{Base1} or in
 | 
						||
one of its base classes before you can figure out the consequences of
 | 
						||
a name conflict with an attribute of \class{Base2}.  The depth-first
 | 
						||
rule makes no differences between direct and inherited attributes of
 | 
						||
\class{Base1}.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is clear that indiscriminate use of multiple inheritance is a
 | 
						||
maintenance nightmare, given the reliance in Python on conventions to
 | 
						||
avoid accidental name conflicts.  A well-known problem with multiple
 | 
						||
inheritance is a class derived from two classes that happen to have a
 | 
						||
common base class.  While it is easy enough to figure out what happens
 | 
						||
in this case (the instance will have a single copy of ``instance
 | 
						||
variables'' or data attributes used by the common base class), it is
 | 
						||
not clear that these semantics are in any way useful.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Private Variables \label{private}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There is limited support for class-private
 | 
						||
identifiers.  Any identifier of the form \code{__spam} (at least two
 | 
						||
leading underscores, at most one trailing underscore) is now textually
 | 
						||
replaced with \code{_classname__spam}, where \code{classname} is the
 | 
						||
current class name with leading underscore(s) stripped.  This mangling
 | 
						||
is done without regard of the syntactic position of the identifier, so
 | 
						||
it can be used to define class-private instance and class variables,
 | 
						||
methods, as well as globals, and even to store instance variables
 | 
						||
private to this class on instances of \emph{other} classes.  Truncation
 | 
						||
may occur when the mangled name would be longer than 255 characters.
 | 
						||
Outside classes, or when the class name consists of only underscores,
 | 
						||
no mangling occurs.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Name mangling is intended to give classes an easy way to define
 | 
						||
``private'' instance variables and methods, without having to worry
 | 
						||
about instance variables defined by derived classes, or mucking with
 | 
						||
instance variables by code outside the class.  Note that the mangling
 | 
						||
rules are designed mostly to avoid accidents; it still is possible for
 | 
						||
a determined soul to access or modify a variable that is considered
 | 
						||
private.  This can even be useful in special circumstances, such as in
 | 
						||
the debugger, and that's one reason why this loophole is not closed.
 | 
						||
(Buglet: derivation of a class with the same name as the base class
 | 
						||
makes use of private variables of the base class possible.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Notice that code passed to \code{exec}, \code{eval()} or
 | 
						||
\code{evalfile()} does not consider the classname of the invoking 
 | 
						||
class to be the current class; this is similar to the effect of the 
 | 
						||
\code{global} statement, the effect of which is likewise restricted to 
 | 
						||
code that is byte-compiled together.  The same restriction applies to
 | 
						||
\code{getattr()}, \code{setattr()} and \code{delattr()}, as well as
 | 
						||
when referencing \code{__dict__} directly.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Odds and Ends \label{odds}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Sometimes it is useful to have a data type similar to the Pascal
 | 
						||
``record'' or C ``struct'', bundling together a couple of named data
 | 
						||
items.  An empty class definition will do nicely:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
class Employee:
 | 
						||
    pass
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
john = Employee() # Create an empty employee record
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
# Fill the fields of the record
 | 
						||
john.name = 'John Doe'
 | 
						||
john.dept = 'computer lab'
 | 
						||
john.salary = 1000
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A piece of Python code that expects a particular abstract data type
 | 
						||
can often be passed a class that emulates the methods of that data
 | 
						||
type instead.  For instance, if you have a function that formats some
 | 
						||
data from a file object, you can define a class with methods
 | 
						||
\method{read()} and \method{readline()} that gets the data from a string
 | 
						||
buffer instead, and pass it as an argument.%  (Unfortunately, this
 | 
						||
%technique has its limitations: a class can't define operations that
 | 
						||
%are accessed by special syntax such as sequence subscripting or
 | 
						||
%arithmetic operators, and assigning such a ``pseudo-file'' to
 | 
						||
%\code{sys.stdin} will not cause the interpreter to read further input
 | 
						||
%from it.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Instance method objects have attributes, too: \code{m.im_self} is the
 | 
						||
object of which the method is an instance, and \code{m.im_func} is the
 | 
						||
function object corresponding to the method.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Exceptions Are Classes Too\label{exceptionClasses}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
User-defined exceptions are identified by classes as well.  Using this
 | 
						||
mechanism it is possible to create extensible hierarchies of exceptions.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There are two new valid (semantic) forms for the raise statement:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
raise Class, instance
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
raise instance
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In the first form, \code{instance} must be an instance of
 | 
						||
\class{Class} or of a class derived from it.  The second form is a
 | 
						||
shorthand for:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
raise instance.__class__, instance
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A class in an except clause is compatible with an exception if it is the same
 | 
						||
class or a base class thereof (but not the other way around --- an
 | 
						||
except clause listing a derived class is not compatible with a base
 | 
						||
class).  For example, the following code will print B, C, D in that
 | 
						||
order:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
class B:
 | 
						||
    pass
 | 
						||
class C(B):
 | 
						||
    pass
 | 
						||
class D(C):
 | 
						||
    pass
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
for c in [B, C, D]:
 | 
						||
    try:
 | 
						||
        raise c()
 | 
						||
    except D:
 | 
						||
        print "D"
 | 
						||
    except C:
 | 
						||
        print "C"
 | 
						||
    except B:
 | 
						||
        print "B"
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that if the except clauses were reversed (with
 | 
						||
\samp{except B} first), it would have printed B, B, B --- the first
 | 
						||
matching except clause is triggered.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When an error message is printed for an unhandled exception which is a
 | 
						||
class, the class name is printed, then a colon and a space, and
 | 
						||
finally the instance converted to a string using the built-in function
 | 
						||
\function{str()}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Iterators\label{iterators}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
By now, you've probably noticed that most container objects can looped over
 | 
						||
using a \code{for} statement:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
for element in [1, 2, 3]:
 | 
						||
    print element
 | 
						||
for element in (1, 2, 3):
 | 
						||
    print element
 | 
						||
for key in {'one':1, 'two':2}:
 | 
						||
    print key
 | 
						||
for char in "123":
 | 
						||
    print char
 | 
						||
for line in open("myfile.txt"):
 | 
						||
    print line
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This style of access is clear, concise, and convenient.  The use of iterators
 | 
						||
pervades and unifies Python.  Behind the scenes, the \code{for} statement calls
 | 
						||
\function{iter()} on the container object.  The function returns an iterator
 | 
						||
object that defines the method \method{next()} which accesses elements in the
 | 
						||
container one at a time.  When there are no more elements, \method{next()}
 | 
						||
raises a \exception{StopIteration} exception which tells the \code{for} loop
 | 
						||
to terminate.  This example shows how it all works:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> s = 'abc'
 | 
						||
>>> it = iter(s)
 | 
						||
>>> it
 | 
						||
<iterator object at 0x00A1DB50>
 | 
						||
>>> it.next()
 | 
						||
'a'
 | 
						||
>>> it.next()
 | 
						||
'b'
 | 
						||
>>> it.next()
 | 
						||
'c'
 | 
						||
>>> it.next()
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Traceback (most recent call last):
 | 
						||
  File "<pyshell#6>", line 1, in -toplevel-
 | 
						||
    it.next()
 | 
						||
StopIteration
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Having seen the mechanics behind the iterator protocol, it is easy to add
 | 
						||
iterator behavior to your classes.  Define a \method{__iter__()} method
 | 
						||
which returns an object with a \method{next()} method.  If the class defines
 | 
						||
\method{next()}, then \method{__iter__()} can just return \code{self}:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> class Reverse:
 | 
						||
    "Iterator for looping over a sequence backwards"
 | 
						||
    def __init__(self, data):
 | 
						||
        self.data = data
 | 
						||
        self.index = len(data)
 | 
						||
    def __iter__(self):
 | 
						||
        return self
 | 
						||
    def next(self):
 | 
						||
        if self.index == 0:
 | 
						||
            raise StopIteration
 | 
						||
        self.index = self.index - 1
 | 
						||
        return self.data[self.index]
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
>>> for char in Reverse('spam'):
 | 
						||
	print char
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
m
 | 
						||
a
 | 
						||
p
 | 
						||
s
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Generators\label{generators}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Generators are a simple and powerful tool for creating iterators.  They are
 | 
						||
written like regular functions but use the \keyword{yield} statement whenever
 | 
						||
they want to return data.  Each time the \method{next()} is called, the
 | 
						||
generator resumes where it left-off (it remembers all the data values and
 | 
						||
which statement was last executed).  An example shows that generators can
 | 
						||
be trivially easy to create:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> def reverse(data):
 | 
						||
        for index in range(len(data)-1, -1, -1):
 | 
						||
            yield data[index]
 | 
						||
		
 | 
						||
>>> for char in reverse('golf'):
 | 
						||
        print char
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
f
 | 
						||
l
 | 
						||
o
 | 
						||
g	
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Anything that can be done with generators can also be done with class based
 | 
						||
iterators as described in the previous section.  What makes generators so
 | 
						||
compact is that the \method{__iter__()} and \method{next()} methods are
 | 
						||
created automatically.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Another key feature is that the local variables and execution state
 | 
						||
are automatically saved between calls.  This made the function easier to write
 | 
						||
and much more clear than an approach using class variables like
 | 
						||
\code{self.index} and \code{self.data}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In addition to automatic method creation and saving program state, when
 | 
						||
generators terminate, they automatically raise \exception{StopIteration}.
 | 
						||
In combination, these features make it easy to create iterators with no
 | 
						||
more effort than writing a regular function.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{Brief Tour of the Standard Library \label{briefTour}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Operating System Interface\label{os-interface}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \ulink{\module{os}}{../lib/module-os.html}
 | 
						||
module provides dozens of functions for interacting with the
 | 
						||
operating system:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import os
 | 
						||
>>> os.system('time 0:02')
 | 
						||
0
 | 
						||
>>> os.getcwd()      # Return the current working directory
 | 
						||
'C:\\Python24'
 | 
						||
>>> os.chdir('/server/accesslogs')
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Be sure to use the \samp{import os} style instead of
 | 
						||
\samp{from os import *}.  This will keep \function{os.open()} from
 | 
						||
shadowing the builtin \function{open()} function which operates much
 | 
						||
differently.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The builtin \function{dir()} and \function{help()} functions are useful
 | 
						||
as interactive aids for working with large modules like \module{os}:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import os
 | 
						||
>>> dir(os)
 | 
						||
<returns a list of all module functions>
 | 
						||
>>> help(os)
 | 
						||
<returns an extensive manual page created from the module's docstrings>
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
For daily file and directory management tasks, the 
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{shutil}}{../lib/module-shutil.html}
 | 
						||
module provides a higher level interface that is easier to use:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import shutil
 | 
						||
>>> shutil.copyfile('data.db', 'archive.db')
 | 
						||
>>> shutil.move('/build/executables', 'installdir')
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{File Wildcards\label{file-wildcards}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \ulink{\module{glob}}{../lib/module-glob.html}
 | 
						||
module provides a function for making file lists from directory
 | 
						||
wildcard searches:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import glob
 | 
						||
>>> glob.glob('*.py')
 | 
						||
['primes.py', 'random.py', 'quote.py']
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Command Line Arguments\label{command-line-arguments}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Common utility scripts often invoke processing command line arguments.
 | 
						||
These arguments are stored in the
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{sys}}{../lib/module-sys.html}\ module's \var{argv}
 | 
						||
attribute as a list.  For instance the following output results from
 | 
						||
running \samp{python demo.py one two three} at the command line:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import sys
 | 
						||
>>> print sys.argv
 | 
						||
['demo.py', 'one', 'two', 'three']
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \ulink{\module{getopt}}{../lib/module-getopt.html}
 | 
						||
module processes \var{sys.argv} using the conventions of the \UNIX{}
 | 
						||
\function{getopt()} function.  More powerful and flexible command line
 | 
						||
processing is provided by the
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{optparse}}{../lib/module-optparse.html} module.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Error Output Redirection and Program Termination\label{stderr}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \ulink{\module{sys}}{../lib/module-sys.html}
 | 
						||
module also has attributes for \var{stdin}, \var{stdout}, and
 | 
						||
\var{stderr}.  The latter is useful for emitting warnings and error
 | 
						||
messages to make them visible even when \var{stdout} has been redirected:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> sys.stderr.write('Warning, log file not found starting a new one')
 | 
						||
Warning, log file not found starting a new one
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The most direct way to terminate a script is to use \samp{sys.exit()}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{String Pattern Matching\label{string-pattern-matching}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \ulink{\module{re}}{../lib/module-re.html}
 | 
						||
module provides regular expression tools for advanced string processing.
 | 
						||
For complex matching and manipulation, regular expressions offer succinct,
 | 
						||
optimized solutions:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import re
 | 
						||
>>> re.findall(r'\bf[a-z]*', 'which foot or hand fell fastest')
 | 
						||
['foot', 'fell', 'fastest']
 | 
						||
>>> re.sub(r'(\b[a-z]+) \1', r'\1', 'cat in the the hat')
 | 
						||
'cat in the hat'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When only simple capabilities are needed, string methods are preferred
 | 
						||
because they are easier to read and debug:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 'tea for too'.replace('too', 'two')
 | 
						||
'tea for two'
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Mathematics\label{mathematics}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \ulink{\module{math}}{../lib/module-math.html} module gives
 | 
						||
access to the underlying C library functions for floating point math:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import math
 | 
						||
>>> math.cos(math.pi / 4.0)
 | 
						||
0.70710678118654757
 | 
						||
>>> math.log(1024, 2)
 | 
						||
10.0
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \ulink{\module{random}}{../lib/module-random.html}
 | 
						||
module provides tools for making random selections:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import random
 | 
						||
>>> random.choice(['apple', 'pear', 'banana'])
 | 
						||
'apple'
 | 
						||
>>> random.sample(xrange(100), 10)   # sampling without replacement
 | 
						||
[30, 83, 16, 4, 8, 81, 41, 50, 18, 33]
 | 
						||
>>> random.random()    # random float
 | 
						||
0.17970987693706186
 | 
						||
>>> random.randrange(6)    # random integer chosen from range(6)
 | 
						||
4   
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Internet Access\label{internet-access}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
There are a number of modules for accessing the internet and processing
 | 
						||
internet protocols. Two of the simplest are
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{urllib2}}{../lib/module-urllib2.html}
 | 
						||
for retrieving data from urls and
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{smtplib}}{../lib/module-smtplib.html} 
 | 
						||
for sending mail:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import urllib2
 | 
						||
>>> for line in urllib2.urlopen('http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/cgi-bin/timer.pl'):
 | 
						||
... if 'EST' in line:      # look for Eastern Standard Time
 | 
						||
...     print line
 | 
						||
    
 | 
						||
<BR>Nov. 25, 09:43:32 PM EST
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
>>> import smtplib
 | 
						||
>>> server = smtplib.SMTP('localhost')
 | 
						||
>>> server.sendmail('soothsayer@tmp.org', 'jceasar@tmp.org',
 | 
						||
"""To: jceasar@tmp.org
 | 
						||
From: soothsayer@tmp.org
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Beware the Ides of March.
 | 
						||
""")
 | 
						||
>>> server.quit()
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Dates and Times\label{dates-and-times}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \ulink{\module{datetime}}{../lib/module-datetime.html} module
 | 
						||
supplies classes for manipulating dates and times in both simple
 | 
						||
and complex ways. While date and time arithmetic is supported, the
 | 
						||
focus of the implementation is on efficient member extraction for
 | 
						||
output formatting and manipulation.  The module also supports objects
 | 
						||
that are time zone aware.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
# dates are easily constructed and formatted
 | 
						||
>>> from datetime import date
 | 
						||
>>> now = date.today()
 | 
						||
>>> now
 | 
						||
datetime.date(2003, 12, 2)
 | 
						||
>>> now.strftime("%m-%d-%y or %d%b %Y is a %A on the %d day of %B")
 | 
						||
'12-02-03 or 02Dec 2003 is a Tuesday on the 02 day of December'
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
# dates support calendar arithmetic
 | 
						||
>>> birthday = date(1964, 7, 31)
 | 
						||
>>> age = now - birthday
 | 
						||
>>> age.days
 | 
						||
14368
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Data Compression\label{data-compression}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Common data archiving and compression formats are directly supported
 | 
						||
by modules including:
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{zlib}}{../lib/module-zlib.html},
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{gzip}}{../lib/module-gzip.html},
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{bz2}}{../lib/module-bz2.html},
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{zipfile}}{../lib/module-zipfile.html}, and
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{tarfile}}{../lib/module-tarfile.html}.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> import zlib
 | 
						||
>>> s = 'witch which has which witches wrist watch'
 | 
						||
>>> len(s)
 | 
						||
41
 | 
						||
>>> t = zlib.compress(s)
 | 
						||
>>> len(t)
 | 
						||
37
 | 
						||
>>> zlib.decompress(t)
 | 
						||
'witch which has which witches wrist watch'
 | 
						||
>>> zlib.crc32(t)
 | 
						||
-1438085031
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Performance Measurement\label{performance-measurement}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Some Python users develop a deep interest in knowing the relative
 | 
						||
performance between different approaches to the same problem.
 | 
						||
Python provides a measurement tool that answers those questions
 | 
						||
immediately.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
For example, it may be tempting to use the tuple packing and unpacking
 | 
						||
feature instead of the traditional approach to swapping arguments.
 | 
						||
The \ulink{\module{timeit}}{../lib/module-timeit.html} module
 | 
						||
quickly demonstrates that the traditional approach is faster:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> from timeit import Timer
 | 
						||
>>> Timer('t=a; a=b; b=t', 'a=1; b=2').timeit()
 | 
						||
0.60864915603680925
 | 
						||
>>> Timer('a,b = b,a', 'a=1; b=2').timeit()
 | 
						||
0.8625194857439773
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In contrast to \module{timeit}'s fine level of granularity, the
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{profile}}{../lib/module-profile.html} and \module{pstats}
 | 
						||
modules provide tools for identifying time critical sections in larger
 | 
						||
blocks of code.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Quality Control\label{quality-control}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
One approach for developing high quality software is to write tests for
 | 
						||
each function as it is developed and to run those tests frequently during
 | 
						||
the development process.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \ulink{\module{doctest}}{../lib/module-doctest.html} module provides
 | 
						||
a tool for scanning a module and validating tests embedded in a program's
 | 
						||
docstrings.  Test construction is as simple as cutting-and-pasting a
 | 
						||
typical call along with its results into the docstring.  This improves
 | 
						||
the documentation by providing the user with an example and it allows the
 | 
						||
doctest module to make sure the code remains true to the documentation:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
def average(values):
 | 
						||
    """Computes the arithmetic mean of a list of numbers.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    >>> print average([20, 30, 70])
 | 
						||
    40.0
 | 
						||
    """
 | 
						||
    return sum(values, 0.0) / len(values)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
import doctest
 | 
						||
doctest.testmod()   # automatically validate the embedded tests
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The \ulink{\module{unittest}}{../lib/module-unittest.html} module is not
 | 
						||
as effortless as the \module{doctest} module, but it allows a more
 | 
						||
comprehensive set of tests to be maintained in a separate file:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
import unittest
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
class TestStatisticalFunctions(unittest.TestCase):
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    def test_average(self):
 | 
						||
        self.assertEqual(average([20, 30, 70]), 40.0)
 | 
						||
        self.assertEqual(round(average([1, 5, 7]), 1), 4.3)
 | 
						||
        self.assertRaises(ZeroDivisionError, average, [])
 | 
						||
        self.assertRaises(TypeError, average, 20, 30, 70)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
unittest.main() # Calling from the command line invokes all tests
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Batteries Included\label{batteries-included}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Python has a ``batteries included'' philosophy.  This is best seen
 | 
						||
through the sophisticated and robust capabilities of its larger
 | 
						||
packages. For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
* The \ulink{\module{xmlrpclib}}{../lib/module-xmlrpclib.html} and
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{SimpleXMLRPCServer}}{../lib/module-SimpleXMLRPCServer.html}
 | 
						||
modules make implementing remote procedure calls into an almost trivial
 | 
						||
task.  Despite the names, no direct knowledge or handling of XML is needed.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
* The \ulink{\module{email}}{../lib/module-email.html}
 | 
						||
package is a library for managing email messages,
 | 
						||
including MIME and other RFC 2822-based message documents.  Unlike
 | 
						||
\module{smtplib} and \module{poplib} which actually send and receive
 | 
						||
messages, the email package has a complete toolset for building or
 | 
						||
decoding complex message structures (including attachments)
 | 
						||
and for implementing internet encoding and header protocols.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
* The \ulink{\module{xml.dom}}{../lib/module-xml.dom.html} and
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{xml.sax}}{../lib/module-xml.sax.html} packages provide
 | 
						||
robust support for parsing this popular data interchange format.  Likewise,
 | 
						||
the \module{csv} module supports direct reads and writes in a common
 | 
						||
database format.  Together, these modules and packages greatly simplify
 | 
						||
data interchange between python applications and other tools.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
* Internationalization is supported by a number of modules including
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{gettext}}{../lib/module-gettext.html},
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{locale}}{../lib/module-locale.html}, and the
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{codecs}}{../lib/module-codecs.html} package.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{What Now? \label{whatNow}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Reading this tutorial has probably reinforced your interest in using
 | 
						||
Python --- you should be eager to apply Python to solve your
 | 
						||
real-world problems.  Now what should you do?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
You should read, or at least page through, the
 | 
						||
\citetitle[../lib/lib.html]{Python Library Reference},
 | 
						||
which gives complete (though terse) reference material about types,
 | 
						||
functions, and modules that can save you a lot of time when writing
 | 
						||
Python programs.  The standard Python distribution includes a
 | 
						||
\emph{lot} of code in both C and Python; there are modules to read
 | 
						||
\UNIX{} mailboxes, retrieve documents via HTTP, generate random
 | 
						||
numbers, parse command-line options, write CGI programs, compress
 | 
						||
data, and a lot more; skimming through the Library Reference will give
 | 
						||
you an idea of what's available.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The major Python Web site is \url{http://www.python.org/}; it contains
 | 
						||
code, documentation, and pointers to Python-related pages around the
 | 
						||
Web.  This Web site is mirrored in various places around the
 | 
						||
world, such as Europe, Japan, and Australia; a mirror may be faster
 | 
						||
than the main site, depending on your geographical location.  A more
 | 
						||
informal site is \url{http://starship.python.net/}, which contains a
 | 
						||
bunch of Python-related personal home pages; many people have
 | 
						||
downloadable software there. Many more user-created Python modules
 | 
						||
can be found in the \ulink{Python Package
 | 
						||
Index}{http://www.python.org/pypi} (PyPI).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
For Python-related questions and problem reports, you can post to the
 | 
						||
newsgroup \newsgroup{comp.lang.python}, or send them to the mailing
 | 
						||
list at \email{python-list@python.org}.  The newsgroup and mailing list
 | 
						||
are gatewayed, so messages posted to one will automatically be
 | 
						||
forwarded to the other.  There are around 120 postings a day (with peaks
 | 
						||
up to several hundred),
 | 
						||
% Postings figure based on average of last six months activity as
 | 
						||
% reported by www.egroups.com; Jan. 2000 - June 2000: 21272 msgs / 182
 | 
						||
% days = 116.9 msgs / day and steadily increasing.
 | 
						||
asking (and answering) questions, suggesting new features, and
 | 
						||
announcing new modules.  Before posting, be sure to check the list of
 | 
						||
\ulink{Frequently Asked Questions}{http://www.python.org/doc/faq/} (also called the FAQ), or look for it in the
 | 
						||
\file{Misc/} directory of the Python source distribution.  Mailing
 | 
						||
list archives are available at \url{http://www.python.org/pipermail/}.
 | 
						||
The FAQ answers many of the questions that come up again and again,
 | 
						||
and may already contain the solution for your problem.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\appendix
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{Interactive Input Editing and History Substitution\label{interacting}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Some versions of the Python interpreter support editing of the current
 | 
						||
input line and history substitution, similar to facilities found in
 | 
						||
the Korn shell and the GNU Bash shell.  This is implemented using the
 | 
						||
\emph{GNU Readline} library, which supports Emacs-style and vi-style
 | 
						||
editing.  This library has its own documentation which I won't
 | 
						||
duplicate here; however, the basics are easily explained.  The
 | 
						||
interactive editing and history described here are optionally
 | 
						||
available in the \UNIX{} and CygWin versions of the interpreter.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This chapter does \emph{not} document the editing facilities of Mark
 | 
						||
Hammond's PythonWin package or the Tk-based environment, IDLE,
 | 
						||
distributed with Python.  The command line history recall which
 | 
						||
operates within DOS boxes on NT and some other DOS and Windows flavors 
 | 
						||
is yet another beast.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Line Editing \label{lineEditing}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If supported, input line editing is active whenever the interpreter
 | 
						||
prints a primary or secondary prompt.  The current line can be edited
 | 
						||
using the conventional Emacs control characters.  The most important
 | 
						||
of these are: \kbd{C-A} (Control-A) moves the cursor to the beginning
 | 
						||
of the line, \kbd{C-E} to the end, \kbd{C-B} moves it one position to
 | 
						||
the left, \kbd{C-F} to the right.  Backspace erases the character to
 | 
						||
the left of the cursor, \kbd{C-D} the character to its right.
 | 
						||
\kbd{C-K} kills (erases) the rest of the line to the right of the
 | 
						||
cursor, \kbd{C-Y} yanks back the last killed string.
 | 
						||
\kbd{C-underscore} undoes the last change you made; it can be repeated
 | 
						||
for cumulative effect.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{History Substitution \label{history}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
History substitution works as follows.  All non-empty input lines
 | 
						||
issued are saved in a history buffer, and when a new prompt is given
 | 
						||
you are positioned on a new line at the bottom of this buffer.
 | 
						||
\kbd{C-P} moves one line up (back) in the history buffer,
 | 
						||
\kbd{C-N} moves one down.  Any line in the history buffer can be
 | 
						||
edited; an asterisk appears in front of the prompt to mark a line as
 | 
						||
modified.  Pressing the \kbd{Return} key passes the current line to
 | 
						||
the interpreter.  \kbd{C-R} starts an incremental reverse search;
 | 
						||
\kbd{C-S} starts a forward search.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Key Bindings \label{keyBindings}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The key bindings and some other parameters of the Readline library can
 | 
						||
be customized by placing commands in an initialization file called
 | 
						||
\file{\~{}/.inputrc}.  Key bindings have the form
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
key-name: function-name
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
or
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
"string": function-name
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
and options can be set with
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
set option-name value
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
For example:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
# I prefer vi-style editing:
 | 
						||
set editing-mode vi
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
# Edit using a single line:
 | 
						||
set horizontal-scroll-mode On
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
# Rebind some keys:
 | 
						||
Meta-h: backward-kill-word
 | 
						||
"\C-u": universal-argument
 | 
						||
"\C-x\C-r": re-read-init-file
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that the default binding for \kbd{Tab} in Python is to insert a
 | 
						||
\kbd{Tab} character instead of Readline's default filename completion
 | 
						||
function.  If you insist, you can override this by putting
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
Tab: complete
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
in your \file{\~{}/.inputrc}.  (Of course, this makes it harder to
 | 
						||
type indented continuation lines if you're accustomed to using
 | 
						||
\kbd{Tab} for that purpose.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Automatic completion of variable and module names is optionally
 | 
						||
available.  To enable it in the interpreter's interactive mode, add
 | 
						||
the following to your startup file:\footnote{
 | 
						||
  Python will execute the contents of a file identified by the
 | 
						||
  \envvar{PYTHONSTARTUP} environment variable when you start an
 | 
						||
  interactive interpreter.}
 | 
						||
\refstmodindex{rlcompleter}\refbimodindex{readline}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
import rlcompleter, readline
 | 
						||
readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete')
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This binds the \kbd{Tab} key to the completion function, so hitting
 | 
						||
the \kbd{Tab} key twice suggests completions; it looks at Python
 | 
						||
statement names, the current local variables, and the available module
 | 
						||
names.  For dotted expressions such as \code{string.a}, it will
 | 
						||
evaluate the expression up to the final \character{.} and then
 | 
						||
suggest completions from the attributes of the resulting object.  Note
 | 
						||
that this may execute application-defined code if an object with a
 | 
						||
\method{__getattr__()} method is part of the expression.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A more capable startup file might look like this example.  Note that
 | 
						||
this deletes the names it creates once they are no longer needed; this
 | 
						||
is done since the startup file is executed in the same namespace as
 | 
						||
the interactive commands, and removing the names avoids creating side
 | 
						||
effects in the interactive environments.  You may find it convenient
 | 
						||
to keep some of the imported modules, such as
 | 
						||
\ulink{\module{os}}{../lib/module-os.html}, which turn
 | 
						||
out to be needed in most sessions with the interpreter.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
# Add auto-completion and a stored history file of commands to your Python
 | 
						||
# interactive interpreter. Requires Python 2.0+, readline. Autocomplete is
 | 
						||
# bound to the Esc key by default (you can change it - see readline docs).
 | 
						||
#
 | 
						||
# Store the file in ~/.pystartup, and set an environment variable to point
 | 
						||
# to it:  "export PYTHONSTARTUP=/max/home/itamar/.pystartup" in bash.
 | 
						||
#
 | 
						||
# Note that PYTHONSTARTUP does *not* expand "~", so you have to put in the
 | 
						||
# full path to your home directory.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
import atexit
 | 
						||
import os
 | 
						||
import readline
 | 
						||
import rlcompleter
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
historyPath = os.path.expanduser("~/.pyhistory")
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
def save_history(historyPath=historyPath):
 | 
						||
    import readline
 | 
						||
    readline.write_history_file(historyPath)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
if os.path.exists(historyPath):
 | 
						||
    readline.read_history_file(historyPath)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
atexit.register(save_history)
 | 
						||
del os, atexit, readline, rlcompleter, save_history, historyPath
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Commentary \label{commentary}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This facility is an enormous step forward compared to earlier versions
 | 
						||
of the interpreter; however, some wishes are left: It would be nice if
 | 
						||
the proper indentation were suggested on continuation lines (the
 | 
						||
parser knows if an indent token is required next).  The completion
 | 
						||
mechanism might use the interpreter's symbol table.  A command to
 | 
						||
check (or even suggest) matching parentheses, quotes, etc., would also
 | 
						||
be useful.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{Floating Point Arithmetic:  Issues and Limitations\label{fp-issues}}
 | 
						||
\sectionauthor{Tim Peters}{tim_one@users.sourceforge.net}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Floating-point numbers are represented in computer hardware as
 | 
						||
base 2 (binary) fractions.  For example, the decimal fraction
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
0.125
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
has value 1/10 + 2/100 + 5/1000, and in the same way the binary fraction
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
0.001
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
has value 0/2 + 0/4 + 1/8.  These two fractions have identical values,
 | 
						||
the only real difference being that the first is written in base 10
 | 
						||
fractional notation, and the second in base 2.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Unfortunately, most decimal fractions cannot be represented exactly as
 | 
						||
binary fractions.  A consequence is that, in general, the decimal
 | 
						||
floating-point numbers you enter are only approximated by the binary
 | 
						||
floating-point numbers actually stored in the machine.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The problem is easier to understand at first in base 10.  Consider the
 | 
						||
fraction 1/3.  You can approximate that as a base 10 fraction:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
0.3
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
or, better,
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
0.33
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
or, better,
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
0.333
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
and so on.  No matter how many digits you're willing to write down, the
 | 
						||
result will never be exactly 1/3, but will be an increasingly better
 | 
						||
approximation to 1/3.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In the same way, no matter how many base 2 digits you're willing to
 | 
						||
use, the decimal value 0.1 cannot be represented exactly as a base 2
 | 
						||
fraction.  In base 2, 1/10 is the infinitely repeating fraction
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
0.0001100110011001100110011001100110011001100110011...
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Stop at any finite number of bits, and you get an approximation.  This
 | 
						||
is why you see things like:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 0.1
 | 
						||
0.10000000000000001
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
On most machines today, that is what you'll see if you enter 0.1 at
 | 
						||
a Python prompt.  You may not, though, because the number of bits
 | 
						||
used by the hardware to store floating-point values can vary across
 | 
						||
machines, and Python only prints a decimal approximation to the true
 | 
						||
decimal value of the binary approximation stored by the machine.  On
 | 
						||
most machines, if Python were to print the true decimal value of
 | 
						||
the binary approximation stored for 0.1, it would have to display
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 0.1
 | 
						||
0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
instead!  The Python prompt (implicitly) uses the builtin
 | 
						||
\function{repr()} function to obtain a string version of everything it
 | 
						||
displays.  For floats, \code{repr(\var{float})} rounds the true
 | 
						||
decimal value to 17 significant digits, giving
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
0.10000000000000001
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\code{repr(\var{float})} produces 17 significant digits because it
 | 
						||
turns out that's enough (on most machines) so that
 | 
						||
\code{eval(repr(\var{x})) == \var{x}} exactly for all finite floats
 | 
						||
\var{x}, but rounding to 16 digits is not enough to make that true.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that this is in the very nature of binary floating-point: this is
 | 
						||
not a bug in Python, it is not a bug in your code either, and you'll
 | 
						||
see the same kind of thing in all languages that support your
 | 
						||
hardware's floating-point arithmetic (although some languages may
 | 
						||
not \emph{display} the difference by default, or in all output modes).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Python's builtin \function{str()} function produces only 12
 | 
						||
significant digits, and you may wish to use that instead.  It's
 | 
						||
unusual for \code{eval(str(\var{x}))} to reproduce \var{x}, but the
 | 
						||
output may be more pleasant to look at:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> print str(0.1)
 | 
						||
0.1
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It's important to realize that this is, in a real sense, an illusion:
 | 
						||
the value in the machine is not exactly 1/10, you're simply rounding
 | 
						||
the \emph{display} of the true machine value.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Other surprises follow from this one.  For example, after seeing
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 0.1
 | 
						||
0.10000000000000001
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
you may be tempted to use the \function{round()} function to chop it
 | 
						||
back to the single digit you expect.  But that makes no difference:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> round(0.1, 1)
 | 
						||
0.10000000000000001
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The problem is that the binary floating-point value stored for "0.1"
 | 
						||
was already the best possible binary approximation to 1/10, so trying
 | 
						||
to round it again can't make it better:  it was already as good as it
 | 
						||
gets.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Another consequence is that since 0.1 is not exactly 1/10, adding 0.1
 | 
						||
to itself 10 times may not yield exactly 1.0, either:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> sum = 0.0
 | 
						||
>>> for i in range(10):
 | 
						||
...     sum += 0.1
 | 
						||
...
 | 
						||
>>> sum
 | 
						||
0.99999999999999989
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Binary floating-point arithmetic holds many surprises like this.  The
 | 
						||
problem with "0.1" is explained in precise detail below, in the
 | 
						||
"Representation Error" section.  See
 | 
						||
\citetitle[http://www.lahey.com/float.htm]{The Perils of Floating
 | 
						||
Point} for a more complete account of other common surprises.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
As that says near the end, ``there are no easy answers.''  Still,
 | 
						||
don't be unduly wary of floating-point!  The errors in Python float
 | 
						||
operations are inherited from the floating-point hardware, and on most
 | 
						||
machines are on the order of no more than 1 part in 2**53 per
 | 
						||
operation.  That's more than adequate for most tasks, but you do need
 | 
						||
to keep in mind that it's not decimal arithmetic, and that every float
 | 
						||
operation can suffer a new rounding error.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
While pathological cases do exist, for most casual use of
 | 
						||
floating-point arithmetic you'll see the result you expect in the end
 | 
						||
if you simply round the display of your final results to the number of
 | 
						||
decimal digits you expect.  \function{str()} usually suffices, and for
 | 
						||
finer control see the discussion of Pythons's \code{\%} format
 | 
						||
operator: the \code{\%g}, \code{\%f} and \code{\%e} format codes
 | 
						||
supply flexible and easy ways to round float results for display.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\section{Representation Error
 | 
						||
         \label{fp-error}}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
This section explains the ``0.1'' example in detail, and shows how
 | 
						||
you can perform an exact analysis of cases like this yourself.  Basic
 | 
						||
familiarity with binary floating-point representation is assumed.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\dfn{Representation error} refers to that some (most, actually)
 | 
						||
decimal fractions cannot be represented exactly as binary (base 2)
 | 
						||
fractions.  This is the chief reason why Python (or Perl, C, \Cpp,
 | 
						||
Java, Fortran, and many others) often won't display the exact decimal
 | 
						||
number you expect:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 0.1
 | 
						||
0.10000000000000001
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Why is that?  1/10 is not exactly representable as a binary fraction.
 | 
						||
Almost all machines today (November 2000) use IEEE-754 floating point
 | 
						||
arithmetic, and almost all platforms map Python floats to IEEE-754
 | 
						||
"double precision".  754 doubles contain 53 bits of precision, so on
 | 
						||
input the computer strives to convert 0.1 to the closest fraction it can
 | 
						||
of the form \var{J}/2**\var{N} where \var{J} is an integer containing
 | 
						||
exactly 53 bits.  Rewriting
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 1 / 10 ~= J / (2**N)
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
as
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
J ~= 2**N / 10
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
and recalling that \var{J} has exactly 53 bits (is \code{>= 2**52} but
 | 
						||
\code{< 2**53}), the best value for \var{N} is 56:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 2L**52
 | 
						||
4503599627370496L
 | 
						||
>>> 2L**53
 | 
						||
9007199254740992L
 | 
						||
>>> 2L**56/10
 | 
						||
7205759403792793L
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
That is, 56 is the only value for \var{N} that leaves \var{J} with
 | 
						||
exactly 53 bits.  The best possible value for \var{J} is then that
 | 
						||
quotient rounded:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> q, r = divmod(2L**56, 10)
 | 
						||
>>> r
 | 
						||
6L
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Since the remainder is more than half of 10, the best approximation is
 | 
						||
obtained by rounding up:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> q+1
 | 
						||
7205759403792794L
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Therefore the best possible approximation to 1/10 in 754 double
 | 
						||
precision is that over 2**56, or
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
7205759403792794 / 72057594037927936
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Note that since we rounded up, this is actually a little bit larger than
 | 
						||
1/10; if we had not rounded up, the quotient would have been a little
 | 
						||
bit smaller than 1/10.  But in no case can it be \emph{exactly} 1/10!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
So the computer never ``sees'' 1/10:  what it sees is the exact
 | 
						||
fraction given above, the best 754 double approximation it can get:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> .1 * 2L**56
 | 
						||
7205759403792794.0
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If we multiply that fraction by 10**30, we can see the (truncated)
 | 
						||
value of its 30 most significant decimal digits:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\begin{verbatim}
 | 
						||
>>> 7205759403792794L * 10L**30 / 2L**56
 | 
						||
100000000000000005551115123125L
 | 
						||
\end{verbatim}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
meaning that the exact number stored in the computer is approximately
 | 
						||
equal to the decimal value 0.100000000000000005551115123125.  Rounding
 | 
						||
that to 17 significant digits gives the 0.10000000000000001 that Python
 | 
						||
displays (well, will display on any 754-conforming platform that does
 | 
						||
best-possible input and output conversions in its C library --- yours may
 | 
						||
not!).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\chapter{History and License}
 | 
						||
\input{license}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\input{glossary}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\input{tut.ind}
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
\end{document}
 |