mirror of
				https://github.com/python/cpython.git
				synced 2025-10-31 13:41:24 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	 24ebaf6323
			
		
	
	
		24ebaf6323
		
			
		
	
	
	
	
		
			
			(cherry picked from commit badb637c8c)
Co-authored-by: William Andrea <william.j.andrea@gmail.com>
		
	
			
		
			
				
	
	
		
			935 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			32 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			935 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			32 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| .. _tut-morecontrol:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ***********************
 | |
| More Control Flow Tools
 | |
| ***********************
 | |
| 
 | |
| Besides the :keyword:`while` statement just introduced, Python uses the usual
 | |
| flow control statements known from other languages, with some twists.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-if:
 | |
| 
 | |
| :keyword:`!if` Statements
 | |
| =========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Perhaps the most well-known statement type is the :keyword:`if` statement.  For
 | |
| example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> x = int(input("Please enter an integer: "))
 | |
|    Please enter an integer: 42
 | |
|    >>> if x < 0:
 | |
|    ...     x = 0
 | |
|    ...     print('Negative changed to zero')
 | |
|    ... elif x == 0:
 | |
|    ...     print('Zero')
 | |
|    ... elif x == 1:
 | |
|    ...     print('Single')
 | |
|    ... else:
 | |
|    ...     print('More')
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    More
 | |
| 
 | |
| There can be zero or more :keyword:`elif` parts, and the :keyword:`else` part is
 | |
| optional.  The keyword ':keyword:`!elif`' is short for 'else if', and is useful
 | |
| to avoid excessive indentation.  An  :keyword:`!if` ... :keyword:`!elif` ...
 | |
| :keyword:`!elif` ... sequence is a substitute for the ``switch`` or
 | |
| ``case`` statements found in other languages.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-for:
 | |
| 
 | |
| :keyword:`!for` Statements
 | |
| ==========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    statement: for
 | |
| 
 | |
| The :keyword:`for` statement in Python differs a bit from what you may be used
 | |
| to in C or Pascal.  Rather than always iterating over an arithmetic progression
 | |
| of numbers (like in Pascal), or giving the user the ability to define both the
 | |
| iteration step and halting condition (as C), Python's :keyword:`!for` statement
 | |
| iterates over the items of any sequence (a list or a string), in the order that
 | |
| they appear in the sequence.  For example (no pun intended):
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. One suggestion was to give a real C example here, but that may only serve to
 | |
|    confuse non-C programmers.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> # Measure some strings:
 | |
|    ... words = ['cat', 'window', 'defenestrate']
 | |
|    >>> for w in words:
 | |
|    ...     print(w, len(w))
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    cat 3
 | |
|    window 6
 | |
|    defenestrate 12
 | |
| 
 | |
| Code that modifies a collection while iterating over that same collection can
 | |
| be tricky to get right.  Instead, it is usually more straight-forward to loop
 | |
| over a copy of the collection or to create a new collection::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Strategy:  Iterate over a copy
 | |
|     for user, status in users.copy().items():
 | |
|         if status == 'inactive':
 | |
|             del users[user]
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Strategy:  Create a new collection
 | |
|     active_users = {}
 | |
|     for user, status in users.items():
 | |
|         if status == 'active':
 | |
|             active_users[user] = status
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-range:
 | |
| 
 | |
| The :func:`range` Function
 | |
| ==========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you do need to iterate over a sequence of numbers, the built-in function
 | |
| :func:`range` comes in handy.  It generates arithmetic progressions::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> for i in range(5):
 | |
|     ...     print(i)
 | |
|     ...
 | |
|     0
 | |
|     1
 | |
|     2
 | |
|     3
 | |
|     4
 | |
| 
 | |
| The given end point is never part of the generated sequence; ``range(10)`` generates
 | |
| 10 values, the legal indices for items of a sequence of length 10.  It
 | |
| is possible to let the range start at another number, or to specify a different
 | |
| increment (even negative; sometimes this is called the 'step')::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> list(range(5, 10))
 | |
|     [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> list(range(0, 10, 3))
 | |
|     [0, 3, 6, 9]
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> list(range(-10, -100, -30))
 | |
|     [-10, -40, -70]
 | |
| 
 | |
| To iterate over the indices of a sequence, you can combine :func:`range` and
 | |
| :func:`len` as follows::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> a = ['Mary', 'had', 'a', 'little', 'lamb']
 | |
|    >>> for i in range(len(a)):
 | |
|    ...     print(i, a[i])
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    0 Mary
 | |
|    1 had
 | |
|    2 a
 | |
|    3 little
 | |
|    4 lamb
 | |
| 
 | |
| In most such cases, however, it is convenient to use the :func:`enumerate`
 | |
| function, see :ref:`tut-loopidioms`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A strange thing happens if you just print a range::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> range(10)
 | |
|    range(0, 10)
 | |
| 
 | |
| In many ways the object returned by :func:`range` behaves as if it is a list,
 | |
| but in fact it isn't. It is an object which returns the successive items of
 | |
| the desired sequence when you iterate over it, but it doesn't really make
 | |
| the list, thus saving space.
 | |
| 
 | |
| We say such an object is :term:`iterable`, that is, suitable as a target for
 | |
| functions and constructs that expect something from which they can
 | |
| obtain successive items until the supply is exhausted.  We have seen that
 | |
| the :keyword:`for` statement is such a construct, while an example of a function
 | |
| that takes an iterable is :func:`sum`::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> sum(range(4))  # 0 + 1 + 2 + 3
 | |
|     6
 | |
| 
 | |
| Later we will see more functions that return iterables and take iterables as
 | |
| arguments.  In chapter :ref:`tut-structures`, we will discuss in more detail about
 | |
| :func:`list`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-break:
 | |
| 
 | |
| :keyword:`!break` and :keyword:`!continue` Statements, and :keyword:`!else` Clauses on Loops
 | |
| ============================================================================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The :keyword:`break` statement, like in C, breaks out of the innermost enclosing
 | |
| :keyword:`for` or :keyword:`while` loop.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Loop statements may have an :keyword:`!else` clause; it is executed when the loop
 | |
| terminates through exhaustion of the iterable (with :keyword:`for`) or when the
 | |
| condition becomes false (with :keyword:`while`), but not when the loop is
 | |
| terminated by a :keyword:`break` statement.  This is exemplified by the
 | |
| following loop, which searches for prime numbers::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> for n in range(2, 10):
 | |
|    ...     for x in range(2, n):
 | |
|    ...         if n % x == 0:
 | |
|    ...             print(n, 'equals', x, '*', n//x)
 | |
|    ...             break
 | |
|    ...     else:
 | |
|    ...         # loop fell through without finding a factor
 | |
|    ...         print(n, 'is a prime number')
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    2 is a prime number
 | |
|    3 is a prime number
 | |
|    4 equals 2 * 2
 | |
|    5 is a prime number
 | |
|    6 equals 2 * 3
 | |
|    7 is a prime number
 | |
|    8 equals 2 * 4
 | |
|    9 equals 3 * 3
 | |
| 
 | |
| (Yes, this is the correct code.  Look closely: the ``else`` clause belongs to
 | |
| the :keyword:`for` loop, **not** the :keyword:`if` statement.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| When used with a loop, the ``else`` clause has more in common with the
 | |
| ``else`` clause of a :keyword:`try` statement than it does with that of
 | |
| :keyword:`if` statements: a :keyword:`try` statement's ``else`` clause runs
 | |
| when no exception occurs, and a loop's ``else`` clause runs when no ``break``
 | |
| occurs. For more on the :keyword:`!try` statement and exceptions, see
 | |
| :ref:`tut-handling`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The :keyword:`continue` statement, also borrowed from C, continues with the next
 | |
| iteration of the loop::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> for num in range(2, 10):
 | |
|     ...     if num % 2 == 0:
 | |
|     ...         print("Found an even number", num)
 | |
|     ...         continue
 | |
|     ...     print("Found an odd number", num)
 | |
|     ...
 | |
|     Found an even number 2
 | |
|     Found an odd number 3
 | |
|     Found an even number 4
 | |
|     Found an odd number 5
 | |
|     Found an even number 6
 | |
|     Found an odd number 7
 | |
|     Found an even number 8
 | |
|     Found an odd number 9
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-pass:
 | |
| 
 | |
| :keyword:`!pass` Statements
 | |
| ===========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The :keyword:`pass` statement does nothing. It can be used when a statement is
 | |
| required syntactically but the program requires no action. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> while True:
 | |
|    ...     pass  # Busy-wait for keyboard interrupt (Ctrl+C)
 | |
|    ...
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is commonly used for creating minimal classes::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> class MyEmptyClass:
 | |
|    ...     pass
 | |
|    ...
 | |
| 
 | |
| Another place :keyword:`pass` can be used is as a place-holder for a function or
 | |
| conditional body when you are working on new code, allowing you to keep thinking
 | |
| at a more abstract level.  The :keyword:`!pass` is silently ignored::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> def initlog(*args):
 | |
|    ...     pass   # Remember to implement this!
 | |
|    ...
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-functions:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Defining Functions
 | |
| ==================
 | |
| 
 | |
| We can create a function that writes the Fibonacci series to an arbitrary
 | |
| boundary::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> def fib(n):    # write Fibonacci series up to n
 | |
|    ...     """Print a Fibonacci series up to n."""
 | |
|    ...     a, b = 0, 1
 | |
|    ...     while a < n:
 | |
|    ...         print(a, end=' ')
 | |
|    ...         a, b = b, a+b
 | |
|    ...     print()
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    >>> # Now call the function we just defined:
 | |
|    ... fib(2000)
 | |
|    0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    single: documentation strings
 | |
|    single: docstrings
 | |
|    single: strings, documentation
 | |
| 
 | |
| The keyword :keyword:`def` introduces a function *definition*.  It must be
 | |
| followed by the function name and the parenthesized list of formal parameters.
 | |
| The statements that form the body of the function start at the next line, and
 | |
| must be indented.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The first statement of the function body can optionally be a string literal;
 | |
| this string literal is the function's documentation string, or :dfn:`docstring`.
 | |
| (More about docstrings can be found in the section :ref:`tut-docstrings`.)
 | |
| There are tools which use docstrings to automatically produce online or printed
 | |
| documentation, or to let the user interactively browse through code; it's good
 | |
| practice to include docstrings in code that you write, so make a habit of it.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The *execution* of a function introduces a new symbol table used for the local
 | |
| variables of the function.  More precisely, all variable assignments in a
 | |
| function store the value in the local symbol table; whereas variable references
 | |
| first look in the local symbol table, then in the local symbol tables of
 | |
| enclosing functions, then in the global symbol table, and finally in the table
 | |
| of built-in names. Thus, global variables and variables of enclosing functions
 | |
| cannot be directly assigned a value within a function (unless, for global
 | |
| variables, named in a :keyword:`global` statement, or, for variables of enclosing
 | |
| functions, named in a :keyword:`nonlocal` statement), although they may be
 | |
| referenced.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The actual parameters (arguments) to a function call are introduced in the local
 | |
| symbol table of the called function when it is called; thus, arguments are
 | |
| passed using *call by value* (where the *value* is always an object *reference*,
 | |
| not the value of the object). [#]_ When a function calls another function,
 | |
| or calls itself recursively, a new
 | |
| local symbol table is created for that call.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A function definition associates the function name with the function object in
 | |
| the current symbol table.  The interpreter recognizes the object pointed to by
 | |
| that name as a user-defined function.  Other names can also point to that same
 | |
| function object and can also be used to access the function::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> fib
 | |
|    <function fib at 10042ed0>
 | |
|    >>> f = fib
 | |
|    >>> f(100)
 | |
|    0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89
 | |
| 
 | |
| Coming from other languages, you might object that ``fib`` is not a function but
 | |
| a procedure since it doesn't return a value.  In fact, even functions without a
 | |
| :keyword:`return` statement do return a value, albeit a rather boring one.  This
 | |
| value is called ``None`` (it's a built-in name).  Writing the value ``None`` is
 | |
| normally suppressed by the interpreter if it would be the only value written.
 | |
| You can see it if you really want to using :func:`print`::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> fib(0)
 | |
|    >>> print(fib(0))
 | |
|    None
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is simple to write a function that returns a list of the numbers of the
 | |
| Fibonacci series, instead of printing it::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> def fib2(n):  # return Fibonacci series up to n
 | |
|    ...     """Return a list containing the Fibonacci series up to n."""
 | |
|    ...     result = []
 | |
|    ...     a, b = 0, 1
 | |
|    ...     while a < n:
 | |
|    ...         result.append(a)    # see below
 | |
|    ...         a, b = b, a+b
 | |
|    ...     return result
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    >>> f100 = fib2(100)    # call it
 | |
|    >>> f100                # write the result
 | |
|    [0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89]
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example, as usual, demonstrates some new Python features:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * The :keyword:`return` statement returns with a value from a function.
 | |
|   :keyword:`!return` without an expression argument returns ``None``. Falling off
 | |
|   the end of a function also returns ``None``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * The statement ``result.append(a)`` calls a *method* of the list object
 | |
|   ``result``.  A method is a function that 'belongs' to an object and is named
 | |
|   ``obj.methodname``, where ``obj`` is some object (this may be an expression),
 | |
|   and ``methodname`` is the name of a method that is defined by the object's type.
 | |
|   Different types define different methods.  Methods of different types may have
 | |
|   the same name without causing ambiguity.  (It is possible to define your own
 | |
|   object types and methods, using *classes*, see :ref:`tut-classes`)
 | |
|   The method :meth:`append` shown in the example is defined for list objects; it
 | |
|   adds a new element at the end of the list.  In this example it is equivalent to
 | |
|   ``result = result + [a]``, but more efficient.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-defining:
 | |
| 
 | |
| More on Defining Functions
 | |
| ==========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is also possible to define functions with a variable number of arguments.
 | |
| There are three forms, which can be combined.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-defaultargs:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Default Argument Values
 | |
| -----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The most useful form is to specify a default value for one or more arguments.
 | |
| This creates a function that can be called with fewer arguments than it is
 | |
| defined to allow.  For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    def ask_ok(prompt, retries=4, reminder='Please try again!'):
 | |
|        while True:
 | |
|            ok = input(prompt)
 | |
|            if ok in ('y', 'ye', 'yes'):
 | |
|                return True
 | |
|            if ok in ('n', 'no', 'nop', 'nope'):
 | |
|                return False
 | |
|            retries = retries - 1
 | |
|            if retries < 0:
 | |
|                raise ValueError('invalid user response')
 | |
|            print(reminder)
 | |
| 
 | |
| This function can be called in several ways:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * giving only the mandatory argument:
 | |
|   ``ask_ok('Do you really want to quit?')``
 | |
| * giving one of the optional arguments:
 | |
|   ``ask_ok('OK to overwrite the file?', 2)``
 | |
| * or even giving all arguments:
 | |
|   ``ask_ok('OK to overwrite the file?', 2, 'Come on, only yes or no!')``
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example also introduces the :keyword:`in` keyword. This tests whether or
 | |
| not a sequence contains a certain value.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The default values are evaluated at the point of function definition in the
 | |
| *defining* scope, so that ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    i = 5
 | |
| 
 | |
|    def f(arg=i):
 | |
|        print(arg)
 | |
| 
 | |
|    i = 6
 | |
|    f()
 | |
| 
 | |
| will print ``5``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| **Important warning:**  The default value is evaluated only once. This makes a
 | |
| difference when the default is a mutable object such as a list, dictionary, or
 | |
| instances of most classes.  For example, the following function accumulates the
 | |
| arguments passed to it on subsequent calls::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    def f(a, L=[]):
 | |
|        L.append(a)
 | |
|        return L
 | |
| 
 | |
|    print(f(1))
 | |
|    print(f(2))
 | |
|    print(f(3))
 | |
| 
 | |
| This will print ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    [1]
 | |
|    [1, 2]
 | |
|    [1, 2, 3]
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you don't want the default to be shared between subsequent calls, you can
 | |
| write the function like this instead::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    def f(a, L=None):
 | |
|        if L is None:
 | |
|            L = []
 | |
|        L.append(a)
 | |
|        return L
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-keywordargs:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Keyword Arguments
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Functions can also be called using :term:`keyword arguments <keyword argument>`
 | |
| of the form ``kwarg=value``.  For instance, the following function::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    def parrot(voltage, state='a stiff', action='voom', type='Norwegian Blue'):
 | |
|        print("-- This parrot wouldn't", action, end=' ')
 | |
|        print("if you put", voltage, "volts through it.")
 | |
|        print("-- Lovely plumage, the", type)
 | |
|        print("-- It's", state, "!")
 | |
| 
 | |
| accepts one required argument (``voltage``) and three optional arguments
 | |
| (``state``, ``action``, and ``type``).  This function can be called in any
 | |
| of the following ways::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    parrot(1000)                                          # 1 positional argument
 | |
|    parrot(voltage=1000)                                  # 1 keyword argument
 | |
|    parrot(voltage=1000000, action='VOOOOOM')             # 2 keyword arguments
 | |
|    parrot(action='VOOOOOM', voltage=1000000)             # 2 keyword arguments
 | |
|    parrot('a million', 'bereft of life', 'jump')         # 3 positional arguments
 | |
|    parrot('a thousand', state='pushing up the daisies')  # 1 positional, 1 keyword
 | |
| 
 | |
| but all the following calls would be invalid::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    parrot()                     # required argument missing
 | |
|    parrot(voltage=5.0, 'dead')  # non-keyword argument after a keyword argument
 | |
|    parrot(110, voltage=220)     # duplicate value for the same argument
 | |
|    parrot(actor='John Cleese')  # unknown keyword argument
 | |
| 
 | |
| In a function call, keyword arguments must follow positional arguments.
 | |
| All the keyword arguments passed must match one of the arguments
 | |
| accepted by the function (e.g. ``actor`` is not a valid argument for the
 | |
| ``parrot`` function), and their order is not important.  This also includes
 | |
| non-optional arguments (e.g. ``parrot(voltage=1000)`` is valid too).
 | |
| No argument may receive a value more than once.
 | |
| Here's an example that fails due to this restriction::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> def function(a):
 | |
|    ...     pass
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    >>> function(0, a=0)
 | |
|    Traceback (most recent call last):
 | |
|      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
 | |
|    TypeError: function() got multiple values for argument 'a'
 | |
| 
 | |
| When a final formal parameter of the form ``**name`` is present, it receives a
 | |
| dictionary (see :ref:`typesmapping`) containing all keyword arguments except for
 | |
| those corresponding to a formal parameter.  This may be combined with a formal
 | |
| parameter of the form ``*name`` (described in the next subsection) which
 | |
| receives a :ref:`tuple <tut-tuples>` containing the positional
 | |
| arguments beyond the formal parameter list.  (``*name`` must occur
 | |
| before ``**name``.) For example, if we define a function like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    def cheeseshop(kind, *arguments, **keywords):
 | |
|        print("-- Do you have any", kind, "?")
 | |
|        print("-- I'm sorry, we're all out of", kind)
 | |
|        for arg in arguments:
 | |
|            print(arg)
 | |
|        print("-" * 40)
 | |
|        for kw in keywords:
 | |
|            print(kw, ":", keywords[kw])
 | |
| 
 | |
| It could be called like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    cheeseshop("Limburger", "It's very runny, sir.",
 | |
|               "It's really very, VERY runny, sir.",
 | |
|               shopkeeper="Michael Palin",
 | |
|               client="John Cleese",
 | |
|               sketch="Cheese Shop Sketch")
 | |
| 
 | |
| and of course it would print:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: none
 | |
| 
 | |
|    -- Do you have any Limburger ?
 | |
|    -- I'm sorry, we're all out of Limburger
 | |
|    It's very runny, sir.
 | |
|    It's really very, VERY runny, sir.
 | |
|    ----------------------------------------
 | |
|    shopkeeper : Michael Palin
 | |
|    client : John Cleese
 | |
|    sketch : Cheese Shop Sketch
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that the order in which the keyword arguments are printed is guaranteed
 | |
| to match the order in which they were provided in the function call.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Special parameters
 | |
| ------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| By default, arguments may be passed to a Python function either by position
 | |
| or explicitly by keyword. For readability and performance, it makes sense to
 | |
| restrict the way arguments can be passed so that a developer need only look
 | |
| at the function definition to determine if items are passed by position, by
 | |
| position or keyword, or by keyword.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A function definition may look like:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: none
 | |
| 
 | |
|    def f(pos1, pos2, /, pos_or_kwd, *, kwd1, kwd2):
 | |
|          -----------    ----------     ----------
 | |
|            |             |                  |
 | |
|            |        Positional or keyword   |
 | |
|            |                                - Keyword only
 | |
|             -- Positional only
 | |
| 
 | |
| where ``/`` and ``*`` are optional. If used, these symbols indicate the kind of
 | |
| parameter by how the arguments may be passed to the function:
 | |
| positional-only, positional-or-keyword, and keyword-only. Keyword parameters
 | |
| are also referred to as named parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| -------------------------------
 | |
| Positional-or-Keyword Arguments
 | |
| -------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If ``/`` and ``*`` are not present in the function definition, arguments may
 | |
| be passed to a function by position or by keyword.
 | |
| 
 | |
| --------------------------
 | |
| Positional-Only Parameters
 | |
| --------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Looking at this in a bit more detail, it is possible to mark certain parameters
 | |
| as *positional-only*. If *positional-only*, the parameters' order matters, and
 | |
| the parameters cannot be passed by keyword. Positional-only parameters are
 | |
| placed before a ``/`` (forward-slash). The ``/`` is used to logically
 | |
| separate the positional-only parameters from the rest of the parameters.
 | |
| If there is no ``/`` in the function definition, there are no positional-only
 | |
| parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Parameters following the ``/`` may be *positional-or-keyword* or *keyword-only*.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| Keyword-Only Arguments
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| To mark parameters as *keyword-only*, indicating the parameters must be passed
 | |
| by keyword argument, place an ``*`` in the arguments list just before the first
 | |
| *keyword-only* parameter.
 | |
| 
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| Function Examples
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Consider the following example function definitions paying close attention to the
 | |
| markers ``/`` and ``*``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> def standard_arg(arg):
 | |
|    ...     print(arg)
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    >>> def pos_only_arg(arg, /):
 | |
|    ...     print(arg)
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    >>> def kwd_only_arg(*, arg):
 | |
|    ...     print(arg)
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    >>> def combined_example(pos_only, /, standard, *, kwd_only):
 | |
|    ...     print(pos_only, standard, kwd_only)
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| The first function definition, ``standard_arg``, the most familiar form,
 | |
| places no restrictions on the calling convention and arguments may be
 | |
| passed by position or keyword::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> standard_arg(2)
 | |
|    2
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> standard_arg(arg=2)
 | |
|    2
 | |
| 
 | |
| The second function ``pos_only_arg`` is restricted to only use positional
 | |
| parameters as there is a ``/`` in the function definition::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> pos_only_arg(1)
 | |
|    1
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> pos_only_arg(arg=1)
 | |
|    Traceback (most recent call last):
 | |
|      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
 | |
|    TypeError: pos_only_arg() got some positional-only arguments passed as keyword arguments: 'arg'
 | |
| 
 | |
| The third function ``kwd_only_args`` only allows keyword arguments as indicated
 | |
| by a ``*`` in the function definition::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> kwd_only_arg(3)
 | |
|    Traceback (most recent call last):
 | |
|      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
 | |
|    TypeError: kwd_only_arg() takes 0 positional arguments but 1 was given
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> kwd_only_arg(arg=3)
 | |
|    3
 | |
| 
 | |
| And the last uses all three calling conventions in the same function
 | |
| definition::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> combined_example(1, 2, 3)
 | |
|    Traceback (most recent call last):
 | |
|      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
 | |
|    TypeError: combined_example() takes 2 positional arguments but 3 were given
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> combined_example(1, 2, kwd_only=3)
 | |
|    1 2 3
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> combined_example(1, standard=2, kwd_only=3)
 | |
|    1 2 3
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> combined_example(pos_only=1, standard=2, kwd_only=3)
 | |
|    Traceback (most recent call last):
 | |
|      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
 | |
|    TypeError: combined_example() got some positional-only arguments passed as keyword arguments: 'pos_only'
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, consider this function definition which has a potential collision between the positional argument ``name``  and ``**kwds`` which has ``name`` as a key::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     def foo(name, **kwds):
 | |
|         return 'name' in kwds
 | |
| 
 | |
| There is no possible call that will make it return ``True`` as the keyword ``'name'``
 | |
| will always bind to the first parameter. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> foo(1, **{'name': 2})
 | |
|     Traceback (most recent call last):
 | |
|       File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
 | |
|     TypeError: foo() got multiple values for argument 'name'
 | |
|     >>>
 | |
| 
 | |
| But using ``/`` (positional only arguments), it is possible since it allows ``name`` as a positional argument and ``'name'`` as a key in the keyword arguments::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     def foo(name, /, **kwds):
 | |
|         return 'name' in kwds
 | |
|     >>> foo(1, **{'name': 2})
 | |
|     True
 | |
| 
 | |
| In other words, the names of positional-only parameters can be used in
 | |
| ``**kwds`` without ambiguity.
 | |
| 
 | |
| -----
 | |
| Recap
 | |
| -----
 | |
| 
 | |
| The use case will determine which parameters to use in the function definition::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    def f(pos1, pos2, /, pos_or_kwd, *, kwd1, kwd2):
 | |
| 
 | |
| As guidance:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Use positional-only if you want the name of the parameters to not be
 | |
|   available to the user. This is useful when parameter names have no real
 | |
|   meaning, if you want to enforce the order of the arguments when the function
 | |
|   is called or if you need to take some positional parameters and arbitrary
 | |
|   keywords.
 | |
| * Use keyword-only when names have meaning and the function definition is
 | |
|   more understandable by being explicit with names or you want to prevent
 | |
|   users relying on the position of the argument being passed.
 | |
| * For an API, use positional-only to prevent breaking API changes
 | |
|   if the parameter's name is modified in the future.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-arbitraryargs:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Arbitrary Argument Lists
 | |
| ------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    single: * (asterisk); in function calls
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, the least frequently used option is to specify that a function can be
 | |
| called with an arbitrary number of arguments.  These arguments will be wrapped
 | |
| up in a tuple (see :ref:`tut-tuples`).  Before the variable number of arguments,
 | |
| zero or more normal arguments may occur. ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    def write_multiple_items(file, separator, *args):
 | |
|        file.write(separator.join(args))
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Normally, these *variadic* arguments will be last in the list of formal
 | |
| parameters, because they scoop up all remaining input arguments that are
 | |
| passed to the function. Any formal parameters which occur after the ``*args``
 | |
| parameter are 'keyword-only' arguments, meaning that they can only be used as
 | |
| keywords rather than positional arguments. ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> def concat(*args, sep="/"):
 | |
|    ...     return sep.join(args)
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    >>> concat("earth", "mars", "venus")
 | |
|    'earth/mars/venus'
 | |
|    >>> concat("earth", "mars", "venus", sep=".")
 | |
|    'earth.mars.venus'
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-unpacking-arguments:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Unpacking Argument Lists
 | |
| ------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The reverse situation occurs when the arguments are already in a list or tuple
 | |
| but need to be unpacked for a function call requiring separate positional
 | |
| arguments.  For instance, the built-in :func:`range` function expects separate
 | |
| *start* and *stop* arguments.  If they are not available separately, write the
 | |
| function call with the  ``*``\ -operator to unpack the arguments out of a list
 | |
| or tuple::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> list(range(3, 6))            # normal call with separate arguments
 | |
|    [3, 4, 5]
 | |
|    >>> args = [3, 6]
 | |
|    >>> list(range(*args))            # call with arguments unpacked from a list
 | |
|    [3, 4, 5]
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    single: **; in function calls
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the same fashion, dictionaries can deliver keyword arguments with the
 | |
| ``**``\ -operator::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> def parrot(voltage, state='a stiff', action='voom'):
 | |
|    ...     print("-- This parrot wouldn't", action, end=' ')
 | |
|    ...     print("if you put", voltage, "volts through it.", end=' ')
 | |
|    ...     print("E's", state, "!")
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    >>> d = {"voltage": "four million", "state": "bleedin' demised", "action": "VOOM"}
 | |
|    >>> parrot(**d)
 | |
|    -- This parrot wouldn't VOOM if you put four million volts through it. E's bleedin' demised !
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-lambda:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Lambda Expressions
 | |
| ------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Small anonymous functions can be created with the :keyword:`lambda` keyword.
 | |
| This function returns the sum of its two arguments: ``lambda a, b: a+b``.
 | |
| Lambda functions can be used wherever function objects are required.  They are
 | |
| syntactically restricted to a single expression.  Semantically, they are just
 | |
| syntactic sugar for a normal function definition.  Like nested function
 | |
| definitions, lambda functions can reference variables from the containing
 | |
| scope::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> def make_incrementor(n):
 | |
|    ...     return lambda x: x + n
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    >>> f = make_incrementor(42)
 | |
|    >>> f(0)
 | |
|    42
 | |
|    >>> f(1)
 | |
|    43
 | |
| 
 | |
| The above example uses a lambda expression to return a function.  Another use
 | |
| is to pass a small function as an argument::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> pairs = [(1, 'one'), (2, 'two'), (3, 'three'), (4, 'four')]
 | |
|    >>> pairs.sort(key=lambda pair: pair[1])
 | |
|    >>> pairs
 | |
|    [(4, 'four'), (1, 'one'), (3, 'three'), (2, 'two')]
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-docstrings:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Documentation Strings
 | |
| ---------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    single: docstrings
 | |
|    single: documentation strings
 | |
|    single: strings, documentation
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here are some conventions about the content and formatting of documentation
 | |
| strings.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The first line should always be a short, concise summary of the object's
 | |
| purpose.  For brevity, it should not explicitly state the object's name or type,
 | |
| since these are available by other means (except if the name happens to be a
 | |
| verb describing a function's operation).  This line should begin with a capital
 | |
| letter and end with a period.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If there are more lines in the documentation string, the second line should be
 | |
| blank, visually separating the summary from the rest of the description.  The
 | |
| following lines should be one or more paragraphs describing the object's calling
 | |
| conventions, its side effects, etc.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The Python parser does not strip indentation from multi-line string literals in
 | |
| Python, so tools that process documentation have to strip indentation if
 | |
| desired.  This is done using the following convention. The first non-blank line
 | |
| *after* the first line of the string determines the amount of indentation for
 | |
| the entire documentation string.  (We can't use the first line since it is
 | |
| generally adjacent to the string's opening quotes so its indentation is not
 | |
| apparent in the string literal.)  Whitespace "equivalent" to this indentation is
 | |
| then stripped from the start of all lines of the string.  Lines that are
 | |
| indented less should not occur, but if they occur all their leading whitespace
 | |
| should be stripped.  Equivalence of whitespace should be tested after expansion
 | |
| of tabs (to 8 spaces, normally).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here is an example of a multi-line docstring::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> def my_function():
 | |
|    ...     """Do nothing, but document it.
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    ...     No, really, it doesn't do anything.
 | |
|    ...     """
 | |
|    ...     pass
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    >>> print(my_function.__doc__)
 | |
|    Do nothing, but document it.
 | |
| 
 | |
|        No, really, it doesn't do anything.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-annotations:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Function Annotations
 | |
| --------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. sectionauthor:: Zachary Ware <zachary.ware@gmail.com>
 | |
| .. index::
 | |
|    pair: function; annotations
 | |
|    single: ->; function annotations
 | |
|    single: : (colon); function annotations
 | |
| 
 | |
| :ref:`Function annotations <function>` are completely optional metadata
 | |
| information about the types used by user-defined functions (see :pep:`3107` and
 | |
| :pep:`484` for more information).
 | |
| 
 | |
| :term:`Annotations <function annotation>` are stored in the :attr:`__annotations__`
 | |
| attribute of the function as a dictionary and have no effect on any other part of the
 | |
| function.  Parameter annotations are defined by a colon after the parameter name, followed
 | |
| by an expression evaluating to the value of the annotation.  Return annotations are
 | |
| defined by a literal ``->``, followed by an expression, between the parameter
 | |
| list and the colon denoting the end of the :keyword:`def` statement.  The
 | |
| following example has a required argument, an optional argument, and the return
 | |
| value annotated::
 | |
| 
 | |
|    >>> def f(ham: str, eggs: str = 'eggs') -> str:
 | |
|    ...     print("Annotations:", f.__annotations__)
 | |
|    ...     print("Arguments:", ham, eggs)
 | |
|    ...     return ham + ' and ' + eggs
 | |
|    ...
 | |
|    >>> f('spam')
 | |
|    Annotations: {'ham': <class 'str'>, 'return': <class 'str'>, 'eggs': <class 'str'>}
 | |
|    Arguments: spam eggs
 | |
|    'spam and eggs'
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tut-codingstyle:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Intermezzo: Coding Style
 | |
| ========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. sectionauthor:: Georg Brandl <georg@python.org>
 | |
| .. index:: pair: coding; style
 | |
| 
 | |
| Now that you are about to write longer, more complex pieces of Python, it is a
 | |
| good time to talk about *coding style*.  Most languages can be written (or more
 | |
| concise, *formatted*) in different styles; some are more readable than others.
 | |
| Making it easy for others to read your code is always a good idea, and adopting
 | |
| a nice coding style helps tremendously for that.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For Python, :pep:`8` has emerged as the style guide that most projects adhere to;
 | |
| it promotes a very readable and eye-pleasing coding style.  Every Python
 | |
| developer should read it at some point; here are the most important points
 | |
| extracted for you:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Use 4-space indentation, and no tabs.
 | |
| 
 | |
|   4 spaces are a good compromise between small indentation (allows greater
 | |
|   nesting depth) and large indentation (easier to read).  Tabs introduce
 | |
|   confusion, and are best left out.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Wrap lines so that they don't exceed 79 characters.
 | |
| 
 | |
|   This helps users with small displays and makes it possible to have several
 | |
|   code files side-by-side on larger displays.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Use blank lines to separate functions and classes, and larger blocks of
 | |
|   code inside functions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * When possible, put comments on a line of their own.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Use docstrings.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Use spaces around operators and after commas, but not directly inside
 | |
|   bracketing constructs: ``a = f(1, 2) + g(3, 4)``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Name your classes and functions consistently; the convention is to use
 | |
|   ``UpperCamelCase`` for classes and ``lowercase_with_underscores`` for functions
 | |
|   and methods.  Always use ``self`` as the name for the first method argument
 | |
|   (see :ref:`tut-firstclasses` for more on classes and methods).
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Don't use fancy encodings if your code is meant to be used in international
 | |
|   environments.  Python's default, UTF-8, or even plain ASCII work best in any
 | |
|   case.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Likewise, don't use non-ASCII characters in identifiers if there is only the
 | |
|   slightest chance people speaking a different language will read or maintain
 | |
|   the code.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. rubric:: Footnotes
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. [#] Actually, *call by object reference* would be a better description,
 | |
|    since if a mutable object is passed, the caller will see any changes the
 | |
|    callee makes to it (items inserted into a list).
 |