forgejo/modules/actions
Andreas Ahlenstorf 761ed894c5 fix: workflow with pull_request trigger and path filter not run when merging (#12739)
Forgejo would not trigger Actions workflows `on: pull_request:` with `paths:` or `paths-ignore:` filters when the pull request was merged. The reason was that the triggers were evaluated after the PR was merged, but Forgejo still looked for changed files between the base branch and the PR's HEAD, which by then was already in the base branch.

Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/12585.

## Checklist

The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. All work and communication must conform to Forgejo's [AI Agreement](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/AIAgreement.md). There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).

### Tests for Go changes

(can be removed for JavaScript changes)

- I added test coverage for Go changes...
  - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
  - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I ran...
  - [x] `make pr-go` before pushing

### Tests for JavaScript changes

(can be removed for Go changes)

- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
  - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
  - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).

### Documentation

- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.

### Release notes

- [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change.
- [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change.

*The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.*

The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12739
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
2026-05-26 03:45:09 +02:00
..
github.go chore: branding import path (#7337) 2025-03-27 19:40:14 +00:00
github_test.go chore: branding import path (#7337) 2025-03-27 19:40:14 +00:00
job_parser.go Update module code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/v11 to v12 (forgejo) (#10213) 2025-11-23 15:58:57 +01:00
job_parser_test.go chore(refactor): move actions_service.jobParser to actions_module.jobParser 2025-11-06 07:28:16 +01:00
log.go chore: add more diagnostic output to dbfs Stat error (#11525) 2026-03-06 06:43:33 +01:00
task_state.go feat: reusable workflow outer job is skipped if 'if:' block skips workflow (#12412) 2026-05-05 02:59:34 +02:00
task_state_test.go feat: reusable workflow outer job is skipped if 'if:' block skips workflow (#12412) 2026-05-05 02:59:34 +02:00
workflows.go fix: workflow with pull_request trigger and path filter not run when merging (#12739) 2026-05-26 03:45:09 +02:00
workflows_test.go feat: show workflow name for scheduled runs (#11770) 2026-03-24 01:27:32 +01:00