go/src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/rewritedec.go

508 lines
12 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// autogenerated from gen/dec.rules: do not edit!
// generated with: cd gen; go run *.go
package ssa
import "math"
var _ = math.MinInt8 // in case not otherwise used
func rewriteValuedec(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
switch v.Op {
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
case OpComplexImag:
return rewriteValuedec_OpComplexImag(v, config)
case OpComplexReal:
return rewriteValuedec_OpComplexReal(v, config)
case OpIData:
return rewriteValuedec_OpIData(v, config)
case OpITab:
return rewriteValuedec_OpITab(v, config)
case OpLoad:
return rewriteValuedec_OpLoad(v, config)
case OpSliceCap:
return rewriteValuedec_OpSliceCap(v, config)
case OpSliceLen:
return rewriteValuedec_OpSliceLen(v, config)
case OpSlicePtr:
return rewriteValuedec_OpSlicePtr(v, config)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
case OpStore:
return rewriteValuedec_OpStore(v, config)
case OpStringLen:
return rewriteValuedec_OpStringLen(v, config)
case OpStringPtr:
return rewriteValuedec_OpStringPtr(v, config)
}
return false
}
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
func rewriteValuedec_OpComplexImag(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (ComplexImag (ComplexMake _ imag ))
// cond:
// result: imag
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpComplexMake {
break
}
imag := v_0.Args[1]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = imag.Type
v.AddArg(imag)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpComplexReal(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (ComplexReal (ComplexMake real _ ))
// cond:
// result: real
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpComplexMake {
break
}
real := v_0.Args[0]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = real.Type
v.AddArg(real)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpIData(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (IData (IMake _ data))
// cond:
// result: data
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpIMake {
break
}
data := v_0.Args[1]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = data.Type
v.AddArg(data)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpITab(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (ITab (IMake itab _))
// cond:
// result: itab
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpIMake {
break
}
itab := v_0.Args[0]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = itab.Type
v.AddArg(itab)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpLoad(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (Load <t> ptr mem)
// cond: t.IsComplex() && t.Size() == 8
// result: (ComplexMake (Load <config.fe.TypeFloat32()> ptr mem) (Load <config.fe.TypeFloat32()> (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeFloat32().PtrTo()> [4] ptr) mem) )
for {
t := v.Type
ptr := v.Args[0]
mem := v.Args[1]
if !(t.IsComplex() && t.Size() == 8) {
break
}
v.reset(OpComplexMake)
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, config.fe.TypeFloat32())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AddArg(ptr)
v0.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v0)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, config.fe.TypeFloat32())
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeFloat32().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = 4
v2.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Load <t> ptr mem)
// cond: t.IsComplex() && t.Size() == 16
// result: (ComplexMake (Load <config.fe.TypeFloat64()> ptr mem) (Load <config.fe.TypeFloat64()> (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeFloat64().PtrTo()> [8] ptr) mem) )
for {
t := v.Type
ptr := v.Args[0]
mem := v.Args[1]
if !(t.IsComplex() && t.Size() == 16) {
break
}
v.reset(OpComplexMake)
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, config.fe.TypeFloat64())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AddArg(ptr)
v0.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v0)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, config.fe.TypeFloat64())
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeFloat64().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = 8
v2.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Load <t> ptr mem)
// cond: t.IsString()
// result: (StringMake (Load <config.fe.TypeBytePtr()> ptr mem) (Load <config.fe.TypeInt()> (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo()> [config.PtrSize] ptr) mem))
for {
t := v.Type
ptr := v.Args[0]
mem := v.Args[1]
if !(t.IsString()) {
break
}
v.reset(OpStringMake)
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, config.fe.TypeBytePtr())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AddArg(ptr)
v0.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v0)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, config.fe.TypeInt())
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v2.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Load <t> ptr mem)
// cond: t.IsSlice()
// result: (SliceMake (Load <t.ElemType().PtrTo()> ptr mem) (Load <config.fe.TypeInt()> (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo()> [config.PtrSize] ptr) mem) (Load <config.fe.TypeInt()> (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo()> [2*config.PtrSize] ptr) mem))
for {
t := v.Type
ptr := v.Args[0]
mem := v.Args[1]
if !(t.IsSlice()) {
break
}
v.reset(OpSliceMake)
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, t.ElemType().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AddArg(ptr)
v0.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v0)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, config.fe.TypeInt())
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v2.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
v3 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, config.fe.TypeInt())
v4 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v4.AuxInt = 2 * config.PtrSize
v4.AddArg(ptr)
v3.AddArg(v4)
v3.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v3)
return true
}
// match: (Load <t> ptr mem)
// cond: t.IsInterface()
// result: (IMake (Load <config.fe.TypeBytePtr()> ptr mem) (Load <config.fe.TypeBytePtr()> (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeBytePtr().PtrTo()> [config.PtrSize] ptr) mem))
for {
t := v.Type
ptr := v.Args[0]
mem := v.Args[1]
if !(t.IsInterface()) {
break
}
v.reset(OpIMake)
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, config.fe.TypeBytePtr())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AddArg(ptr)
v0.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v0)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, config.fe.TypeBytePtr())
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeBytePtr().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v2.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpSliceCap(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (SliceCap (SliceMake _ _ cap))
// cond:
// result: cap
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpSliceMake {
break
}
cap := v_0.Args[2]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = cap.Type
v.AddArg(cap)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpSliceLen(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (SliceLen (SliceMake _ len _))
// cond:
// result: len
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpSliceMake {
break
}
len := v_0.Args[1]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = len.Type
v.AddArg(len)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpSlicePtr(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (SlicePtr (SliceMake ptr _ _ ))
// cond:
// result: ptr
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpSliceMake {
break
}
ptr := v_0.Args[0]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = ptr.Type
v.AddArg(ptr)
return true
}
return false
}
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
func rewriteValuedec_OpStore(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (Store [8] dst (ComplexMake real imag) mem)
// cond:
// result: (Store [4] (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeFloat32().PtrTo()> [4] dst) imag (Store [4] dst real mem))
for {
if v.AuxInt != 8 {
break
}
dst := v.Args[0]
v_1 := v.Args[1]
if v_1.Op != OpComplexMake {
break
}
real := v_1.Args[0]
imag := v_1.Args[1]
mem := v.Args[2]
v.reset(OpStore)
v.AuxInt = 4
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeFloat32().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AuxInt = 4
v0.AddArg(dst)
v.AddArg(v0)
v.AddArg(imag)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v1.AuxInt = 4
v1.AddArg(dst)
v1.AddArg(real)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Store [16] dst (ComplexMake real imag) mem)
// cond:
// result: (Store [8] (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeFloat64().PtrTo()> [8] dst) imag (Store [8] dst real mem))
for {
if v.AuxInt != 16 {
break
}
dst := v.Args[0]
v_1 := v.Args[1]
if v_1.Op != OpComplexMake {
break
}
real := v_1.Args[0]
imag := v_1.Args[1]
mem := v.Args[2]
v.reset(OpStore)
v.AuxInt = 8
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeFloat64().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AuxInt = 8
v0.AddArg(dst)
v.AddArg(v0)
v.AddArg(imag)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v1.AuxInt = 8
v1.AddArg(dst)
v1.AddArg(real)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Store [2*config.PtrSize] dst (StringMake ptr len) mem)
// cond:
// result: (Store [config.PtrSize] (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo()> [config.PtrSize] dst) len (Store [config.PtrSize] dst ptr mem))
for {
if v.AuxInt != 2*config.PtrSize {
break
}
dst := v.Args[0]
v_1 := v.Args[1]
if v_1.Op != OpStringMake {
break
}
ptr := v_1.Args[0]
len := v_1.Args[1]
mem := v.Args[2]
v.reset(OpStore)
v.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v0.AddArg(dst)
v.AddArg(v0)
v.AddArg(len)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v1.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v1.AddArg(dst)
v1.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Store [3*config.PtrSize] dst (SliceMake ptr len cap) mem)
// cond:
// result: (Store [config.PtrSize] (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo()> [2*config.PtrSize] dst) cap (Store [config.PtrSize] (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo()> [config.PtrSize] dst) len (Store [config.PtrSize] dst ptr mem)))
for {
if v.AuxInt != 3*config.PtrSize {
break
}
dst := v.Args[0]
v_1 := v.Args[1]
if v_1.Op != OpSliceMake {
break
}
ptr := v_1.Args[0]
len := v_1.Args[1]
cap := v_1.Args[2]
mem := v.Args[2]
v.reset(OpStore)
v.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AuxInt = 2 * config.PtrSize
v0.AddArg(dst)
v.AddArg(v0)
v.AddArg(cap)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v1.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeInt().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v2.AddArg(dst)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(len)
v3 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v3.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v3.AddArg(dst)
v3.AddArg(ptr)
v3.AddArg(mem)
v1.AddArg(v3)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Store [2*config.PtrSize] dst (IMake itab data) mem)
// cond:
// result: (Store [config.PtrSize] (OffPtr <config.fe.TypeBytePtr().PtrTo()> [config.PtrSize] dst) data (Store [config.PtrSize] dst itab mem))
for {
if v.AuxInt != 2*config.PtrSize {
break
}
dst := v.Args[0]
v_1 := v.Args[1]
if v_1.Op != OpIMake {
break
}
itab := v_1.Args[0]
data := v_1.Args[1]
mem := v.Args[2]
v.reset(OpStore)
v.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, config.fe.TypeBytePtr().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v0.AddArg(dst)
v.AddArg(v0)
v.AddArg(data)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v1.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v1.AddArg(dst)
v1.AddArg(itab)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpStringLen(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (StringLen (StringMake _ len))
// cond:
// result: len
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpStringMake {
break
}
len := v_0.Args[1]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = len.Type
v.AddArg(len)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpStringPtr(v *Value, config *Config) bool {
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (StringPtr (StringMake ptr _))
// cond:
// result: ptr
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpStringMake {
break
}
ptr := v_0.Args[0]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = ptr.Type
v.AddArg(ptr)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteBlockdec(b *Block, config *Config) bool {
switch b.Kind {
}
return false
}