go/src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/rewritedec.go

499 lines
11 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// autogenerated from gen/dec.rules: do not edit!
// generated with: cd gen; go run *.go
package ssa
import "math"
var _ = math.MinInt8 // in case not otherwise used
func rewriteValuedec(v *Value) bool {
switch v.Op {
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
case OpComplexImag:
return rewriteValuedec_OpComplexImag(v)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
case OpComplexReal:
return rewriteValuedec_OpComplexReal(v)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
case OpIData:
return rewriteValuedec_OpIData(v)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
case OpITab:
return rewriteValuedec_OpITab(v)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
case OpLoad:
return rewriteValuedec_OpLoad(v)
case OpSliceCap:
return rewriteValuedec_OpSliceCap(v)
case OpSliceLen:
return rewriteValuedec_OpSliceLen(v)
case OpSlicePtr:
return rewriteValuedec_OpSlicePtr(v)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
case OpStore:
return rewriteValuedec_OpStore(v)
case OpStringLen:
return rewriteValuedec_OpStringLen(v)
case OpStringPtr:
return rewriteValuedec_OpStringPtr(v)
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpComplexImag(v *Value) bool {
cmd/compile: automatically handle commuting ops in rewrite rules We have lots of rewrite rules that vary only in the fact that we have 2 versions for the 2 different orderings of various commuting ops. For example: (ADDL x (MOVLconst [c])) -> (ADDLconst [c] x) (ADDL (MOVLconst [c]) x) -> (ADDLconst [c] x) It can get unwieldly quickly, especially when there is more than one commuting op in a rule. Our existing "fix" for this problem is to have rules that canonicalize the operations first. For example: (Eq64 x (Const64 <t> [c])) && x.Op != OpConst64 -> (Eq64 (Const64 <t> [c]) x) Subsequent rules can then assume if there is a constant arg to Eq64, it will be the first one. This fix kinda works, but it is fragile and only works when we remember to include the required extra rules. The fundamental problem is that the rule matcher doesn't know anything about commuting ops. This CL fixes that fact. We already have information about which ops commute. (The register allocator takes advantage of commutivity.) The rule generator now automatically generates multiple rules for a single source rule when there are commutative ops in the rule. We can now drop all of our almost-duplicate source-level rules and the canonicalization rules. I have some CLs in progress that will be a lot less verbose when the rule generator handles commutivity for me. I had to reorganize the load-combining rules a bit. The 8-way OR rules generated 128 different reorderings, which was causing the generator to put too much code in the rewrite*.go files (the big ones were going from 25K lines to 132K lines). Instead I reorganized the rules to combine pairs of loads at a time. The generated rule files are now actually a bit (5%) smaller. [Note to reviewers: check these carefully. Most of the other rule changes are trivial.] Make.bash times are ~unchanged. Compiler benchmarks are not observably different. Probably because we don't spend much compiler time in rule matching anyway. I've also done a pass over all of our ops adding commutative markings for ops which hadn't had them previously. Fixes #18292 Change-Id: I999b1307272e91965b66754576019dedcbe7527a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38666 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2017-03-25 15:05:42 -07:00
// match: (ComplexImag (ComplexMake _ imag))
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
// cond:
// result: imag
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpComplexMake {
break
}
imag := v_0.Args[1]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = imag.Type
v.AddArg(imag)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpComplexReal(v *Value) bool {
cmd/compile: automatically handle commuting ops in rewrite rules We have lots of rewrite rules that vary only in the fact that we have 2 versions for the 2 different orderings of various commuting ops. For example: (ADDL x (MOVLconst [c])) -> (ADDLconst [c] x) (ADDL (MOVLconst [c]) x) -> (ADDLconst [c] x) It can get unwieldly quickly, especially when there is more than one commuting op in a rule. Our existing "fix" for this problem is to have rules that canonicalize the operations first. For example: (Eq64 x (Const64 <t> [c])) && x.Op != OpConst64 -> (Eq64 (Const64 <t> [c]) x) Subsequent rules can then assume if there is a constant arg to Eq64, it will be the first one. This fix kinda works, but it is fragile and only works when we remember to include the required extra rules. The fundamental problem is that the rule matcher doesn't know anything about commuting ops. This CL fixes that fact. We already have information about which ops commute. (The register allocator takes advantage of commutivity.) The rule generator now automatically generates multiple rules for a single source rule when there are commutative ops in the rule. We can now drop all of our almost-duplicate source-level rules and the canonicalization rules. I have some CLs in progress that will be a lot less verbose when the rule generator handles commutivity for me. I had to reorganize the load-combining rules a bit. The 8-way OR rules generated 128 different reorderings, which was causing the generator to put too much code in the rewrite*.go files (the big ones were going from 25K lines to 132K lines). Instead I reorganized the rules to combine pairs of loads at a time. The generated rule files are now actually a bit (5%) smaller. [Note to reviewers: check these carefully. Most of the other rule changes are trivial.] Make.bash times are ~unchanged. Compiler benchmarks are not observably different. Probably because we don't spend much compiler time in rule matching anyway. I've also done a pass over all of our ops adding commutative markings for ops which hadn't had them previously. Fixes #18292 Change-Id: I999b1307272e91965b66754576019dedcbe7527a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38666 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2017-03-25 15:05:42 -07:00
// match: (ComplexReal (ComplexMake real _))
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
// cond:
// result: real
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpComplexMake {
break
}
real := v_0.Args[0]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = real.Type
v.AddArg(real)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpIData(v *Value) bool {
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
// match: (IData (IMake _ data))
// cond:
// result: data
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpIMake {
break
}
data := v_0.Args[1]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = data.Type
v.AddArg(data)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpITab(v *Value) bool {
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
b := v.Block
_ = b
// match: (ITab (IMake itab _))
// cond:
// result: itab
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpIMake {
break
}
itab := v_0.Args[0]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = itab.Type
v.AddArg(itab)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpLoad(v *Value) bool {
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
b := v.Block
_ = b
config := b.Func.Config
_ = config
types := &b.Func.Config.Types
_ = types
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
// match: (Load <t> ptr mem)
// cond: t.IsComplex() && t.Size() == 8
// result: (ComplexMake (Load <types.Float32> ptr mem) (Load <types.Float32> (OffPtr <types.Float32Ptr> [4] ptr) mem) )
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
for {
t := v.Type
ptr := v.Args[0]
mem := v.Args[1]
if !(t.IsComplex() && t.Size() == 8) {
break
}
v.reset(OpComplexMake)
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, types.Float32)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AddArg(ptr)
v0.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v0)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, types.Float32)
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.Float32Ptr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = 4
v2.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Load <t> ptr mem)
// cond: t.IsComplex() && t.Size() == 16
// result: (ComplexMake (Load <types.Float64> ptr mem) (Load <types.Float64> (OffPtr <types.Float64Ptr> [8] ptr) mem) )
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
for {
t := v.Type
ptr := v.Args[0]
mem := v.Args[1]
if !(t.IsComplex() && t.Size() == 16) {
break
}
v.reset(OpComplexMake)
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, types.Float64)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AddArg(ptr)
v0.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v0)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, types.Float64)
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.Float64Ptr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = 8
v2.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Load <t> ptr mem)
// cond: t.IsString()
// result: (StringMake (Load <types.BytePtr> ptr mem) (Load <types.Int> (OffPtr <types.IntPtr> [config.PtrSize] ptr) mem))
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
for {
t := v.Type
ptr := v.Args[0]
mem := v.Args[1]
if !(t.IsString()) {
break
}
v.reset(OpStringMake)
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, types.BytePtr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AddArg(ptr)
v0.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v0)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, types.Int)
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.IntPtr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v2.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Load <t> ptr mem)
// cond: t.IsSlice()
// result: (SliceMake (Load <t.ElemType().PtrTo()> ptr mem) (Load <types.Int> (OffPtr <types.IntPtr> [config.PtrSize] ptr) mem) (Load <types.Int> (OffPtr <types.IntPtr> [2*config.PtrSize] ptr) mem))
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
for {
t := v.Type
ptr := v.Args[0]
mem := v.Args[1]
if !(t.IsSlice()) {
break
}
v.reset(OpSliceMake)
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, t.ElemType().PtrTo())
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AddArg(ptr)
v0.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v0)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, types.Int)
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.IntPtr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v2.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
v3 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, types.Int)
v4 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.IntPtr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v4.AuxInt = 2 * config.PtrSize
v4.AddArg(ptr)
v3.AddArg(v4)
v3.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v3)
return true
}
// match: (Load <t> ptr mem)
// cond: t.IsInterface()
// result: (IMake (Load <types.BytePtr> ptr mem) (Load <types.BytePtr> (OffPtr <types.BytePtrPtr> [config.PtrSize] ptr) mem))
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
for {
t := v.Type
ptr := v.Args[0]
mem := v.Args[1]
if !(t.IsInterface()) {
break
}
v.reset(OpIMake)
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, types.BytePtr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AddArg(ptr)
v0.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v0)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpLoad, types.BytePtr)
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.BytePtrPtr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v2.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpSliceCap(v *Value) bool {
// match: (SliceCap (SliceMake _ _ cap))
// cond:
// result: cap
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpSliceMake {
break
}
cap := v_0.Args[2]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = cap.Type
v.AddArg(cap)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpSliceLen(v *Value) bool {
// match: (SliceLen (SliceMake _ len _))
// cond:
// result: len
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpSliceMake {
break
}
len := v_0.Args[1]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = len.Type
v.AddArg(len)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpSlicePtr(v *Value) bool {
cmd/compile: automatically handle commuting ops in rewrite rules We have lots of rewrite rules that vary only in the fact that we have 2 versions for the 2 different orderings of various commuting ops. For example: (ADDL x (MOVLconst [c])) -> (ADDLconst [c] x) (ADDL (MOVLconst [c]) x) -> (ADDLconst [c] x) It can get unwieldly quickly, especially when there is more than one commuting op in a rule. Our existing "fix" for this problem is to have rules that canonicalize the operations first. For example: (Eq64 x (Const64 <t> [c])) && x.Op != OpConst64 -> (Eq64 (Const64 <t> [c]) x) Subsequent rules can then assume if there is a constant arg to Eq64, it will be the first one. This fix kinda works, but it is fragile and only works when we remember to include the required extra rules. The fundamental problem is that the rule matcher doesn't know anything about commuting ops. This CL fixes that fact. We already have information about which ops commute. (The register allocator takes advantage of commutivity.) The rule generator now automatically generates multiple rules for a single source rule when there are commutative ops in the rule. We can now drop all of our almost-duplicate source-level rules and the canonicalization rules. I have some CLs in progress that will be a lot less verbose when the rule generator handles commutivity for me. I had to reorganize the load-combining rules a bit. The 8-way OR rules generated 128 different reorderings, which was causing the generator to put too much code in the rewrite*.go files (the big ones were going from 25K lines to 132K lines). Instead I reorganized the rules to combine pairs of loads at a time. The generated rule files are now actually a bit (5%) smaller. [Note to reviewers: check these carefully. Most of the other rule changes are trivial.] Make.bash times are ~unchanged. Compiler benchmarks are not observably different. Probably because we don't spend much compiler time in rule matching anyway. I've also done a pass over all of our ops adding commutative markings for ops which hadn't had them previously. Fixes #18292 Change-Id: I999b1307272e91965b66754576019dedcbe7527a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38666 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2017-03-25 15:05:42 -07:00
// match: (SlicePtr (SliceMake ptr _ _))
// cond:
// result: ptr
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpSliceMake {
break
}
ptr := v_0.Args[0]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = ptr.Type
v.AddArg(ptr)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpStore(v *Value) bool {
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
b := v.Block
_ = b
config := b.Func.Config
_ = config
types := &b.Func.Config.Types
_ = types
// match: (Store {t} dst (ComplexMake real imag) mem)
// cond: t.(Type).Size() == 8
// result: (Store {types.Float32} (OffPtr <types.Float32Ptr> [4] dst) imag (Store {types.Float32} dst real mem))
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
for {
t := v.Aux
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
dst := v.Args[0]
v_1 := v.Args[1]
if v_1.Op != OpComplexMake {
break
}
real := v_1.Args[0]
imag := v_1.Args[1]
mem := v.Args[2]
if !(t.(Type).Size() == 8) {
break
}
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v.reset(OpStore)
v.Aux = types.Float32
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.Float32Ptr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AuxInt = 4
v0.AddArg(dst)
v.AddArg(v0)
v.AddArg(imag)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
v1.Aux = types.Float32
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v1.AddArg(dst)
v1.AddArg(real)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Store {t} dst (ComplexMake real imag) mem)
// cond: t.(Type).Size() == 16
// result: (Store {types.Float64} (OffPtr <types.Float64Ptr> [8] dst) imag (Store {types.Float64} dst real mem))
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
for {
t := v.Aux
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
dst := v.Args[0]
v_1 := v.Args[1]
if v_1.Op != OpComplexMake {
break
}
real := v_1.Args[0]
imag := v_1.Args[1]
mem := v.Args[2]
if !(t.(Type).Size() == 16) {
break
}
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v.reset(OpStore)
v.Aux = types.Float64
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.Float64Ptr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AuxInt = 8
v0.AddArg(dst)
v.AddArg(v0)
v.AddArg(imag)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
v1.Aux = types.Float64
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v1.AddArg(dst)
v1.AddArg(real)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Store dst (StringMake ptr len) mem)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
// cond:
// result: (Store {types.Int} (OffPtr <types.IntPtr> [config.PtrSize] dst) len (Store {types.BytePtr} dst ptr mem))
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
for {
dst := v.Args[0]
v_1 := v.Args[1]
if v_1.Op != OpStringMake {
break
}
ptr := v_1.Args[0]
len := v_1.Args[1]
mem := v.Args[2]
v.reset(OpStore)
v.Aux = types.Int
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.IntPtr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v0.AddArg(dst)
v.AddArg(v0)
v.AddArg(len)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
v1.Aux = types.BytePtr
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v1.AddArg(dst)
v1.AddArg(ptr)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Store dst (SliceMake ptr len cap) mem)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
// cond:
// result: (Store {types.Int} (OffPtr <types.IntPtr> [2*config.PtrSize] dst) cap (Store {types.Int} (OffPtr <types.IntPtr> [config.PtrSize] dst) len (Store {types.BytePtr} dst ptr mem)))
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
for {
dst := v.Args[0]
v_1 := v.Args[1]
if v_1.Op != OpSliceMake {
break
}
ptr := v_1.Args[0]
len := v_1.Args[1]
cap := v_1.Args[2]
mem := v.Args[2]
v.reset(OpStore)
v.Aux = types.Int
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.IntPtr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AuxInt = 2 * config.PtrSize
v0.AddArg(dst)
v.AddArg(v0)
v.AddArg(cap)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
v1.Aux = types.Int
v2 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.IntPtr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v2.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v2.AddArg(dst)
v1.AddArg(v2)
v1.AddArg(len)
v3 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
v3.Aux = types.BytePtr
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v3.AddArg(dst)
v3.AddArg(ptr)
v3.AddArg(mem)
v1.AddArg(v3)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
// match: (Store dst (IMake itab data) mem)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
// cond:
// result: (Store {types.BytePtr} (OffPtr <types.BytePtrPtr> [config.PtrSize] dst) data (Store {types.Uintptr} dst itab mem))
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
for {
dst := v.Args[0]
v_1 := v.Args[1]
if v_1.Op != OpIMake {
break
}
itab := v_1.Args[0]
data := v_1.Args[1]
mem := v.Args[2]
v.reset(OpStore)
v.Aux = types.BytePtr
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpOffPtr, types.BytePtrPtr)
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v0.AuxInt = config.PtrSize
v0.AddArg(dst)
v.AddArg(v0)
v.AddArg(data)
v1 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, OpStore, TypeMem)
v1.Aux = types.Uintptr
cmd/compile: better job of naming compound types Compound AUTO types weren't named previously. That was because live variable analysis (plive.go) doesn't handle spilling to compound types. It can't handle them because there is no valid place to put VARDEFs when regalloc is spilling compound types. compound types = multiword builtin types: complex, string, slice, and interface. Instead, we split named AUTOs into individual one-word variables. For example, a string s gets split into a byte ptr s.ptr and an integer s.len. Those two variables can be spilled to / restored from independently. As a result, live variable analysis can handle them because they are one-word objects. This CL will change how AUTOs are described in DWARF information. Consider the code: func f(s string, i int) int { x := s[i:i+5] g() return lookup(x) } The old compiler would spill x to two consecutive slots on the stack, both named x (at offsets 0 and 8). The new compiler spills the pointer of x to a slot named x.ptr. It doesn't spill x.len at all, as it is a constant (5) and can be rematerialized for the call to lookup. So compound objects may not be spilled in their entirety, and even if they are they won't necessarily be contiguous. Such is the price of optimization. Re-enable live variable analysis tests. One test remains disabled, it fails because of #14904. Change-Id: I8ef2b5ab91e43a0d2136bfc231c05d100ec0b801 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21233 Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2016-03-28 11:25:17 -07:00
v1.AddArg(dst)
v1.AddArg(itab)
v1.AddArg(mem)
v.AddArg(v1)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpStringLen(v *Value) bool {
// match: (StringLen (StringMake _ len))
// cond:
// result: len
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpStringMake {
break
}
len := v_0.Args[1]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = len.Type
v.AddArg(len)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteValuedec_OpStringPtr(v *Value) bool {
// match: (StringPtr (StringMake ptr _))
// cond:
// result: ptr
for {
v_0 := v.Args[0]
if v_0.Op != OpStringMake {
break
}
ptr := v_0.Args[0]
v.reset(OpCopy)
v.Type = ptr.Type
v.AddArg(ptr)
return true
}
return false
}
func rewriteBlockdec(b *Block) bool {
config := b.Func.Config
_ = config
fe := b.Func.fe
_ = fe
types := &config.Types
_ = types
switch b.Kind {
}
return false
}