2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
// Copyright 2013 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
|
|
|
|
|
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "runtime.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "arch_GOARCH.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "malloc.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "stack.h"
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
#include "funcdata.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "typekind.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "type.h"
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
enum
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
// StackDebug == 0: no logging
|
|
|
|
|
// == 1: logging of per-stack operations
|
|
|
|
|
// == 2: logging of per-frame operations
|
|
|
|
|
// == 3: logging of per-word updates
|
|
|
|
|
// == 4: logging of per-word reads
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
StackDebug = 0,
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
StackFromSystem = 0, // allocate stacks from system memory instead of the heap
|
|
|
|
|
StackFaultOnFree = 0, // old stacks are mapped noaccess to detect use after free
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
typedef struct StackCacheNode StackCacheNode;
|
|
|
|
|
struct StackCacheNode
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
StackCacheNode *next;
|
|
|
|
|
void* batch[StackCacheBatch-1];
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static StackCacheNode *stackcache;
|
|
|
|
|
static Lock stackcachemu;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-26 09:59:17 -08:00
|
|
|
// stackcacherefill/stackcacherelease implement a global cache of stack segments.
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
// The cache is required to prevent unlimited growth of per-thread caches.
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
|
stackcacherefill(void)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
StackCacheNode *n;
|
|
|
|
|
int32 i, pos;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·lock(&stackcachemu);
|
|
|
|
|
n = stackcache;
|
|
|
|
|
if(n)
|
|
|
|
|
stackcache = n->next;
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·unlock(&stackcachemu);
|
|
|
|
|
if(n == nil) {
|
runtime: account for all sys memory in MemStats
Currently lots of sys allocations are not accounted in any of XxxSys,
including GC bitmap, spans table, GC roots blocks, GC finalizer blocks,
iface table, netpoll descriptors and more. Up to ~20% can unaccounted.
This change introduces 2 new stats: GCSys and OtherSys for GC metadata
and all other misc allocations, respectively.
Also ensures that all XxxSys indeed sum up to Sys. All sys memory allocation
functions require the stat for accounting, so that it's impossible to miss something.
Also fix updating of mcache_sys/inuse, they were not updated after deallocation.
test/bench/garbage/parser before:
Sys 670064344
HeapSys 610271232
StackSys 65536
MSpanSys 14204928
MCacheSys 16384
BuckHashSys 1439992
after:
Sys 670064344
HeapSys 610271232
StackSys 65536
MSpanSys 14188544
MCacheSys 16384
BuckHashSys 3194304
GCSys 39198688
OtherSys 3129656
Fixes #5799.
R=rsc, dave, alex.brainman
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12946043
2013-09-06 16:55:40 -04:00
|
|
|
n = (StackCacheNode*)runtime·SysAlloc(FixedStack*StackCacheBatch, &mstats.stacks_sys);
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
if(n == nil)
|
2013-02-26 09:59:17 -08:00
|
|
|
runtime·throw("out of memory (stackcacherefill)");
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
for(i = 0; i < StackCacheBatch-1; i++)
|
|
|
|
|
n->batch[i] = (byte*)n + (i+1)*FixedStack;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
pos = m->stackcachepos;
|
|
|
|
|
for(i = 0; i < StackCacheBatch-1; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackcache[pos] = n->batch[i];
|
|
|
|
|
pos = (pos + 1) % StackCacheSize;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackcache[pos] = n;
|
|
|
|
|
pos = (pos + 1) % StackCacheSize;
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackcachepos = pos;
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackcachecnt += StackCacheBatch;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
|
stackcacherelease(void)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
StackCacheNode *n;
|
|
|
|
|
uint32 i, pos;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pos = (m->stackcachepos - m->stackcachecnt) % StackCacheSize;
|
|
|
|
|
n = (StackCacheNode*)m->stackcache[pos];
|
|
|
|
|
pos = (pos + 1) % StackCacheSize;
|
|
|
|
|
for(i = 0; i < StackCacheBatch-1; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
n->batch[i] = m->stackcache[pos];
|
|
|
|
|
pos = (pos + 1) % StackCacheSize;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackcachecnt -= StackCacheBatch;
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·lock(&stackcachemu);
|
|
|
|
|
n->next = stackcache;
|
|
|
|
|
stackcache = n;
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·unlock(&stackcachemu);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void*
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
runtime·stackalloc(G *gp, uint32 n)
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
uint32 pos;
|
|
|
|
|
void *v;
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
bool malloced;
|
|
|
|
|
Stktop *top;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Stackalloc must be called on scheduler stack, so that we
|
|
|
|
|
// never try to grow the stack during the code that stackalloc runs.
|
|
|
|
|
// Doing so would cause a deadlock (issue 1547).
|
|
|
|
|
if(g != m->g0)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("stackalloc not on scheduler stack");
|
2014-03-06 16:03:43 -08:00
|
|
|
if((n & (n-1)) != 0)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("stack size not a power of 2");
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 1)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("stackalloc %d\n", n);
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
gp->stacksize += n;
|
2014-03-14 21:22:03 +04:00
|
|
|
if(runtime·debug.efence || StackFromSystem) {
|
|
|
|
|
v = runtime·SysAlloc(ROUND(n, PageSize), &mstats.stacks_sys);
|
|
|
|
|
if(v == nil)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("out of memory (stackalloc)");
|
|
|
|
|
return v;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Minimum-sized stacks are allocated with a fixed-size free-list allocator,
|
|
|
|
|
// but if we need a stack of a bigger size, we fall back on malloc
|
|
|
|
|
// (assuming that inside malloc all the stack frames are small,
|
2013-05-25 22:47:36 +04:00
|
|
|
// so that we do not deadlock).
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
malloced = true;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if(n == FixedStack || m->mallocing) {
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
if(n != FixedStack) {
|
2013-02-15 17:04:02 +04:00
|
|
|
runtime·printf("stackalloc: in malloc, size=%d want %d\n", FixedStack, n);
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
runtime·throw("stackalloc");
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if(m->stackcachecnt == 0)
|
|
|
|
|
stackcacherefill();
|
|
|
|
|
pos = m->stackcachepos;
|
|
|
|
|
pos = (pos - 1) % StackCacheSize;
|
|
|
|
|
v = m->stackcache[pos];
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackcachepos = pos;
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackcachecnt--;
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackinuse++;
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
malloced = false;
|
|
|
|
|
} else
|
|
|
|
|
v = runtime·mallocgc(n, 0, FlagNoProfiling|FlagNoGC|FlagNoZero|FlagNoInvokeGC);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
top = (Stktop*)((byte*)v+n-sizeof(Stktop));
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·memclr((byte*)top, sizeof(*top));
|
|
|
|
|
top->malloced = malloced;
|
|
|
|
|
return v;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
runtime·stackfree(G *gp, void *v, Stktop *top)
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
uint32 pos;
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
uintptr n;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
n = (uintptr)(top+1) - (uintptr)v;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 1)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("stackfree %p %d\n", v, (int32)n);
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
gp->stacksize -= n;
|
2014-03-12 10:21:34 +04:00
|
|
|
if(runtime·debug.efence || StackFromSystem) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(runtime·debug.efence || StackFaultOnFree)
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
runtime·SysFault(v, n);
|
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·SysFree(v, n, &mstats.stacks_sys);
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
if(top->malloced) {
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·free(v);
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
if(n != FixedStack)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("stackfree: bad fixed size");
|
|
|
|
|
if(m->stackcachecnt == StackCacheSize)
|
|
|
|
|
stackcacherelease();
|
|
|
|
|
pos = m->stackcachepos;
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackcache[pos] = v;
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackcachepos = (pos + 1) % StackCacheSize;
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackcachecnt++;
|
|
|
|
|
m->stackinuse--;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Called from runtime·lessstack when returning from a function which
|
|
|
|
|
// allocated a new stack segment. The function's return value is in
|
|
|
|
|
// m->cret.
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·oldstack(void)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
Stktop *top;
|
|
|
|
|
uint32 argsize;
|
|
|
|
|
byte *sp, *old;
|
|
|
|
|
uintptr *src, *dst, *dstend;
|
|
|
|
|
G *gp;
|
|
|
|
|
int64 goid;
|
2013-06-28 00:49:53 +04:00
|
|
|
int32 oldstatus;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gp = m->curg;
|
|
|
|
|
top = (Stktop*)gp->stackbase;
|
|
|
|
|
old = (byte*)gp->stackguard - StackGuard;
|
|
|
|
|
sp = (byte*)top;
|
|
|
|
|
argsize = top->argsize;
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 1) {
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
runtime·printf("runtime: oldstack gobuf={pc:%p sp:%p lr:%p} cret=%p argsize=%p\n",
|
2014-03-11 14:43:10 +11:00
|
|
|
top->gobuf.pc, top->gobuf.sp, top->gobuf.lr, (uintptr)m->cret, (uintptr)argsize);
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-06-28 00:49:53 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
// gp->status is usually Grunning, but it could be Gsyscall if a stack overflow
|
2013-06-28 00:49:53 +04:00
|
|
|
// happens during a function call inside entersyscall.
|
|
|
|
|
oldstatus = gp->status;
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gp->sched = top->gobuf;
|
|
|
|
|
gp->sched.ret = m->cret;
|
|
|
|
|
m->cret = 0; // drop reference
|
|
|
|
|
gp->status = Gwaiting;
|
|
|
|
|
gp->waitreason = "stack unsplit";
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
if(argsize > 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
sp -= argsize;
|
|
|
|
|
dst = (uintptr*)top->argp;
|
|
|
|
|
dstend = dst + argsize/sizeof(*dst);
|
|
|
|
|
src = (uintptr*)sp;
|
|
|
|
|
while(dst < dstend)
|
|
|
|
|
*dst++ = *src++;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
goid = top->gobuf.g->goid; // fault if g is bad, before gogo
|
|
|
|
|
USED(goid);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-12 08:49:38 -04:00
|
|
|
gp->stackbase = top->stackbase;
|
|
|
|
|
gp->stackguard = top->stackguard;
|
2013-06-03 12:28:24 +04:00
|
|
|
gp->stackguard0 = gp->stackguard;
|
runtime, cmd/gc, cmd/ld: ignore method wrappers in recover
Bug #1:
Issue 5406 identified an interesting case:
defer iface.M()
may end up calling a wrapper that copies an indirect receiver
from the iface value and then calls the real M method. That's
two calls down, not just one, and so recover() == nil always
in the real M method, even during a panic.
[For the purposes of this entire discussion, a wrapper's
implementation is a function containing an ordinary call, not
the optimized tail call form that is somtimes possible. The
tail call does not create a second frame, so it is already
handled correctly.]
Fix this bug by introducing g->panicwrap, which counts the
number of bytes on current stack segment that are due to
wrapper calls that should not count against the recover
check. All wrapper functions must now adjust g->panicwrap up
on entry and back down on exit. This adds slightly to their
expense; on the x86 it is a single instruction at entry and
exit; on the ARM it is three. However, the alternative is to
make a call to recover depend on being able to walk the stack,
which I very much want to avoid. We have enough problems
walking the stack for garbage collection and profiling.
Also, if performance is critical in a specific case, it is already
faster to use a pointer receiver and avoid this kind of wrapper
entirely.
Bug #2:
The old code, which did not consider the possibility of two
calls, already contained a check to see if the call had split
its stack and so the panic-created segment was one behind the
current segment. In the wrapper case, both of the two calls
might split their stacks, so the panic-created segment can be
two behind the current segment.
Fix this by propagating the Stktop.panic flag forward during
stack splits instead of looking backward during recover.
Fixes #5406.
R=golang-dev, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/13367052
2013-09-12 14:00:16 -04:00
|
|
|
gp->panicwrap = top->panicwrap;
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
runtime·stackfree(gp, old, top);
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-06-28 00:49:53 +04:00
|
|
|
gp->status = oldstatus;
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
runtime·gogo(&gp->sched);
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-15 22:34:06 -04:00
|
|
|
uintptr runtime·maxstacksize = 1<<20; // enough until runtime.main sets it for real
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
static uint8*
|
|
|
|
|
mapnames[] = {
|
|
|
|
|
(uint8*)"---",
|
2014-04-01 14:57:58 -04:00
|
|
|
(uint8*)"scalar",
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
(uint8*)"ptr",
|
2014-04-01 14:57:58 -04:00
|
|
|
(uint8*)"multi",
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Stack frame layout
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// (x86)
|
|
|
|
|
// +------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
// | args from caller |
|
|
|
|
|
// +------------------+ <- frame->argp
|
|
|
|
|
// | return address |
|
|
|
|
|
// +------------------+ <- frame->varp
|
|
|
|
|
// | locals |
|
|
|
|
|
// +------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
// | args to callee |
|
|
|
|
|
// +------------------+ <- frame->sp
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// (arm: TODO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct CopyableInfo CopyableInfo;
|
|
|
|
|
struct CopyableInfo {
|
|
|
|
|
byte *stk; // bottom address of segment
|
|
|
|
|
byte *base; // top address of segment (including Stktop)
|
|
|
|
|
int32 frames; // count of copyable frames (-1 = not copyable)
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void runtime·main(void);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
|
|
|
checkframecopy(Stkframe *frame, void *arg)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
CopyableInfo *cinfo;
|
|
|
|
|
Func *f;
|
|
|
|
|
StackMap *stackmap;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cinfo = arg;
|
|
|
|
|
f = frame->fn;
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 2)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf(" checking %s frame=[%p,%p] stk=[%p,%p]\n", runtime·funcname(f), frame->sp, frame->fp, cinfo->stk, cinfo->base);
|
|
|
|
|
// if we're not in the segment any more, return immediately.
|
|
|
|
|
if(frame->varp < cinfo->stk || frame->varp >= cinfo->base) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 2)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf(" <next segment>\n");
|
|
|
|
|
return false; // stop traceback
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if(f->entry == (uintptr)runtime·main) {
|
|
|
|
|
// A special routine at the TOS of the main routine.
|
|
|
|
|
// We will allow it to be copied even though we don't
|
|
|
|
|
// have full GC info for it (because it is written in C).
|
|
|
|
|
cinfo->frames++;
|
|
|
|
|
return false; // stop traceback
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if(frame->varp != (byte*)frame->sp) { // not in prologue (and has at least one local or outarg)
|
|
|
|
|
stackmap = runtime·funcdata(f, FUNCDATA_LocalsPointerMaps);
|
|
|
|
|
if(stackmap == nil) {
|
|
|
|
|
cinfo->frames = -1;
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 1)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("copystack: no locals info for %s\n", runtime·funcname(f));
|
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if(stackmap->n <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
cinfo->frames = -1;
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 1)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("copystack: locals size info only for %s\n", runtime·funcname(f));
|
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if(frame->arglen != 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
stackmap = runtime·funcdata(f, FUNCDATA_ArgsPointerMaps);
|
|
|
|
|
if(stackmap == nil) {
|
|
|
|
|
cinfo->frames = -1;
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 1)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("copystack: no arg info for %s\n", runtime·funcname(f));
|
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
cinfo->frames++;
|
|
|
|
|
return true; // this frame is ok; keep going
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If the top segment of the stack contains an uncopyable
|
|
|
|
|
// frame, return -1. Otherwise return the number of frames
|
|
|
|
|
// in the top segment, all of which are copyable.
|
|
|
|
|
static int32
|
|
|
|
|
copyabletopsegment(G *gp)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
CopyableInfo cinfo;
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
Defer *d;
|
|
|
|
|
Func *f;
|
|
|
|
|
FuncVal *fn;
|
|
|
|
|
StackMap *stackmap;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cinfo.stk = (byte*)gp->stackguard - StackGuard;
|
|
|
|
|
cinfo.base = (byte*)gp->stackbase + sizeof(Stktop);
|
|
|
|
|
cinfo.frames = 0;
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that each frame is copyable. As a side effect,
|
|
|
|
|
// count the frames.
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
runtime·gentraceback(~(uintptr)0, ~(uintptr)0, 0, gp, 0, nil, 0x7fffffff, checkframecopy, &cinfo, false);
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 1 && cinfo.frames != -1)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("copystack: %d copyable frames\n", cinfo.frames);
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check to make sure all Defers are copyable
|
|
|
|
|
for(d = gp->defer; d != nil; d = d->link) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(cinfo.stk <= (byte*)d && (byte*)d < cinfo.base) {
|
|
|
|
|
// Defer is on the stack. Its copyableness has
|
|
|
|
|
// been established during stack walking.
|
|
|
|
|
// For now, this only happens with the Defer in runtime.main.
|
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if(d->argp < cinfo.stk || cinfo.base <= d->argp)
|
|
|
|
|
break; // a defer for the next segment
|
|
|
|
|
fn = d->fn;
|
2014-05-27 16:26:08 -07:00
|
|
|
if(fn == nil) // See issue 8047
|
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
f = runtime·findfunc((uintptr)fn->fn);
|
|
|
|
|
if(f == nil)
|
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check to make sure we have an args pointer map for the defer's args.
|
|
|
|
|
// We only need the args map, but we check
|
|
|
|
|
// for the locals map also, because when the locals map
|
|
|
|
|
// isn't provided it means the ptr map came from C and
|
|
|
|
|
// C (particularly, cgo) lies to us. See issue 7695.
|
|
|
|
|
stackmap = runtime·funcdata(f, FUNCDATA_ArgsPointerMaps);
|
|
|
|
|
if(stackmap == nil || stackmap->n <= 0)
|
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
|
stackmap = runtime·funcdata(f, FUNCDATA_LocalsPointerMaps);
|
|
|
|
|
if(stackmap == nil || stackmap->n <= 0)
|
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if(cinfo.stk <= (byte*)fn && (byte*)fn < cinfo.base) {
|
|
|
|
|
// FuncVal is on the stack. Again, its copyableness
|
|
|
|
|
// was established during stack walking.
|
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// The FuncVal may have pointers in it, but fortunately for us
|
|
|
|
|
// the compiler won't put pointers into the stack in a
|
|
|
|
|
// heap-allocated FuncVal.
|
|
|
|
|
// One day if we do need to check this, we'll need maps of the
|
|
|
|
|
// pointerness of the closure args. The only place we have that map
|
|
|
|
|
// right now is in the gc program for the FuncVal. Ugh.
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
return cinfo.frames;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct AdjustInfo AdjustInfo;
|
|
|
|
|
struct AdjustInfo {
|
|
|
|
|
byte *oldstk; // bottom address of segment
|
|
|
|
|
byte *oldbase; // top address of segment (after Stktop)
|
|
|
|
|
uintptr delta; // ptr distance from old to new stack (newbase - oldbase)
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// bv describes the memory starting at address scanp.
|
|
|
|
|
// Adjust any pointers contained therein.
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
|
adjustpointers(byte **scanp, BitVector *bv, AdjustInfo *adjinfo, Func *f)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
uintptr delta;
|
|
|
|
|
int32 num, i;
|
|
|
|
|
byte *p, *minp, *maxp;
|
|
|
|
|
Type *t;
|
|
|
|
|
Itab *tab;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minp = adjinfo->oldstk;
|
|
|
|
|
maxp = adjinfo->oldbase;
|
|
|
|
|
delta = adjinfo->delta;
|
|
|
|
|
num = bv->n / BitsPerPointer;
|
|
|
|
|
for(i = 0; i < num; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 4)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf(" %p:%s:%p\n", &scanp[i], mapnames[bv->data[i / (32 / BitsPerPointer)] >> (i * BitsPerPointer & 31) & 3], scanp[i]);
|
|
|
|
|
switch(bv->data[i / (32 / BitsPerPointer)] >> (i * BitsPerPointer & 31) & 3) {
|
2014-03-25 14:11:34 -07:00
|
|
|
case BitsDead:
|
|
|
|
|
if(runtime·debug.gcdead)
|
cmd/gc, runtime: make GODEBUG=gcdead=1 mode work with liveness
Trying to make GODEBUG=gcdead=1 work with liveness
and in particular ambiguously live variables.
1. In the liveness computation, mark all ambiguously live
variables as live for the entire function, except the entry.
They are zeroed directly after entry, and we need them not
to be poisoned thereafter.
2. In the liveness computation, compute liveness (and deadness)
for all parameters, not just pointer-containing parameters.
Otherwise gcdead poisons untracked scalar parameters and results.
3. Fix liveness debugging print for -live=2 to use correct bitmaps.
(Was not updated for compaction during compaction CL.)
4. Correct varkill during map literal initialization.
Was killing the map itself instead of the inserted value temp.
5. Disable aggressive varkill cleanup for call arguments if
the call appears in a defer or go statement.
6. In the garbage collector, avoid bug scanning empty
strings. An empty string is two zeros. The multiword
code only looked at the first zero and then interpreted
the next two bits in the bitmap as an ordinary word bitmap.
For a string the bits are 11 00, so if a live string was zero
length with a 0 base pointer, the poisoning code treated
the length as an ordinary word with code 00, meaning it
needed poisoning, turning the string into a poison-length
string with base pointer 0. By the same logic I believe that
a live nil slice (bits 11 01 00) will have its cap poisoned.
Always scan full multiword struct.
7. In the runtime, treat both poison words (PoisonGC and
PoisonStack) as invalid pointers that warrant crashes.
Manual testing as follows:
- Create a script called gcdead on your PATH containing:
#!/bin/bash
GODEBUG=gcdead=1 GOGC=10 GOTRACEBACK=2 exec "$@"
- Now you can build a test and then run 'gcdead ./foo.test'.
- More importantly, you can run 'go test -short -exec gcdead std'
to run all the tests.
Fixes #7676.
While here, enable the precise scanning of slices, since that was
disabled due to bugs like these. That now works, both with and
without gcdead.
Fixes #7549.
LGTM=khr
R=khr
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/83410044
2014-04-03 20:33:25 -04:00
|
|
|
scanp[i] = (byte*)PoisonStack;
|
2014-03-25 14:11:34 -07:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
case BitsScalar:
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
case BitsPointer:
|
|
|
|
|
p = scanp[i];
|
cmd/gc, runtime: make GODEBUG=gcdead=1 mode work with liveness
Trying to make GODEBUG=gcdead=1 work with liveness
and in particular ambiguously live variables.
1. In the liveness computation, mark all ambiguously live
variables as live for the entire function, except the entry.
They are zeroed directly after entry, and we need them not
to be poisoned thereafter.
2. In the liveness computation, compute liveness (and deadness)
for all parameters, not just pointer-containing parameters.
Otherwise gcdead poisons untracked scalar parameters and results.
3. Fix liveness debugging print for -live=2 to use correct bitmaps.
(Was not updated for compaction during compaction CL.)
4. Correct varkill during map literal initialization.
Was killing the map itself instead of the inserted value temp.
5. Disable aggressive varkill cleanup for call arguments if
the call appears in a defer or go statement.
6. In the garbage collector, avoid bug scanning empty
strings. An empty string is two zeros. The multiword
code only looked at the first zero and then interpreted
the next two bits in the bitmap as an ordinary word bitmap.
For a string the bits are 11 00, so if a live string was zero
length with a 0 base pointer, the poisoning code treated
the length as an ordinary word with code 00, meaning it
needed poisoning, turning the string into a poison-length
string with base pointer 0. By the same logic I believe that
a live nil slice (bits 11 01 00) will have its cap poisoned.
Always scan full multiword struct.
7. In the runtime, treat both poison words (PoisonGC and
PoisonStack) as invalid pointers that warrant crashes.
Manual testing as follows:
- Create a script called gcdead on your PATH containing:
#!/bin/bash
GODEBUG=gcdead=1 GOGC=10 GOTRACEBACK=2 exec "$@"
- Now you can build a test and then run 'gcdead ./foo.test'.
- More importantly, you can run 'go test -short -exec gcdead std'
to run all the tests.
Fixes #7676.
While here, enable the precise scanning of slices, since that was
disabled due to bugs like these. That now works, both with and
without gcdead.
Fixes #7549.
LGTM=khr
R=khr
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/83410044
2014-04-03 20:33:25 -04:00
|
|
|
if(f != nil && (byte*)0 < p && (p < (byte*)PageSize || (uintptr)p == PoisonGC || (uintptr)p == PoisonStack)) {
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
// Looks like a junk value in a pointer slot.
|
|
|
|
|
// Live analysis wrong?
|
runtime: enable 'bad pointer' check during garbage collection of Go stack frames
This is the same check we use during stack copying.
The check cannot be applied to C stack frames, even
though we do emit pointer bitmaps for the arguments,
because (1) the pointer bitmaps assume all arguments
are always live, not true of outputs during the prologue,
and (2) the pointer bitmaps encode interface values as
pointer pairs, not true of interfaces holding integers.
For the rest of the frames, however, we should hold ourselves
to the rule that a pointer marked live really is initialized.
The interface scanning already implicitly checks this
because it interprets the type word as a valid type pointer.
This may slow things down a little because of the extra loads.
Or it may speed things up because we don't bother enqueuing
nil pointers anymore. Enough of the rest of the system is slow
right now that we can't measure it meaningfully.
Enable for now, even if it is slow, to shake out bugs in the
liveness bitmaps, and then decide whether to turn it off
for the Go 1.3 release (issue 7650 reminds us to do this).
The new m->traceback field lets us force printing of fp=
values on all goroutine stack traces when we detect a
bad pointer. This makes it easier to understand exactly
where in the frame the bad pointer is, so that we can trace
it back to a specific variable and determine what is wrong.
Update #7650
LGTM=khr
R=khr
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/80860044
2014-03-27 14:06:15 -04:00
|
|
|
m->traceback = 2;
|
cmd/gc, runtime: make GODEBUG=gcdead=1 mode work with liveness
Trying to make GODEBUG=gcdead=1 work with liveness
and in particular ambiguously live variables.
1. In the liveness computation, mark all ambiguously live
variables as live for the entire function, except the entry.
They are zeroed directly after entry, and we need them not
to be poisoned thereafter.
2. In the liveness computation, compute liveness (and deadness)
for all parameters, not just pointer-containing parameters.
Otherwise gcdead poisons untracked scalar parameters and results.
3. Fix liveness debugging print for -live=2 to use correct bitmaps.
(Was not updated for compaction during compaction CL.)
4. Correct varkill during map literal initialization.
Was killing the map itself instead of the inserted value temp.
5. Disable aggressive varkill cleanup for call arguments if
the call appears in a defer or go statement.
6. In the garbage collector, avoid bug scanning empty
strings. An empty string is two zeros. The multiword
code only looked at the first zero and then interpreted
the next two bits in the bitmap as an ordinary word bitmap.
For a string the bits are 11 00, so if a live string was zero
length with a 0 base pointer, the poisoning code treated
the length as an ordinary word with code 00, meaning it
needed poisoning, turning the string into a poison-length
string with base pointer 0. By the same logic I believe that
a live nil slice (bits 11 01 00) will have its cap poisoned.
Always scan full multiword struct.
7. In the runtime, treat both poison words (PoisonGC and
PoisonStack) as invalid pointers that warrant crashes.
Manual testing as follows:
- Create a script called gcdead on your PATH containing:
#!/bin/bash
GODEBUG=gcdead=1 GOGC=10 GOTRACEBACK=2 exec "$@"
- Now you can build a test and then run 'gcdead ./foo.test'.
- More importantly, you can run 'go test -short -exec gcdead std'
to run all the tests.
Fixes #7676.
While here, enable the precise scanning of slices, since that was
disabled due to bugs like these. That now works, both with and
without gcdead.
Fixes #7549.
LGTM=khr
R=khr
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/83410044
2014-04-03 20:33:25 -04:00
|
|
|
runtime·printf("runtime: bad pointer in frame %s at %p: %p\n", runtime·funcname(f), &scanp[i], p);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
runtime·throw("bad pointer!");
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if(minp <= p && p < maxp) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 3)
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
runtime·printf("adjust ptr %p %s\n", p, runtime·funcname(f));
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
scanp[i] = p + delta;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2014-03-25 14:11:34 -07:00
|
|
|
case BitsMultiWord:
|
|
|
|
|
switch(bv->data[(i+1) / (32 / BitsPerPointer)] >> ((i+1) * BitsPerPointer & 31) & 3) {
|
|
|
|
|
case BitsString:
|
|
|
|
|
// string referents are never on the stack, never need to be adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
i++; // skip len
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
case BitsSlice:
|
|
|
|
|
p = scanp[i];
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if(minp <= p && p < maxp) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 3)
|
2014-03-25 14:11:34 -07:00
|
|
|
runtime·printf("adjust slice %p\n", p);
|
|
|
|
|
scanp[i] = p + delta;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-03-25 14:11:34 -07:00
|
|
|
i += 2; // skip len, cap
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
case BitsEface:
|
|
|
|
|
t = (Type*)scanp[i];
|
|
|
|
|
if(t != nil && (t->size > PtrSize || (t->kind & KindNoPointers) == 0)) {
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
p = scanp[i+1];
|
|
|
|
|
if(minp <= p && p < maxp) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 3)
|
2014-03-25 14:11:34 -07:00
|
|
|
runtime·printf("adjust eface %p\n", p);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if(t->size > PtrSize) // currently we always allocate such objects on the heap
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("large interface value found on stack");
|
|
|
|
|
scanp[i+1] = p + delta;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-03-25 14:11:34 -07:00
|
|
|
i++;
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
case BitsIface:
|
|
|
|
|
tab = (Itab*)scanp[i];
|
|
|
|
|
if(tab != nil) {
|
|
|
|
|
t = tab->type;
|
|
|
|
|
//runtime·printf(" type=%p\n", t);
|
|
|
|
|
if(t->size > PtrSize || (t->kind & KindNoPointers) == 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
p = scanp[i+1];
|
|
|
|
|
if(minp <= p && p < maxp) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 3)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("adjust iface %p\n", p);
|
|
|
|
|
if(t->size > PtrSize) // currently we always allocate such objects on the heap
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("large interface value found on stack");
|
|
|
|
|
scanp[i+1] = p + delta;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
i++;
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Note: the argument/return area is adjusted by the callee.
|
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
|
|
|
adjustframe(Stkframe *frame, void *arg)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
AdjustInfo *adjinfo;
|
|
|
|
|
Func *f;
|
|
|
|
|
StackMap *stackmap;
|
|
|
|
|
int32 pcdata;
|
2014-04-02 16:49:27 -04:00
|
|
|
BitVector bv;
|
2014-04-01 14:57:58 -04:00
|
|
|
uintptr targetpc;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjinfo = arg;
|
|
|
|
|
f = frame->fn;
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 2)
|
2014-05-31 10:10:12 -04:00
|
|
|
runtime·printf(" adjusting %s frame=[%p,%p] pc=%p continpc=%p\n", runtime·funcname(f), frame->sp, frame->fp, frame->pc, frame->continpc);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if(f->entry == (uintptr)runtime·main)
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
2014-05-31 10:10:12 -04:00
|
|
|
targetpc = frame->continpc;
|
|
|
|
|
if(targetpc == 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
// Frame is dead.
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-04-01 14:57:58 -04:00
|
|
|
if(targetpc != f->entry)
|
|
|
|
|
targetpc--;
|
|
|
|
|
pcdata = runtime·pcdatavalue(f, PCDATA_StackMapIndex, targetpc);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if(pcdata == -1)
|
|
|
|
|
pcdata = 0; // in prologue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// adjust local pointers
|
|
|
|
|
if(frame->varp != (byte*)frame->sp) {
|
|
|
|
|
stackmap = runtime·funcdata(f, FUNCDATA_LocalsPointerMaps);
|
|
|
|
|
if(stackmap == nil)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("no locals info");
|
|
|
|
|
if(stackmap->n <= 0)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("locals size info only");
|
|
|
|
|
bv = runtime·stackmapdata(stackmap, pcdata);
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 3)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf(" locals\n");
|
2014-04-02 16:49:27 -04:00
|
|
|
adjustpointers((byte**)frame->varp - bv.n / BitsPerPointer, &bv, adjinfo, f);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// adjust inargs and outargs
|
|
|
|
|
if(frame->arglen != 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
stackmap = runtime·funcdata(f, FUNCDATA_ArgsPointerMaps);
|
|
|
|
|
if(stackmap == nil)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("no arg info");
|
|
|
|
|
bv = runtime·stackmapdata(stackmap, pcdata);
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 3)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf(" args\n");
|
2014-04-02 16:49:27 -04:00
|
|
|
adjustpointers((byte**)frame->argp, &bv, adjinfo, nil);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
|
adjustctxt(G *gp, AdjustInfo *adjinfo)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
if(adjinfo->oldstk <= (byte*)gp->sched.ctxt && (byte*)gp->sched.ctxt < adjinfo->oldbase)
|
|
|
|
|
gp->sched.ctxt = (byte*)gp->sched.ctxt + adjinfo->delta;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
|
adjustdefers(G *gp, AdjustInfo *adjinfo)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
Defer *d, **dp;
|
|
|
|
|
Func *f;
|
|
|
|
|
FuncVal *fn;
|
|
|
|
|
StackMap *stackmap;
|
2014-04-02 16:49:27 -04:00
|
|
|
BitVector bv;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for(dp = &gp->defer, d = *dp; d != nil; dp = &d->link, d = *dp) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(adjinfo->oldstk <= (byte*)d && (byte*)d < adjinfo->oldbase) {
|
|
|
|
|
// The Defer record is on the stack. Its fields will
|
|
|
|
|
// get adjusted appropriately.
|
|
|
|
|
// This only happens for runtime.main now, but a compiler
|
|
|
|
|
// optimization could do more of this.
|
|
|
|
|
*dp = (Defer*)((byte*)d + adjinfo->delta);
|
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if(d->argp < adjinfo->oldstk || adjinfo->oldbase <= d->argp)
|
|
|
|
|
break; // a defer for the next segment
|
2014-05-27 16:26:08 -07:00
|
|
|
fn = d->fn;
|
|
|
|
|
if(fn == nil) {
|
|
|
|
|
// Defer of nil function. It will panic when run, and there
|
|
|
|
|
// aren't any args to adjust. See issue 8047.
|
|
|
|
|
d->argp += adjinfo->delta;
|
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
f = runtime·findfunc((uintptr)fn->fn);
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
if(f == nil)
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
runtime·throw("can't adjust unknown defer");
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 4)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf(" checking defer %s\n", runtime·funcname(f));
|
|
|
|
|
// Defer's FuncVal might be on the stack
|
|
|
|
|
if(adjinfo->oldstk <= (byte*)fn && (byte*)fn < adjinfo->oldbase) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 3)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf(" adjust defer fn %s\n", runtime·funcname(f));
|
|
|
|
|
d->fn = (FuncVal*)((byte*)fn + adjinfo->delta);
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
// deferred function's args might point into the stack.
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 3)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf(" adjust deferred args for %s\n", runtime·funcname(f));
|
|
|
|
|
stackmap = runtime·funcdata(f, FUNCDATA_ArgsPointerMaps);
|
|
|
|
|
if(stackmap == nil)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("runtime: deferred function has no arg ptr map");
|
|
|
|
|
bv = runtime·stackmapdata(stackmap, 0);
|
2014-04-02 16:49:27 -04:00
|
|
|
adjustpointers(d->args, &bv, adjinfo, f);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
d->argp += adjinfo->delta;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Copies the top stack segment of gp to a new stack segment of a
|
|
|
|
|
// different size. The top segment must contain nframes frames.
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
|
copystack(G *gp, uintptr nframes, uintptr newsize)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
byte *oldstk, *oldbase, *newstk, *newbase;
|
|
|
|
|
uintptr oldsize, used;
|
|
|
|
|
AdjustInfo adjinfo;
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
Stktop *oldtop, *newtop;
|
|
|
|
|
bool malloced;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if(gp->syscallstack != 0)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("can't handle stack copy in syscall yet");
|
|
|
|
|
oldstk = (byte*)gp->stackguard - StackGuard;
|
|
|
|
|
oldbase = (byte*)gp->stackbase + sizeof(Stktop);
|
|
|
|
|
oldsize = oldbase - oldstk;
|
|
|
|
|
used = oldbase - (byte*)gp->sched.sp;
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
oldtop = (Stktop*)gp->stackbase;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// allocate new stack
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
newstk = runtime·stackalloc(gp, newsize);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
newbase = newstk + newsize;
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
newtop = (Stktop*)(newbase - sizeof(Stktop));
|
|
|
|
|
malloced = newtop->malloced;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 1)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("copystack [%p %p]/%d -> [%p %p]/%d\n", oldstk, oldbase, (int32)oldsize, newstk, newbase, (int32)newsize);
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
USED(oldsize);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// adjust pointers in the to-be-copied frames
|
|
|
|
|
adjinfo.oldstk = oldstk;
|
|
|
|
|
adjinfo.oldbase = oldbase;
|
|
|
|
|
adjinfo.delta = newbase - oldbase;
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·gentraceback(~(uintptr)0, ~(uintptr)0, 0, gp, 0, nil, nframes, adjustframe, &adjinfo, false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// adjust other miscellaneous things that have pointers into stacks.
|
|
|
|
|
adjustctxt(gp, &adjinfo);
|
|
|
|
|
adjustdefers(gp, &adjinfo);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
// copy the stack (including Stktop) to the new location
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
runtime·memmove(newbase - used, oldbase - used, used);
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
newtop->malloced = malloced;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Swap out old stack for new one
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
gp->stackbase = (uintptr)newtop;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
gp->stackguard = (uintptr)newstk + StackGuard;
|
|
|
|
|
gp->stackguard0 = (uintptr)newstk + StackGuard; // NOTE: might clobber a preempt request
|
|
|
|
|
if(gp->stack0 == (uintptr)oldstk)
|
|
|
|
|
gp->stack0 = (uintptr)newstk;
|
|
|
|
|
gp->sched.sp = (uintptr)(newbase - used);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// free old stack
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
runtime·stackfree(gp, oldstk, oldtop);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-03-06 16:03:43 -08:00
|
|
|
// round x up to a power of 2.
|
2014-03-07 15:11:16 -05:00
|
|
|
int32
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·round2(int32 x)
|
2014-03-06 16:03:43 -08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
int32 s;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
while((1 << s) < x)
|
|
|
|
|
s++;
|
|
|
|
|
return 1 << s;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-02 13:03:14 -07:00
|
|
|
// Called from runtime·newstackcall or from runtime·morestack when a new
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
// stack segment is needed. Allocate a new stack big enough for
|
|
|
|
|
// m->moreframesize bytes, copy m->moreargsize bytes to the new frame,
|
|
|
|
|
// and then act as though runtime·lessstack called the function at
|
|
|
|
|
// m->morepc.
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·newstack(void)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
int32 framesize, argsize, oldstatus, oldsize, newsize, nframes;
|
runtime, cmd/gc, cmd/ld: ignore method wrappers in recover
Bug #1:
Issue 5406 identified an interesting case:
defer iface.M()
may end up calling a wrapper that copies an indirect receiver
from the iface value and then calls the real M method. That's
two calls down, not just one, and so recover() == nil always
in the real M method, even during a panic.
[For the purposes of this entire discussion, a wrapper's
implementation is a function containing an ordinary call, not
the optimized tail call form that is somtimes possible. The
tail call does not create a second frame, so it is already
handled correctly.]
Fix this bug by introducing g->panicwrap, which counts the
number of bytes on current stack segment that are due to
wrapper calls that should not count against the recover
check. All wrapper functions must now adjust g->panicwrap up
on entry and back down on exit. This adds slightly to their
expense; on the x86 it is a single instruction at entry and
exit; on the ARM it is three. However, the alternative is to
make a call to recover depend on being able to walk the stack,
which I very much want to avoid. We have enough problems
walking the stack for garbage collection and profiling.
Also, if performance is critical in a specific case, it is already
faster to use a pointer receiver and avoid this kind of wrapper
entirely.
Bug #2:
The old code, which did not consider the possibility of two
calls, already contained a check to see if the call had split
its stack and so the panic-created segment was one behind the
current segment. In the wrapper case, both of the two calls
might split their stacks, so the panic-created segment can be
two behind the current segment.
Fix this by propagating the Stktop.panic flag forward during
stack splits instead of looking backward during recover.
Fixes #5406.
R=golang-dev, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/13367052
2013-09-12 14:00:16 -04:00
|
|
|
Stktop *top, *oldtop;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
byte *stk, *oldstk, *oldbase;
|
2013-06-12 08:49:38 -04:00
|
|
|
uintptr sp;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
uintptr *src, *dst, *dstend;
|
|
|
|
|
G *gp;
|
2014-03-26 19:06:15 +04:00
|
|
|
Gobuf label, morebuf;
|
|
|
|
|
void *moreargp;
|
2013-08-02 13:03:14 -07:00
|
|
|
bool newstackcall;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-13 17:41:08 +04:00
|
|
|
if(m->forkstackguard)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("split stack after fork");
|
2013-08-02 13:51:28 -04:00
|
|
|
if(m->morebuf.g != m->curg) {
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("runtime: newstack called from g=%p\n"
|
|
|
|
|
"\tm=%p m->curg=%p m->g0=%p m->gsignal=%p\n",
|
|
|
|
|
m->morebuf.g, m, m->curg, m->g0, m->gsignal);
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("runtime: wrong goroutine in newstack");
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
// gp->status is usually Grunning, but it could be Gsyscall if a stack overflow
|
2013-06-28 00:49:53 +04:00
|
|
|
// happens during a function call inside entersyscall.
|
|
|
|
|
gp = m->curg;
|
|
|
|
|
oldstatus = gp->status;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
framesize = m->moreframesize;
|
|
|
|
|
argsize = m->moreargsize;
|
2014-03-26 19:06:15 +04:00
|
|
|
moreargp = m->moreargp;
|
|
|
|
|
m->moreargp = nil;
|
|
|
|
|
morebuf = m->morebuf;
|
|
|
|
|
m->morebuf.pc = (uintptr)nil;
|
|
|
|
|
m->morebuf.lr = (uintptr)nil;
|
|
|
|
|
m->morebuf.sp = (uintptr)nil;
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
gp->status = Gwaiting;
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
gp->waitreason = "stack growth";
|
2013-08-02 13:03:14 -07:00
|
|
|
newstackcall = framesize==1;
|
|
|
|
|
if(newstackcall)
|
2013-06-28 17:52:17 +04:00
|
|
|
framesize = 0;
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-02 13:03:14 -07:00
|
|
|
// For newstackcall the context already points to beginning of runtime·newstackcall.
|
|
|
|
|
if(!newstackcall)
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
runtime·rewindmorestack(&gp->sched);
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-06-27 16:51:06 -04:00
|
|
|
sp = gp->sched.sp;
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
if(thechar == '6' || thechar == '8') {
|
|
|
|
|
// The call to morestack cost a word.
|
|
|
|
|
sp -= sizeof(uintptr);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 1 || sp < gp->stackguard - StackGuard) {
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
runtime·printf("runtime: newstack framesize=%p argsize=%p sp=%p stack=[%p, %p]\n"
|
|
|
|
|
"\tmorebuf={pc:%p sp:%p lr:%p}\n"
|
|
|
|
|
"\tsched={pc:%p sp:%p lr:%p ctxt:%p}\n",
|
|
|
|
|
(uintptr)framesize, (uintptr)argsize, sp, gp->stackguard - StackGuard, gp->stackbase,
|
|
|
|
|
m->morebuf.pc, m->morebuf.sp, m->morebuf.lr,
|
|
|
|
|
gp->sched.pc, gp->sched.sp, gp->sched.lr, gp->sched.ctxt);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if(sp < gp->stackguard - StackGuard) {
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("runtime: split stack overflow: %p < %p\n", sp, gp->stackguard - StackGuard);
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
runtime·throw("runtime: split stack overflow");
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
if(argsize % sizeof(uintptr) != 0) {
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
runtime·printf("runtime: stack growth with misaligned argsize %d\n", argsize);
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("runtime: stack growth argsize");
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
cmd/ld: fix large stack split for preempt check
If the stack frame size is larger than the known-unmapped region at the
bottom of the address space, then the stack split prologue cannot use the usual
condition:
SP - size >= stackguard
because SP - size may wrap around to a very large number.
Instead, if the stack frame is large, the prologue tests:
SP - stackguard >= size
(This ends up being a few instructions more expensive, so we don't do it always.)
Preemption requests register by setting stackguard to a very large value, so
that the first test (SP - size >= stackguard) cannot possibly succeed.
Unfortunately, that same very large value causes a wraparound in the
second test (SP - stackguard >= size), making it succeed incorrectly.
To avoid *that* wraparound, we have to amend the test:
stackguard != StackPreempt && SP - stackguard >= size
This test is only used for functions with large frames, which essentially
always split the stack, so the cost of the few instructions is noise.
This CL and CL 11085043 together fix the known issues with preemption,
at the beginning of a function, so we will be able to try turning it on again.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/11205043
2013-07-12 12:12:56 -04:00
|
|
|
if(gp->stackguard0 == (uintptr)StackPreempt) {
|
2013-06-28 17:52:17 +04:00
|
|
|
if(gp == m->g0)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("runtime: preempt g0");
|
2013-10-28 19:40:40 -04:00
|
|
|
if(oldstatus == Grunning && m->p == nil && m->locks == 0)
|
2013-06-28 17:52:17 +04:00
|
|
|
runtime·throw("runtime: g is running but p is not");
|
2013-07-29 22:22:34 +04:00
|
|
|
if(oldstatus == Gsyscall && m->locks == 0)
|
2014-04-07 17:40:00 -07:00
|
|
|
runtime·throw("runtime: stack growth during syscall");
|
2013-06-28 17:52:17 +04:00
|
|
|
// Be conservative about where we preempt.
|
|
|
|
|
// We are interested in preempting user Go code, not runtime code.
|
2013-07-19 01:22:26 +04:00
|
|
|
if(oldstatus != Grunning || m->locks || m->mallocing || m->gcing || m->p->status != Prunning) {
|
2013-06-28 17:52:17 +04:00
|
|
|
// Let the goroutine keep running for now.
|
2013-07-17 12:52:37 -04:00
|
|
|
// gp->preempt is set, so it will be preempted next time.
|
2013-06-28 17:52:17 +04:00
|
|
|
gp->stackguard0 = gp->stackguard;
|
|
|
|
|
gp->status = oldstatus;
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·gogo(&gp->sched); // never return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// Act like goroutine called runtime.Gosched.
|
|
|
|
|
gp->status = oldstatus;
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·gosched0(gp); // never return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
// If every frame on the top segment is copyable, allocate a bigger segment
|
|
|
|
|
// and move the segment instead of allocating a new segment.
|
|
|
|
|
if(runtime·copystack) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(!runtime·precisestack)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("can't copy stacks without precise stacks");
|
|
|
|
|
nframes = copyabletopsegment(gp);
|
|
|
|
|
if(nframes != -1) {
|
|
|
|
|
oldstk = (byte*)gp->stackguard - StackGuard;
|
|
|
|
|
oldbase = (byte*)gp->stackbase + sizeof(Stktop);
|
|
|
|
|
oldsize = oldbase - oldstk;
|
|
|
|
|
newsize = oldsize * 2;
|
|
|
|
|
copystack(gp, nframes, newsize);
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 1)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("stack grow done\n");
|
2014-03-13 13:16:02 +04:00
|
|
|
if(gp->stacksize > runtime·maxstacksize) {
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("runtime: goroutine stack exceeds %D-byte limit\n", (uint64)runtime·maxstacksize);
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("stack overflow");
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-03-06 21:33:19 +04:00
|
|
|
gp->status = oldstatus;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
runtime·gogo(&gp->sched);
|
2013-08-15 22:34:06 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
// TODO: if stack is uncopyable because we're in C code, patch return value at
|
|
|
|
|
// end of C code to trigger a copy as soon as C code exits. That way, we'll
|
|
|
|
|
// have stack available if we get this deep again.
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
// allocate new segment.
|
|
|
|
|
framesize += argsize;
|
|
|
|
|
framesize += StackExtra; // room for more functions, Stktop.
|
|
|
|
|
if(framesize < StackMin)
|
|
|
|
|
framesize = StackMin;
|
|
|
|
|
framesize += StackSystem;
|
2014-03-07 15:11:16 -05:00
|
|
|
framesize = runtime·round2(framesize);
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
stk = runtime·stackalloc(gp, framesize);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if(gp->stacksize > runtime·maxstacksize) {
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("runtime: goroutine stack exceeds %D-byte limit\n", (uint64)runtime·maxstacksize);
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("stack overflow");
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
top = (Stktop*)(stk+framesize-sizeof(*top));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug >= 1) {
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
runtime·printf("\t-> new stack [%p, %p]\n", stk, top);
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-12 08:49:38 -04:00
|
|
|
top->stackbase = gp->stackbase;
|
|
|
|
|
top->stackguard = gp->stackguard;
|
2014-03-26 19:06:15 +04:00
|
|
|
top->gobuf = morebuf;
|
|
|
|
|
top->argp = moreargp;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
top->argsize = argsize;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// copy flag from panic
|
|
|
|
|
top->panic = gp->ispanic;
|
|
|
|
|
gp->ispanic = false;
|
runtime, cmd/gc, cmd/ld: ignore method wrappers in recover
Bug #1:
Issue 5406 identified an interesting case:
defer iface.M()
may end up calling a wrapper that copies an indirect receiver
from the iface value and then calls the real M method. That's
two calls down, not just one, and so recover() == nil always
in the real M method, even during a panic.
[For the purposes of this entire discussion, a wrapper's
implementation is a function containing an ordinary call, not
the optimized tail call form that is somtimes possible. The
tail call does not create a second frame, so it is already
handled correctly.]
Fix this bug by introducing g->panicwrap, which counts the
number of bytes on current stack segment that are due to
wrapper calls that should not count against the recover
check. All wrapper functions must now adjust g->panicwrap up
on entry and back down on exit. This adds slightly to their
expense; on the x86 it is a single instruction at entry and
exit; on the ARM it is three. However, the alternative is to
make a call to recover depend on being able to walk the stack,
which I very much want to avoid. We have enough problems
walking the stack for garbage collection and profiling.
Also, if performance is critical in a specific case, it is already
faster to use a pointer receiver and avoid this kind of wrapper
entirely.
Bug #2:
The old code, which did not consider the possibility of two
calls, already contained a check to see if the call had split
its stack and so the panic-created segment was one behind the
current segment. In the wrapper case, both of the two calls
might split their stacks, so the panic-created segment can be
two behind the current segment.
Fix this by propagating the Stktop.panic flag forward during
stack splits instead of looking backward during recover.
Fixes #5406.
R=golang-dev, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/13367052
2013-09-12 14:00:16 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// if this isn't a panic, maybe we're splitting the stack for a panic.
|
|
|
|
|
// if we're splitting in the top frame, propagate the panic flag
|
|
|
|
|
// forward so that recover will know we're in a panic.
|
|
|
|
|
oldtop = (Stktop*)top->stackbase;
|
|
|
|
|
if(oldtop != nil && oldtop->panic && top->argp == (byte*)oldtop - oldtop->argsize - gp->panicwrap)
|
|
|
|
|
top->panic = true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
top->panicwrap = gp->panicwrap;
|
|
|
|
|
gp->panicwrap = 0;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gp->stackbase = (uintptr)top;
|
|
|
|
|
gp->stackguard = (uintptr)stk + StackGuard;
|
2013-06-03 12:28:24 +04:00
|
|
|
gp->stackguard0 = gp->stackguard;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-06-12 08:49:38 -04:00
|
|
|
sp = (uintptr)top;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
if(argsize > 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
sp -= argsize;
|
|
|
|
|
dst = (uintptr*)sp;
|
|
|
|
|
dstend = dst + argsize/sizeof(*dst);
|
|
|
|
|
src = (uintptr*)top->argp;
|
|
|
|
|
while(dst < dstend)
|
|
|
|
|
*dst++ = *src++;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if(thechar == '5') {
|
|
|
|
|
// caller would have saved its LR below args.
|
|
|
|
|
sp -= sizeof(void*);
|
|
|
|
|
*(void**)sp = nil;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Continue as if lessstack had just called m->morepc
|
|
|
|
|
// (the PC that decided to grow the stack).
|
2013-06-12 15:22:26 -04:00
|
|
|
runtime·memclr((byte*)&label, sizeof label);
|
2013-06-12 08:49:38 -04:00
|
|
|
label.sp = sp;
|
|
|
|
|
label.pc = (uintptr)runtime·lessstack;
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
label.g = m->curg;
|
2013-08-02 13:03:14 -07:00
|
|
|
if(newstackcall)
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
runtime·gostartcallfn(&label, (FuncVal*)m->cret);
|
2013-06-12 15:22:26 -04:00
|
|
|
else {
|
runtime: record proper goroutine state during stack split
Until now, the goroutine state has been scattered during the
execution of newstack and oldstack. It's all there, and those routines
know how to get back to a working goroutine, but other pieces of
the system, like stack traces, do not. If something does interrupt
the newstack or oldstack execution, the rest of the system can't
understand the goroutine. For example, if newstack decides there
is an overflow and calls throw, the stack tracer wouldn't dump the
goroutine correctly.
For newstack to save a useful state snapshot, it needs to be able
to rewind the PC in the function that triggered the split back to
the beginning of the function. (The PC is a few instructions in, just
after the call to morestack.) To make that possible, we change the
prologues to insert a jmp back to the beginning of the function
after the call to morestack. That is, the prologue used to be roughly:
TEXT myfunc
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
Now an extra instruction is inserted after the call:
TEXT myfunc
start:
check for split
jmpcond nosplit
call morestack
jmp start
nosplit:
sub $xxx, sp
The jmp is not executed directly. It is decoded and simulated by
runtime.rewindmorestack to discover the beginning of the function,
and then the call to morestack returns directly to the start label
instead of to the jump instruction. So logically the jmp is still
executed, just not by the cpu.
The prologue thus repeats in the case of a function that needs a
stack split, but against the cost of the split itself, the extra few
instructions are noise. The repeated prologue has the nice effect of
making a stack split double-check that the new stack is big enough:
if morestack happens to return on a too-small stack, we'll now notice
before corruption happens.
The ability for newstack to rewind to the beginning of the function
should help preemption too. If newstack decides that it was called
for preemption instead of a stack split, it now has the goroutine state
correctly paused if rescheduling is needed, and when the goroutine
can run again, it can return to the start label on its original stack
and re-execute the split check.
Here is an example of a split stack overflow showing the full
trace, without any special cases in the stack printer.
(This one was triggered by making the split check incorrect.)
runtime: newstack framesize=0x0 argsize=0x18 sp=0x6aebd0 stack=[0x6b0000, 0x6b0fa0]
morebuf={pc:0x69f5b sp:0x6aebd8 lr:0x0}
sched={pc:0x68880 sp:0x6aebd0 lr:0x0 ctxt:0x34e700}
runtime: split stack overflow: 0x6aebd0 < 0x6b0000
fatal error: runtime: split stack overflow
goroutine 1 [stack split]:
runtime.mallocgc(0x290, 0x100000000, 0x1)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:21 fp=0x6aebd8
runtime.new()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/zmalloc_darwin_amd64.c:682 +0x5b fp=0x6aec08
go/build.(*Context).Import(0x5ae340, 0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/go/build/build.go:424 +0x3a fp=0x6b00a0
main.loadImport(0xc210030c71, 0xa, 0xc2100b4380, 0x1b, 0xc2100b42c0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:249 +0x371 fp=0x6b01a8
main.(*Package).load(0xc21017c800, 0xc2100b42c0, 0xc2101828c0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:431 +0x2801 fp=0x6b0c98
main.loadPackage(0x369040, 0x7, 0xc2100b42c0, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/pkg.go:709 +0x857 fp=0x6b0f80
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc2100e6c00, 0xc2100e5750, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:539 +0x437 fp=0x6b14a0
main.(*builder).action(0xc2100902a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21015b400, 0x2, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/build.go:528 +0x1d2 fp=0x6b1658
main.(*builder).test(0xc2100902a0, 0xc210092000, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc21008ff60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:622 +0x1b53 fp=0x6b1f68
----- stack segment boundary -----
main.runTest(0x5a6b20, 0xc21000a020, 0x2, 0x2)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/test.go:366 +0xd09 fp=0x6a5cf0
main.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/cmd/go/main.go:161 +0x4f9 fp=0x6a5f78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:183 +0x92 fp=0x6a5fa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1266 fp=0x6a5fa8
And here is a seg fault during oldstack:
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x1b2a6
runtime.oldstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/stack.c:159 +0x76
runtime.lessstack()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/asm_amd64.s:270 +0x22
goroutine 1 [stack unsplit]:
fmt.(*pp).printArg(0x2102e64e0, 0xe5c80, 0x2102c9220, 0x73, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:818 +0x3d3 fp=0x221031e6f8
fmt.(*pp).doPrintf(0x2102e64e0, 0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:1183 +0x15cb fp=0x221031eaf0
fmt.Sprintf(0x12fb20, 0x2, 0x221031eb98, 0x1, 0x1, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/fmt/print.go:234 +0x67 fp=0x221031eb40
flag.(*stringValue).String(0x2102c9210, 0x1, 0x0)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:180 +0xb3 fp=0x221031ebb0
flag.(*FlagSet).Var(0x2102f6000, 0x293d38, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:633 +0x40 fp=0x221031eca0
flag.(*FlagSet).StringVar(0x2102f6000, 0x2102c9210, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:550 +0x91 fp=0x221031ece8
flag.(*FlagSet).String(0x2102f6000, 0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:563 +0x87 fp=0x221031ed38
flag.String(0x143490, 0xa, 0x12fa60, 0x0, 0x161950, ...)
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/flag/flag.go:570 +0x6b fp=0x221031ed80
testing.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:-531 +0xbb fp=0x221031edc0
strings_test.init()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/strings/strings_test.go:1115 +0x62 fp=0x221031ef70
main.init()
strings/_test/_testmain.go:90 +0x3d fp=0x221031ef78
runtime.main()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:180 +0x8a fp=0x221031efa0
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269 fp=0x221031efa8
goroutine 2 [runnable]:
runtime.MHeap_Scavenger()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/mheap.c:438
runtime.goexit()
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1269
created by runtime.main
/Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:166
rax 0x23ccc0
rbx 0x23ccc0
rcx 0x0
rdx 0x38
rdi 0x2102c0170
rsi 0x221032cfe0
rbp 0x221032cfa0
rsp 0x7fff5fbff5b0
r8 0x2102c0120
r9 0x221032cfa0
r10 0x221032c000
r11 0x104ce8
r12 0xe5c80
r13 0x1be82baac718
r14 0x13091135f7d69200
r15 0x0
rip 0x1b2a6
rflags 0x10246
cs 0x2b
fs 0x0
gs 0x0
Fixes #5723.
R=r, dvyukov, go.peter.90, dave, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10360048
2013-06-27 11:32:01 -04:00
|
|
|
runtime·gostartcall(&label, (void(*)(void))gp->sched.pc, gp->sched.ctxt);
|
|
|
|
|
gp->sched.ctxt = nil;
|
2013-06-12 15:22:26 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-06-28 00:49:53 +04:00
|
|
|
gp->status = oldstatus;
|
2013-06-12 15:22:26 -04:00
|
|
|
runtime·gogo(&label);
|
2013-02-14 12:37:55 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*(int32*)345 = 123; // never return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-06-12 15:22:26 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// adjust Gobuf as if it executed a call to fn
|
|
|
|
|
// and then did an immediate gosave.
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·gostartcallfn(Gobuf *gobuf, FuncVal *fv)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2014-06-12 16:34:36 -04:00
|
|
|
void *fn;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn = nil;
|
|
|
|
|
if(fv != nil)
|
|
|
|
|
fn = fv->fn;
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·gostartcall(gobuf, fn, fv);
|
2013-06-12 15:22:26 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Maybe shrink the stack being used by gp.
|
|
|
|
|
// Called at garbage collection time.
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·shrinkstack(G *gp)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
int32 nframes;
|
|
|
|
|
byte *oldstk, *oldbase;
|
2014-03-06 16:03:43 -08:00
|
|
|
uintptr used, oldsize, newsize;
|
|
|
|
|
MSpan *span;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-14 21:11:04 +04:00
|
|
|
if(!runtime·copystack)
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
oldstk = (byte*)gp->stackguard - StackGuard;
|
|
|
|
|
oldbase = (byte*)gp->stackbase + sizeof(Stktop);
|
|
|
|
|
oldsize = oldbase - oldstk;
|
2014-03-06 16:03:43 -08:00
|
|
|
newsize = oldsize / 2;
|
|
|
|
|
if(newsize < FixedStack)
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
return; // don't shrink below the minimum-sized stack
|
|
|
|
|
used = oldbase - (byte*)gp->sched.sp;
|
|
|
|
|
if(used >= oldsize / 4)
|
|
|
|
|
return; // still using at least 1/4 of the segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-03-06 16:03:43 -08:00
|
|
|
// To shrink to less than 1/2 a page, we need to copy.
|
|
|
|
|
if(newsize < PageSize/2) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(gp->syscallstack != (uintptr)nil) // TODO: can we handle this case?
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef GOOS_windows
|
|
|
|
|
if(gp->m != nil && gp->m->libcallsp != 0)
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
nframes = copyabletopsegment(gp);
|
|
|
|
|
if(nframes == -1)
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
copystack(gp, nframes, newsize);
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-06 16:03:43 -08:00
|
|
|
// To shrink a stack of one page size or more, we can shrink it
|
|
|
|
|
// without copying. Just deallocate the lower half.
|
|
|
|
|
span = runtime·MHeap_LookupMaybe(&runtime·mheap, oldstk);
|
|
|
|
|
if(span == nil)
|
|
|
|
|
return; // stack allocated outside heap. Can't shrink it. Can happen if stack is allocated while inside malloc. TODO: shrink by copying?
|
|
|
|
|
if(span->elemsize != oldsize)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("span element size doesn't match stack size");
|
|
|
|
|
if((uintptr)oldstk != span->start << PageShift)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·throw("stack not at start of span");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if(StackDebug)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·printf("shrinking stack in place %p %X->%X\n", oldstk, oldsize, newsize);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// new stack guard for smaller stack
|
|
|
|
|
gp->stackguard = (uintptr)oldstk + newsize + StackGuard;
|
|
|
|
|
gp->stackguard0 = (uintptr)oldstk + newsize + StackGuard;
|
|
|
|
|
if(gp->stack0 == (uintptr)oldstk)
|
|
|
|
|
gp->stack0 = (uintptr)oldstk + newsize;
|
2014-03-07 20:52:29 +04:00
|
|
|
gp->stacksize -= oldsize - newsize;
|
2014-03-06 16:03:43 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-12 10:21:34 +04:00
|
|
|
// Free bottom half of the stack.
|
|
|
|
|
if(runtime·debug.efence || StackFromSystem) {
|
|
|
|
|
if(runtime·debug.efence || StackFaultOnFree)
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·SysFault(oldstk, newsize);
|
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·SysFree(oldstk, newsize, &mstats.stacks_sys);
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// First, we trick malloc into thinking
|
2014-03-06 16:03:43 -08:00
|
|
|
// we allocated the stack as two separate half-size allocs. Then the
|
|
|
|
|
// free() call does the rest of the work for us.
|
2014-03-14 23:25:48 +04:00
|
|
|
runtime·MSpan_EnsureSwept(span);
|
|
|
|
|
runtime·MHeap_SplitSpan(&runtime·mheap, span);
|
2014-03-06 16:03:43 -08:00
|
|
|
runtime·free(oldstk);
|
runtime: grow stack by copying
On stack overflow, if all frames on the stack are
copyable, we copy the frames to a new stack twice
as large as the old one. During GC, if a G is using
less than 1/4 of its stack, copy the stack to a stack
half its size.
TODO
- Do something about C frames. When a C frame is in the
stack segment, it isn't copyable. We allocate a new segment
in this case.
- For idempotent C code, we can abort it, copy the stack,
then retry. I'm working on a separate CL for this.
- For other C code, we can raise the stackguard
to the lowest Go frame so the next call that Go frame
makes triggers a copy, which will then succeed.
- Pick a starting stack size?
The plan is that eventually we reach a point where the
stack contains only copyable frames.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/54650044
2014-02-26 23:28:44 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|