2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
// Code generated from gen/386splitload.rules; DO NOT EDIT.
|
|
|
|
|
// generated with: cd gen; go run *.go
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package ssa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func rewriteValue386splitload(v *Value) bool {
|
|
|
|
|
switch v.Op {
|
|
|
|
|
case Op386CMPBconstload:
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
return rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPBconstload(v)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
case Op386CMPBload:
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
return rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPBload(v)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
case Op386CMPLconstload:
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
return rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPLconstload(v)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
case Op386CMPLload:
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
return rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPLload(v)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
case Op386CMPWconstload:
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
return rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPWconstload(v)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
case Op386CMPWload:
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
return rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPWload(v)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
func rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPBconstload(v *Value) bool {
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
v_1 := v.Args[1]
|
|
|
|
|
v_0 := v.Args[0]
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
b := v.Block
|
|
|
|
|
typ := &b.Func.Config.Types
|
|
|
|
|
// match: (CMPBconstload {sym} [vo] ptr mem)
|
|
|
|
|
// result: (CMPBconst (MOVBload {sym} [offOnly(vo)] ptr mem) [valOnly(vo)])
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
|
vo := v.AuxInt
|
|
|
|
|
sym := v.Aux
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
ptr := v_0
|
|
|
|
|
mem := v_1
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
v.reset(Op386CMPBconst)
|
|
|
|
|
v.AuxInt = valOnly(vo)
|
|
|
|
|
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, Op386MOVBload, typ.UInt8)
|
|
|
|
|
v0.AuxInt = offOnly(vo)
|
|
|
|
|
v0.Aux = sym
|
2020-02-26 11:29:34 -08:00
|
|
|
v0.AddArg2(ptr, mem)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
v.AddArg(v0)
|
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
func rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPBload(v *Value) bool {
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
v_2 := v.Args[2]
|
|
|
|
|
v_1 := v.Args[1]
|
|
|
|
|
v_0 := v.Args[0]
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
b := v.Block
|
|
|
|
|
typ := &b.Func.Config.Types
|
|
|
|
|
// match: (CMPBload {sym} [off] ptr x mem)
|
|
|
|
|
// result: (CMPB (MOVBload {sym} [off] ptr mem) x)
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
|
off := v.AuxInt
|
|
|
|
|
sym := v.Aux
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
ptr := v_0
|
|
|
|
|
x := v_1
|
|
|
|
|
mem := v_2
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
v.reset(Op386CMPB)
|
|
|
|
|
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, Op386MOVBload, typ.UInt8)
|
|
|
|
|
v0.AuxInt = off
|
|
|
|
|
v0.Aux = sym
|
2020-02-26 11:29:34 -08:00
|
|
|
v0.AddArg2(ptr, mem)
|
|
|
|
|
v.AddArg2(v0, x)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
func rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPLconstload(v *Value) bool {
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
v_1 := v.Args[1]
|
|
|
|
|
v_0 := v.Args[0]
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
b := v.Block
|
|
|
|
|
typ := &b.Func.Config.Types
|
|
|
|
|
// match: (CMPLconstload {sym} [vo] ptr mem)
|
|
|
|
|
// result: (CMPLconst (MOVLload {sym} [offOnly(vo)] ptr mem) [valOnly(vo)])
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
|
vo := v.AuxInt
|
|
|
|
|
sym := v.Aux
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
ptr := v_0
|
|
|
|
|
mem := v_1
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
v.reset(Op386CMPLconst)
|
|
|
|
|
v.AuxInt = valOnly(vo)
|
|
|
|
|
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, Op386MOVLload, typ.UInt32)
|
|
|
|
|
v0.AuxInt = offOnly(vo)
|
|
|
|
|
v0.Aux = sym
|
2020-02-26 11:29:34 -08:00
|
|
|
v0.AddArg2(ptr, mem)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
v.AddArg(v0)
|
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
func rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPLload(v *Value) bool {
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
v_2 := v.Args[2]
|
|
|
|
|
v_1 := v.Args[1]
|
|
|
|
|
v_0 := v.Args[0]
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
b := v.Block
|
|
|
|
|
typ := &b.Func.Config.Types
|
|
|
|
|
// match: (CMPLload {sym} [off] ptr x mem)
|
|
|
|
|
// result: (CMPL (MOVLload {sym} [off] ptr mem) x)
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
|
off := v.AuxInt
|
|
|
|
|
sym := v.Aux
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
ptr := v_0
|
|
|
|
|
x := v_1
|
|
|
|
|
mem := v_2
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
v.reset(Op386CMPL)
|
|
|
|
|
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, Op386MOVLload, typ.UInt32)
|
|
|
|
|
v0.AuxInt = off
|
|
|
|
|
v0.Aux = sym
|
2020-02-26 11:29:34 -08:00
|
|
|
v0.AddArg2(ptr, mem)
|
|
|
|
|
v.AddArg2(v0, x)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
func rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPWconstload(v *Value) bool {
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
v_1 := v.Args[1]
|
|
|
|
|
v_0 := v.Args[0]
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
b := v.Block
|
|
|
|
|
typ := &b.Func.Config.Types
|
|
|
|
|
// match: (CMPWconstload {sym} [vo] ptr mem)
|
|
|
|
|
// result: (CMPWconst (MOVWload {sym} [offOnly(vo)] ptr mem) [valOnly(vo)])
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
|
vo := v.AuxInt
|
|
|
|
|
sym := v.Aux
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
ptr := v_0
|
|
|
|
|
mem := v_1
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
v.reset(Op386CMPWconst)
|
|
|
|
|
v.AuxInt = valOnly(vo)
|
|
|
|
|
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, Op386MOVWload, typ.UInt16)
|
|
|
|
|
v0.AuxInt = offOnly(vo)
|
|
|
|
|
v0.Aux = sym
|
2020-02-26 11:29:34 -08:00
|
|
|
v0.AddArg2(ptr, mem)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
v.AddArg(v0)
|
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-21 20:53:30 -08:00
|
|
|
func rewriteValue386splitload_Op386CMPWload(v *Value) bool {
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
v_2 := v.Args[2]
|
|
|
|
|
v_1 := v.Args[1]
|
|
|
|
|
v_0 := v.Args[0]
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
b := v.Block
|
|
|
|
|
typ := &b.Func.Config.Types
|
|
|
|
|
// match: (CMPWload {sym} [off] ptr x mem)
|
|
|
|
|
// result: (CMPW (MOVWload {sym} [off] ptr mem) x)
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
|
off := v.AuxInt
|
|
|
|
|
sym := v.Aux
|
cmd/compile: reduce bounds checks in generated rewrite rules
CL 213703 converted generated rewrite rules for commutative ops
to use loops instead of duplicated code.
However, it loaded args using expressions like
v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1], which the compiler could
not eliminate bounds for (including with all outstanding
prove CLs).
Also, given a series of separate rewrite rules for the same op,
we generated bounds checks for every rewrite rule, even though
we were repeatedly loading the same set of args.
This change reduces both sets of bounds checks.
Instead of loading v.Args[i] and v.Args[i^1] for commutative loops,
we now preload v.Args[0] and v.Args[1] into local variables,
and then swap them (as needed) in the commutative loop post statement.
And we now load all top level v.Args into local variables
at the beginning of every rewrite rule function.
The second optimization is the more significant,
but the first helps a little, and they play together
nicely from the perspective of generating the code.
This does increase register pressure, but the reduced bounds
checks more than compensate.
Note that the vast majority of rewrite rules evaluated
are not applied, so the prologue is the most important
part of the rewrite rules.
There is one subtle aspect to the new generated code.
Because the top level v.Args are shared across rewrite rules,
and rule evaluation can swap v_0 and v_1, v_0 and v_1
can end up being swapped from one rule to the next.
That is OK, because any time a rule does not get applied,
they will have been swapped exactly twice.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 213ms ± 2% 211ms ± 2% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=92+96)
Unicode 83.5ms ± 2% 83.2ms ± 2% -0.41% (p=0.004 n=95+90)
GoTypes 737ms ± 2% 733ms ± 2% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
Compiler 3.45s ± 2% 3.43s ± 2% -0.44% (p=0.000 n=99+100)
SSA 8.54s ± 1% 8.32s ± 2% -2.56% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
Flate 136ms ± 2% 135ms ± 1% -0.47% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoParser 169ms ± 1% 168ms ± 1% -0.33% (p=0.000 n=96+93)
Reflect 456ms ± 3% 455ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.261 n=95+94)
Tar 186ms ± 2% 185ms ± 2% -0.48% (p=0.000 n=94+95)
XML 251ms ± 1% 250ms ± 1% -0.51% (p=0.000 n=91+94)
[Geo mean] 424ms 421ms -0.68%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 275ms ± 1% 274ms ± 2% -0.55% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
Unicode 118ms ± 4% 118ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.642 n=98+90)
GoTypes 983ms ± 1% 980ms ± 1% -0.30% (p=0.000 n=93+93)
Compiler 4.56s ± 6% 4.52s ± 6% -0.72% (p=0.003 n=100+100)
SSA 11.4s ± 1% 11.1s ± 1% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=96+97)
Flate 168ms ± 1% 167ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
GoParser 204ms ± 1% 204ms ± 2% -0.27% (p=0.003 n=99+96)
Reflect 599ms ± 2% 598ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.116 n=95+92)
Tar 227ms ± 2% 225ms ± 2% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=95+98)
XML 313ms ± 2% 312ms ± 1% -0.37% (p=0.000 n=89+95)
[Geo mean] 547ms 544ms -0.61%
file before after Δ %
compile 21113112 21109016 -4096 -0.019%
total 131704940 131700844 -4096 -0.003%
Change-Id: Id6c39e0367e597c0c75b8a4b1eb14cc3cbd11956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216218
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2020-01-20 20:09:41 -08:00
|
|
|
ptr := v_0
|
|
|
|
|
x := v_1
|
|
|
|
|
mem := v_2
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
v.reset(Op386CMPW)
|
|
|
|
|
v0 := b.NewValue0(v.Pos, Op386MOVWload, typ.UInt16)
|
|
|
|
|
v0.AuxInt = off
|
|
|
|
|
v0.Aux = sym
|
2020-02-26 11:29:34 -08:00
|
|
|
v0.AddArg2(ptr, mem)
|
|
|
|
|
v.AddArg2(v0, x)
|
2019-03-10 08:34:59 -07:00
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
func rewriteBlock386splitload(b *Block) bool {
|
|
|
|
|
switch b.Kind {
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
|
}
|