mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go.git
synced 2025-12-08 06:10:04 +00:00
cmd/compile: fix rules regression with shifts on PPC64
Some rules for PPC64 were checking for a case where a shift followed by an 'and' of a mask could be lowered, depending on the format of the mask. The function to verify if the mask was valid for this purpose was not checking if the mask was 0 which we don't want to allow. This case can happen if previous optimizations resulted in that mask value. This fixes isPPC64ValidShiftMask to check for a mask of 0 and return false. This also adds a codegen testcase to verify it doesn't try to match the rules in the future. Fixes #42610 Change-Id: I565d94e88495f51321ab365d6388c01e791b4dbb Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/270358 Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@linaro.org> Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
869e2957b9
commit
0ae3b7cb74
2 changed files with 34 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -1427,10 +1427,11 @@ func DecodePPC64RotateMask(sauxint int64) (rotate, mb, me int64, mask uint64) {
|
|||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// This verifies that the mask occupies the
|
||||
// rightmost bits.
|
||||
// This verifies that the mask is a set of
|
||||
// consecutive bits including the least
|
||||
// significant bit.
|
||||
func isPPC64ValidShiftMask(v int64) bool {
|
||||
if ((v + 1) & v) == 0 {
|
||||
if (v != 0) && ((v+1)&v) == 0 {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue