net: do not use RLock around Accept

It might be non-blocking, but it also might be blocking.
Cannot take the chance, as Accept might block indefinitely
and make it impossible to acquire ForkLock exclusively
(during fork+exec).

Fixes #4737.

R=golang-dev, dave, iant, mikioh.mikioh
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7309050
This commit is contained in:
Russ Cox 2013-02-07 22:45:12 -05:00
parent 3c1dfb2b9a
commit 18441e8ade
3 changed files with 9 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -35,14 +35,14 @@ func sysSocket(f, t, p int) (int, error) {
// descriptor as nonblocking and close-on-exec.
func accept(fd int) (int, syscall.Sockaddr, error) {
// See ../syscall/exec_unix.go for description of ForkLock.
// It is okay to hold the lock across syscall.Accept
// It is probably okay to hold the lock across syscall.Accept
// because we have put fd.sysfd into non-blocking mode.
syscall.ForkLock.RLock()
// However, a call to the File method will put it back into
// blocking mode. We can't take that risk, so no use of ForkLock here.
nfd, sa, err := syscall.Accept(fd)
if err == nil {
syscall.CloseOnExec(nfd)
}
syscall.ForkLock.RUnlock()
if err != nil {
return -1, nil, err
}