mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go.git
synced 2025-12-08 06:10:04 +00:00
net/http: don't reuse conns after incomplete 100-continue requests
If we receive an HTTP request with "Expect: 100-continue" and the Handler never read to EOF, the conn is in an unknown state. Don't reuse that connection. Fixes #11549 Change-Id: I5be93e7a54e899d615b05f72bdcf12b25304bc60 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12262 Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b9e5a7165
commit
88fc3587ec
2 changed files with 65 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -554,6 +554,7 @@ type expectContinueReader struct {
|
|||
resp *response
|
||||
readCloser io.ReadCloser
|
||||
closed bool
|
||||
sawEOF bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (ecr *expectContinueReader) Read(p []byte) (n int, err error) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -565,7 +566,11 @@ func (ecr *expectContinueReader) Read(p []byte) (n int, err error) {
|
|||
ecr.resp.conn.buf.WriteString("HTTP/1.1 100 Continue\r\n\r\n")
|
||||
ecr.resp.conn.buf.Flush()
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ecr.readCloser.Read(p)
|
||||
n, err = ecr.readCloser.Read(p)
|
||||
if err == io.EOF {
|
||||
ecr.sawEOF = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (ecr *expectContinueReader) Close() error {
|
||||
|
|
@ -846,6 +851,22 @@ func (cw *chunkWriter) writeHeader(p []byte) {
|
|||
w.closeAfterReply = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If the client wanted a 100-continue but we never sent it to
|
||||
// them (or, more strictly: we never finished reading their
|
||||
// request body), don't reuse this connection because it's now
|
||||
// in an unknown state: we might be sending this response at
|
||||
// the same time the client is now sending its request body
|
||||
// after a timeout. (Some HTTP clients send Expect:
|
||||
// 100-continue but knowing that some servers don't support
|
||||
// it, the clients set a timer and send the body later anyway)
|
||||
// If we haven't seen EOF, we can't skip over the unread body
|
||||
// because we don't know if the next bytes on the wire will be
|
||||
// the body-following-the-timer or the subsequent request.
|
||||
// See Issue 11549.
|
||||
if ecr, ok := w.req.Body.(*expectContinueReader); ok && !ecr.sawEOF {
|
||||
w.closeAfterReply = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Per RFC 2616, we should consume the request body before
|
||||
// replying, if the handler hasn't already done so. But we
|
||||
// don't want to do an unbounded amount of reading here for
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue