mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go.git
synced 2025-12-08 06:10:04 +00:00
cmd/compile: split exported/non-exported methods for interface type
Currently, mhdr/methods is emitted with the same len/cap. There's no way to distinguish between exported and non-exported methods statically. This CL splits mhdr/methods into two parts, use "len" for number of exported methods, and "cap" for all methods. This fixes the bug in issue #22075, which intends to return the number of exported methods but currently return all methods. Note that with this encoding, we still can access either all/exported-only/non-exported-only methods: mhdr[:cap(mhdr)] // all methods mhdr // exported methods mhdr[len(mhdr):cap(mhdr)] // non-exported methods Thank to Matthew Dempsky (@mdempsky) for suggesting this encoding. Fixes #22075 Change-Id: If662adb03ccff27407d55a5578a0ed05a15e7cdd Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/259237 Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com> Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f8df205e74
commit
8f26b57f9a
11 changed files with 124 additions and 64 deletions
|
|
@ -2995,6 +2995,14 @@ func TestUnexportedMethods(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
if got := typ.NumMethod(); got != 0 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("NumMethod=%d, want 0 satisfied methods", got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var i unexpI
|
||||
if got := TypeOf(&i).Elem().NumMethod(); got != 0 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("NumMethod=%d, want 0 satisfied methods", got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if got := ValueOf(&i).Elem().NumMethod(); got != 0 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("NumMethod=%d, want 0 satisfied methods", got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type InnerInt struct {
|
||||
|
|
@ -3648,21 +3656,21 @@ func TestCallPanic(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
v := ValueOf(T{i, i, i, i, T2{i, i}, i, i, T2{i, i}})
|
||||
badCall(func() { call(v.Field(0).Method(0)) }) // .t0.W
|
||||
badCall(func() { call(v.Field(0).Elem().Method(0)) }) // .t0.W
|
||||
badCall(func() { call(v.Field(0).Method(1)) }) // .t0.w
|
||||
badMethod(func() { call(v.Field(0).Method(1)) }) // .t0.w
|
||||
badMethod(func() { call(v.Field(0).Elem().Method(2)) }) // .t0.w
|
||||
ok(func() { call(v.Field(1).Method(0)) }) // .T1.Y
|
||||
ok(func() { call(v.Field(1).Elem().Method(0)) }) // .T1.Y
|
||||
badCall(func() { call(v.Field(1).Method(1)) }) // .T1.y
|
||||
badMethod(func() { call(v.Field(1).Method(1)) }) // .T1.y
|
||||
badMethod(func() { call(v.Field(1).Elem().Method(2)) }) // .T1.y
|
||||
|
||||
ok(func() { call(v.Field(2).Method(0)) }) // .NamedT0.W
|
||||
ok(func() { call(v.Field(2).Elem().Method(0)) }) // .NamedT0.W
|
||||
badCall(func() { call(v.Field(2).Method(1)) }) // .NamedT0.w
|
||||
badMethod(func() { call(v.Field(2).Method(1)) }) // .NamedT0.w
|
||||
badMethod(func() { call(v.Field(2).Elem().Method(2)) }) // .NamedT0.w
|
||||
|
||||
ok(func() { call(v.Field(3).Method(0)) }) // .NamedT1.Y
|
||||
ok(func() { call(v.Field(3).Elem().Method(0)) }) // .NamedT1.Y
|
||||
badCall(func() { call(v.Field(3).Method(1)) }) // .NamedT1.y
|
||||
badMethod(func() { call(v.Field(3).Method(1)) }) // .NamedT1.y
|
||||
badMethod(func() { call(v.Field(3).Elem().Method(3)) }) // .NamedT1.y
|
||||
|
||||
ok(func() { call(v.Field(4).Field(0).Method(0)) }) // .NamedT2.T1.Y
|
||||
|
|
@ -3672,7 +3680,7 @@ func TestCallPanic(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
||||
badCall(func() { call(v.Field(5).Method(0)) }) // .namedT0.W
|
||||
badCall(func() { call(v.Field(5).Elem().Method(0)) }) // .namedT0.W
|
||||
badCall(func() { call(v.Field(5).Method(1)) }) // .namedT0.w
|
||||
badMethod(func() { call(v.Field(5).Method(1)) }) // .namedT0.w
|
||||
badMethod(func() { call(v.Field(5).Elem().Method(2)) }) // .namedT0.w
|
||||
|
||||
badCall(func() { call(v.Field(6).Method(0)) }) // .namedT1.Y
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue