From bffe7ad9f11b874429d6c2561b0383e931502164 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mateusz Poliwczak <mpoliwczak34@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:37:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] go/parser: Add TestBothLineAndLeadComment

I was wondering whether is is expected that both p.lineComment
and p.leadComment might be populated at the same time.

i.e. whether parser.go:275 can be changed from:

if p.lineFor(p.pos) != endline || p.tok == token.SEMICOLON || p.tok == token.EOF

to:

if (p.tok != token.COMMENT && p.lineFor(p.pos) != endline) || p.tok == token.SEMICOLON || p.tok == token.EOF

It turns out that we cannot do so. So while i am here, add a test
case for that, since nothing else failed with that change.


Change-Id: I6a6a6964f760237c068098db8a7b4b7aaf26c651
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/703915
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
---
 src/go/parser/parser_test.go | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/go/parser/parser_test.go b/src/go/parser/parser_test.go
index 2516cedc88d..87b7d7bbab7 100644
--- a/src/go/parser/parser_test.go
+++ b/src/go/parser/parser_test.go
@@ -896,3 +896,53 @@ func test() {
 		t.Fatalf("unexpected f.Comments got:\n%v\nwant:\n%v", got.String(), want.String())
 	}
 }
+
+// TestBothLineAndLeadComment makes sure that we populate the
+// p.lineComment field even though there is a comment after the
+// line comment.
+func TestBothLineAndLeadComment(t *testing.T) {
+	const src = `package test
+
+var _ int; /* line comment */
+// Doc comment
+func _() {}
+
+var _ int; /* line comment */
+// Some comment
+
+func _() {}
+`
+
+	fset := token.NewFileSet()
+	f, _ := ParseFile(fset, "", src, ParseComments|SkipObjectResolution)
+
+	lineComment := f.Decls[0].(*ast.GenDecl).Specs[0].(*ast.ValueSpec).Comment
+	docComment := f.Decls[1].(*ast.FuncDecl).Doc
+
+	if lineComment == nil {
+		t.Fatal("missing line comment")
+	}
+	if docComment == nil {
+		t.Fatal("missing doc comment")
+	}
+
+	if lineComment.List[0].Text != "/* line comment */" {
+		t.Errorf(`unexpected line comment got = %q; want "/* line comment */"`, lineComment.List[0].Text)
+	}
+	if docComment.List[0].Text != "// Doc comment" {
+		t.Errorf(`unexpected line comment got = %q; want "// Doc comment"`, docComment.List[0].Text)
+	}
+
+	lineComment2 := f.Decls[2].(*ast.GenDecl).Specs[0].(*ast.ValueSpec).Comment
+	if lineComment2 == nil {
+		t.Fatal("missing line comment")
+	}
+	if lineComment.List[0].Text != "/* line comment */" {
+		t.Errorf(`unexpected line comment got = %q; want "/* line comment */"`, lineComment.List[0].Text)
+	}
+
+	docComment2 := f.Decls[3].(*ast.FuncDecl).Doc
+	if docComment2 != nil {
+		t.Errorf("unexpected doc comment %v", docComment2)
+	}
+}