mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go.git
synced 2025-12-08 06:10:04 +00:00
runtime: skip work recheck for non-spinning Ms
When an M transitions from spinning to non-spinning state, it must recheck most sources of work to avoid missing work submitted between its initial check and decrementing sched.nmspinning (see "delicate dance" comment). Ever since the scheduler rewrite in Go 1.1 (golang.org/cl/7314062), we have performed this recheck on all Ms before stopping, regardless of whether or not they were spinning. Unfortunately, there is a problem with this approach: non-spinning Ms are not eligible to steal work (note the skip over the stealWork block), but can detect work during the recheck. If there is work available, this non-spinning M will jump to top, skip stealing, land in recheck again, and repeat. i.e., it will spin uselessly. The spin is bounded. This can only occur if there is another spinning M, which will either take the work, allowing this M to stop, or take some other work, allowing this M to upgrade to spinning. But the spinning is ultimately just a fancy spin-wait. golang.org/issue/43997 discusses several ways to address this. This CL takes the simplest approach: skipping the recheck on non-spinning Ms and allowing them to go to stop. Results for scheduler-relevant runtime and time benchmarks can be found at https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20210420.5. The new BenchmarkCreateGoroutinesSingle is a characteristic example workload that hits this issue hard. A single M readies lots of work without itself parking. Other Ms must spin to steal work, which is very short-lived, forcing those Ms to spin again. Some of the Ms will be non-spinning and hit the above bug. With this fixed, that benchmark drops in CPU usage by a massive 68%, and wall time 24%. BenchmarkNetpollBreak shows similar drops because it is unintentionally almost the same benchmark (create short-living Gs in a loop). Typical well-behaved programs show little change. We also measure scheduling latency (time from goready to execute). Note that many of these benchmarks are very noisy because they don't involve much scheduling. Those that do, like CreateGoroutinesSingle, are expected to increase as we are replacing unintentional spin waiting with a real park. Fixes #43997 Change-Id: Ie1d1e1800f393cee1792455412caaa5865d13562 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/310850 Trust: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com> Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b6ff3c69d5
commit
ecfce58965
2 changed files with 79 additions and 28 deletions
|
|
@ -2841,45 +2841,47 @@ top:
|
|||
if int32(atomic.Xadd(&sched.nmspinning, -1)) < 0 {
|
||||
throw("findrunnable: negative nmspinning")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check all runqueues once again.
|
||||
_p_ = checkRunqsNoP(allpSnapshot, idlepMaskSnapshot)
|
||||
if _p_ != nil {
|
||||
acquirep(_p_)
|
||||
if wasSpinning {
|
||||
// Note the for correctness, only the last M transitioning from
|
||||
// spinning to non-spinning must perform these rechecks to
|
||||
// ensure no missed work. We are performing it on every M that
|
||||
// transitions as a conservative change to monitor effects on
|
||||
// latency. See golang.org/issue/43997.
|
||||
|
||||
// Check all runqueues once again.
|
||||
_p_ = checkRunqsNoP(allpSnapshot, idlepMaskSnapshot)
|
||||
if _p_ != nil {
|
||||
acquirep(_p_)
|
||||
_g_.m.spinning = true
|
||||
atomic.Xadd(&sched.nmspinning, 1)
|
||||
goto top
|
||||
}
|
||||
goto top
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for idle-priority GC work again.
|
||||
_p_, gp = checkIdleGCNoP()
|
||||
if _p_ != nil {
|
||||
acquirep(_p_)
|
||||
if wasSpinning {
|
||||
// Check for idle-priority GC work again.
|
||||
_p_, gp = checkIdleGCNoP()
|
||||
if _p_ != nil {
|
||||
acquirep(_p_)
|
||||
_g_.m.spinning = true
|
||||
atomic.Xadd(&sched.nmspinning, 1)
|
||||
|
||||
// Run the idle worker.
|
||||
_p_.gcMarkWorkerMode = gcMarkWorkerIdleMode
|
||||
casgstatus(gp, _Gwaiting, _Grunnable)
|
||||
if trace.enabled {
|
||||
traceGoUnpark(gp, 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return gp, false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Run the idle worker.
|
||||
_p_.gcMarkWorkerMode = gcMarkWorkerIdleMode
|
||||
casgstatus(gp, _Gwaiting, _Grunnable)
|
||||
if trace.enabled {
|
||||
traceGoUnpark(gp, 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return gp, false
|
||||
// Finally, check for timer creation or expiry concurrently with
|
||||
// transitioning from spinning to non-spinning.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that we cannot use checkTimers here because it calls
|
||||
// adjusttimers which may need to allocate memory, and that isn't
|
||||
// allowed when we don't have an active P.
|
||||
pollUntil = checkTimersNoP(allpSnapshot, timerpMaskSnapshot, pollUntil)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Finally, check for timer creation or expiry concurrently with
|
||||
// transitioning from spinning to non-spinning.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that we cannot use checkTimers here because it calls
|
||||
// adjusttimers which may need to allocate memory, and that isn't
|
||||
// allowed when we don't have an active P.
|
||||
pollUntil = checkTimersNoP(allpSnapshot, timerpMaskSnapshot, pollUntil)
|
||||
|
||||
// Poll network until next timer.
|
||||
if netpollinited() && (atomic.Load(&netpollWaiters) > 0 || pollUntil != 0) && atomic.Xchg64(&sched.lastpoll, 0) != 0 {
|
||||
atomic.Store64(&sched.pollUntil, uint64(pollUntil))
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -692,6 +692,55 @@ func BenchmarkCreateGoroutinesCapture(b *testing.B) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// warmupScheduler ensures the scheduler has at least targetThreadCount threads
|
||||
// in its thread pool.
|
||||
func warmupScheduler(targetThreadCount int) {
|
||||
var wg sync.WaitGroup
|
||||
var count int32
|
||||
for i := 0; i < targetThreadCount; i++ {
|
||||
wg.Add(1)
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
atomic.AddInt32(&count, 1)
|
||||
for atomic.LoadInt32(&count) < int32(targetThreadCount) {
|
||||
// spin until all threads started
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// spin a bit more to ensure they are all running on separate CPUs.
|
||||
doWork(time.Millisecond)
|
||||
wg.Done()
|
||||
}()
|
||||
}
|
||||
wg.Wait()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func doWork(dur time.Duration) {
|
||||
start := time.Now()
|
||||
for time.Since(start) < dur {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// BenchmarkCreateGoroutinesSingle creates many goroutines, all from a single
|
||||
// producer (the main benchmark goroutine).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Compared to BenchmarkCreateGoroutines, this causes different behavior in the
|
||||
// scheduler because Ms are much more likely to need to steal work from the
|
||||
// main P rather than having work in the local run queue.
|
||||
func BenchmarkCreateGoroutinesSingle(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
// Since we are interested in stealing behavior, warm the scheduler to
|
||||
// get all the Ps running first.
|
||||
warmupScheduler(runtime.GOMAXPROCS(0))
|
||||
b.ResetTimer()
|
||||
|
||||
var wg sync.WaitGroup
|
||||
wg.Add(b.N)
|
||||
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
|
||||
go func(){
|
||||
wg.Done()
|
||||
}()
|
||||
}
|
||||
wg.Wait()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func BenchmarkClosureCall(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
sum := 0
|
||||
off1 := 1
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue