mirror of
				https://github.com/golang/go.git
				synced 2025-10-31 08:40:55 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	programming_faq: added question on T vs *T method sets
Adding this question on Russ' recommendation - not sure if there is some detail here I'm missing. The associated discussion was: http://groups.google.com/group/golang-nuts/t/ec6b27e332ed7f77 R=rsc, r CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/887042
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									2379fdec04
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						fb2758167f
					
				
					 1 changed files with 37 additions and 1 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -125,7 +125,43 @@ should recognise such cases and optimize its use of OS threads. For now, | |||
| </p> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <h2 id="Closures">Closures</h2> | ||||
| <h2 id="Functions_methods">Functions and Methods</h2> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <h3 id="different_method_sets"> | ||||
| Why do T and *T have different method sets?</h3> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <p> | ||||
| From the <a href="http://golang.org/doc/go_spec.html#Types">Go Spec</a>: | ||||
| </p> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <blockquote> | ||||
| The method set of any other named type <code>T</code> consists of all methods | ||||
| with receiver type <code>T</code>. The method set of the corresponding pointer | ||||
| type <code>*T</code> is the set of all methods with receiver <code>*T</code> or | ||||
| <code>T</code> (that is, it also contains the method set of <code>T</code>). | ||||
| </blockquote> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <p> | ||||
| If an interface value contains a pointer <code>*T</code>, | ||||
| a method call can obtain a value by dereferencing the pointer, | ||||
| but if an interface value contains a value <code>T</code>, | ||||
| there is no useful way for a method call to obtain a pointer. | ||||
| </p> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <p> | ||||
| If not for this restriction, this code: | ||||
| </p> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <pre> | ||||
| var buf bytes.Buffer | ||||
| io.Copy(buf, os.Stdin) | ||||
| </pre> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <p> | ||||
| would copy standard input into a <i>copy</i> of <code>buf</code>, | ||||
| not into <code>buf</code> itself. | ||||
| This is almost never the desired behavior. | ||||
| </p> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <h3 id="closures_and_goroutines"> | ||||
| Why am I confused by the way my closures behave as goroutines?</h3> | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Andrew Gerrand
						Andrew Gerrand