These comments were originally introduced together with the changes
for alias declarations, and then reverted when we backed out alias
support.
Reintroduce them.
Change-Id: I3ef2c4f4672d6af8a900f5d73df273edf28d1a14
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32826
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This reverts commit 32db3f2756.
Reason: Decision to back out current alias implementation.
For #16339.
Change-Id: Ib05e3d96041d8347e49cae292f66bec791a1fdc8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32825
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This adds a //go:notinheap pragma for declarations of types that must
not be heap allocated. We ensure these rules by disallowing new(T),
make([]T), append([]T), or implicit allocation of T, by disallowing
conversions to notinheap types, and by propagating notinheap to any
struct or array that contains notinheap elements.
The utility of this pragma is that we can eliminate write barriers for
writes to pointers to go:notinheap types, since the write barrier is
guaranteed to be a no-op. This will let us mark several scheduler and
memory allocator structures as go:notinheap, which will let us
disallow write barriers in the scheduler and memory allocator much
more thoroughly and also eliminate some problematic hybrid write
barriers.
This also makes go:nowritebarrierrec and go:yeswritebarrierrec much
more powerful. Currently we use go:nowritebarrier all over the place,
but it's almost never what you actually want: when write barriers are
illegal, they're typically illegal for a whole dynamic scope. Partly
this is because go:nowritebarrier has been around longer, but it's
also because go:nowritebarrierrec couldn't be used in situations that
had no-op write barriers or where some nested scope did allow write
barriers. go:notinheap eliminates many no-op write barriers and
go:yeswritebarrierrec makes it possible to opt back in to write
barriers, so these two changes will let us use go:nowritebarrierrec
far more liberally.
This updates #13386, which is about controlling pointers from non-GC'd
memory to GC'd memory. That would require some additional pragma (or
pragmas), but could build on this pragma.
Change-Id: I6314f8f4181535dd166887c9ec239977b54940bd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30939
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Permits parsing of alias declarations with -newparser
const/type/var/func T => p.T
but the compiler will reject it with an error. For now this
also accepts
type T = p.T
so we can experiment with a type-alias only scenario.
- renamed _Arrow token to _Larrow (<-)
- introduced _Rarrow token (=>)
- introduced AliasDecl node
- extended scanner to accept _Rarrow
- extended parser and printer to handle alias declarations
Change-Id: I0170d10a87df8255db9186d466b6fd405228c38e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29355
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Instead of saving all pragmas and processing them after parsing is
finished, process them immediately during scanning like the current
lexer does.
This is a bit unfortunate because it means we can't use
syntax.ParseFile to concurrently parse files yet, but it fixes how we
report syntax errors in the presence of //line pragmas.
While here, add a bunch more gcCompat entries to syntax/parser.go to
get "go build -toolexec='toolstash -cmp' std cmd" passing. There are
still a few remaining cases only triggered building unit tests, but
this seems like a nice checkpoint.
Change-Id: Iaf3bbcf2849857a460496f31eea228e0c585ce13
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/28226
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
gc needs access to line offsets for Nodes. It also needs access to the
end line offset for function bodies so it knows what line number to
use for things like implicit returns and defer executions.
Lastly, include an extra bool to distinguish between simple and full
slice expressions. This is redundant in valid parse trees, but needed
by gc for producing complete warnings in invalid inputs.
Change-Id: I64baf334a35c72336d26fa6755c67eb9d6f4e93c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27196
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Syntax tree nodes, scanner, parser, basic printers.
Builds syntax trees for entire Go std lib at a rate of ~1.8M lines/s
in warmed up state (MacMini, 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7, 8GB RAM):
$ go test -run StdLib -fast
parsed 1074617 lines (2832 files) in 579.66364ms (1853863 lines/s)
allocated 282.212Mb (486.854Mb/s)
PASS
Change-Id: Ie26d9a7bf4e5ff07457aedfcc9b89f0eba72ae3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27195
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
