This CL reverts CL 192097 and fixes the issue in CL 189277.
Change-Id: Icd271262e1f5019a8e01c91f91c12c1261eeb02b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192519
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL optimizes math.bits.TrailingZeros16 on 386 with
a pair of BSFL and ORL instrcutions.
The case TrailingZeros16-4 of the benchmark test in
math/bits shows big improvement.
name old time/op new time/op delta
TrailingZeros16-4 1.55ns ± 1% 0.87ns ± 1% -43.87% (p=0.000 n=50+49)
Change-Id: Ia899975b0e46f45dcd20223b713ed632bc32740b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/189277
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
state and ssafn both have their own Fatalf, so use them instead of
global Fatalf.
Updates #19683
Change-Id: Ie02a961d4285ab0a3f3b8d889a5b498d926ed567
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188539
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This reverts CL 180761
Reason for revert: Reinstate the stack-allocated defer CL.
There was nothing wrong with the CL proper, but stack allocation of defers exposed two other issues.
Issue #32477: Fix has been submitted as CL 181258.
Issue #32498: Possible fix is CL 181377 (not submitted yet).
Change-Id: I32b3365d5026600069291b068bbba6cb15295eb3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/181378
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The z/Architecture does not guarantee that a load following a store
will not be reordered with that store, unless they access the same
address. Therefore if we want to ensure the sequential consistency
of atomic loads and stores we need to perform serialization
operations after atomic stores.
We do not need to serialize in the runtime when using StoreRel[ease]
and LoadAcq[uire]. The z/Architecture already provides sufficient
ordering guarantees for these operations.
name old time/op new time/op delta
AtomicLoad64-16 0.51ns ± 0% 0.51ns ± 0% ~ (all equal)
AtomicStore64-16 0.51ns ± 0% 0.60ns ± 9% +16.47% (p=0.000 n=17+20)
AtomicLoad-16 0.51ns ± 0% 0.51ns ± 0% ~ (all equal)
AtomicStore-16 0.51ns ± 0% 0.60ns ± 9% +16.50% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
Fixes#32428.
Change-Id: I88d19a4010c46070e4fff4b41587efe4c628d4d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/180439
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This reverts commit fff4f599fe.
Reason for revert: Seems to still have issues around GC.
Fixes#32452
Change-Id: Ibe7af629f9ad6a3d5312acd7b066123f484da7f0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/180761
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
When a defer is executed at most once in a function body,
we can allocate the defer record for it on the stack instead
of on the heap.
This should make defers like this (which are very common) faster.
This optimization applies to 363 out of the 370 static defer sites
in the cmd/go binary.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Defer-4 52.2ns ± 5% 36.2ns ± 3% -30.70% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Fixes#6980
Update #14939
Change-Id: I697109dd7aeef9e97a9eeba2ef65ff53d3ee1004
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171758
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Some runtime functions, like getcallerpc/sp, don't have Go or
assembly implementations and have to be intrinsified. Make sure
they are, even if intrinsics are disabled.
This makes "go build -gcflags=all=-d=ssa/intrinsics/off hello.go"
work.
Change-Id: I77caaed7715d3ca7ffef68a3cdc9357f095c6b9f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/179897
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This CL adds intrinsics for the 64-bit addition and subtraction
functions in math/bits. These intrinsics use the condition code
to propagate the carry or borrow bit.
To make the carry chains more efficient I've removed the
'clobberFlags' property from most of the load and store
operations. Originally these ops did clobber flags when using
offsets that didn't fit in a signed 20-bit integer, however
that is no longer true.
As with other platforms the intrinsics are faster when executed
in a chain rather than a loop because currently we need to spill
and restore the carry bit between each loop iteration. We may
be able to reduce the need to do this on s390x (e.g. by using
compare-and-branch instructions that do not clobber flags) in the
future.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Add64 1.21ns ± 2% 2.03ns ± 2% +67.18% (p=0.000 n=7+10)
Add64multiple 2.98ns ± 3% 1.03ns ± 0% -65.39% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Sub64 1.23ns ± 4% 2.03ns ± 1% +64.85% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Sub64multiple 3.73ns ± 4% 1.04ns ± 1% -72.28% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
Change-Id: I913bbd5e19e6b95bef52f5bc4f14d6fe40119083
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174303
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
In the statement x = a[i], the index panic should appear to come from
the line number of the '['. Previous to this CL we sometimes used the
line number of the '=' instead.
Fixes#29504
Change-Id: Ie718fd303c1ac2aee33e88d52c9ba9bcf220dea1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174617
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change creates an intrinsic for Add64 for ppc64x and adds a
testcase for it.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Add64-160 1.90ns ±40% 2.29ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.119 n=5+5)
Add64multiple-160 6.69ns ± 2% 2.45ns ± 4% -63.47% (p=0.016 n=4+5)
Change-Id: I9abe6fb023fdf62eea3c9b46a1820f60bb0a7f97
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173758
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In 31618, we end up comparing the is-stmt-ness of positions
to repurpose real instructions as inline marks. If the is-stmt-ness
doesn't match, we end up not being able to remove the inline mark.
Always use statement-full positions to do the matching, so we
always find a match if there is one.
Also always use positions that are statements for inline marks.
Fixes#31618
Change-Id: Idaf39bdb32fa45238d5cd52973cadf4504f947d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173324
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Though there is variation in the spelling of canceled,
cancellation is always spelled with a double l.
Reference: https://www.grammarly.com/blog/canceled-vs-cancelled/
Change-Id: I240f1a297776c8e27e74f3eca566d2bc4c856f2f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170060
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This change is mostly cosmetic.
OINDREGSP was used only for reading the results of a function call.
In recognition of that fact, rename it to ORESULT.
Along the way, trim down our handling of it to the bare minimum,
and rely on the increased clarity of ORESULT to inline nodarg.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I25b177df4ea54a8e94b1698d044c297b7e453c64
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170705
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This opcode was only used to mark unreachable code for plive to use.
plive now uses the SSA representation, so it knows locations are
unreachable because they are ends of Exit blocks. It doesn't need
these opcodes any more.
These opcodes actually used space in the binary, 2 bytes per undef
on x86 and more for other archs.
Makes the amd64 go binary 0.2% smaller.
Change-Id: I64c84c35db7c7949617a3a5830f09c8e5fcd2620
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171058
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Tidy the code up a little bit to move variable definitions closer
to uses, prefer early return to else branches and some other minor
tweaks.
I'd like to make some more changes to this code in the near future
and this CL should make those changes cleaner.
Change-Id: Ie7d7f2e4bb1e670347941e255c9cdc1703282db5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170120
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
ssa/debug_test.go already had a step limit; this exposes
it to individual tests, and it is then set low for the
infinite loop tests.
That however is not enough; in an infinite loop debuggers
see an unchanging line number, and therefore keep trying
until they see a different one. To do this, the concept
of a "bogus" line number is introduced, and on output
single-instruction infinite loops are detected and a
hardware nop with correct line number is inserted into
the loop; the branch itself receives a bogus line number.
This breaks up the endless stream of same line number and
causes both gdb and delve to not hang; Delve complains
about the incorrect line number while gdb does
a sort of odd step-to-nowhere that then steps back
to the loop. Since repeats are suppressed in the reference
file, a single line is shown there.
(The wrong line number mentioned in previous message
was an artifact of debug_test.go, not Delve, and is now
fixed.)
The bogus line number exposed in Delve is less than
wonderful, but compared to hanging, it is better.
Fixes#30664.
Change-Id: I30c927cf8869a84c6c9b84033ee44d7044aab552
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/168477
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Instead of always inserting a nop to use as the target of an inline
mark, see if we can instead find an instruction we're issuing anyway
with the correct line number, and use that instruction. That way, we
don't need to issue a nop.
Makes cmd/go 0.3% smaller.
Update #29571
Change-Id: If6cfc93ab3352ec2c6e0878f8074a3bf0786b2f8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/158021
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
This is part of a general effort to shrink walk.
In an ideal world, we'd have an SSA op for allocation,
but we don't yet have a good mechanism for introducing
function calling during SSA compilation.
In the meantime, SSA conversion is a better place for it.
This also makes it easier to introduce new optimizations;
instead of doing the typecheck walk dance,
we can simply write what we want the backend to do.
I introduced a new opcode in this change because:
(a) It avoids a class of bugs involving correctly detecting
whether this ONEW is a "before walk" ONEW or an "after walk" ONEW.
It also means that using ONEW or ONEWOBJ in the wrong context
will generally result in a faster failure.
(b) Opcodes are cheap.
(c) It provides a better place to put documentation.
This change also is also marginally more performant:
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
Template 39.1MB ± 0% 39.0MB ± 0% -0.14% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Unicode 28.4MB ± 0% 28.4MB ± 0% ~ (p=0.421 n=5+5)
GoTypes 132MB ± 0% 132MB ± 0% -0.23% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Compiler 608MB ± 0% 607MB ± 0% -0.25% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
SSA 2.04GB ± 0% 2.04GB ± 0% -0.01% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Flate 24.4MB ± 0% 24.3MB ± 0% -0.13% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
GoParser 29.3MB ± 0% 29.1MB ± 0% -0.54% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Reflect 84.8MB ± 0% 84.7MB ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Tar 36.7MB ± 0% 36.6MB ± 0% -0.10% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
XML 48.7MB ± 0% 48.6MB ± 0% -0.24% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
[Geo mean] 85.0MB 84.8MB -0.19%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
Template 383k ± 0% 382k ± 0% -0.26% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Unicode 341k ± 0% 341k ± 0% ~ (p=0.579 n=5+5)
GoTypes 1.37M ± 0% 1.36M ± 0% -0.39% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Compiler 5.59M ± 0% 5.56M ± 0% -0.49% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
SSA 16.9M ± 0% 16.9M ± 0% -0.03% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Flate 238k ± 0% 238k ± 0% -0.23% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
GoParser 306k ± 0% 303k ± 0% -0.93% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Reflect 990k ± 0% 987k ± 0% -0.33% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Tar 356k ± 0% 355k ± 0% -0.20% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
XML 444k ± 0% 442k ± 0% -0.45% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
[Geo mean] 848k 845k -0.33%
Change-Id: I2c36003a7cbf71b53857b7de734852b698f49310
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/167957
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This CL instrinsifies Add64 with arm64 instruction sequence ADDS, ADCS
and ADC, and optimzes the case of carry chains.The CL also changes the
test code so that the intrinsic implementation can be tested.
Benchmarks:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Add-224 2.500000ns +- 0% 2.090000ns +- 4% -16.40% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Add32-224 2.500000ns +- 0% 2.500000ns +- 0% ~ (all equal)
Add64-224 2.500000ns +- 0% 1.577778ns +- 2% -36.89% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Add64multiple-224 6.000000ns +- 0% 2.000000ns +- 0% -66.67% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Change-Id: I6ee91c9a85c16cc72ade5fd94868c579f16c7615
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/159017
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
A few examples (for accessing a slice of length 3):
s[-1] runtime error: index out of range [-1]
s[3] runtime error: index out of range [3] with length 3
s[-1:0] runtime error: slice bounds out of range [-1:]
s[3:0] runtime error: slice bounds out of range [3:0]
s[3:-1] runtime error: slice bounds out of range [:-1]
s[3:4] runtime error: slice bounds out of range [:4] with capacity 3
s[0:3:4] runtime error: slice bounds out of range [::4] with capacity 3
Note that in cases where there are multiple things wrong with the
indexes (e.g. s[3:-1]), we report one of those errors kind of
arbitrarily, currently the rightmost one.
An exhaustive set of examples is in issue30116[u].out in the CL.
The message text has the same prefix as the old message text. That
leads to slightly awkward phrasing but hopefully minimizes the chance
that code depending on the error text will break.
Increases the size of the go binary by 0.5% (amd64). The panic functions
take arguments in registers in order to keep the size of the compiled code
as small as possible.
Fixes#30116
Change-Id: Idb99a827b7888822ca34c240eca87b7e44a04fdd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/161477
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
When a jump at the end of a block is about to be marked as
a statement, if the first real instruction in the target
block is also a statement for the same line, remove the
mark from the jump.
This is a first effort at a minimal-harm heuristic.
A better heuristic might skip over any "not-statement"
values preceding a definitely marked value.
Fixes#29443.
Change-Id: Ibd52783713b4936e0c2dfda8d708bf186f33b00a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/159977
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alessandro Arzilli <alessandro.arzilli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Turns out this makes the fix for 28797 unnecessary, because this order
ensures that the RHS of IsSliceInBounds ops are always nonnegative.
The real reason for this change is that it also makes dealing with
<0 values easier for reporting values in bounds check panics (issue #30116).
Makes cmd/go negligibly smaller.
Update #28797
Change-Id: I1f25ba6d2b3b3d4a72df3105828aa0a4b629ce85
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/166377
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Assign SSA OFOR's bBody.Pos to AST (*Node).Pos as it is created.
An empty for loop has no other information which may be used to give
correct position information in the resulting executable. Such a for
loop may compile to a single `JMP *self` and it is important that the
location of this is in the right place.
Fixes#30167.
Change-Id: Iec44f0281c462c33fac6b7b8ccfc2ef37434c247
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/163019
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Make sure the side effects inside short-circuited operations (&& and ||)
happen correctly.
Before this CL, we attached the side effects to the node itself using
exprInPlace. That caused other side effects in sibling expressions
to get reordered with respect to the short circuit side effect.
Instead, rewrite a && b like:
r := a
if r {
r = b
}
That code we can keep correctly ordered with respect to other
side-effects extracted from part of a big expression.
exprInPlace seems generally unsafe. But this was the only case where
exprInPlace is called not at the top level of an expression, so I
don't think the other uses can actually trigger an issue (there can't
be a sibling expression). TODO: maybe those cases don't need "in
place", and we can retire that function generally.
This CL needed a small tweak to the SSA generation of OIF so that the
short circuit optimization still triggers. The short circuit optimization
looks for triangle but not diamonds, so don't bother allocating a block
if it will be empty.
Go 1 benchmarks are in the noise.
Fixes#30566
Change-Id: I19c04296bea63cbd6ad05f87a63b005029123610
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/165617
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
They can't be used, so we don't need code generated for them. We just
need to report errors in their bodies.
The compiler currently has a bunch of special cases sprinkled about
for "_" functions, because we never generate a linker symbol for them.
Instead, abort compilation earlier so we never reach any of that
special-case code.
Fixes#29870
Change-Id: I3530c9c353deabcf75ce9072c0b740e992349ee5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/158845
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
A recent change to fix stacktraces for inlined functions
introduced a regression on ppc64le when compiling position
independent code. That happened because ginsnop2 was called for
the purpose of inserting a NOP to identify the location of
the inlined function, when ginsnop should have been used.
ginsnop2 is intended to be used before deferreturn to ensure
r2 is properly restored when compiling position independent code.
In some cases the location where r2 is loaded from might not be
initialized. If that happens and r2 is used to generate an address,
the result is likely a SEGV.
This fixes that problem.
Fixes#30283
Change-Id: If70ef27fc65ef31969712422306ac3a57adbd5b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/163337
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Allow shifts by signed amounts. Panic if the shift amount is negative.
TODO: We end up doing two compares per shift, see Ian's comment
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/19113#issuecomment-443241799 that
we could do it with a single comparison in the normal case.
The prove pass mostly handles this code well. For instance, it removes the
<0 check for cases like this:
if s >= 0 { _ = x << s }
_ = x << len(a)
This case isn't handled well yet:
_ = x << (y & 0xf)
I'll do followon CLs for unhandled cases as needed.
Update #19113
R=go1.13
Change-Id: I839a5933d94b54ab04deb9dd5149f32c51c90fa1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/158719
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Currently, obj.Ctxt's symbol table does not distinguish between ABI0
and ABIInternal symbols. This is *almost* okay, since a given symbol
name in the final object file is only going to belong to one ABI or
the other, but it requires that the compiler mark a Sym as being a
function symbol before it retrieves its LSym. If it retrieves the LSym
first, that LSym will be created as ABI0, and later marking the Sym as
a function symbol won't change the LSym's ABI.
Marking a Sym as a function symbol before looking up its LSym sounds
easy, except Syms have a dual purpose: they are used just as interned
strings (every function, variable, parameter, etc with the same
textual name shares a Sym), and *also* to store state for whatever
package global has that name. As a result, it's easy to slip up and
look up an LSym when a Sym is serving as the name of a local variable,
and then later mark it as a function when it's serving as the global
with the name.
In general, we were careful to avoid this, but #29610 demonstrates one
case where we messed up. Because of on-demand importing from indexed
export data, it's possible to compile a method wrapper for a type
imported from another package before importing an init function from
that package. If the argument of the method is named "init", the
"init" LSym will be created as a data symbol when compiling the
wrapper, before it gets marked as a function symbol.
To fix this, we separate obj.Ctxt's symbol tables for ABI0 and
ABIInternal symbols. This way, the compiler will simply get a
different LSym once the Sym takes on its package-global meaning as a
function.
This fixes the above ordering issue, and means we no longer need to go
out of our way to create the "init" function early and mark it as a
function symbol.
Fixes#29610.
Updates #27539.
Change-Id: Id9458b40017893d46ef9e4a3f9b47fc49e1ce8df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/157017
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Work involved in getting a stack trace is divided between
runtime.Callers and runtime.CallersFrames.
Before this CL, runtime.Callers returns a pc per runtime frame.
runtime.CallersFrames is responsible for expanding a runtime frame
into potentially multiple user frames.
After this CL, runtime.Callers returns a pc per user frame.
runtime.CallersFrames just maps those to user frame info.
Entries in the result of runtime.Callers are now pcs
of the calls (or of the inline marks), not of the instruction
just after the call.
Fixes#29007Fixes#28640
Update #26320
Change-Id: I1c9567596ff73dc73271311005097a9188c3406f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/152537
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Instead of testing len(slice)+numNewElements > cap(slice) use
uint(len(slice)+numNewElements) > uint(cap(slice)) to test
if a slice needs to be grown in an append operation.
This prevents a possible overflow when len(slice) is near the maximum
int value and the addition of a constant number of new elements
makes it overflow and wrap around to a negative number which is
smaller than the capacity of the slice.
Appending a slice to a slice with append(s1, s2...) already used
a uint comparison to test slice capacity and therefore was not
vulnerable to the same overflow issue.
Fixes: #29190
Change-Id: I41733895838b4f80a44f827bf900ce931d8be5ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/154037
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
IsSliceInBounds(x, y) asserts that y is not negative, but
there were cases where this is not true. Change code
generation to ensure that this is true when it's not obviously
true. Prove phase cleans a few of these out.
With this change the compiler text section is 0.06% larger,
that is, not very much. Benchmarking still TBD, may need
to wait for access to a benchmarking box (next week).
Also corrected run.go to handle '?' in -update_errors output.
Fixes#28797.
Change-Id: Ia8af90bc50a91ae6e934ef973def8d3f398fac7b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/152477
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
For the entry block, make the "first instruction" be truly
the first instruction. This allows printing of incoming
parameters with Delve.
Also be sure Phis are marked as being at the start of their
block. This is observed to move location list pointers,
and where moved, they become correct.
Leading zero-width instructions include LoweredGetClosurePtr.
Because this instruction is actually architecture-specific,
and it is now tested for in 3 different places, also created
Op.isLoweredGetClosurePtr() to reduce future surprises.
Change-Id: Ic043b7265835cf1790382a74334b5714ae4060af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145179
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Note that the intrinsic implementation panics separately for overflow and
divide by zero, which matches the behavior of the pure go implementation.
There is a modest performance improvement after intrinsic implementation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Div-4 53.0ns ± 1% 47.0ns ± 0% -11.28% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Div32-4 18.4ns ± 0% 18.5ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.444 n=5+5)
Div64-4 53.3ns ± 0% 47.5ns ± 4% -10.77% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Updates #28273
Change-Id: Ic1688ecc0964acace2e91bf44ef16f5fb6b6bc82
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144378
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This commit adapts compile tool to create correct nilchecks for AIX.
AIX allows to load a nil pointer. Therefore, the default nilcheck
which issues a load must be replaced by a CMP instruction followed by a
store at 0x0 if the value is nil. The store will trigger a SIGSEGV as on
others OS.
The nilcheck algorithm must be adapted to do not remove nilcheck if it's
only a read. Stores are detected with v.Type.IsMemory().
Tests related to nilptr must be adapted to the previous changements.
nilptr.go cannot be used as it's because the AIX address space starts at
1<<32.
Change-Id: I9f5aaf0b7e185d736a9b119c0ed2fe4e5bd1e7af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144538
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL adds CFGs to ssa.html.
It execs dot to generate SVG,
which then gets inlined into the html.
Some standard naming and javascript hacks
enable integration with the rest of ssa.html.
Clicking on blocks highlights the relevant
part of the CFG, and vice versa.
Sample output and screenshots can be seen in #28177.
CFGs can be turned on with the suffix mask:
:* - dump CFG for every phase
:lower - just the lower phase
:lower-layout - lower through layout
:w,x-y - phases w and x through y
Calling dot after every pass is noticeably slow,
instead use the range of phases.
Dead blocks are not displayed on CFG.
User can zoom and pan individual CFG
when the automatic adjustment has failed.
Dot-related errors are reported
without bringing down the process.
Fixes#28177
Change-Id: Id52c42d86c4559ca737288aa10561b67a119c63d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142517
Run-TryBot: Yury Smolsky <yury@smolsky.by>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
This change does a bulk rename of several identifiers in the compiler.
See #27167 and https://docs.google.com/document/d/19_ExiylD9MRfeAjKIfEsMU1_RGhuxB9sA0b5Zv7byVI/
for context and for discussion of these particular renames.
Commands run to generate this change:
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OPROC' -to OGO
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OCOM' -to OBITNOT
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OMINUS' -to ONEG
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OIND' -to ODEREF
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OARRAYBYTESTR' -to OBYTES2STR
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OARRAYBYTESTRTMP' -to OBYTES2STRTMP
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OARRAYRUNESTR' -to ORUNES2STR
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OSTRARRAYBYTE' -to OSTR2BYTES
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OSTRARRAYBYTETMP' -to OSTR2BYTESTMP
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OSTRARRAYRUNE' -to OSTR2RUNES
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Etop' -to ctxStmt
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Erv' -to ctxExpr
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Ecall' -to ctxCallee
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Efnstruct' -to ctxMultiOK
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Easgn' -to ctxAssign
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Ecomplit' -to ctxCompLit
Not altered: parameters and local variables (mostly in typecheck.go) named top,
which should probably now be called ctx (and which should probably have a named type).
Also not altered: Field called Top in gc.Func.
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Node.Isddd' -to IsDDD
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Node.SetIsddd' -to SetIsDDD
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".nodeIsddd' -to nodeIsDDD
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/types".Field.Isddd' -to IsDDD
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/types".Field.SetIsddd' -to SetIsDDD
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/types".fieldIsddd' -to fieldIsDDD
Not altered: function gc.hasddd, params and local variables called isddd
Also not altered: fmt.go prints nodes using "isddd(%v)".
cd cmd/compile/internal/gc; go generate
I then manually found impacted comments using exact string match
and fixed them up by hand. The comment changes were trivial.
Passes toolstash-check.
Fixes#27167. If this experiment is deemed a success,
we will open a new tracking issue for renames to do
at the end of the 1.13 cycles.
Change-Id: I2dc541533d2ab0d06cb3d31d65df205ecfb151e8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/150140
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The current support_XXX variables are specific for the
amd64 and 386 platforms.
Prefix processor capability variables by architecture to have a
consistent naming scheme and avoid reuse of the existing
variables for new platforms.
This also aligns naming of runtime variables closer with internal/cpu
processor capability variable names.
Change-Id: I3eabb29a03874678851376185d3a62e73c1aff1d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/91435
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <martisch@uos.de>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
