Syms are meant to be just interned (pkg, name) tuples, and are a
purely abstract, Go-language concept. As such, associating them with
linker symbols (a low-level, implementation-oriented detail) is
inappropriate.
There's still work to be done before linker symbols can be directly
attached to their appropriate, higher-level objects instead. But in
the mean-time, we can at least add helper functions and discourage
folks from using Sym.Linksym directly. The next CL will mechanically
rewrite code to use these helpers where possible.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: I413bd1c80bce056304f9a7343526bd153f2b9c7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280639
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
This CL shuffles a couple functions around to help flatten the package
dependency graph somewhat:
1. ssa.LosesStmtMark is only ever used in associated with an
objw.Prog, so we might as well move it to that package. This removes a
dependency from objw (a relatively low-level utility package that
wraps cmd/internal/obj) on ssa (a large and relatively high-level
package).
2. Moves liveness.SetTypeBits into a new package typebits. A
single-function package is a bit on the silly side, but reflectdata
shouldn't need to depend on liveness (nor vice versa).
[git-generate]
cd src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa
rf '
mv LosesStmtMark prog.go
mv prog.go cmd/compile/internal/objw
'
cd ../liveness
rf '
mv SetTypeBits Set
mv Set typebits.go
rm typebits.go:/Copyright/+4,/^package/-0
mv typebits.go cmd/compile/internal/typebits
'
Change-Id: Ic9a983f0ad6c0cf1a537f99889699a8444699e6e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280447
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Now that the previous CL ensures we always set SelectorExpr.Selection,
we can replace the SelectorExpr.Offset field with a helper method that
simply returns SelectorExpr.Selection.Offset.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: Id0f22b8b1980397b668f6860d27cb197b90ff52a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280433
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
During walkCall, there's a half-hearted attempt at rewriting OCALLMETH
expressions into regular function calls by moving the receiver
argument into n.Args with the rest of the arguments. But the way it
does this leaves the AST in an inconsistent state (an ODOTMETH node
with no X expression), and leaves a lot of duplicate work for the rest
of the backend to deal with.
By simply rewriting OCALLMETH expressions into proper OCALLFUNC
expressions, we eliminate a ton of unnecessary code duplication during
SSA construction and avoid creation of invalid method-typed variables.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: I4d5c5f90a79f8994059b2d0ae472182e08096c0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280294
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Within the compiler, we represent the type of methods as a special
"method" type, where the receiver parameter type is kept separate from
the other parameters. This is convenient for operations like testing
whether a type implements an interface, where we want to ignore the
receiver type.
These method types don't properly exist within the Go language though:
there are only "function" types. E.g., method expressions (expressions
of the form Type.Method) are simply functions with the receiver
parameter prepended to the regular parameter list.
However, the compiler backend is currently a little sloppy in its
handling of these types, which results in temporary variables being
declared as having "method" type, which then end up in DWARF
data. This is probably harmless in practice, but it's still wrong.
The proper solution is to fix the backend code so that we use correct
types everywhere, and the next CL does exactly this. But as it fixes
the DWARF output, so it fails toolstash -cmp. So this prelim CL
bandages over the issue in a way that generates the same output as
that proper fix.
Change-Id: I37a127bc8365c3a79ce513bdb3cfccb945912762
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280293
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Similar to the earlier mkbuiltin cleanup, there's a bunch of code that
calls typecheck.NewFuncType or typecheck.NewStructType, which can now
just call types.NewSignature and types.NewStruct, respectively.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: Ie6e09f1a7efef84b9a2bb5daa7087a6879979668
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/279955
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>