This mirrors https://go.dev/cl/637755, as x/telemetry is now aware of
sigpanic preceding trap frames.
For #70637.
Change-Id: I13a775f25e89047702d4f2d463ce3210bcf192d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/638015
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
When given a hint size, set the initial capacity large enough to avoid
requiring growth in the average case.
When not given a hint (or given 0), don't allocate anything at all.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I8844fc652b8d2d4e5136cd56f7e78999a07fe381
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/616457
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Grab the print lock around the set of prints we use to report
fatal errors. This ensures that each fatal error gets reported
atomically instead of interleaved with other fatal errors.
Fixes#69447
Change-Id: Ib3569f0c8210fd7e19a7d8ef4bc114f07469f317
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/615655
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This change fixes problems with thread-locked goroutines using
newcoro/coroswitch/etc. Currently, the coro paths do not consider
thread-locked goroutines at all and can quickly result in broken
scheduler state or lost/leaked goroutines.
One possible fix to these issues is to fall back on goroutine+channel
semantics, but that turns out to be fairly complicated to implement and
results in significant performance cliffs. More complex thread-lock
state donation tricks also result in some fairly complicated state
tracking that doesn't seem worth it given the use-cases of iter.Pull
(and even then, there will be performance cliffs).
This change implements a much simpler, but more restrictive semantics.
In particular, thread-lock state is tied to the coro at the first call
to newcoro (i.e. iter.Pull). From then on, the invariant is that if the
coro has any thread-lock state *or* a goroutine calling into coroswitch
has any thread-lock state, that the full gamut of thread-lock state must
remain the same as it was when newcoro was called (the full gamut
meaning internal and external lock counts as well as the identity of the
thread that was locked to).
This semantics allows the common cases to be always fast, but comes with
a non-orthogonality caveat. Specifically, when iter.Pull is used in
conjunction with thread-locked goroutines, complex cases (passing next
between goroutines or passing yield between goroutines) are likely to
fail. Simple cases, where any number of iter.Pull iterators are used in
a straightforward way (nested, in series, etc.) from the same
goroutine, will work and will be guaranteed to be fast regardless of
thread-lock state.
This is a compromise for the near-term and we may consider lifting the
restrictions imposed by this CL in the future.
Fixes#65889.
Fixes#65946.
Change-Id: I3fb5791e36a61f5ded50226a229a79d28739b24e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/583675
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This change moves the v2 tracer into the trace directory.
Updates #67367
Change-Id: I3657b4227002cb00fdf29c797434800ea796715e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/584538
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This CL causes the printing of panic values to ensure that all
newlines in the output are immediately followed by a tab, so
that there is no way for a maliciously crafted panic value to
fool a program attempting to parse the traceback into thinking
that the panic value is in fact a goroutine stack.
See https://github.com/golang/go/issues/64590#issuecomment-1932675696
+ release note
Updates #64590
Updates #63455
Change-Id: I5142acb777383c0c122779d984e73879567dc627
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/581215
Auto-Submit: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
This change makes the new execution tracer described in #60773, the
default tracer. This change attempts to make the smallest amount of
changes for a single CL.
Updates #66703
For #60773
Change-Id: I3742f3419c54f07d7c020ae5e1c18d29d8bcae6d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/576256
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Currently lots of functions require systemstack because the trace buffer
might get flushed, but that will already switch to the systemstack for
the most critical bits (grabbing trace.lock). That means a lot of this
code is non-preemptible when it doesn't need to be. We've seen this
cause problems at scale, when dumping very large numbers of stacks at
once, for example.
This is a re-land of CL 572095 which was reverted in CL 577376. This
re-land includes a fix of the test that broke on the longtest builders.
Change-Id: Ia8d7cbe3aaa8398cf4a1818bac66c3415a399348
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/577377
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
This makes CL 561635's test pass without any changes to the
traceback textual format.
The test in this CL is copied identically from CL 561635.
Change-Id: I5130abdfefd9940f98f20c283cca6cd159e37617
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/571798
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
This reverts commit 643d816c8b (CL 561635).
Reason for revert: This works for telemetry but broke various other
properties of the tracebacks as well as some programs that read
tracebacks. We should figure out a solution that works for all uses,
and in the interim we should not be making telemetry work at the
cost of breaking other, existing valid uses.
See #65761 for details.
Change-Id: I467993ae778887e5bd3cca4c0fb54e9d44802ee1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/571797
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
This ensures the trace buffers are as up-to-date as possible right
before crashing. It increases the chance of finding the culprit for the
crash when looking at core dumps, e.g. if slowness is the cause for the
crash (monitor kills process).
Fixes#65319.
Change-Id: Iaf5551911b3b3b01ba65cb8749cf62a411e02d9c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/562616
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Crash monitoring tools may parse the PC values and feed them
to CallersFrames, which does not run the inline unwinder, since
Callers already did so. So, the GOTRACEBACK=system output
must also include PC values even for inlined frames.
(The actual values are just marker NOP instructions,
but that isn't important.)
This CL also includes a test that the PC values can be
parsed out of the crash report and fed to CallersFrames
to yield a sensible result. (The logic is a distillation
of the x/telemetry crashmonitor.)
The previously printed PCs were in fact slightly wrong
for frames containing inlined calls: instead of the
virtual CALL instruction (a NOP) to the first
inlined call, it would display the PC of the
CALL in the innermost inlined function.
Change-Id: I64a06771fc191ba16c1383b8139b714f4f299703
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/561635
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
We currently suppress runtime frames in tracebacks, except for
exported functions.
This CL also prints exported methods of exported types
in tracebacks, for consistency.
Change-Id: Ic65e7611621f0b210de5ae0c02b9d0a044f39fd6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/507736
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Apparently, on Windows, throwing an exception on a non-system-
allocated crash stack causes EXCEPTION_STACK_OVERFLOW and hangs
the process (see issue #63938). Disable crash stack for now, which
gets us back the the behavior of Go 1.21.
Fixes#63938.
Change-Id: I4c090315b93b484e756b242f0de7a9e02f199261
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/543996
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
Temporarily skip to make the builder happy. Will work on a fix.
Updates #63938.
Change-Id: Ic9db771342108430c29774b2c3e50043791189a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/541195
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Change-Id: Ib89a71e20f9c6b86c97814c75cb427e9bd7075e5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/538735
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
Error like "morestack on g0" is one of the errors that is very
hard to debug, because often it doesn't print a useful stack trace.
The runtime doesn't directly print a stack trace because it is
a bad stack state to call print. Sometimes the SIGABRT may trigger
a traceback, but sometimes not especially in a cgo binary. Even if
it triggers a traceback it often does not include the stack trace
of the bad stack.
This CL makes it explicitly print a stack trace and throw. The
idea is to have some space as an "emergency" crash stack. When the
stack is in a really bad state, we switch to the crash stack and
do a traceback.
Currently only implemented on AMD64 and ARM64.
TODO: also handle errors like "morestack on gsignal" and bad
systemstack. Also handle other architectures.
Change-Id: Ibfc397202f2bb0737c5cbe99f2763de83301c1c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/419435
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Apparently it falls into infinite printing loop. Skipping for now.
Will investigate.
For #62671.
Change-Id: I5be8e8c1d0f4f2eaa231d6bcdfe13e7f08c28b98
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/528403
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
The stack bounds from pthread are not always accurate, and could
cause seg fault if we run out of the actual stack space before
reaching the bounds. Here we use an artificially small stack bounds
to check overflow without actually running out of the system stack.
Change-Id: I8067c5e1297307103b315d9d0c60120293b57aab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/523695
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Use ^ and $ in the -run flag regular expression value when the intention
is to invoke a single named test. This removes the reliance on there not
being another similarly named test to achieve the intended result.
In particular, package syscall has tests named TestUnshareMountNameSpace
and TestUnshareMountNameSpaceChroot that both trigger themselves setting
GO_WANT_HELPER_PROCESS=1 to run alternate code in a helper process. As a
consequence of overlap in their test names, the former was inadvertently
triggering one too many helpers.
Spotted while reviewing CL 525196. Apply the same change in other places
to make it easier for code readers to see that said tests aren't running
extraneous tests. The unlikely cases of -run=TestSomething intentionally
being used to run all tests that have the TestSomething substring in the
name can be better written as -run=^.*TestSomething.*$ or with a comment
so it is clear it wasn't an oversight.
Change-Id: Iba208aba3998acdbf8c6708e5d23ab88938bfc1e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/524948
Reviewed-by: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Also add a check that we didn't leave any core files behind.
Change-Id: I30444ef43ad1a8cc1cacd3b75280f2128e104939
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/525175
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
We used to decrement it in netpollgoready, but that missed
the common case of a descriptor becoming ready due to I/O.
All calls to netpollgoready go through netpollunblock,
so this shouldn't miss any decrements we missed before.
Fixes#60782
Change-Id: Ideefefa1ac96ca38e09fe2dd5d595c5dd7883237
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/503923
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
If running testprog fails, print the output.
For #60901.
Change-Id: Iee80fb09412ce13bae6ac3589779a8cdf7761765
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/507978
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
This test fails when run on ios. (Although ios does not normally
support "exec", in the corellium environment it does.)
For #26061.
Change-Id: Idfdc53758aaabf0cb87ae50f9a4666deebf57fd6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/487355
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
internal/platform.MustLinkExternal is used in various places to
determine whether external linking is required. It should always
match what the linker actually requires, but today does not match
because the linker imposes additional constraints.
Updates #31544.
Change-Id: I0cc6ad587e95c607329dea5d60d29a5fb2a9e722
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/472515
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
This test previously failed if running a new pthread took longer than
a hard-coded 100ms. On some slow or heavily-loaded builders, that
scheduling latency is too short.
Since the point of this test is to verify that the background thread
is not reused after it terminates (see #20395), the arbitrary time
limit does not seem helpful: if the background thread fails to
terminate the test will time out on its own, and if the main goroutine
is scheduled on the background thread the test will fail regardless of
how long it takes.
Fixes#58247.
Change-Id: I626af52aac55af7a4c0e7829798573c479750c20
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/464735
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This may fix the TestEINTR failures that have been frequent on the
riscv64 builders since CL 445597.
Updates #37405.
Updates #39043.
Change-Id: Iaf1403ff5ce2ff0203d5d0059908097d32d0b217
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/447495
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
ErrWaitDelay is not expected to occur in this test, but if it does
it indicates a failure mode very different from the “failed to start”
catchall that we log for other non-ExitError errors.
Updates #50436.
Change-Id: I3f4d87d502f772bf471fc17303d5a6b483446f8f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/446876
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
For most tests, the test's deadline itself is more appropriate than an
arbitrary timeout layered atop of it (especially once #48157 is
implemented), and testenv.Command already adds cleaner timeout
behavior when a command would run too close to the test's deadline.
That makes RunWithTimeout something of an attractive nuisance. For
now, migrate the two existing uses of it to testenv.CommandContext,
with a shorter timeout implemented using context.WithTimeout.
As a followup, we may want to drop the extra timeouts from these
invocations entirely.
Updates #50436.
Updates #37405.
Change-Id: I16840fd36c0137b6da87ec54012b3e44661f0d08
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/445597
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Add new line at the end of crash_test.go.
Change-Id: I73c77666066b105e563215f34e7ede6c1d92226b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/422299
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
In issue #17671, there are a endless loop if printing
the panic value panics, CL 30358 has fixed that.
As issue #52257 pointed out, above change should not
discard the value from panic while panicking.
With this CL, when we recover from a panic in error.Error()
or stringer.String(), and the recovered value is string,
then we can print it normally.
Fixes#52257
Change-Id: Icfcc4a1a390635de405eea04904b4607ae9e3055
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399874
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
This makes it easier to figure out where the crash is occurring.
Change-Id: Ie1f78a360367090dcd61c61b2a55c34f3e2ff2eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/390034
Trust: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Trust: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
And then revert the bootstrap cmd directories and certain testdata.
And adjust tests as needed.
Not reverting the changes in std that are bootstrapped,
because some of those changes would appear in API docs,
and we want to use any consistently.
Instead, rewrite 'any' to 'interface{}' in cmd/dist for those directories
when preparing the bootstrap copy.
A few files changed as a result of running gofmt -w
not because of interface{} -> any but because they
hadn't been updated for the new //go:build lines.
Fixes#49884.
Change-Id: Ie8045cba995f65bd79c694ec77a1b3d1fe01bb09
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/368254
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This lifts the logic to run a subcommand with a timeout in a test from
the runtime's runTestProg into testenv. The implementation is
unchanged in this CL. We'll improve it in a future CL.
Currently, tests that run subcommands usually just timeout with no
useful output if the subcommand runs for too long. This is a step
toward improving this.
For #37405.
Change-Id: I2298770db516e216379c4c438e05d23cbbdda51d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/370701
Trust: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
On illumos nanotime calls libc, like on the other systems for which
TestTimePprof is skipped.
For #43118
Change-Id: I370d3f098a261185920cb1e3e3402d16200e301a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/366737
Trust: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fixes#43118
Change-Id: I499bf335904e2b72a2a8876d0368fff5e69aa7fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/366759
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Permit a test whose program is already built to run immediately,
rather than waiting for another test to complete its build.
For #44422
Change-Id: I2d1b35d055ee4c4251f4caef3b52dccc82b71a1b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/364654
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
We add entries to the defer list at panic/goexit time on-the-fly for
frames with open-coded defers. We do this so that we can correctly
process open-coded defers and non-open-coded defers in the correct order
during panics/goexits. But we need to remove entries for open-coded
defers from the defer list when there is a recover, since those entries
may never get removed otherwise and will get stale, since their
corresponding defers may now be processed normally (inline).
This bug here is that we were only removing higher-up stale entries
during a recover if all defers in the current frame were done. But we
could have more defers in the current frame (as the new test case
shows). In this case, we need to leave the current defer entry around
for use by deferreturn, but still remove any stale entries further along
the chain.
For bug 43921, simple change that we should abort the removal loop for
any defer entry that is started (i.e. in process by a still
not-recovered outer panic), even if it is not an open-coded defer.
This change does not fix bug 43920, which looks to be a more complex fix.
Fixes#43882Fixes#43921
Change-Id: Ie05b2fa26973aa26b25c8899a2abc916090ee4f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/286712
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
As part of #42026, these helpers from io/ioutil were moved to os.
(ioutil.TempFile and TempDir became os.CreateTemp and MkdirTemp.)
Update the Go tree to use the preferred names.
As usual, code compiled with the Go 1.4 bootstrap toolchain
and code vendored from other sources is excluded.
ReadDir changes are in a separate CL, because they are not a
simple search and replace.
For #42026.
Change-Id: If318df0216d57e95ea0c4093b89f65e5b0ababb3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/266365
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This reverts commit 3a81338622.
Reason for revert: Some edge cases not properly covered due to changes within runtime traceback generation since 2017, that need to be examined. This change landed very late in the Go1.16 cycle.
Change-Id: I8cf6f46ea0ef6161d878e79943e6c7cdac94bccf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/268577
Trust: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL makes it so that instead of printing massive stack traces during
endless recursion, which spams users and aren't useful, it now prints out
the top and bottom 50 frames. If the number of frames <= 100
(_TracebackMaxFrames), we'll just print all the frames out.
Modified gentraceback to return counts of:
* ntotalframes
* nregularframes
which allows us to get accurate counts of the various kinds of frames.
While here, also fixed a bug that resulted from CL 37222, in which we
no longer accounted for decrementing requested frame skips, and assumed
that when printing, that skip would always be 0. The fix is instead to add
precondition that we'll only print if skip <= 0, but also decrement skip
as we iterate.
Fixes#7181.
Fixes#24628.
Change-Id: Ie31ec6413fdfbe43827b254fef7d99ea26a5277f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/37222
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
On macOS, we can do "go build", can exec, and have the source
tree available, so we can enable more tests.
Skip ones that don't work. Most of them are due to that it
requires external linking (for now) and some tests don't work
with external linking (e.g. runtime deadlock detection). For
them, helper functions CanInternalLink/MustInternalLink are
introduced. I still want to have internal linking implemented,
but it is still a good idea to identify which tests don't work
with external linking.
Updates #38485.
Change-Id: I6b14697573cf3f371daf54b9ddd792acf232f2f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/260719
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
We've seen timeouts of TestTimePprof, but the tracebacks aren't useful
because goroutines are running on other threads. Add GOTRACEBACK=crash
to catch these in the future.
For #41120.
Change-Id: I97318172ef78d0cbab10df5e4ffcbfeadff579e3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/258802
Trust: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
When a locked M wants to start a new M, it hands off to the template
thread to actually call clone and start the thread. The template thread
is lazily created the first time a thread is locked (or if cgo is in
use).
stoplockedm will release the P (_Pidle), then call handoffp to give the
P to another M. In the case of a pending STW, one of two things can
happen:
1. handoffp starts an M, which does acquirep followed by schedule, which
will finally enter _Pgcstop.
2. handoffp immediately enters _Pgcstop. This only occurs if the P has
no local work, GC work, and no spinning M is required.
If handoffp starts an M, and must create a new M to do so, then newm
will simply queue the M on newmHandoff for the template thread to do the
clone.
When a stop-the-world is required, stopTheWorldWithSema will start the
stop and then wait for all Ps to enter _Pgcstop. If the template thread
is not fully created because startTemplateThread gets stopped, then
another stoplockedm may queue an M that will never get created, and the
handoff P will never leave _Pidle. Thus stopTheWorldWithSema will wait
forever.
A sequence to trigger this hang when STW occurs can be visualized with
two threads:
T1 T2
------------------------------- -----------------------------
LockOSThread LockOSThread
haveTemplateThread == 0
startTemplateThread
haveTemplateThread = 1
newm haveTemplateThread == 1
preempt -> schedule g.m.lockedExt++
gcstopm -> _Pgcstop g.m.lockedg = ...
park g.lockedm = ...
return
... (any code)
preempt -> schedule
stoplockedm
releasep -> _Pidle
handoffp
startm (first 3 handoffp cases)
newm
g.m.lockedExt != 0
Add to newmHandoff, return
park
Note that the P in T2 is stuck sitting in _Pidle. Since the template
thread isn't running, the new M will not be started complete the
transition to _Pgcstop.
To resolve this, we disable preemption around the assignment of
haveTemplateThread and the creation of the template thread in order to
guarantee that if handTemplateThread is set then the template thread
will eventually exist, in the presence of stops.
Fixes#38931
Change-Id: I50535fbbe2f328f47b18e24d9030136719274191
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/232978
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Print the current SP and (old) stack bounds when the stack grows
too large. This helps to identify the problem: whether a large
stack is used, or something else goes wrong.
For #35470.
Change-Id: I34a4064d5c7280978391d835e171b90d06f87222
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207351
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
The check is not relevant anymore.
The comment claims that go run does not rebuild packages,
but this is not true. And we use go build anyway.
We may have added the check because without caching
rebuilding everything starting from runtime for each test
takes a while. But now we have caching.
So from every side this check just adds code and pain.
Change-Id: Ifbbb643724100622e5f9db884339b67cde4ba729
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202450
Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
When we do a successful recover of a panic, we resume normal execution by
returning from the frame that had the deferred call that did the recover (after
executing any remaining deferred calls in that frame).
However, suppose we have called runtime.Goexit and there is a panic during one of the
deferred calls run by the Goexit. Further assume that there is a deferred call in
the frame of the Goexit or a parent frame that does a recover. Then the recovery
process will actually resume normal execution above the Goexit frame and hence
abort the Goexit. We will not terminate the thread as expected, but continue
running in the frame above the Goexit.
To fix this, we explicitly create a _panic object for a Goexit call. We then
change the "abort" behavior for Goexits, but not panics. After a recovery, if the
top-level panic is actually a Goexit that is marked to be aborted, then we return
to the Goexit defer-processing loop, so that the Goexit is not actually aborted.
Actual code changes are just panic.go, runtime2.go, and funcid.go. Adjusted the
test related to the new Goexit behavior (TestRecoverBeforePanicAfterGoexit) and
added several new tests of aborted panics (whose behavior has not changed).
Fixes#29226
Change-Id: Ib13cb0074f5acc2567a28db7ca6912cfc47eecb5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/200081
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
