Remove an unused type, a few redundant returns and replace a few slice
append loops with a single append.
Change-Id: If07248180bae5631b5b152c6051d9635889997d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66851
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
Previous code failed to account for particular control flow
involving nested loops when updating phi function inputs.
Fix involves:
1) remove incorrect shortcut
2) generate a "better" order for children in dominator tree
3) note inner-loop updates and check before applying
outer-loop updates.
Fixes#20675.
Change-Id: I2fe21470604b5c259e777ad8b15de95f7706894d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45791
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Enhance the one-live-memory-at-a-time check to run during many
more phases of the SSA backend. Also make it work in an interblock
fashion.
Change types.IsMemory to return true for tuples containing a memory type.
Fix trim pass to build the merged phi correctly. Doesn't affect
code but allows the check to pass after trim runs.
Switch the AddTuple* ops to take the memory-containing tuple argument second.
Update #20335
Change-Id: I5b03ef3606b75a9e4f765276bb8b183cdc172b43
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43495
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
When package ssa was created, Type was in package gc.
To avoid circular dependencies, we used an interface (ssa.Type)
to represent type information in SSA.
In the Go 1.9 cycle, gri extricated the Type type from package gc.
As a result, we can now use it in package ssa.
Now, instead of package types depending on package ssa,
it is the other way.
This is a more sensible dependency tree,
and helps compiler performance a bit.
Though this is a big CL, most of the changes are
mechanical and uninteresting.
Interesting bits:
* Add new singleton globals to package types for the special
SSA types Memory, Void, Invalid, Flags, and Int128.
* Add two new Types, TSSA for the special types,
and TTUPLE, for SSA tuple types.
ssa.MakeTuple is now types.NewTuple.
* Move type comparison result constants CMPlt, CMPeq, and CMPgt
to package types.
* We had picked the name "types" in our rules for the handy
list of types provided by ssa.Config. That conflicted with
the types package name, so change it to "typ".
* Update the type comparison routine to handle tuples and special
types inline.
* Teach gc/fmt.go how to print special types.
* We can now eliminate ElemTypes in favor of just Elem,
and probably also some other duplicated Type methods
designed to return ssa.Type instead of *types.Type.
* The ssa tests were using their own dummy types,
and they were not particularly careful about types in general.
Of necessity, this CL switches them to use *types.Type;
it does not make them more type-accurate.
Unfortunately, using types.Type means initializing a bit
of the types universe.
This is prime for refactoring and improvement.
This shrinks ssa.Value; it now fits in a smaller size class
on 64 bit systems. This doesn't have a giant impact,
though, since most Values are preallocated in a chunk.
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
Template 37.9MB ± 0% 37.7MB ± 0% -0.57% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
Unicode 28.9MB ± 0% 28.7MB ± 0% -0.52% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
GoTypes 110MB ± 0% 109MB ± 0% -0.88% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Flate 24.7MB ± 0% 24.6MB ± 0% -0.66% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
GoParser 31.1MB ± 0% 30.9MB ± 0% -0.61% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Reflect 73.9MB ± 0% 73.4MB ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
Tar 25.8MB ± 0% 25.6MB ± 0% -0.77% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
XML 41.2MB ± 0% 40.9MB ± 0% -0.80% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
[Geo mean] 40.5MB 40.3MB -0.68%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
Template 385k ± 0% 386k ± 0% ~ (p=0.356 n=10+9)
Unicode 343k ± 1% 344k ± 0% ~ (p=0.481 n=10+10)
GoTypes 1.16M ± 0% 1.16M ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.004 n=10+10)
Flate 238k ± 1% 238k ± 1% ~ (p=0.853 n=10+10)
GoParser 320k ± 0% 320k ± 0% ~ (p=0.720 n=10+9)
Reflect 957k ± 0% 957k ± 0% ~ (p=0.460 n=10+8)
Tar 252k ± 0% 252k ± 0% ~ (p=0.133 n=9+10)
XML 400k ± 0% 400k ± 0% ~ (p=0.796 n=10+10)
[Geo mean] 428k 428k -0.01%
Removing all the interface calls helps non-trivially with CPU, though.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 178ms ± 4% 173ms ± 3% -2.90% (p=0.000 n=94+96)
Unicode 85.0ms ± 4% 83.9ms ± 4% -1.23% (p=0.000 n=96+96)
GoTypes 543ms ± 3% 528ms ± 3% -2.73% (p=0.000 n=98+96)
Flate 116ms ± 3% 113ms ± 4% -2.34% (p=0.000 n=96+99)
GoParser 144ms ± 3% 140ms ± 4% -2.80% (p=0.000 n=99+97)
Reflect 344ms ± 3% 334ms ± 4% -3.02% (p=0.000 n=100+99)
Tar 106ms ± 5% 103ms ± 4% -3.30% (p=0.000 n=98+94)
XML 198ms ± 5% 192ms ± 4% -2.88% (p=0.000 n=92+95)
[Geo mean] 178ms 173ms -2.65%
name old user-time/op new user-time/op delta
Template 229ms ± 5% 224ms ± 5% -2.36% (p=0.000 n=95+99)
Unicode 107ms ± 6% 106ms ± 5% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=93+95)
GoTypes 696ms ± 4% 679ms ± 4% -2.45% (p=0.000 n=97+99)
Flate 137ms ± 4% 134ms ± 5% -2.66% (p=0.000 n=99+96)
GoParser 176ms ± 5% 172ms ± 8% -2.27% (p=0.000 n=98+100)
Reflect 430ms ± 6% 411ms ± 5% -4.46% (p=0.000 n=100+92)
Tar 128ms ±13% 123ms ±13% -4.21% (p=0.000 n=100+100)
XML 239ms ± 6% 233ms ± 6% -2.50% (p=0.000 n=95+97)
[Geo mean] 220ms 213ms -2.76%
Change-Id: I15c7d6268347f8358e75066dfdbd77db24e8d0c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42145
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Type.Size and Type.Alignment are for the front end:
They calculate size and alignment if needed.
Type.MustSize and Type.MustAlignment are for the back end:
They call Fatal if size and alignment are not already calculated.
Most uses are of MustSize and MustAlignment,
but that's because the back end is newer,
and this API was added to support it.
This CL was mostly generated with sed and selective reversion.
The only mildly interesting bit is the change of the ssa.Type interface
and the supporting ssa dummy types.
Follow-up to review feedback on CL 41970.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I0d9b9505e57453dae8fb6a236a07a7a02abd459e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42016
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Prior to this CL, the ssa.Frontend field was responsible
for providing types to the backend during compilation.
However, the types needed by the backend are few and static.
It makes more sense to use a struct for them
and to hang that struct off the ssa.Config,
which is the correct home for readonly data.
Now that Types is a struct, we can clean up the names a bit as well.
This has the added benefit of allowing early construction
of all types needed by the backend.
This will be useful for concurrent backend compilation.
Passes toolstash-check -all. No compiler performance change.
Updates #15756
Change-Id: I021658c8cf2836d6a22bbc20cc828ac38c7da08a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38336
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Suggested by mdempsky in CL 38232.
This allows us to use the Frontend field
to associate frontend state and information
with a function.
See the following CL in the series for examples.
This is a giant CL, but it is almost entirely routine refactoring.
The ssa test API is starting to feel a bit unwieldy.
I will clean it up separately, once the dust has settled.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Updates #15756
Change-Id: I71c573bd96ff7251935fce1391b06b1f133c3caf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38327
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
After benchmarking with a compiler modified to have better
spill location, it became clear that this method of checking
was actually faster on (at least) two different architectures
(ppc64 and amd64) and it also provides more timely interruption
of loops.
This change adds a modified FOR loop node "FORUNTIL" that
checks after executing the loop body instead of before (i.e.,
always at least once). This ensures that a pointer past the
end of a slice or array is not made visible to the garbage
collector.
Without the rescheduling checks inserted, the restructured
loop from this change apparently provides a 1% geomean
improvement on PPC64 running the go1 benchmarks; the
improvement on AMD64 is only 0.12%.
Inserting the rescheduling check exposed some peculiar bug
with the ssa test code for s390x; this was updated based on
initial code actually generated for GOARCH=s390x to use
appropriate OpArg, OpAddr, and OpVarDef.
NaCl is disabled in testing.
Change-Id: Ieafaa9a61d2a583ad00968110ef3e7a441abca50
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36206
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Loop breaking with a counter. Benchmarked (see comments),
eyeball checked for sanity on popular loops. This code
ought to handle loops in general, and properly inserts phi
functions in cases where the earlier version might not have.
Includes test, plus modifications to test/run.go to deal with
timeout and killing looping test. Tests broken by the addition
of extra code (branch frequency and live vars) for added
checks turn the check insertion off.
If GOEXPERIMENT=preemptibleloops, the compiler inserts reschedule
checks on every backedge of every reducible loop. Alternately,
specifying GO_GCFLAGS=-d=ssa/insert_resched_checks/on will
enable it for a single compilation, but because the core Go
libraries contain some loops that may run long, this is less
likely to have the desired effect.
This is intended as a tool to help in the study and diagnosis
of GC and other latency problems, now that goal STW GC latency
is on the order of 100 microseconds or less.
Updates #17831.
Updates #10958.
Change-Id: I6206c163a5b0248e3f21eb4fc65f73a179e1f639
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33910
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
