The previous version used the position of the switch statement,
which makes for potentially jumpy stepping and introduces a large
number of statements repeating the line (tricky for inserting
breaks). It also shared a single OBREAK node and this was not
really a syntax "tree".
This improves both the nostmt test (by 6 lines) and
reduces the total badness score from dwarf-goodness (by about 200).
Change-Id: I1f71b231a26f152bdb6ce9bc8f95828bb222f665
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188218
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Faller <jeremy@golang.org>
When compiling expression switches, we try to optimize runs of
constants into binary searches. The ordering used isn't visible to the
application, so it's unimportant as long as we're consistent between
sorting and searching.
For strings, it's much cheaper to compare string lengths than strings
themselves, so instead of ordering strings by "si <= sj", we currently
order them by "len(si) < len(sj) || len(si) == len(sj) && si <= sj"
(i.e., the lexicographical ordering on the 2-tuple (len(s), s)).
However, it's also somewhat cheaper to compare strings for equality
(i.e., ==) than for ordering (i.e., <=). And if there were two or
three string constants of the same length in a switch statement, we
might unnecessarily emit ordering comparisons.
For example, given:
switch s {
case "", "1", "2", "3": // ordered by length then content
goto L
}
we currently compile this as:
if len(s) < 1 || len(s) == 1 && s <= "1" {
if s == "" { goto L }
else if s == "1" { goto L }
} else {
if s == "2" { goto L }
else if s == "3" { goto L }
}
This CL switches to using a 2-level binary search---first on len(s),
then on s itself---so that string ordering comparisons are only needed
when there are 4 or more strings of the same length. (4 being the
cut-off for when using binary search is actually worthwhile.)
So the above switch instead now compiles to:
if len(s) == 0 {
if s == "" { goto L }
} else if len(s) == 1 {
if s == "1" { goto L }
else if s == "2" { goto L }
else if s == "3" { goto L }
}
which is better optimized by walk and SSA. (Notably, because there are
only two distinct lengths and no more than three strings of any
particular length, this example ends up falling back to simply using
linear search.)
Test case by khr@ from CL 195138.
Fixes#33934.
Change-Id: I8eeebcaf7e26343223be5f443d6a97a0daf84f07
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195340
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
We used to use OXCASE to represent general, possibly multi-valued
cases, and then desugar these during walk into single-value cases
represented by OCASE.
In CL 194660, we switched to eliminated the desugaring step and
instead handle the multi-valued cases directly, which eliminates the
need for an OCASE Op. Instead, we can simply remove OCASE, and rename
OXCASE to just OCASE.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I3cc184340f9081d37453927cca1c059267fdbc12
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/196117
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
When emitting base cases, previously we would emit:
if c1 { s1 }
if c2 { s2 }
if c3 { s3 }
With this CL, we instead emit:
if c1 { s1 }
else if c2 { s2 }
else if c3 { s3 }
Most of the time, this doesn't make a difference, because s1/s2/s3 are
typically "goto" statements. But for type switches, we currently emit:
if hash == 271 { if _, ok := iface.(T1); ok { goto t1case } }
if hash == 314 { if _, ok := iface.(T2); ok { goto t2case } }
That is, the if bodies can fallthrough, even though it's impossible
for them to match any of the subsequent cases.
Change-Id: I453d424d0b5e40060a703738bbb374523f1c403c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195339
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
There are a lot of complexities to handling switches efficiently:
1. Order matters for expression switches with non-constant cases and
for type expressions with interface types. We have to respect
side-effects, and we also can't allow later cases to accidentally take
precedence over earlier cases.
2. For runs of integers, floats, and string constants in expression
switches or runs of concrete types in type switches, we want to emit
efficient binary searches.
3. For runs of consecutive integers in expression switches, we want to
collapse them into range comparisons.
4. For binary searches of strings, we want to compare by length first,
because that's more efficient and we don't need to respect any
particular ordering.
5. For "switch true { ... }" and "switch false { ... }", we want to
optimize "case x:" as simply "if x" or "if !x", respectively, unless x
is interface-typed.
The current swt.go code reflects how these constraints have been
incrementally added over time, with each of them being handled ad
hocly in different parts of the code. Also, the existing code tries
very hard to reuse logic between expression and type switches, even
though the similarities are very superficial.
This CL rewrites switch handling to better abstract away the logic
involved in constructing the binary searches. In particular, it's
intended to make further optimizations to switch dispatch much easier.
It also eliminates the need for both OXCASE and OCASE ops, and a
subsequent CL can collapse the two.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: Ifcd1e56f81f858117a412971d82e98abe7c4481f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/194660
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Part of the general trend of moving yyerror calls out of walk and into
typecheck.
Notably, this requires splitting test/typeswitch2.go into two files,
because now some of the errors are reported during typecheck and
others are still reported during walk; and if there were any errors
during typecheck, then cmd/compile exits without invoking walk.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I05ee0c00b99af659ee1eef098d342d0d736cf31e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/194659
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
While superficially type and expression switch handling seem similar
and that it would be worthwhile to unify typechecking them, it turns
out they're actually different enough that separately handling them is
fewer lines of code and easier to understand as well.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I357d6912dd580639b6001bccdb2e227ed83c6fe9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/194566
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Because the Node AST represents references to declared objects (e.g.,
variables, packages, types, constants) by directly pointing to the
referred object, we don't have use-position info for these objects.
For switch statements with duplicate cases, we report back where the
first duplicate value appeared. However, due to the AST
representation, if the value was a declared constant, we mistakenly
reported the constant declaration position as the previous case
position.
This CL reports back against the 'case' keyword's position instead, if
there's no more precise information available to us.
It also refactors code to emit the same "previous at" error message
for duplicate values in map literals.
Thanks to Emmanuel Odeke for the test case.
Fixes#33460.
Change-Id: Iec69542ccd4aad594dde8df02d1b880a422c5622
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188901
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
If a type switch case expression has failed typechecking, the case body is
likely to also fail with confusing or spurious errors. Suppress
typechecking the case body when this happens.
Fixes#28926
Change-Id: Idfdb9d5627994f2fd90154af1659e9a92bf692c4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/158617
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Consistent logic for handling both duplicate map keys and case values,
and eliminates ad hoc value hashing code.
Also makes cmd/compile consistent with go/types's handling of
duplicate constants (see #28085), which is at least an improvement
over the status quo even if we settle on something different for the
spec.
As a side effect, this also suppresses cmd/compile's warnings about
duplicate nils in (non-interface expression) switch statements, which
was technically never allowed by the spec anyway.
Updates #28085.
Updates #28378.
Change-Id: I176a251e770c3c5bc11c2bf8d1d862db8f252a17
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/152544
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The compiler appears to contain several squirrelly corner
cases where nodes are double walked, some where new nodes
are created from walked parts. Rather than trust that we
had searched hard enough for the last one, change
exprSwitch.walk() to return immediately if it has already
been walked. This appears to be the only case where
double-walking a node is actually harmful.
Fixes#29562.
Change-Id: I0667e8769aba4c3236666cd836a934e256c0bfc5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/156317
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Don't convert values that aren't Go constants, like
uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(nil)), to a literal constant. This avoids
assuming they are constants for things like indexing, array sizes,
case duplication, etc.
Also, nil is an allowed duplicate in switches. CTNILs aren't Go constants.
Fixes#28078Fixes#28079
Change-Id: I9ab8af47098651ea09ef10481787eae2ae2fb445
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151320
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change does a bulk rename of several identifiers in the compiler.
See #27167 and https://docs.google.com/document/d/19_ExiylD9MRfeAjKIfEsMU1_RGhuxB9sA0b5Zv7byVI/
for context and for discussion of these particular renames.
Commands run to generate this change:
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OPROC' -to OGO
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OCOM' -to OBITNOT
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OMINUS' -to ONEG
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OIND' -to ODEREF
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OARRAYBYTESTR' -to OBYTES2STR
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OARRAYBYTESTRTMP' -to OBYTES2STRTMP
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OARRAYRUNESTR' -to ORUNES2STR
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OSTRARRAYBYTE' -to OSTR2BYTES
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OSTRARRAYBYTETMP' -to OSTR2BYTESTMP
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".OSTRARRAYRUNE' -to OSTR2RUNES
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Etop' -to ctxStmt
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Erv' -to ctxExpr
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Ecall' -to ctxCallee
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Efnstruct' -to ctxMultiOK
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Easgn' -to ctxAssign
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Ecomplit' -to ctxCompLit
Not altered: parameters and local variables (mostly in typecheck.go) named top,
which should probably now be called ctx (and which should probably have a named type).
Also not altered: Field called Top in gc.Func.
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Node.Isddd' -to IsDDD
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".Node.SetIsddd' -to SetIsDDD
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/gc".nodeIsddd' -to nodeIsDDD
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/types".Field.Isddd' -to IsDDD
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/types".Field.SetIsddd' -to SetIsDDD
gorename -from '"cmd/compile/internal/types".fieldIsddd' -to fieldIsDDD
Not altered: function gc.hasddd, params and local variables called isddd
Also not altered: fmt.go prints nodes using "isddd(%v)".
cd cmd/compile/internal/gc; go generate
I then manually found impacted comments using exact string match
and fixed them up by hand. The comment changes were trivial.
Passes toolstash-check.
Fixes#27167. If this experiment is deemed a success,
we will open a new tracking issue for renames to do
at the end of the 1.13 cycles.
Change-Id: I2dc541533d2ab0d06cb3d31d65df205ecfb151e8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/150140
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Avoids allocating an ONAME for OLABEL, OGOTO, and named OBREAK and
OCONTINUE nodes.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I359142cd48e8987b5bf29ac100752f8c497261c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145200
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Inlining of switch statements into a RETURNed expression
can sometimes lead to the switch being walked twice, which
results in a miscompiled switch statement. The bug depends
on:
1) multiple results
2) named results
3) a return statement whose expression includes a call to a
function containing a switch statement that is inlined.
It may also be significant that the default case of that
switch is a panic(), though that's not proven.
Rearranged the walk case for ORETURN so that double walks are
not possible. Added a test, because this is so fiddly.
Added a check against double walks, verified that it fires
w/o other fix.
Fixes#25776.
Change-Id: I2d594351fa082632512ef989af67eb887059729b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/118318
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This triggers three times while building std,
once in image/png and twice in go/internal/gccgoimporter.
There are no instances in std in which a more aggressive
optimization would have triggered.
This doesn't necessarily avoid an allocation,
because escape analysis is already able in many cases
to use a temporary backing for the string,
but it does at a minimum avoid the runtime call and copy.
Fixes#24937
Change-Id: I7019e85638ba8cd7e2f03890e672558b858579bc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108035
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Focus on "isfoo" funcs that take a *Node, and conver them to isFoo
methods instead. This makes for more idiomatic Go code, and also more
readable func names.
Found candidates with grep, and applied most changes with sed. The funcs
chosen were isgoconst, isnil, and isblank. All had the same signature,
func(*Node) bool.
While at it, camelCase the isliteral and iszero function names. Don't
move these to methods, as they are only used in the backend part of gc,
which might one day be split into a separate package.
Passes toolstash -cmp on std cmd.
Change-Id: I4df081b12d36c46c253167c8841c5a841f1c5a16
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105555
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
When combining adjacent type switch cases with the same type hash, we
failed to actually remove the combined cases, so we would generate
code for them twice.
We use MD5 for type hashes, so collisions are rare, but they do
currently appear in test/fixedbugs/bug248.dir/bug2.go, which is how I
noticed this failure.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I66729b3366b96cb8ddc8fa6f3ebea11ef6d74012
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/100461
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
We already require expressions to have already been typechecked before
reaching walk. Moreover, all untyped expressions should have been
converted to their default type by walk.
However, in practice, we've been somewhat sloppy and inconsistent
about ensuring this. In particular, a lot of AST rewrites ended up
leaving untyped bool expressions scattered around. These likely aren't
harmful in practice, but it seems worth cleaning up.
The two most common cases addressed by this CL are:
1) When generating OIF and OFOR nodes, we would often typecheck the
conditional expression, but not apply defaultlit to force it to the
expression's default type.
2) When rewriting string comparisons into more fundamental primitives,
we were simply overwriting r.Type with the desired type, which didn't
propagate the type to nested subexpressions. These are fixed by
utilizing finishcompare, which correctly handles this (and is already
used by other comparison lowering rewrites).
Lastly, walkexpr is extended to assert that it's not called on untyped
expressions.
Fixes#23834.
Change-Id: Icbd29648a293555e4015d3b06a95a24ccbd3f790
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98337
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Noticed while reading some code that the two branches in this loop body
shared the last statements. Rewrite it in a way that they are not
duplicated.
Passes toolstash -cmp on std.
Change-Id: I3356ca9fa37c32eee496e221d7830bfc581dade1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66470
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Focused on ranges, selects and switches for this one.
While at it, simplify some vars in typecheckselect.
Updates #19683.
Change-Id: Ib6aabe0f6826cb1930483aeb4bb2de1ff8052d9e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69690
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Before, -1 meant a node being nil or not an OLITERAL, and 0 meant an
OLITERAL missing a Val.
However, the use of this value was confusing and led to some issues,
such as swt.go checking for < 0 instead of <= 0, causing panics.
We never need to differentiate these two cases, so collapse both into 0.
To make it clear that negative values can no longer happen, make Ctype
an uint8.
With this change, we can now get rid of the two n.Type == nil checks
in swt.go added to fix a couple of these panics.
Thanks to Matthew Dempsky for spotting this inconsistency.
Fixes#22001.
Change-Id: I51c65a76f38a3e16788b6a3b57932dad3436dc7e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69510
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Very similar fix to the one made in golang.org/cl/65655. This time it's
for switches on interface values, as we look for duplicates in a
different manner to keep types in mind.
As before, add a small regression test.
Updates #22001.
Fixes#22063.
Change-Id: I9a55d08999aeca262ad276b4649b51848a627b02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66450
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This is a regression introduced by myself in golang.org/cl/41852,
confirmed by the program that reproduces the crash that can be seen in
the added test.
Fixes#21988.
Change-Id: I18d5b2b3de63ced84db705b18490b00b16b59e02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65655
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Previously, we used OXFALL vs OFALL to distinguish fallthrough
statements that had been validated. Because in the Node AST we flatten
statement blocks, OXCASE and OXFALL needed to keep track of their
block scopes for this purpose.
Now that we have an AST that keeps these separate, we can just perform
the validation earlier.
Passes toolstash-check.
Fixes#14540.
Change-Id: I8421eaba16c2b3b72c9c5483b5cf20b14261385e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/61130
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
We don't use it any more, remove it.
Change-Id: I76ce1a4c2e7048fdd13a37d3718b5abf39ed9d26
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44474
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Instead of just printing the value, print the original node to make the
error more human-friendly. Also print the value if its string form is
different than the original node, to make sure it's obvious what value
was duplicated.
This means that "case '@', '@':", which used to print:
duplicate case 64 in switch
Will now print:
duplicate case '@' (value 64) in switch
Factor this logic out into its own function to reuse it in range cases
and any other place where we might want to print a node and its value in
the future.
Also needed to split the errorcheck files because expression switch case
duplicates are now detected earlier, so they stop the compiler before it
gets to generating the AST and detecting the type switch case
duplicates.
Fixes#20112.
Change-Id: I9009b50dec0d0e705e5de9c9ccb08f1dce8a5a99
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41852
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
- created new package cmd/compile/internal/types
- moved Pkg, Sym, Type to new package
- to break cycles, for now we need the (ugly) types/utils.go
file which contains a handful of functions that must be installed
early by the gc frontend
- to break cycles, for now we need two functions to convert between
*gc.Node and *types.Node (the latter is a dummy type)
- adjusted the gc's code to use the new package and the conversion
functions as needed
- made several Pkg, Sym, and Type methods functions as needed
- renamed constructors typ, typPtr, typArray, etc. to types.New,
types.NewPtr, types.NewArray, etc.
Passes toolstash-check -all.
Change-Id: I8adfa5e85c731645d0a7fd2030375ed6ebf54b72
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39855
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Add Set3 function to complement existing Set1 and Set2 functions.
Consistently use Set1, Set2 and Set3 for []*Node instead of Set where applicable.
Add SetFirst and SetSecond for setting elements of []*Node to mirror
First and Second for accessing elements in []*Node.
Replace uses of Index by First and Second and
SetIndex with SetFirst and SetSecond where applicable.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: I8255aae768cf245c8f93eec2e9efa05b8112b4e5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37430
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
When doing i.(T) for non-empty-interface i and concrete type T,
there's no need to read the type out of the itab. Just compare the
itab to the itab we expect for that interface/type pair.
Also optimize type switches by putting the type hash of the
concrete type in the itab. That way we don't need to load the
type pointer out of the itab.
Update #18492
Change-Id: I49e280a21e5687e771db5b8a56b685291ac168ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34810
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Fixes#10561.
Provides a better diagnostic message for failed type switch
satisfaction in the case that a value receiver is being used
in place of the pointer receiver that implements and satisfies
the interface.
Change-Id: If8c13ba13f2a8d81bf44bac7c3a66c12921ba921
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35235
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Various minor adjustments.
Change-Id: Iedfb97989f7bedaa3e9e8993b167e05f162434a7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34136
Reviewed-by: David Lazar <lazard@golang.org>
The use of these has been removed in recent commits.
Change-Id: Iff36a3ee4dcdfe39c40e93e2601f44d3c59f7024
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33274
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Previously, the check to make sure we only considered constant cases
for duplicates was skipping past integer ranges, because those use
n.List instead of n.Left. Thanks to Emmanuel Odeke for investigating
and helping to identify the root cause.
Fixes#17517.
Change-Id: I46fcda8ed9c346ff3a9647d50b83f1555587b740
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31716
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
When processing a fallthrough, the casebody function in swt.go
checks that the last statement has indeed Op == OXFALL (not-processed
fallthrough) before setting it to OFALL (processed fallthrough).
Unfortunately, sometimes the fallthrough statement won't be in the
last node. For example, in
case 0:
return func() int {return 1}()
fallthrough
the compiler generates
autotmp_0 = (func literal)(); return autotmp_0; fallthrough; <node VARKILL>
with an OVARKILL node in the last position. casebody will find that
last.Op != OXFALL, won't mark the fallthrough as processed, and the
fallthrough line will cause a "fallthrough statement out of place" error.
To fix this, we change casebody so that it searches for the fallthrough
statement backwards in the statements list, without assuming that it'll
be in the last position.
Fixes#13262
Change-Id: I366c6caa7fd7442d365bd7a08cc66a552212d9b2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22921
Run-TryBot: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
