Recurse into structs/arrays of one element when
assigning names.
Test incorporated into existing end-to-end debugger test,
hand-verified that it fails without this CL.
Fixes#19868
Revives CL 40010
Old-Change-Id: I0266e58af975fb64cfa17922be383b70f0a7ea96
Change-Id: I122ac2375931477769ec8d763607c1ec42d78a7f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71731
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Excluded when -short because it still runs relatively long,
but deflaked.
Removed timeouts from normal path and ensured that they were
not needed and that reference files did not change.
Use "tbreak" instead of "break" with gdb to reduce chance
of multiple hits on main.main. (Seems not enough, but a
move in the right direction).
By default, testing ignores repeated lines that occur when
nexting. This appears to sometimes be timing-dependent and
is the observed source of flakiness in testing so far.
Note that these can also be signs of a bug in the generated
debugging output, but it is one of the less-confusing bugs
that can occur.
By default, testing with gdb uses compilation with
inlining disabled to prevent dependence on library code
(it's a bug that library code is seen while Nexting, but
the bug is current behavior).
Also by default exclude all source files outside /testdata
to prevent accidental dependence on library code. Note that
this is currently only applicable to dlv because (for the
debugging information we produce) gdb does not indicate a
change in the source file for inlined code.
Added flags -i and -r to make gdb testing compile with
inlining and be sensitive to repeats in the next stream.
This is for developer-testing and so we can describe these
problems in bug reports.
Updates #22206.
Change-Id: I9a30ebbc65aa0153fe77b1858cf19743bdc985e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69930
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This makes it more obvious which of the two builds is failing by
putting "dbg" or "opt" directly in the test name. It also makes it
possible for them to fail independently, so a failure in "dbg" doesn't
mask a failure in "opt", and to visibly skip the opt test when run
with an unoptimized runtime.
Change-Id: I3403a7fd3c1a13ad51a938bb95dfe54c320bb58e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69970
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
CL50610 broke the build for noopt (different inlining
behavior) and clang (no gdb) so it needs to catch those
cases and skip.
The run/no-run logic was slightly cleaned up,
the name of gdb on OSX was made more robust (tries gdb
first, then ggdb), and the file names were canonicalized
before loggging instead of in comparison to reduce
gratuitous noise in diffs when things aren't otherwise
equal.
This probably doesn't fix problems on Alpine, but it should
provide a cleaner and less confusing failure.
Change-Id: I26c65bff5a8d3d60f1cd6ae02a282558c53dda67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69371
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This attempts to choose better values for values that are
rematerialized (uses the XPos of the consumer, not the
original) and for unconditional branches (uses the last
assigned XPos in the block).
The JMP branches seem to sometimes end up with a PC in the
destination block, I think because of register movement
or rematerialization that gets placed in predecessor blocks.
This may be acceptable because (eyeball-empirically) that is
often the line number of the target block, so the line number
flow is correct.
Added proper test, that checks both -N -l and regular compilation.
The test is also capable (for gdb, delve soon) of tracking
variable printing based on comments in the source code.
There's substantial room for improvement in debugger behavior.
Updates #21098.
Change-Id: I13abd48a39141583b85576a015f561065819afd0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/50610
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
