Each URL was manually verified to ensure it did not serve up incorrect
content.
Change-Id: I4dc846227af95a73ee9a3074d0c379ff0fa955df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/115798
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
XPos is a compact (8 instead of 16 bytes on a 64bit machine) source
position representation. There is a 1:1 correspondence between each
XPos and each regular Pos, translated via a global table.
In some sense this brings back the LineHist, though positions can
track line and column information; there is a O(1) translation
between the representations (no binary search), and the translation
is factored out.
The size increase with the prior change is brought down again and
the compiler speed is in line with the master repo (measured on
the same "quiet" machine as for prior change):
name old time/op new time/op delta
Template 256ms ± 1% 262ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.063 n=5+4)
Unicode 132ms ± 1% 135ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.063 n=5+4)
GoTypes 891ms ± 1% 871ms ± 1% -2.28% (p=0.016 n=5+4)
Compiler 3.84s ± 2% 3.89s ± 2% ~ (p=0.413 n=5+4)
MakeBash 47.1s ± 1% 46.2s ± 2% ~ (p=0.095 n=5+5)
name old user-ns/op new user-ns/op delta
Template 309M ± 1% 314M ± 2% ~ (p=0.111 n=5+4)
Unicode 165M ± 1% 172M ± 9% ~ (p=0.151 n=5+5)
GoTypes 1.14G ± 2% 1.12G ± 1% ~ (p=0.063 n=5+4)
Compiler 5.00G ± 1% 4.96G ± 1% ~ (p=0.286 n=5+4)
Change-Id: Icc570cc60ab014d8d9af6976f1f961ab8828cc47
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34506
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Using a variable instead of a composite literal makes
the code independent of implementation changes of Pos.
Per David Lazar's suggestion.
Change-Id: I336967ac12a027c51a728a58ac6207cb5119af4a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34148
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Adjust cmd/compile accordingly.
This will make it easier to replace the underlying implementation.
Change-Id: I33645850bb18c839b24785b6222a9e028617addb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34133
Reviewed-by: David Lazar <lazard@golang.org>
This is a step toward chosing a different position representation.
By introducing an explicit type, it will be easier to make the
transition step-wise while ensuring everything keeps running.
This has been reviewed via https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34025/.
Change-Id: Ibceddcd62d8f346321ac3250e3940e9c436ed684
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34132
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Lazar <lazard@golang.org>
A tentative fix of #16380. It adds "line" everywhere...
This also reduces binary size slightly (cmd/go on ARM as an example):
before after
total binary size 8068097 8018945 (-0.6%)
.gopclntab 1195341 1179929 (-1.3%)
.debug_line 689692 652017 (-5.5%)
Change-Id: Ibda657c6999783c5bac180cbbba487006dbf0ed7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/25082
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
sparseSet and sparseMap only need 32 bit integers in their
arrays, since a sparseEntry key is also limited to 32 bits.
This appears to reduce the space allocated for at least
one pathological compilation by 1%, perhaps more.
Not necessarily for 1.7, but it saves a little and is very
low-risk.
Change-Id: Icf1185859e9f5fe1261a206b441e02c34f7d02fd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22972
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
For call-free inner loops.
Revised statistics:
85 inner loop spills sunk
341 inner loop spills remaining
1162 inner loop spills that were candidates for sinking
ended up completely register allocated
119 inner loop spills could have been sunk were used in
"shuffling" at the bottom of the loop.
1 inner loop spill not sunk because the register assigned
changed between def and exit,
Understanding how to make an inner loop definition not be
a candidate for from-memory shuffling (to force the shuffle
code to choose some other value) should pick up some of the
119 other spills disqualified for this reason.
Modified the stats printing based on feedback from Austin.
Change-Id: If3fb9b5d5a028f42ccc36c4e3d9e0da39db5ca60
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21037
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Use a more precise computation of next use. It properly
detects lifetime holes and deallocates values during those holes.
It also uses a more precise version of distance to next use which
affects which values get spilled.
Change-Id: I49eb3ebe2d2cb64842ecdaa7fb4f3792f8afb90b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16760
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
