Syms are meant to be just interned (pkg, name) tuples, and are a
purely abstract, Go-language concept. As such, associating them with
linker symbols (a low-level, implementation-oriented detail) is
inappropriate.
There's still work to be done before linker symbols can be directly
attached to their appropriate, higher-level objects instead. But in
the mean-time, we can at least add helper functions and discourage
folks from using Sym.Linksym directly. The next CL will mechanically
rewrite code to use these helpers where possible.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: I413bd1c80bce056304f9a7343526bd153f2b9c7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280639
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Previously, ODOTTYPE/ODOTTYPE2 were forced to reuse some available
Node fields for storing pointers to runtime type descriptors. This
resulted in awkward field types for TypeAssertExpr and AddrExpr.
This CL gives TypeAssertExpr proper fields for the runtime type
descriptors, and also tightens the field types as
possible/appropriate.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: I521ee7a1462affc5459de33a0de6c68a7d6416ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280637
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
These three expression nodes all represent the same syntax, and so
they're represented the same within types2. And also they're not
handled that meaningfully differently throughout the rest of the
compiler to merit unique representations.
Method expressions are somewhat unique today that they're very
frequently turned into plain function names. But eventually that can
be handled by a post-typecheck desugaring phase that reduces the
number of redundant AST forms.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: I20df91bbd0d885c1f18ec67feb61ae1558670719
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280636
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
A subsequent CL will change FuncName to lazily create the ONAME nodes,
which isn't currently safe to do during SSA construction, because that
phase is concurrent.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: Ic24acc1d1160ad93b70ced3baa468f750e689ea6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280435
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
This CL cleans up a few minor points in walkExpr:
1. We don't actually care about computing the type-size of all
expressions that are walked. We care about computing the type-size of
all expressions that are *returned* by walk, as these are the
expressions that will actually be seen by the back end.
2. There's no need to call typecheck.EvalConst anymore. EvalConst used
to be responsible for doing additional constant folding during walk;
but for a while a now, it has done only as much constant folding as is
required during type checking (because doing further constant folding
led to too many issues with Go spec compliance). Instead, more
aggressive constant folding is handled entirely by SSA.
3. The code for detecting string constants and generating their
symbols can be simplified somewhat.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: I464ef5bceb8a97689c8f55435369a3402a5ebc55
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280434
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Now that the previous CL ensures we always set SelectorExpr.Selection,
we can replace the SelectorExpr.Offset field with a helper method that
simply returns SelectorExpr.Selection.Offset.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: Id0f22b8b1980397b668f6860d27cb197b90ff52a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280433
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
During walkCall, there's a half-hearted attempt at rewriting OCALLMETH
expressions into regular function calls by moving the receiver
argument into n.Args with the rest of the arguments. But the way it
does this leaves the AST in an inconsistent state (an ODOTMETH node
with no X expression), and leaves a lot of duplicate work for the rest
of the backend to deal with.
By simply rewriting OCALLMETH expressions into proper OCALLFUNC
expressions, we eliminate a ton of unnecessary code duplication during
SSA construction and avoid creation of invalid method-typed variables.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: I4d5c5f90a79f8994059b2d0ae472182e08096c0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280294
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
ir.IsAssignable does not include map index expression, so it should be
named ir.IsAddressable instead.
[git-generate]
cd src/cmd/compile/internal/ir
rf '
mv IsAssignable IsAddressable
'
Change-Id: Ief6188e7b784ba9592d7b0cbec33b5f70d78f638
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/279436
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
