This ensures that we are explicitly declaring the allocator to use when
allocating a cell(-inheriting) type, instead of silently falling back
to size-based allocation.
Since this is done in allocate_cell, this will only be detected for
types that are actively being allocated. However, since that means
they're _not_ being allocated, that means it's safe to not declare
an allocator to use for those. For example, the base TypedArray<T>,
which is never directly allocated and only the defined specializations
are ever allocated.
This has quite a lot of fall out. But the majority of it is just type or
UDL substitution, where the changes just fall through to other function
calls.
By changing property key storage to UTF-16, the main affected areas are:
* NativeFunction names must now be UTF-16
* Bytecode identifiers must now be UTF-16
* Module/binding names must now be UTF-16
This is a normative change in the ECMA-262 spec. See:
0fb1859
As noted in the PR for this change, this is not actually testable via
either test262 or WPT.
Resulting in a massive rename across almost everywhere! Alongside the
namespace change, we now have the following names:
* JS::NonnullGCPtr -> GC::Ref
* JS::GCPtr -> GC::Ptr
* JS::HeapFunction -> GC::Function
* JS::CellImpl -> GC::Cell
* JS::Handle -> GC::Root
The main motivation behind this is to remove JS specifics of the Realm
from the implementation of the Heap.
As a side effect of this change, this is a bit nicer to read than the
previous approach, and in my opinion, also makes it a little more clear
that this method is specific to a JavaScript Realm.