Previously we would consider an alternative syntax child to be a match
as long as parsing produced a value, even if there were trailing tokens
(which would later invalidate it within `parse_with_a_syntax`). This
meant that we wouldn't consider later alternatives which may actually
produce a valid match.
This reverts 0e3487b9ab.
Back when I made that change, I thought we could make our StyleValue
classes match the typed-om definitions directly. However, they have
different requirements. Typed-om types need to be mutable and GCed,
whereas StyleValues are immutable and ideally wouldn't require a JS VM.
While I was already making such a cataclysmic change, I've moved it into
the StyleValues directory, because it *not* being there has bothered me
for a long time. 😅
`<syntax>` is a limited subset of the "value definition syntax" used in
CSS specs. It's used for `@property`'s `syntax` descriptor, and for the
`type()` function in `attr()`.
