Previously we would either parse these as `StyleValueList<T>` or `T`
depending on whether or not there was more than one value, this meant we
always had to handle both cases anywhere we used these values.
Fixes a crash on https://www.lego.com/en-gb/product/game-boy-72046 :^)
The apparent regressions in clip-path-interpolation-xywh-rect.html are
because of false positives. Something about the test was causing it to
compare two wrong values that happened to be the same. Now one of the
values is correct, they don't match.
Since we now have access to the `AbstractElement` through the
`ComputationContext` we can just set the flag that this element relies
on tree counting functions directly, no need to pass this struct around.
There are some non-math functions (such as tree counting functions)
which we should allow within `calc()`s . This commit implements the
initial infrastructure for this.
We don't yet parse any of these non-math functions in
`parse_a_calculation` so there is no functional change.
Adds support for `sibling-index()` and `sibling-count()` when parsing
`<number>` and `<integer>`. This is achieved by a new
`TreeCountingFunctionStyleValue` class which is converted within
`absolutized` to `NumberStyleValue` and `IntegerStyleValue` respectively
There are still a few kinks to work out in order to support these
everywhere, namely:
- There are some `StyleValue`s which aren't absolutized (i.e. those
which are stored within another `StyleValue` without an
`absolutize()` method.
- We don't have a way to represent this new `StyleValue` within
`{Number,Integer}OrCalculated`. This would be fixed if we were to
instead just use the `StyleValue` classes until style computation at
which time they would be absolutized into their respective
primitives (double, i64, etc) bypassing the need for *OrCalculated
entirely.
Some contexts (e.g. descriptors, media conditions) don't allow tree
counting functions, this commit adds an easy way to check if the current
value context is one of those.
This excludes `step-end` and `step-start` which are expected to be
converted to the equivalent function at parse time.
We are expected to serialize these as the explicit keywords - previously
we would parse as `EasingStyleValue` and serialize equivalent functions
as the keywords. This caused issues as we would incorrectly serialize
even explicit functions as the keyword.
This also allows us to move the magic easing functions to
`EasingFunction` rather than `EasingStyleValue` which is a bit tidier
Previously we were doing this ad-hoc later in the process but we now
have the `calc` clamping system which can simplify things.
This reveals some false-positives in that we don't handle relative
lengths within these `calc`s but these are fixed in the next commit
Before this change we would maintain explicit signs when serializing
e.g. `animation-iteration-count: calc(+1)` would serialize as `calc(+1)`
rather than `calc(1)` as intended
Canonicalization can require information that is only known after
compute time (i.e. resolved relative lengths within calcs).
This also allows us to get rid of the `had_explicit_input` flag and just
rely on whether Optional has a value
The `transform` property is now parsed based on its JSON data, and
shouldn't behave any differently than before.
This makes `<transform-list>` and `<transform-function>` work in the
`syntax` descriptor for `@property`, and also means we know that
`transform` can accept the `none` keyword. We get a few WPT passes out
of that.
We have this code duplicated in multiple places, and we'll want to
handle registered custom properties too at some point, so wrap it in a
reusable `CalculationContext::for_property()` method.
Noticed while doing this that ValueParsingContext will eventually need
to take a PropertyNameAndID, not a PropertyID, so I've added a FIXME.
Typed-OM means that the author can set a property's value to a
CSSUnparsedValue, which may or may not have any arbitrary substitution
functions in it. This VERIFY was just there to catch parsing bugs that
created UnresolvedStyleValues unnecessarily, and removing it is
harmless.
This has always been a bit of a hack. Initially it made sense as a lot
of properties that accept a length also accept `auto`, but while
convenient, that leads to problems: It's easy to forget to check if a
length is `auto`, and places that don't accept it end up with an
invalid state lurking in the type system, which makes things unclear.
Not every user of this requires an `auto` state, but most do.
This has quite a big diff but most of that is mechanical:
LengthPercentageOrAuto has `resolved_or_auto()` instead of `resolved()`,
and `to_px_or_zero()` instead of `to_px()`, to make their output
clearer.
This currently only applies to property-level calculation contexts, more
work to be done to generate accepted ranges for other calculation
contexts (e.g. within transformation functions, color functions, etc)
