The overlay shown for the node hovered in the inspector is painted as
part of the normal tree traversal of all paintables. This works well in
most cases, but falls short in specific scenarios:
* If the hovered node or one of its ancestors establishes a stacking
context and there is another element that establishes a stacking
context close by or overlapping it, the overlay and especially the
tooltip can become partially hidden behind the second element. Ditto
for elements that act as if they established a stacking context.
* If the hovered node or one of its ancestors involves clipping, the
clip is applied to the overlay and espicially the tooltip. This can
cause them to be partially invisible.
* Similarly, if the hovered node or one of its ancestors has a defined
mask, the mask is applied to the overlay, often making it mostly
invisible.
* No overlays are shown for SVG nodes because they are painted
differently from HTML documents.
Some of these problems may be fixable with the current system. But some
seem like they fundamentally cannot work fully when the overlays are
painted as part of the regular tree traversal.
Instead we pull out painting the overlay as a separate pass executed
after the tree traversal. This way we ensure that the overlays are
always painted last and therefore on top of everything else. This also
makes sure that the overlays are unaffected by clips and masks. And
since overlay painting is independent from painting the actual elements,
it just works as well.
However we need to be careful, because we still need to apply some of
the steps of the tree traversal to get the correct result. Namely we
need to apply scroll offsets and transforms. To do so, we collect all
ancestors of the hovered node and apply those as if we were in the
normal tree traversal.
This migrates TextNode::text_for_rendering() to Utf16String and deals
with the fallout. As a consequence, this effectively reverts commit
3df83dade8.
The layout test expecation file updates are because we now express text
lengths and offsets in UTF-16 code units.
The selection-over-multiple-code-units expectation file update actually
represents a correctness fix. Our result now matches Firefox.
For example, in the following HTML:
```html
<label>
<input type="radio" name="fruit" value="apple" id="radio1">
<span class="box"></span>
</label>
```
When any descendant of a <label> element is clicked, a "click" event
must be dispatched on the <input> element nested within the <label>, in
addition to the "click" event dispatched on the clicked descendant.
Previously, this behavior was implemented only for text node descendants
by "overriding" the mouse event target using `mouse_event_target()` in
the TextPaintable. This approach was incorrect because it was limited to
text nodes, whereas the behavior should apply to any box. Moreover, the
"click" event for the input control must be dispatched *in addition* to
the event on the clicked element, rather than redirecting it.
Resulting in a massive rename across almost everywhere! Alongside the
namespace change, we now have the following names:
* JS::NonnullGCPtr -> GC::Ref
* JS::GCPtr -> GC::Ptr
* JS::HeapFunction -> GC::Function
* JS::CellImpl -> GC::Cell
* JS::Handle -> GC::Root
Now that the heap has no knowledge about a JavaScript realm and is
purely for managing the memory of the heap, it does not make sense
to name this function to say that it is a non-realm variant.