Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Callum Law
ed2909674f LibWeb: Add computationally independent check for custom properties
Registered custom properties only accept "computationally independent"
values for their initial value
2026-03-26 01:11:39 +00:00
Tim Ledbetter
a27d269721 LibWeb: Pass StringBuilder around during StyleValue serialization
Previously, some StyleValues created a large number of intermediate
strings during serialization. Passing a StringBUilder into the
serialization function allows us to avoid a large number of these
unnecessary allocations.
2026-01-09 10:00:58 +01:00
Callum Law
f49cf75d44 LibWeb: Don't pass unnecessary PropertyComputationDependencies struct
Since we now have access to the `AbstractElement` through the
`ComputationContext` we can just set the flag that this element relies
on tree counting functions directly, no need to pass this struct around.
2025-10-22 00:01:30 +02:00
Callum Law
5b9a36b172 LibWeb: Pass AbstractElement in ComputationContext
Passing the `AbstractElement` rather than the
`TreeCountingFunctionResolutionContext` allows us to only compute the
resolution context when necessary (i.e. when we actually need to resolve
a tree counting function)
2025-10-22 00:01:30 +02:00
Callum Law
2404f95e03 LibWeb: Invalidate style for tree counting functions when required
We mark any element that relies on tree counting functions as needing a
style update when a sibling is inserted/removed.
2025-10-20 16:12:08 +01:00
Callum Law
e9036c7c75 LibWeb: Support tree counting functions within calc() 2025-10-20 16:12:08 +01:00
Callum Law
831e471444 LibWeb: Support top-level tree counting functions
Adds support for `sibling-index()` and `sibling-count()` when parsing
`<number>` and `<integer>`. This is achieved by a new
`TreeCountingFunctionStyleValue` class which is converted within
`absolutized` to `NumberStyleValue` and `IntegerStyleValue` respectively

There are still a few kinks to work out in order to support these
everywhere, namely:
 - There are some `StyleValue`s which aren't absolutized (i.e. those
   which are stored within another `StyleValue` without an
   `absolutize()` method.
 - We don't have a way to represent this new `StyleValue` within
   `{Number,Integer}OrCalculated`. This would be fixed if we were to
   instead just use the `StyleValue` classes until style computation at
   which time they would be absolutized into their respective
   primitives (double, i64, etc) bypassing the need for *OrCalculated
   entirely.
2025-10-20 16:12:08 +01:00