Move the layout tree from GC allocation to refcounted ownership so
removed layout and paint subtrees are destroyed synchronously instead
of waiting for the next GC sweep. This dramatically reduces GC memory
usage peaks after layout tree churn and makes it easier for memory use
to fall back after large document updates.
Update layout factories, tree traversal, SVG layout node creation,
paintable back-pointers, and pseudo-element layout links to use RefPtr
ownership.
Make display: contents follow the same shape as Blink and WebKit: the
element itself does not create a layout node, and its children are
flattened into the nearest layout parent. Wrap direct non-whitespace
text in an anonymous inline node when the boxless element contributes
inherited style to that text.
Use an internal inline wrapper for display: contents pseudo-elements
so generated content can still participate in layout, painting, hit
testing, and pseudo-element queries. Keep CSSOM reporting the computed
display value from the pseudo style, not the internal wrapper.
Remove the retained out-of-tree layout node list and its testing hook,
since the flattened model does not need a side owner for boxless
elements. Add coverage for inherited text style, dynamic insertion
order, pseudo-element hit testing, and computed style queries.
Move ComputedProperties and CascadedProperties out of the GC. They no
longer contain strong references to GC-managed data.
Keep computed styles alive from DOM elements and animation updates with
RefPtr. Pass style into layout constructors by reference, since layout
only copies the values it needs while building nodes.
Use GC::Weak for cascade source links, so entries no longer keep the
style declaration or shadow root alive.
The Paintable tree and its supplemental painting data structures were
GC allocated because that was the easiest way to manage it and avoid
leaks introduced by ref cycles. This included the Paintable subclasses
themselves plus StackingContext, ChromeWidget, Scrollbar, ResizeHandle,
and scroll-frame state.
We are now trying to reduce GC allocation churn on layout and painting
updates, so keeping this short-lived rendering tree outside the JS heap
is a better fit. Move Paintable to RefCountedTreeNode, make painting
helpers ref-counted or weakly reference Paintables, and update the
layout and event-handler call sites to use RefPtr/WeakPtr ownership.
Our layout tree requires that all containers either have inline or
non-inline children. In order to support the layout of non-inline
elements inside inline elements, we need to do a bit of tree
restructuring. It effectively simulates temporarily closing all inline
nodes, appending the block element, and resumes appending to the last
open inline node.
The acid1.txt expectation needed to be updated to reflect the fact that
we now hoist its <p> elements out of the inline <form> they were in.
Visually, the before and after situations for acid1.html are identical.
Resulting in a massive rename across almost everywhere! Alongside the
namespace change, we now have the following names:
* JS::NonnullGCPtr -> GC::Ref
* JS::GCPtr -> GC::Ptr
* JS::HeapFunction -> GC::Function
* JS::CellImpl -> GC::Cell
* JS::Handle -> GC::Root
Boxes can now be floated left or right, which makes text within the
same block formatting context flow around them.
We were creating way too many block formatting contexts. As it turns
out, we don't need one for every new block, but rather there's a set
of rules that determines whether a given block creates a new block
formatting context.
Each BFC keeps track of the floating boxes within it, and IFC's can
then query it to find the available space for line boxes.
There's a huge hack in here where we assume all lines are the exact
line-height. Making this work with vertically non-uniform lines will
require some architectural changes.
In order for inline elements (e.g <span>) to contribute padding etc.
to line boxes, we now create special "leading" and "trailing" fragments
for Layout::InlineNode and size them according to the horizontal
padding values.
The height of these fragments is taken from the tallest fragment on the
line. (Perhaps we should stop having per-fragment heights and just keep
a single height per line box, but that's a separate issue.)
In order to make things look nice, we now also adjust the height of all
fragments on a line so that nobody is shorter than the CSS line-height.
Bring the names of various boxes closer to spec language. This should
hopefully make things easier to understand and hack on. :^)
Some notable changes:
- LayoutNode -> Layout::Node
- LayoutBox -> Layout::Box
- LayoutBlock -> Layout::BlockBox
- LayoutReplaced -> Layout::ReplacedBox
- LayoutDocument -> Layout::InitialContainingBlockBox
- LayoutText -> Layout::TextNode
- LayoutInline -> Layout::InlineNode
Note that this is not strictly a "box tree" as we also hang inline/text
nodes in the same tree, and they don't generate boxes. (Instead, they
contribute line box fragments to their containing block!)
2020-11-22 15:56:27 +01:00
Renamed from Libraries/LibWeb/Layout/LayoutInline.cpp (Browse further)
