computation as the overflow behavior of signed integers is undefined.
NOTE: This change is smaller compared to 3.2 as much of this cleanup had
already been done. I added the comment that my change in 3.2 added so that the
code would match up. Otherwise this just adds or synchronizes appropriate UL
designations on some constants to be pedantic.
In practice we require compiling everything with -fwrapv which forces overflow
to be defined as twos compliment but this keeps the code cleaner for checkers
or in the case where someone has compiled it without -fwrapv or their
compiler's equivalent. We could work to get rid of the -fwrapv requirement
in 3.4 but that requires more planning.
Found by Clang trunk's Undefined Behavior Sanitizer (UBSan).
Cleanup only - no functionality or hash values change.
compiler logic will do the right thing with just x as a Py_uhash_t. This
matches what was already done in the 3.3 version.
cleanup only - no functionality or hash values change.
computation as the overflow behavior of signed integers is undefined.
NOTE: This change is smaller compared to 3.2 as much of this cleanup had
already been done. I added the comment that my change in 3.2 added so that the
code would match up. Otherwise this just adds or synchronizes appropriate UL
designations on some constants to be pedantic.
In practice we require compiling everything with -fwrapv which forces overflow
to be defined as twos compliment but this keeps the code cleaner for checkers
or in the case where someone has compiled it without -fwrapv or their
compiler's equivalent.
Found by Clang trunk's Undefined Behavior Sanitizer (UBSan).
Cleanup only - no functionality or hash values change.
computation as the overflow behavior of signed integers is undefined.
In practice we require compiling everything with -fwrapv which forces overflow
to be defined as twos compliment but this keeps the code cleaner for checkers
or in the case where someone has compiled it without -fwrapv or their
compiler's equivalent.
Found by Clang trunk's Undefined Behavior Sanitizer (UBSan).
Cleanup only - no functionality or hash values change.
longer required as of Python 2.5+ when the gc_refs changed from an int (4
bytes) to a Py_ssize_t (8 bytes) as the minimum size is 16 bytes.
The use of a 'long double' triggered a warning by Clang trunk's
Undefined-Behavior Sanitizer as on many platforms a long double requires
16-byte alignment but the Python memory allocator only guarantees 8 byte
alignment.
So our code would allocate and use these structures with technically improper
alignment. Though it didn't matter since the 'dummy' field is never used.
This silences that warning.
Spelunking into code history, the double was added in 2001 to force better
alignment on some platforms and changed to a long double in 2002 to appease
Tru64. That issue should no loner be present since the upgrade from int to
Py_ssize_t where the minimum structure size increased to 16 (unless anyone
knows of a platform where ssize_t is 4 bytes?) or 24 bytes depending on if the
build uses 4 or 8 byte pointers.
We can probably get rid of the double and this union hack all together today.
That is a slightly more invasive change that can be left for later.
A more correct non-hacky alternative if any alignment issues are still found
would be to use a compiler specific alignment declaration on the structure and
determine which value to use at configure time.
